Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #darcs, 2014-11-15

| Channels | #darcs index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:21 Rastus_Vernon joined #darcs
07:19 Rastus_Vernon joined #darcs
08:18 lelit joined #darcs
09:47 aristid_ joined #darcs
09:47 aristid_ joined #darcs
11:06 amgarchIn9 joined #darcs
15:38 mizu_no_oto joined #darcs
17:40 mornfall joined #darcs
18:05 gh_ joined #darcs
18:06 Heffalump hi
18:14 gh_ hi
18:15 gh_ I see there has been activity on darcs-devel, I haven't read everything yet
18:43 amgarchIn9 joined #darcs
18:48 wavis joined #darcs
18:59 Igloo_ joined #darcs
19:03 lambdabot joined #darcs
19:22 sm_ joined #darcs
19:22 florent_ joined #darcs
19:27 thorkilnaur joined #darcs
19:45 Heffalump gh_: is changing the hashes to be stored as binary backwards-incompatible? It doesn't matter particularly given this is only in development darcs, but just wondering what will happen to users with old patch indexes
19:48 gh_ Heffalump, it is not binary backwards-compatible. But patch index was never part of darcs 2.8 so I think we can do it.
19:49 gh_ Heffalump, since the only people that can be bothered by that are the ones who use HEAD
19:51 gh_ Heffalump, I had some weird errors because of that already, it can be puzzling
19:51 gh_ Heffalump, which is why I'd rather be very careful with that before activating it in a stable release..
19:51 Heffalump yeah
19:51 Heffalump I wonder if we should add a versioning scheme now anyway so we can update it later more easily
19:54 gh_ Heffalump, that's quite cheap to implement
19:54 gh_ Heffalump, I can do it after looking into a couple of PI-related stuff I haven't sent yet
20:00 Igloo joined #darcs
20:04 carter_ joined #darcs
20:06 ggherdov` joined #darcs
20:06 Heffalump gh_: further to my most recent patch, I'm planning on refactoring the PI code properly so that [PatchId] is made part of PatchIndex
20:07 Heffalump let me know if that'll conflict with you at all
20:07 mornfall joined #darcs
20:07 aristid_ joined #darcs
20:09 gh_ Heffalump, yes that will probably conflict :
20:09 gh_ :)
20:09 gh_ Heffalump, I'm looking into your tag --ask-deps patches first, then i'll sort out what I have on PI
20:11 Meeh joined #darcs
20:12 gh_ Heffalump, to tell you quickly about what I have: code simplification, at the cost of slight performance degradation on PI use (tested annotate)
20:13 amgarchIn9 joined #darcs
20:16 stepcut joined #darcs
20:27 c74d joined #darcs
20:37 dolio joined #darcs
21:03 amgarchIn9 joined #darcs
21:26 gh_ Heffalump, at last I could try http://bugs.darcs.net/patch1224 (I guess 1216 is obsoleted). very nice :)
21:37 gh_ Heffalump, ah but this refactor is already part of your last bundle
21:41 gh_ ok no
21:42 gh_ Heffalump, I'm having an incorrect output for annotate with your bundle
21:42 gh_ Heffalump, it shows just one big "unknown" patch on darcs.cabal or NEWS, in the darcs.net repo
21:55 amgarchIn9 joined #darcs
22:23 Rastus_Vernon joined #darcs
22:42 Heffalump gh_: ah :-)
23:02 Heffalump gh_: if you have anything that's ready for screened with PI, go ahead and push it, don't worry about conflicting with me, btw
23:33 stepkut joined #darcs

| Channels | #darcs index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary