| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:06 |
|
Riastradh |
...and...Darcs is ignoring changes to one of my files. |
| 01:28 |
|
lispy |
i've never had problems from hitting ^C with darcs, even when it's doing actual work |
| 01:29 |
|
lispy |
well, okay once in a while the _darcs/lock file will get left over and must be manually cleaned up |
| 05:09 |
|
Riastradh |
It's done it a sixth time. |
| 05:10 |
|
Riastradh |
No, on second thought, it's not *all* of my files. |
| 05:11 |
|
Riastradh |
And, in fact, some of them are in chunks. |
| 05:12 |
|
Riastradh |
It appears that only the files that were in the very first revision are pending removal. |
| 06:17 |
|
lispy |
Riastradh: and you use ask-deps every time? |
| 06:23 |
|
Riastradh |
Every time the problem arises, I have used --ask-deps. |
| 19:14 |
|
sorear |
stefan stefans:/usr/local/src/HAppS/src/HAppS/Agents$ darcs annotate SessionKeeperEx.hs |
| 19:14 |
|
sorear |
|
| 19:14 |
|
sorear |
darcs failed: There is no file or directory named 'src/HAppS/Agents/SessionKeeperEx.hs' |
| 19:14 |
|
sorear |
stefanstefans:/usr/local/src/HAppS/src/HAppS/Agents$ ls |
| 19:14 |
|
sorear |
MailSender.hs SessionKeeper.hs SessionKeeperEx.hs Users.hs WithBlockingIO.hs |
| 19:14 |
|
sorear |
stefanstefans:/usr/local/src/HAppS/src/HAppS/Agents$ |
| 19:14 |
|
sorear |
wtf? |
| 19:26 |
|
sorear |
ok, it's fixed with a --complete get |
| 19:26 |
|
sorear |
that was an amazingly unhelpful error :( |
| 19:29 |
|
idnar |
I would tend to agree |
| 20:29 |
|
resiak |
hrm. I have `darcs mv`ed a directory since the last tag, and would like to diff the files inside the directory from then till now in a meaningful way, not in an "oh, look, every line has gone from every file in the old directory name!" way. IS the only way to do this to `darcs get` upto the tag in another directory? |
| 20:36 |
|
kapheine |
I'm not sure if this would make a difference, but are you passing the '-u' option to diff? |
| 20:39 |
|
resiak |
it doesn't make a difference either way, sadly |
| 20:41 |
|
kapheine |
Ah.. well I'm not sure if there is any way to get darcs to behave as you want, but you could cheat by checking out two copies of the repository and then doing a (non-darcs) diff within that directory. |
| 20:46 |
|
resiak |
yep, that's what I suspected, and I gave up and did that about 15 minutes ago ;-) |
| 23:31 |
|
pbx |
When making a second copy of a local repo, should I do 'darcs get' or is cp good enough? |
| 23:36 |
|
lispy |
pbx: darcs get will be more efficient |
| 23:36 |
|
lispy |
pbx: it will use hardlinks if possible |
| 23:36 |
|
lispy |
pbx: but a cp would be sufficient yes |
| 23:37 |
|
pbx |
lispy: Interesting. And it turns the hardlinks into separate files as needed? |
| 23:37 |
|
lispy |
pbx: i've never inspected that part of the code but it must |
| 23:37 |
|
lispy |
pbx: probably it just shares the patches |
| 23:38 |
|
lispy |
pbx: and not the actual files, but i've never really investigated |
| 23:38 |
|
pbx |
Right, that makes sense. |
| 23:39 |
|
pbx |
Thanks. |
| 23:40 |
|
lispy |
yw |
