← Previous day | Index | Channel Index | Today | Next day → | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | plain, newest first
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 01:38 | alexsuraci joined #darcs | |
| 02:33 | abuiles joined #darcs | |
| 06:34 | azathoth99 joined #darcs | |
| 06:35 | azathoth99 | I read some crap about darcs not scaling? |
| 06:35 | how does darcs compare to say git? | |
| 07:28 | alexsuraci | ah, the old in-n'-out |
| 07:46 | balor joined #darcs | |
| 07:53 | gh_ joined #darcs | |
| 07:56 | lelit joined #darcs | |
| 08:02 | darcscommitbot joined #darcs | |
| 08:03 | darcswikibot joined #darcs | |
| 09:09 | Korusef joined #darcs | |
| 09:25 | gh_ joined #darcs | |
| 09:42 | Alpounet joined #darcs | |
| 09:54 | attila_lendvai joined #darcs | |
| 09:58 | attila_lendvai | is it by design that darcs started to folow symlinks? after upgrading to 2.4, i had to extend my .boring file to ignore some symlinks |
| 10:05 | intripoon joined #darcs | |
| 10:51 | Alpounet joined #darcs | |
| 10:52 | exlevan joined #darcs | |
| 13:42 | alp joined #darcs | |
| 13:44 | Alpounet joined #darcs | |
| 13:56 | gal_bolle joined #darcs | |
| 14:00 | stevan joined #darcs | |
| 14:04 | stevan | hi, if i obliterated a patch locally how can i push the change so to say? record says that no change happend. thanks. |
| 14:05 | attila_lendvai | stevan, obliterate is delete... |
| 14:06 | stevan | ok? |
| 14:08 | gwern joined #darcs | |
| 14:08 | stevan | i pulled a patch which i didn't want, what's the proper way of undoing that? obliterate seemed to work well for my local copy, but the global still has the bad patch. i'd like to undo it globally too. |
| 14:09 | rollback? | |
| 14:13 | gh_ | yes |
| 14:13 | since that patch was already in the global repo, | |
| 14:14 | stevan | damn it :-/, so i guess the only way out of this mess i created is to remove the file and then readd it? |
| 14:14 | gh_ | people may have already pulled it |
| 14:15 | the global repo you mentioned is a repo other people have access too, right ? | |
| 14:16 | stevan | yes, but it's only a friend and i who use it |
| 14:16 | abuiles joined #darcs | |
| 14:22 | gh_ | well then you can obliterate everywhere |
| 14:22 | stevan | what if i darcs get a new copy and use rollback there instead? |
| 14:25 | gh_ | you can as well do that rollback in your own repo |
| 14:25 | rollback just creates an inverse patch of one or several patches | |
| 14:26 | stevan | is that possible even after i obliterated them? |
| 14:26 | gh_ | no |
| 14:26 | rollback needs the original patches | |
| 14:26 | it can not just invent them :) | |
| 14:27 | but for instance if you recorded a big binary by mistake, it may make sense to obliterate everywhere | |
| 14:27 | if it's just minor, it's better t odo a rollback | |
| 14:29 | stevan | ok, thanks for the help. |
| 14:41 | abuiles left #darcs | |
| 14:50 | stevan left #darcs | |
| 15:04 | gal_bolle joined #darcs | |
| 16:06 | gh_ joined #darcs | |
| 16:11 | sea-gull joined #darcs | |
| 16:12 | sea-gull left #darcs | |
| 16:27 | solistic joined #darcs | |
| 16:43 | gbeshers joined #darcs | |
| 16:44 | solistic | How can I see the formt of a given repository? |
| 16:53 | wferi joined #darcs | |
| 16:54 | wferi | mornfall: why do you say in http://bugs.darcs.net/msg10122 that my patch is bogus? |
| 16:55 | it's the same as your pastebin link. | |
| 17:00 | Alpounet joined #darcs | |
| 17:07 | kowey joined #darcs | |
| 17:08 | kowey | hello, solistic (just saw your question in the online chat log) |
| 17:08 | try 'darcs show repo' | |
| 17:15 | balor joined #darcs | |
| 17:22 | lisppaste2 joined #darcs | |
| 17:25 | lispy1 joined #darcs | |
| 17:26 | lispy1 joined #darcs | |
| 17:33 | solistic joined #darcs | |
| 17:33 | beschmi joined #darcs | |
| 17:33 | mornfall | wferi: I say that because your context says ReadWrite where it should say ReadWriteEx. |
| 17:34 | wferi: And it's ReadWriteEx after my patch. | |
| 17:35 | So either you applied wrong patch, or you are working with wrong version of h-s or something like that. | |
| 17:36 | Your reported symptoms pretty much match the behaviour one would expect from a h-s with ReadWrite in place of ReadWriteEx, using mmap 0.5. | |
| 17:36 | These 2 things lead me to believe that you indeed have a version of h-s linked against mmap 0.5 but with ReadWrite. | |
| 17:45 | wferi | mornfall: yes, you are right. I applied the patch by hand, and thought that line contained whitespace difference only. I even overlooked the Ex when I specifically looked for a problem... My bad. |
| 17:45 | thanks for pointing this out. | |
