Camelia, the Perl 6 bug

IRC log for #bioclipse, 2008-03-24

| Channels | #bioclipse index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
07:10 egonw joined #bioclipse
13:59 rklancer joined #bioclipse
15:31 CIA-22 bioclipse: rklancer * r5166 /bioclipse2/trunk/ (13 files in 10 dirs): Converted System.out.println()s in ui/core/template/biojava.business/biojava.ui to logger.{debug|info|warn|error}()s; some formatting fixup
15:35 egonw joined #bioclipse
15:37 rklancer hey egonw
15:37 egonw hi rklancer
15:38 egonw do you do foaf?
15:38 rklancer um
15:38 rklancer what's net.bioclipse.cdk10 relative to net.bioclipse.cdk?
15:38 rklancer no
15:38 egonw different versions of the CDK
15:38 egonw cdk10 is the 1.0.x series...
15:38 egonw on which jchempaint is based
15:38 rklancer actually I've just decided it's high time to start learning semantic web/rdf/etc stuff
15:38 egonw while .cdk is trunk/
15:39 egonw which does not have a jchempaint
15:39 rklancer okay
15:39 egonw http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/search?q=foaf
15:39 egonw my experiences with foaf
15:39 egonw and a nice util using SPARQL
15:39 egonw foaf provides a good intro
15:39 rklancer whereas cdk is now at 1.3.xx I guess
15:40 rklancer oh nice I will have to read
15:40 rklancer maybe i will go to the semweb interest group meetings @ MIT too
15:40 egonw no, 1.1 I guess...
15:40 egonw we do not have a 1.2
15:40 rklancer Oh okay
15:40 rklancer net.bioclipse.cdk manifest is in reference to bioclipse version numbering i guess?
15:41 egonw yes, correct
15:41 egonw that version numbering follows Biolcipse versions
15:41 rklancer just like it should, I suppose :)
15:41 egonw not sure about that
15:41 rklancer well
15:42 rklancer you can version the packages you export
15:42 rklancer but maybe also the plugin?
15:43 egonw huh?
15:43 egonw you were not talking about the plugin version?
15:45 rklancer oh I was just thinking of a poor compromise between using cdk and bioclipse numbering for net.bioclipse.cdk
15:45 egonw ah
15:45 rklancer version the packages as the cdk version, & the plugin as the bioclipse numbering
15:45 rklancer but on reflection that is probably not a good idea
15:46 rklancer well I guess it depends how much net.bioclipse.cdk is "third party" with respect to bioclipse
15:48 egonw quite separate in terms of project
15:48 egonw but some overlap in developers...
15:48 rklancer right
15:48 egonw not so much as about a year ago though...
15:49 rklancer should it be available as an "org.openscience.cdk" plugin?
15:49 rklancer which could then be versioned separately from net.bioclipse.* plugins? (btw, this isn't something that matters to me, I'm just thinking out loud)
15:53 egonw yeah, I have been thinking about that...
15:53 egonw that might happen in the future...
15:53 egonw well, I like your thinking :)
16:38 CIA-22 bioclipse: rklancer * r5167 /bioclipse2/trunk/plugins/ (4 files in 2 dirs): Put filter & map utility functions into n.b.core.util
16:39 CIA-22 bioclipse: rklancer * r5168 /bioclipse2/trunk/plugins/net.bioclipse.core‚Äč/src/net/bioclipse/core/util/ListFuncs.java: (fixed tiny mistake in javadoc)
16:40 rklancer off to see the wizard...
17:46 egonw joined #bioclipse

| Channels | #bioclipse index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary