Camelia, the Perl 6 bug

IRC log for #darcs, 2009-07-01

| Channels | #darcs index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | plain, newest first | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time S Nick Message
00:07 twb joined #darcs
00:08 SamB Igloo: and what URL are you using for the repository ?
00:10 Igloo I used the command on http://coq.inria.fr/download
00:11 sm left #darcs
00:11 sm joined #darcs
00:17 SamB huh ... wonder why it wasn't pulling before ... that's exactly the URL bzr should have been trying to pull from ...
00:19 copumpkin joined #darcs
00:43 lambdabot joined #darcs
02:06 Jerri_ joined #darcs
02:07 [1]intripoon joined #darcs
02:22 sm joined #darcs
03:10 gwern @tell kowey gitit head now has categories, but I'd prefer not to update since it looks like template.html and some other static files changed as well...
03:10 lambdabot Consider it noted.
03:13 [1]intripoon joined #darcs
05:30 twb joined #darcs
06:32 copumpkin joined #darcs
07:01 juhp joined #darcs
07:01 juhp hmm "darcs pull -h" hangs with 2.2.0
07:02 twb What is -h supposed to do?
07:02 * juhp really does like programs that page help anyway....
07:02 juhp erm
07:03 * juhp doesn't really like programs that page help anyway....
07:03 juhp wonder if 2.3 is better
07:03 mornfall juhp: That's a GHC bug.
07:03 juhp aha
07:03 mornfall Use 6.10.3.
07:03 juhp I am :)
07:03 twb Ah, -h is --help.
07:03 mornfall Uhm.
07:03 mornfall Then maybe it's not fixed afterall.
07:03 juhp ah but wait
07:03 juhp my build might not be 6.10.3 to be honest
07:04 juhp if it matters
07:04 mornfall juhp: darcs +RTS --info
07:05 juhp cool
07:05 juhp sorry 6.10.1
07:05 juhp so should I rebuild?
07:05 mornfall If you can.
07:05 juhp yep
07:05 juhp for fedora :)
07:05 juhp thanks!
07:05 mornfall Np.
07:06 mornfall (The paging thing is debatable for sure, I'm not sure why we really do it. But it can be convenient at times...)
07:06 juhp I didn't bother rebuilding darcs when we updated to 6.10.3 since I didn't think there was any win :)
07:06 juhp yeah - as long as it works :)
07:06 mornfall :)
07:10 juhp (ah yeah rawhide is ok)
07:10 twb We do it because somebody saw git do it
07:11 juhp :)
07:11 juhp right
07:12 juhp I remember xemacs "configure --help" used to do it too - that might have been one of first times I saw it
07:15 juhp BuildRequires:  autoconf, sendmail, curl-devel, ncurses-devel, zlib-devel
07:15 juhp does that look reasonable for the current release btw?
07:16 * juhp hasn't checked the builddeps in a while
09:48 balor joined #darcs
10:54 kosmikus_ joined #darcs
10:56 kosmikus joined #darcs
12:45 Jerri joined #darcs
13:05 gh_ joined #darcs
13:50 C-Keen_ joined #darcs
13:54 sm joined #darcs
14:14 gbeshers joined #darcs
14:14 gour joined #darcs
15:36 HaPK joined #darcs
15:37 HaPK Hey, people, does anybody know how "darcs move" command work (or should work) ?
15:39 HaPK Here is what confuses me: I just did "darcs move" for a file that I manually renamed and modified... Darcs correctly shows that file with new name is already in repository and was modified. But for the other file it says that the <old file name> is not in repository (while "darcs whatsnew -l" shows it with "R" status)
15:47 gh_ joined #darcs
15:47 balor joined #darcs
15:47 intripoon joined #darcs
15:47 kpreid_ joined #darcs
15:47 sad0ur joined #darcs
15:54 Heffalump did you darcs add the new file before you tried to do the move?
16:15 HaPK Heffalump: no, I didn't
16:16 HaPK Heffalump: in fact, I just have figured out, that it was some strange bug... even when I renamed file to old name, the darcs still showed the file as being deleted and new file with the same name as "not in repository" (the "a" state)
16:16 HaPK Heffalump: I resolved the problem with doing "darcs revert" on old file name first
16:17 kowey joined #darcs
16:33 gwern hm. is darcs mv broken in darcs?
16:34 gwern I'm seeing on a darcs mv foo.hs bar.hs, a hunk for a move, and a removal of the file
16:34 gwern which I don't remember seeing before
16:36 kowey is that the darcs beta?
16:36 gwern darcs.net repo
16:36 gwern built it today
16:37 gwern I'd paste it, but it's too long
16:39 kowey a minimal example would be good and should be fairly easy to construct
16:39 kowey but I'll bet this sort of thing is already covered in the test suite
17:15 arjanb joined #darcs
17:26 balor joined #darcs
17:43 tmh left #darcs
17:58 HaPK left #darcs
18:21 marcot joined #darcs
18:23 marcot Hello.  When I add a file that is in a directory that I haven't added, darcs automatically adds it.  Why doesn't it adds the directory automatically when I try to move a file to an untracked directory?
19:41 sm joined #darcs
19:56 balor joined #darcs
20:58 gh_ joined #darcs
21:08 gbeshers joined #darcs
21:21 Heffalump should I expect darcs 2.0.2 with a cache to hardlink patches between the _darcs/patches directory and the cache directory?
21:32 nwf_ joined #darcs
21:37 sm joined #darcs
21:46 Heffalump Hmm. So the first get put separate copies in the cache and in the repo. Then the second get hardlinked the shared patches to the cache.
21:48 * sm looks in vain for irc log url in /topic
22:32 sm for anyone trying that rss-generating posthook, remember you probably want both apply and record
22:33 sm like:
22:33 sm apply posthook  darcs changes --last=50 --xml-output -s | xsltproc --nonet --stringparam repo_url http://joyful.com _darcs/patches.rss.xsl - > _darcs/patches.rss
22:33 sm apply run-posthook
22:33 sm record posthook darcs changes --last=50 --xml-output -s | xsltproc --nonet --stringparam repo_url http://joyful.com _darcs/patches.rss.xsl - > _darcs/patches.rss
22:33 sm record run-posthook
22:33 sm I always forget that
22:40 sm *and* pull. Darnit
22:42 sm and obliterate ? I guess.
22:43 sm probably not for a regular feed, but good for this one

| Channels | #darcs index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | plain, newest first | summary