| 17:46 | Btw. if I link h-s with mmap-0.5, then install darcs, should Cabal notice that h-s was build with mmap-0.5, and refuse to build darcs with mmap-0.4? | |
| 17:47 | How can I (or cabal) find out which version of mmap h-s was built with, after the fact? | |
| 17:50 | mornfall | Unfortunately, you can't. You can find out what darcs has been built with, using --exact-version, if you are using HEAD. |
| 17:50 | Well, ghc-pkg may know, actually. | |
| 17:50 | wferi | Then how is cabal supposed to stop problems like this? |
| 17:51 | mornfall | Anyway, Cabal will warn you about building with two different versions of a package, but unfortunately it will proceed. |
| 17:51 | Ack, ghc-pkg dump will give you enough data to reconstruct the build-deps used. | |
| 17:52 | wferi | Hmm, ghc-pkg describe gives some "depends:" info, maybe that's what I'm looking for. |
| 17:52 | david_ joined #darcs | |
| 17:52 | mornfall | You can't find the used builddeps from a binary, after-the-fact, though. |
| 17:52 | Yes, describe -> depends is the thing you are looking for. | |
| 17:53 | wferi | Those aren't the builddeps, but the actual chosen versions, aren't they? |
| 17:53 | mornfall | Yes. |
| 17:53 | wferi | The builddeps themselves aren't particularly interesting after the fact, I think. |
| 17:53 | Ok, thanks. | |
| 17:54 | So isn't cabal supposed to stop when several different versions of a package are present in the depends chain? | |
| 17:54 | Or should that really work? | |
| 17:55 | mornfall | It warns about the fact. IMHO, it should stop, but it doesn't, for whatever reason. |
| 17:55 | You could take that up with Duncan (dcoutts). | |
| 17:55 | wferi | He'll probably chime in if he's present. |
| 18:01 | solistic | kowey: thx :) |
| 18:03 | solistic joined #darcs | |
| 18:41 | exlevan joined #darcs | |
| 18:55 | exlevan | how do i save a patch in darcs? e.g. darcs save-patch -p X > x.dpatch |
| 18:59 | beschmi | do you want something that you can feed to patch(1) or a darcs patch bundle? |
| 19:01 | attila_lendvai joined #darcs | |
| 19:02 | exlevan | i want to save darcs pach bundle to file |
| 19:02 | beschmi | for the later, see darcs send -o foo.dpatch |
| 19:04 | exlevan | thanks, looks like what i wanted |
| 19:09 | beschmi | are there redundant patches in the _darcs/patches in case of conflicts? |
| 19:10 | e.g., you pull patch p2 which conflicts with p1 already in the repo. | |
| 19:11 | then you get a conflictor C(p2,p1) which is referenced in the inventory, but p1 is kept in _darcs/patches anyways | |
| 19:13 | solistic joined #darcs | |
| 19:13 | beschmi | nevermind, I think I get it now: p1 is redundant. If you unpull p2 from p2.C(p2,p1), then p1 can be reconstructed from the conflictor. |
| 19:32 | mornfall | Hi beschmi! I keep forgetting to reply to your mail... |
| 19:33 | My ticket says I should arrive 19.3. at 9:17 am to Zürich HB. | |
| 19:38 | beschmi | hi mornfall |
| 19:41 | solistic joined #darcs | |
| 19:41 | beschmi | ok, I haven't decided yet if I want to take the full day off or go to the office in the morning |
| 19:44 | edwardk joined #darcs | |
| 19:45 | beschmi | but I can pick you up at the train station and we can put your luggage (if you have anything that you don't want to carry around) in my office |
| 19:45 | mornfall | Hmm. |
| 19:46 | I tend to travel light if at all possible. | |
| 19:47 | So probably arrange your day however you want. If it suits you to meet up earlier, works for me, or we can meet at ZuriHac at 2 pm. | |
| 19:47 | I can look around, or maybe Eric organizes some darcs pre-hack? | |
| 19:48 | beschmi | ok, I just saw that tux_rocker is arriving already on the 18th |
| 19:54 | tux_rocker joined #darcs | |
| 19:55 | tux_rocker joined #darcs | |
| 19:56 | attila_lendvai joined #darcs | |
| 20:11 | solistic joined #darcs | |
| 20:28 | tux_rocker_ joined #darcs | |
| 21:04 | Alpounet joined #darcs | |
| 21:13 | solistic joined #darcs | |
| 21:35 | Alpounet joined #darcs | |
| 22:13 | aavogt joined #darcs | |
| 22:13 | aavogt | is there such a thing that would be called unapply? |
| 22:14 | Igloo | You can fold definitions |
| 22:15 | Oh, ignore that | |
| 22:15 | You probably want one of obliterate, unrecord and rollback | |
| 22:20 | aavogt | yeah, I was hoping to be able to get rid of all the patches not present in a repo that's pretty slow to get |
| 22:29 | kpreid_ joined #darcs | |
| 23:16 | kpreid_ joined #darcs | |
| 23:19 | abuiles joined #darcs | |
| 23:22 | kpreid_ joined #darcs |
← Previous day | Index | Channel Index | Today | Next day → | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | plain, newest first