Camelia, the Perl 6 bug

IRC log for #bioclipse, 2010-05-31

| Channels | #bioclipse index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
05:12 sneumann_ joined #bioclipse
05:54 annzi joined #bioclipse
06:28 annzi joined #bioclipse
06:50 sneumann_ joined #bioclipse
06:58 Gpox joined #bioclipse
07:06 mgerlich joined #bioclipse
07:38 olass joined #bioclipse
07:51 s_wolf joined #bioclipse
07:57 olass moin folks
07:58 olass hola
07:58 zarah oh hai olass
08:03 CIA-71 bioclipse.qsar: Ola Spjuth 2.4.x * r3f5b3ea / (13 files in 13 dirs): Set version to 2.4.0.RC1 - http://bit.ly/b5qSTG
08:21 jonalv joined #bioclipse
08:36 jonalv moin
08:36 zarah ni hao jonalv
08:37 olass moin
08:37 zarah oh hai olass
09:58 masak joined #bioclipse
10:09 CIA-71 bioclipse.qsar: Ola Spjuth 2.4.x * r5cd7bc8 / (5 files in 5 dirs): Removed log4j version. - http://bit.ly/bC9LFk
10:16 CIA-71 bioclipse.qsar: Ola Spjuth 2.4.x * rc330ab9 / plugins/net.bioclipse.cdk.qs​ar.test/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF : added a missing comma in deps - http://bit.ly/bktBU6
12:02 jonalv Okey, now I can't fix the SWT problem
12:02 * jonalv needs help
12:04 jonalv Gpox: have you never had that problem?
12:05 Gpox once
12:06 jonalv Gpox: what solved it for you?
12:06 Gpox dunno
12:11 Gpox iirc org.eclipse.ui export org.eclipse.swt but Display and other stuff is in a sub pacakge and thus depends on org.eclipse.swt
12:11 jonalv "iirc"?
12:12 Gpox if i remember corectly
12:14 jonalv Gpox: okey so what does that mean?
12:16 Gpox I am not sure something about needing the swt bundle, that or the deltapack. I belive that was how I tried to solve it then it just worked
12:17 jonalv I think I ahve the delta pack
12:17 jonalv or you mean something need to depend on something?
12:20 CIA-71 bioclipse.qsar: Ola Spjuth 2.4.x * rf814a02 / (2 files in 2 dirs): Cleaned up deps and versions. - http://bit.ly/aoFhKi
12:20 Gpox It works for me now, so either it was something I did that stays in elcips permanently or I still have it like you just haven't run into it again
12:21 olass I got things to compile again, for me it was a matter of reload TP, update classpath, clean etc
12:33 * jonalv has tried everythign now
12:37 * jonalv testar att byta fraan cocoa eclipse till carbon
12:40 CIA-71 bioclipse.qsar: Ola Spjuth 2.4.x * r950fdf5 / (2 files in 2 dirs):
12:40 CIA-71 bioclipse.qsar: Use 'aromatic' SMILES with CDKRest services (egonw++).
12:40 CIA-71 bioclipse.qsar: Also cleaned up deps. - http://bit.ly/bQFRa0
12:49 jonalv ha
12:49 * jonalv puts on his silk gloves and hopes he will manage to not break it again
13:03 CIA-71 bioclipse.ds: Ola Spjuth 2.4.x * r0d042d9 / (6 files): Added missing icons48 folder. - http://bit.ly/aPPUb7
13:15 CIA-71 bioclipse.core: jonalv 2.4.x * r15911b0 / plugins/net.bioclipse.ui/src/net/bi​oclipse/ui/BioclipseConstants.java : New update sites for 2.4 - http://bit.ly/drUhkw
13:46 CIA-71 bioclipse.core: Ola Spjuth 2.4.x * re6b08c5 / (2 files in 2 dirs): Removed deps to cdk in webservices.test. - http://bit.ly/9v4R7h
14:18 olass Gpox: ping
14:18 Gpox pong
14:18 olass Gpox: if you have questions about bug 1972 and 1972, let me know
14:19 olass 1971
14:19 olass sry
14:19 olass hope you understand them :)
14:19 Gpox @pz 1971
14:19 zarah http://pele.farmbio.uu.se/cgi-bi​n/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1971
14:21 Gpox dose the view exist in bug 1972?
14:22 Gpox and does it show a model?
14:32 olass Gpox: the view is empty but exists
14:32 olass it echoes to console
14:32 olass but shows nothing in the view
14:32 olass the veiw exists in the branch
14:33 olass in bioclipse.ds.ui plugin
14:33 Gpox 'View should always be up to date with what is shown in the active editor' what does that mean?
14:35 olass well
14:35 jonalv I am going to try and build update site now so I will update all my repos to get the latest
14:35 olass if something happens to the molecule, teh view should be informed
14:35 jonalv I hope no one has anything left they want in RC1
14:35 olass jonalv: not me
14:35 olass Gpox: the view should always be able to know the currently displayed molecule
14:36 olass if a new JCP is opened, teh view should be able to dhat out
14:36 olass also if the JCP edits the molecule
14:36 olass etc
14:36 olass Gpox: does that help explain things?
14:37 Gpox yes, I will implement a 'dhat' function :)
14:37 olass dhat?
14:37 olass ah
14:37 olass my bad :)
14:37 olass find that out :)
15:24 jonalv Gpox: I don't get any version number on my splash screen
15:24 jonalv Gpox: please help
15:25 jonalv it works from Eclipse but not in the exported version
15:25 jonalv what am I doing wrong?
15:25 jonalv Gpox, olass ?
15:26 Gpox we got the -Declipse.buildId="2.4.0.RC1" in the bioclipse.product
15:26 Gpox that could/should be set in the config.ini
15:27 jonalv but it isn't?
15:29 Gpox not atomaticly
15:29 jonalv this release process seems to be full of "not automaticly"
15:30 jonalv Gpox: why?
15:30 * Gpox points at olas
15:30 annzi joined #bioclipse
15:30 jonalv Gpox: I am rebuildign now, tell me what to do
15:31 Gpox you might want to change the location, masak was complaining about it
15:32 jonalv Gpox: change what location, masak what were you complaining about?
15:32 Gpox of the version string
15:32 jonalv Gpox: right now I just want to make it work
15:32 Gpox right now it is up in the right corner and the rc1 bit make sit run of to the side
15:32 jonalv Gpox:  I will make a list for stuff to next RC though
15:33 jonalv and if it is big enough then I guess we will have a RC2...
15:33 jonalv Gpox: ah yea I herad about that
15:33 * jonalv has no idea what to about it though
15:35 Gpox in configuration/config.ini in the bioclipse folder of the exported product add the line 'eclipse.buildId="2.4.0.RC1"'
15:36 Gpox eclipse.buildId=2.4.0.RC1
15:36 * jonalv need a script for all these things
15:36 Gpox the " is not used in the eclipse file so should not be needed
15:37 Gpox at least some documentation of the different steps, the automation might change in the near future
15:47 jonalv Gpox: that file haz a line: -Declipse.buildId=
15:47 jonalv 2.4.0.RC1
15:47 jonalv
15:48 jonalv (or two lines)
15:48 jonalv Gpox: please advice
15:48 Gpox one line
15:48 jonalv but it starts with -D
15:49 jonalv and it is two lines
15:49 Gpox should not be there in the config.ini file I belive it is a property file and the  stuff in it is added as properties to java
15:51 jonalv Gpox: but you just said you wanted me to add it to the config ini
15:51 jonalv Gpox: now I am confused...
15:51 Gpox no -D in the config.ini file
15:52 Gpox and one line
15:52 jonalv Gpox: you think it will work if I remove the -D?
15:52 Gpox yes
15:52 jonalv Gpox: can I do that in the bioclipse.product or do I have to do that for each config.ini file?
15:53 Gpox that I don't know
15:53 jonalv hm that file seesm to be somewhere else in the mac build
15:55 jonalv Gpox: nope
15:56 jonalv or
15:56 jonalv hm
15:56 jonalv strange things going on here
15:57 Gpox if eclipse.buildId is not set I think you get 'unknowned' in stead of a build id
15:57 jonalv I get nothing
15:58 Gpox it can either be set as a row in config.ini 'eclipse.buildId=2.4.0.RC1', or as a -D parameter ot the startup script in bioclipse.ini
16:00 jonalv Gpox: I did not get that, what is the differcne?
16:01 Gpox none
16:05 Gpox there is also plugins/net.bioclipse.ui/plugin_cus​tomization.ini:org.eclipse.ui.workb​ench/SHOW_BUILDID_ON_STARTUP=true related to showing this
16:28 jonalv Gpox: I think I got it working
16:28 jonalv masak++ helped me write a script for editing all the bioclipse.ini files
16:29 jonalv next step is to package to zip and tar.gz and stuff but that will ahve to be tomorrow
16:29 jonalv apparanely we have to head to swimming now...
17:24 sneumann_ joined #bioclipse
20:28 slyrus_ ok, shifted gears... trying to get bioclipse running on linux instead of macos.
20:28 slyrus_ seems to work, but all I get is text views for the sample data. how do I see a 2d/3d structure?
20:53 samuell joined #bioclipse
21:47 egonw joined #bioclipse
21:48 egonw wow, what many people this time of the day...
21:48 egonw hi all
21:48 zarah ni hao egonw
21:51 slyrus hey egonw
21:51 egonw hej
21:51 slyrus i managed to get a core bioclipse up and running (on linux, not macos :( ) but couldn't get any of the cdk extensions running in it
21:52 egonw slyrus++ (well done!)
21:52 egonw it's a start
21:52 egonw this is the 2.4.x branch?
21:52 slyrus oh, and the other day I asked about 2d layout in cdk and you mentioned the distinction between layout (I think) and depiction.
21:52 slyrus yes, the 2.4.x branch
21:52 slyrus should I move to the head?
21:52 egonw we recently switched some stuff, so it is slightly unstable...
21:52 slyrus is there a "depiction" routine somewhere in cdk?
21:52 egonw no 2.4.x is good
21:52 slyrus ok, I'll stay on 2.4.x if that makes things easier
21:52 egonw yes
21:53 egonw the release candidate should go out any day now, I think
21:53 slyrus let me know when you're ready for external testers on the head and I'll try that
21:53 slyrus oh, cool
21:53 egonw oh, we are :)
21:53 egonw you now where to file bugs?
21:53 egonw (and feature requests)
21:53 egonw @bugs
21:53 slyrus no, not yet
21:53 egonw @pz
21:53 zarah egonw: Pelezilla is at http://bugs.bioclipse.net
21:53 egonw pelezilla is our bug tracking installation, using bugzilla
21:53 slyrus ok
21:54 egonw (on a computer which named after Pele :)
21:54 slyrus yes, I figured that much :)
21:54 egonw bug me tomorrow about the cheminf stuff...
21:54 slyrus we americans aren't completely ignorant of your "football"
21:54 slyrus will do
21:54 egonw got back from a short visit to Berlin (Potsdam), and just sent out a job application and need sleep now
21:55 egonw oh, cu tomorrow then
21:55 slyrus good luck with the job application!
23:29 samuell left #bioclipse

| Channels | #bioclipse index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary