Camelia, the Perl 6 bug

IRC log for #bioclipse, 2009-07-31

| Channels | #bioclipse index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
07:18 mgerlich hi zarah
07:25 olass joined #bioclipse
07:27 sneumann joined #bioclipse
08:10 shk3 joined #bioclipse
09:00 edrin joined #bioclipse
09:18 jprieur_ joined #bioclipse
09:19 egonw joined #bioclipse
09:19 egonw moin
09:19 zarah saluton egonw
09:22 olass hi egonw
10:18 CIA-63 bioclipse: shk3 * r11707 /bioclipse2/trunk/plugins/net.bioclipse.d​ata.seneca/data/mass1/desired_result.cml: added desired result
11:06 CIA-63 bioclipse: shk3 * r11708 /bioclipse2/trunk/plugins/net.bioclipse.seneca/src​/net/bioclipse/seneca/editor/SenecaJobEditor.java: avoids npe if no best structure view visible
12:19 egonw shk3: geometry.BondTools -> that is yours, not?
12:21 shk3 yes
12:22 egonw please look at this bug:
12:22 egonw https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&amp​;atid=120024&aid=2830287&group_id=20024
12:22 egonw patch should be trivial, and one is suggested by Peter Maas already
12:23 egonw if you do it, I can review and apply it for 1.2.4
12:23 shk3 i will have a look
12:24 egonw if you can come up with a unit test, that would be great
12:24 egonw but just a fix would go into 1.2.4 too
12:31 stain_ joined #bioclipse
12:56 shk3 patch sent to mailing list
12:56 egonw thanx
12:57 egonw -devel?
12:59 egonw ah, there it is
13:03 * egonw is reviewing
13:04 egonw shk3: next time, please use @cdk.bug in the JavaDoc for unit tests for a specific bug
13:04 egonw (I will add this)
13:05 shk3 well, in this case the unit test does not directly refer to Peter's report
13:05 shk3 but you can add it anyway
13:10 egonw but the unit test fails when the bug is not fixed yet, right?
13:11 * egonw is trying to verify that
13:11 egonw but discovered that Eclipse 3.5 no longer seems able to run JUnit 3.x unit tests
13:11 egonw ah, no
13:12 egonw it actually does succeed in both cases...
13:12 egonw then I won't add the annotation
13:13 shk3 see my comment in the mail/commit message why it also worked before
13:13 egonw ah, right
13:13 egonw the unit test had no chance against that back up
13:13 egonw makes sense
13:13 shk3 so there is no real test case for peters bug
13:14 shk3 except we would test for speed
13:14 shk3 but even that difference should be marginal
13:15 egonw when a commit fixes a bug, please use "(fixes #bugNo)"
13:15 egonw (next time)
14:42 CIA-63 bioclipse: shk3 * r11709 /bioclipse2/trunk/plugins/net.biocli​pse.seneca/src/net/bioclipse/seneca/ (9 files in 4 dirs): The GA is running, but not yet getting the correct result
14:50 mgerlich_ joined #bioclipse
15:37 egonw SF's new Download service sucks big time...
15:37 egonw the concept of a release seems completely lost :(
15:40 olass egonw: Yes, I don't like it either
15:49 egonw no clue how to make 1.3.0 show up as release :(
15:49 egonw or how to mark something as binary and/or source...
15:49 egonw SourceForge--
15:50 olass +1
16:35 olass CIA-83--
16:42 edrin left #bioclipse
18:33 sneumann joined #bioclipse
20:41 olass ah, I'm off for bed
20:41 olass g'night
20:41 olass bye egonw
20:41 egonw same here

| Channels | #bioclipse index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary