Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #fuel-dev, 2014-11-18

| Channels | #fuel-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:38 rmoe joined #fuel-dev
01:48 teran joined #fuel-dev
03:42 jaypipes joined #fuel-dev
03:44 xarses joined #fuel-dev
06:34 Longgeek joined #fuel-dev
07:06 sambork joined #fuel-dev
07:07 dshulyak joined #fuel-dev
07:10 stamak joined #fuel-dev
07:18 prmtl joined #fuel-dev
07:19 dklepikov joined #fuel-dev
07:36 fandi joined #fuel-dev
07:39 dshulyak joined #fuel-dev
07:53 Longgeek joined #fuel-dev
07:56 HeOS joined #fuel-dev
07:57 Longgeek_ joined #fuel-dev
08:05 salmon_ joined #fuel-dev
08:09 romcheg joined #fuel-dev
08:10 Longgeek joined #fuel-dev
08:14 dkusidlo joined #fuel-dev
08:14 Longgeek_ joined #fuel-dev
08:22 tlbr_ joined #fuel-dev
08:24 hyperbaba joined #fuel-dev
08:25 azemlyanov joined #fuel-dev
08:34 avlasov joined #fuel-dev
08:37 asledzinskiy left #fuel-dev
08:44 asledzinskiy joined #fuel-dev
08:47 aliemieshko_ hello
08:47 aliemieshko_ where Fuel UI takes the information about disk partitioning, and if she changed how her refresh ?
08:48 aliemieshko_ df and Fuel UI show different information at the same node
08:55 dkusidlo joined #fuel-dev
09:10 EeeBotu New bug #1393711 in fuel: "[devops] Most of test report threads weren't updated due to gdata.service.RequestError: {'status': 403, 'body': 'It looks like someone else already deleted this cell.', 'reason': 'Forbidden'}" [High, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393711
09:11 [HeOS] joined #fuel-dev
09:16 hyperbaba All the services have config looking for rabbitmq on br-mgmt ip adressess and localhost, but beam.smp listens on :::5673 skiping ipv4 binding?
09:17 dkusidlo joined #fuel-dev
09:17 teran joined #fuel-dev
09:18 teran_ joined #fuel-dev
09:26 alexbh joined #fuel-dev
09:27 sambork please review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131104/
09:33 monester_laptop joined #fuel-dev
09:44 ilbot3 joined #fuel-dev
09:44 Topic for #fuel-dev is now #fuel-dev Fuel dev docs http://docs.mirantis.com/fuel-dev/ | Paste here http://paste.openstack.org/ | IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/fuel-dev/ | gerrit traffic @ #fuel-tracker
09:45 eshumkher joined #fuel-dev
09:46 tlbr joined #fuel-dev
09:55 eshumkher joined #fuel-dev
09:59 dancn joined #fuel-dev
10:35 prmtl joined #fuel-dev
10:48 bogdando hi. Please address https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1392261/comments/3
10:53 amnk joined #fuel-dev
10:55 dmitryme Guys, we’ve updated the blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/sahara-create-default-templates as well as created the spec for it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132196/ . This is a feature we would like to see in 6.0, so I’d really appreciate if you review it.
11:00 mihgen bogdando: hi, can you update https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1393495 status? looks like you merged the change to stable branch, but bug was not updated
11:00 mihgen mattymo: dude should we won't fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1362159 for 5.1.1 ?
11:01 dshulyak1 akasatkin: evgeniyl__:  ikalnitsky: guys, we can merge this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132549/, works good, configuration on slaves updated correctly
11:01 mattymo mihgen, the proposed solution I had in mind was upgrading docker and moving to host networking
11:01 mattymo then we need none of the iptables hacks we have in place now, and this bug will be corrected
11:02 mattymo I'll move to 6.1 and then 6.0/5.1 won't fix
11:02 pasquier-s joined #fuel-dev
11:04 dshulyak1 bogdando: alex_didenko: take a look please https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132549/, bug is related to deployment, so it would be nice to see +1 from you
11:05 Longgeek joined #fuel-dev
11:05 mihgen mattymo: ok, thanks..
11:07 eshumkher joined #fuel-dev
11:08 warpc__ joined #fuel-dev
11:09 mihgen warpc__: asledzinskiy: is https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1318567 about systest or it's issue in astute?
11:09 mihgen dmitryme: hi, any update on https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1346133? It's high for 5.1.1…
11:10 pasquier-s_ joined #fuel-dev
11:10 warpc__ mihgen:  asledzinskiy: i think this is problem in Cobbler, but i have potential solution how to solve it
11:11 mihgen warpc__: are you sure it's high, so must be fixed in stable branch?
11:13 mihgen evgeniyl__: mattymo: guys, what is the plan for https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1382531 ? Also, are you sure it doesn't affect master (6.0) ?
11:13 dmitryme mihgen: realistically, we will not fix it in 5.1.1. It is not an easy bug and Ivan Kolodyazhny is on PTO today
11:14 mihgen Tatyanka_Leontov: can you please confirm that https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1383759 is issue on tests side?
11:14 mihgen dmitryme: ok. then let's close as won't fix and make sure it has release-notes tag, so docs can document it...
11:14 mihgen dmitryme: does it apply to 6.0 too btw?
11:14 mattymo mihgen, I don't agree at all with the proposal here in this bug
11:15 mattymo introducing custom puppet paths for 1 container is a terrible idea and is counter to our approach for 5.0->5.1
11:15 dmitryme mihgen: ok re closing as won’t fix. It might not be applicable to 6.0, at least it was never reproduced on it
11:15 dmitryme mihgen: lets remove 6.0 as affected then
11:16 Tatyanka_Leontov mihgen I can not, lets wait a little bit to see results of this tests in todays test runs
11:17 mihgen Tatyanka_Leontov: ok.. sounds scary..)
11:17 sanek joined #fuel-dev
11:17 Tatyanka_Leontov :)
11:19 mihgen dmitryme: what about https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1392472 ?
11:23 mihgen dmitryme: keystone thing unclear https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1373180 ?
11:25 prmtl joined #fuel-dev
11:25 sambork joined #fuel-dev
11:25 evgeniyl__ mattymo: mihgen I don't agree and think that it's terrible idea to take puppet from outside of container and use it for deployment, and complicates a lot of stuff, container should include everything what it needs, including puppet manifests which are required for post configuration, in case of other containers it works the same way, as I described, but it's
11:25 evgeniyl__ different for rsync container because the directory is overwritten by volume which is mounted from host system, the simplest solution is change this pass not to have this collisions.
11:27 mihgen bogdando: what's our plan with RabbitMQ slow start https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1383247 for 5.1.1 ?
11:27 mattymo you already have to change puppet on fuel master
11:27 mihgen evgeniyl__: ideally container must be just like static lib
11:27 mihgen all configs should be out
11:28 romcheg joined #fuel-dev
11:28 mihgen so puppet should be used only to create container, and then we should not do any reconfig afterwards
11:28 evgeniyl__ mihgen: yes, config should be out, but in current implementation they are in
11:28 mattymo mihgen, no matter what, config files get generated somewhere and have to be managed just the same
11:28 mihgen so let's focus on current issue and come up with agreement on how to fix it for now..
11:29 evgeniyl__ mihgen: mattymo yes, my point is right now rsync container is differen from others, because it takes manifests to make post configuration from the host system, but it should not do that
11:29 evgeniyl__ mihgen: mattymo as the rest of the contaienrs
11:31 mattymo ok for 5.1.1 as a one-time workaround we could do /etc/puppet from container build time and /puppet from host for deployed nodes
11:31 mattymo it makes an exception and won't be visible in any other fuel version
11:31 evgeniyl__ mattymo: I think it should work the same way for 6.0
11:31 mattymo that doesn't solve any of your concerns there might be about 6.0, though
11:32 mattymo no in 6.0 it's already merged to use host manifests everywhere
11:32 mattymo host /etc/puppet = container /etc/puppet
11:32 evgeniyl__ mattymo: we should not implement this symlink hell in yet another place
11:32 mihgen xenolog: aglarendil You guys sure we can't close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1362839 still? Unsafe kill in OpenStack init scripts?
11:32 mattymo no middle container, no abstracted paths, and no symlinks
11:33 evgeniyl__ mattymo: somebody merged the patch to take manifests from host system and use them to make post configuration?
11:34 aarefiev joined #fuel-dev
11:34 bogdando mihgen, I'd say it barely will fit into 6.0. Current status is updating test cases as appropriate. But OSTF should be leveraged in order to not duplicate efforts. But OSTF health checks should be improved as well
11:34 mihgen mattymo: holser: bogdando: aglarendil: guys, can we get this backport merged? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132919/
11:34 mattymo slashdot.org/
11:34 mattymo oops
11:34 mattymo https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121516/
11:35 mattymo evgeniyl__, ^ it's nearly impossible to fuel master CI tests without it
11:35 evgeniyl__ Oh no.
11:36 holser mihgen: mattymo I gave +1, let’s someone else merge it (aglarendil or bogdando )
11:36 holser that patch is valid for 5.1.1 also
11:36 aarefiev joined #fuel-dev
11:37 mattymo holser, mihgen +1 already
11:37 romcheg joined #fuel-dev
11:37 mihgen dmitryme: what about https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1380800 ?
11:37 mihgen this is ceilometer^^^
11:37 evgeniyl__ mattymo: I think we should revert this patch, because it brakes rollbacks, and it's critical issue, and it's not a way how we should solve this problem
11:37 mattymo evgeniyl__, if fuel upgrade/rollback were written correctly, you could set puppet links correctly and do host/docker in the correct order and set them at the appropriate time
11:37 aarefiev joined #fuel-dev
11:38 mihgen aglarendil: holser bogdando one more backport patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131787/, looks like it was merged in master already
11:38 mattymo you can rollback 5.1.1 because it still has local manifests
11:38 dmitryme mihgen: re https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1392472  I’ve pinged neutron team to look into it
11:38 mattymo or to 5.1
11:39 dmitryme mihgen re https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1373180 amakarov need to talk with holser about it, but I think we will just mark it as won’t fix, we just don’t need it
11:39 aglarendil evgeniyl__: let's think about the way how we can fix rollbacks in this case. I am sure, that we can alter the container start flow in case of rollback
11:39 holser we don’t need it as we won’t ship ISO
11:40 mattymo aglarendil, evgeniyl__ you _already_ set fuel version.yaml correctly on rollback
11:40 mattymo why not set /etc/puppet symlink at the same time
11:40 mattymo it's the exact same process
11:42 stamak joined #fuel-dev
11:42 evgeniyl__ mattymo: aglarendil I don't want yet another symlink in case if it's really not required, because all of this symlinks management complicates upgrade process, which leads to bugs, for versions yaml it's required, because there is no other way to solve the problem, the current solution looks like hack, lets revert the patch and discuss how to solve this
11:42 evgeniyl__ particular problem
11:43 dmitryme mihgen: re  https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1380800  it is in progress right now
11:43 holser mihgen, bogdando: concerning  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131787/ if we ship ISO for 5.1.1 then we need this patch, if we have upgrade package only then we don’t need to backport it as keystone is already configured
11:46 mattymo evgeniyl__, we have all the logic in place to properly set host puppet manifests on upgrade already
11:46 bogdando holser, we should backport it anyway, puppet manifests should contain fix for this either we update by patching or as a new deploy
11:46 mattymo why are you putting up a fight for doing the same steps in revert?
11:46 mattymo it's not any harder
11:46 tzn joined #fuel-dev
11:46 mattymo and many many users requested host manifests on containers
11:47 holser bogdando: yeah, you are right, user may deploy a new cluster completely
11:47 amnk joined #fuel-dev
11:48 hyperbaba_ joined #fuel-dev
11:57 avlasov joined #fuel-dev
12:02 dmitryme mihgen: note that to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1378553 in 5.1.1 we need to merge the following three CRs into Fuel https://review.openstack.org/135013 https://review.openstack.org/135014 https://review.openstack.org/135015
12:11 igajsin joined #fuel-dev
12:12 EeeBotu New bug #1393751 in fuel: "[devops] Need to change swarm test scedule" [Medium, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393751
12:12 EeeBotu New bug #1393750 in fuel: "Fuel client ignores options in environment variables" [Medium, In Progress] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393750
12:13 dkusidlo joined #fuel-dev
12:19 teran joined #fuel-dev
12:20 teran_ joined #fuel-dev
12:26 dkusidlo joined #fuel-dev
12:29 eshumkher joined #fuel-dev
12:31 sanek joined #fuel-dev
12:39 dshulyak joined #fuel-dev
12:42 eshumkher_ joined #fuel-dev
12:42 aarefiev joined #fuel-dev
12:45 gilmeir joined #fuel-dev
12:46 barthalion I want to test 5.1 -> 5.1.1 upgrade process with my local changes, pointers appreciated; waiting for answer on #fuel-qa as well
12:46 AlexF joined #fuel-dev
12:49 pasquier-s joined #fuel-dev
12:50 aliemieshko_ joined #fuel-dev
12:54 ikalnitsky barthalion: do you want to build a custom upgrade tarball for 5.1.1? by custom i mean that you want the tarball to use your manifests instead of stable/5.1?
12:54 barthalion exactly
12:54 barthalion I couldn't describe it better
12:56 dshulyak bogdando: alex_didenko: guys, please check this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132549/
12:58 dshulyak mattymo: warpc__ : take a look on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135261/, i believe this is what we need for upgrade to work with new kernel
13:00 asilenkov joined #fuel-dev
13:00 mihgen mattymo: will you take https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1382531 for 5.1.1?
13:02 mattymo dshulyak1, added comments
13:03 mattymo mihgen, yeah but it's an ugly hack to me
13:12 zigo mattymo: Fuel client has very high version requirements, is this a reality, or just bullshit that I can ignore?
13:12 zigo For example: python-kombu (>= 3.0.15) python-mako (>= 0.9.1) python-markupsafe (>= 0.18) python-psycopg2 (>= 2.5.1) python-sphinxcontrib.actdiag (>= 0.6.0) python-sphinxcontrib.nwdiag (>= 0.7.0)
13:12 zigo In Juno, we use kombu 2.5.15 for example ...
13:13 zigo python-markupsafe is 0.15
13:13 zigo etc.
13:13 EeeBotu New bug #1393766 in fuel: "    Basic profiling facilities for CLI" [Undecided, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393766
13:13 zigo Some packages are hard to backport. :(
13:13 mattymo zigo, we rely on juno requirements, but we have lots of kombu and sqlalchemy special requirements too
13:13 zigo mattymo: So, kombu 3.0.15 is a hard one?
13:14 mattymo I believe yes
13:14 mattymo it was to solve some bug
13:14 zigo Ok.
13:14 mattymo if you're okay with a buggy early release, then skip it for now
13:14 mattymo but every high requirement had a cause
13:14 zigo Just for fuelclient, I'm currently backporting this list of packages: python-markupsafe  python-nwdiag          python-sphinxcontrib.blockdiag  python-wand         python3-funcparserlib
13:14 zigo python-blockdiag   python-fysom                       python-nose        python-seqdiag         python-sphinxcontrib.nwdiag     python-wsgilog
13:14 zigo python-fuelclient  python-kombu                       python-nose2       python-sphinx-testing  python-sphinxcontrib.seqdiag    python-zc.buildout
13:14 zigo That's quite a lot ...
13:15 zigo mattymo: At some point, I'll simply give-up on backporting to Wheezy and switch to Jessie, then my work will be a lot more easy! :)
13:18 mattymo ok
13:19 mattymo trust me, it's going to be a fun rebase packaging chase for a while until you get results
13:25 proberts joined #fuel-dev
13:26 amnk joined #fuel-dev
13:27 ikalnitsky bookwar: hi! i want to cry - fuel ci doesn't run tests for my patch and as far as i know for other patches too. could you please take a look? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135017/ i hope you'll calm me down :)
13:27 teran joined #fuel-dev
13:27 akasatkin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134752/2 - same issue
13:28 eshumkher joined #fuel-dev
13:30 teran__ joined #fuel-dev
13:32 ikalnitsky mattymo: could you please take a look? looks familiar https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1393777
13:36 zigo mattymo: Well, I'm quite use to manage dependency hell... :P
13:36 zigo But really, Fuel should be respecting whatever is in global-requirements.txt
13:37 zigo That'd be a lot more easy.
13:37 mattymo ikalnitsky, that was fixed recently in 6.0
13:37 mattymo just a sec
13:37 ikalnitsky mattymo: yep, it has been filed to 5.1
13:38 mattymo the actual cause for nailgun breaking during iso build: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134525/
13:38 mattymo which fixes upgrades
13:38 mattymo and the underlying issue how it got past make iso: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134536/
13:38 mattymo did either get backported?
13:39 eshumkher joined #fuel-dev
13:46 ikalnitsky mattymo: i think it should be backported. mihgen what do you think?
13:46 dkusidlo joined #fuel-dev
13:47 EeeBotu New bug #1393777 in fuel: "puppet fails to install nailgun into docker" [High, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393777
13:47 EeeBotu New bug #1393772 in fuel: "neutron server has unsanctioned autostart in HA under Ubuntu" [Medium, In Progress] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393772
13:47 EeeBotu New bug #1393771 in fuel: "5.1.1 Ha neuton environment  - there is not connectivity to the instacne" [Critical, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393771
13:49 youellet joined #fuel-dev
13:50 dancn` joined #fuel-dev
13:51 hyperbaba Is there any paticular reason for setting rabbit_ha_queues to False in ceilometer.conf on compute nodes and setting them to true on controller nodes? Fuel 5.1 HA deployment
13:51 alexbh joined #fuel-dev
13:55 dkusidlo joined #fuel-dev
14:08 IvanBerezovskiy please review bug fix for sahara https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134987/
14:09 kvk joined #fuel-dev
14:15 EeeBotu New bug #1393798 in fuel: "puppet manifests for CI fail to create venv" [Undecided, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393798
14:15 EeeBotu New bug #1393797 in fuel: "System can not  detect HDDs on one of chezh server" [High, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393797
14:15 EeeBotu New bug #1393795 in fuel: "Astute log do not update after error" [High, Confirmed] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393795
14:15 EeeBotu New bug #1393789 in fuel: "[upgrade] Refactoring of fuel_upgrade.config.Config" [Undecided, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393789
14:26 mihgen aglarendil: xenolog: bogdando: q-agent-cleanup.py script should write consistent logs https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1371664 Is it really High for 5.1.1 ?
14:28 barthalion mihgen: I'm working on 1392261
14:28 barthalion mihgen: I hope to test my changes today and push them for review tommorow
14:28 mihgen barthalion: ok… reassign it back to yourself then please..
14:30 bogdando mihgen, looks like the main status should be 6.1 medium, the same as for 6.x milestone
14:31 bogdando mihgen, and we can remove 6.1 milestone then
14:34 xdeller joined #fuel-dev
14:34 mihgen bogdando: can you do it then with comment? I'm especially interest with 5.1.1 milestone update there
14:35 mihgen bogdando: that one I mentioned earlier today, https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1383247, rabbitmq - can we rename it somehow then, like "OSTF doesn't wait long enough before checking RMQ status", or smth like that?
14:35 mihgen right now it's more like rabbitmq doesn't reassable approapriately, which is rather critical
14:38 bogdando mihgen, I cannot update the status because the submitter wants this as a critical for 6.0
14:39 xenolog mihgen: no.
14:39 mihgen bogdando: which one is that? 247?
14:39 bogdando mihgen, so looks like it is better to raise it to hign for 6.0
14:40 bogdando https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1371664
14:40 mihgen bogdando: ok.. the problem is that he wants to fix it in 5.1.1 too - and we have to basically do something now
14:41 mihgen or close as won't fix in 5.1.1....
14:41 mihgen for 6.0 then it shoud be confirmed for sure
14:47 eshumkher joined #fuel-dev
14:48 EeeBotu New bug #1393803 in fuel: "[ui] Settings tab layout bugs" [Medium, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393803
14:48 EeeBotu New bug #1393802 in fuel: "Dropdown settings are displayed as radio group on Settings tab" [High, In Progress] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393802
14:52 mihgen sbog: does https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1392799 affect 6.0 ?
14:52 akuznetsova_ joined #fuel-dev
14:53 IgorYozhikov joined #fuel-dev
14:56 katyafervent joined #fuel-dev
14:57 meow-nofer_ joined #fuel-dev
14:58 dteselkin joined #fuel-dev
14:59 tsufiev joined #fuel-dev
14:59 teran joined #fuel-dev
15:00 teran_ joined #fuel-dev
15:01 asilenkov joined #fuel-dev
15:01 igormarnat_ joined #fuel-dev
15:02 ikalnitsky bookwar: SergK: what the hell with our CI? https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/verify-fuel-web/3305/ it blocks my work.
15:03 SergK ikalnitsky: give me the link to the patch i will check
15:03 ikalnitsky SergK: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135017/
15:05 stamak Hello, anybody knows who could take look into problem with keystone? Do we have mos-keystone team?
15:11 jobewan joined #fuel-dev
15:12 proberts1 joined #fuel-dev
15:17 EeeBotu New bug #1393819 in fuel: "    Redeploy cinder/compute nodes if new controller added" [Undecided, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393819
15:17 EeeBotu New bug #1393809 in fuel: "5.1.1 check_before_deployment task  in error state" [High, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393809
15:22 AlexF joined #fuel-dev
15:22 akasatkin SergK:   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134752/  - same issue with CI
15:51 angdraug joined #fuel-dev
16:08 akasatkin SergK:   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134752/  - same issue again, tests were run for the 1st patch
16:08 akasatkin https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/verify-fuel-web/3340
16:08 dancn joined #fuel-dev
16:08 fandi joined #fuel-dev
16:20 monester_laptop joined #fuel-dev
16:39 zigo mattymo: Am I right that fuel-agent == nailgun-agent?
16:39 mattymo zigo, no
16:40 mattymo look at the email thread
16:40 zigo mattymo: Where's the sources for nailgun-agent then?
16:40 mattymo nailgun-agent reports hardware and "I'm online" to nailgun. fuel-agent is related to image-based provisioning
16:41 mattymo fuel-web repo in bin directory
16:41 zigo mattymo: I'm currently trying to get all components built so that I can do the bootstrap image (using live-build).
16:41 mattymo ls
16:41 mattymo ^ ignore that
16:41 zigo mattymo: Oh, so it's a single file?
16:41 mattymo yeah
16:41 mattymo you can see the ruby deps at the top
16:42 mattymo but look at RPM or debian spec because nailgun-agent requires a certain version of json
16:42 zigo Ok.
16:43 zigo Thanks.
16:46 akasatkin SergK: it continues to fail: https://review.openstack.org/135341 , http://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/verify-fuel-web/3358/
16:46 zigo mattymo: What is fencing-agent for?
16:53 EeeBotu New bug #1393859 in fuel: "There is no requirement for 'requests' in nailgun" [High, Confirmed] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393859
16:53 EeeBotu New bug #1393849 in fuel: "Command "fuel --fuel-version" redirects content to stderr" [Undecided, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393849
17:00 adanin joined #fuel-dev
17:04 IvanBerezovskiy left #fuel-dev
17:07 pboldin joined #fuel-dev
17:08 agordeev hello. have anyone also used a magic of 'udevadm settle'? please ping me back
17:10 dshulyak joined #fuel-dev
17:11 amnk joined #fuel-dev
17:14 mihgen agordeev: you might need to ping dilyin, aglarendil, alex_didenko on this ^^
17:15 aglarendil I do not know what udevadm settle is
17:21 agordeev dilyin: alex_didenko: the same question for you guys ^
17:21 amnk joined #fuel-dev
17:21 rmoe joined #fuel-dev
17:22 agordeev aglarendil: what about a trick such as `udevadm control --stop-exec-queue` ?
17:26 amnk joined #fuel-dev
17:31 amnk joined #fuel-dev
17:39 ddmitriev1 joined #fuel-dev
17:41 xarses joined #fuel-dev
17:48 teran joined #fuel-dev
17:59 pboldin joined #fuel-dev
18:00 zigo Has someone already worked out the nailgun-agent dependencies?
18:00 teran joined #fuel-dev
18:00 zigo Like, is there a ruby-ohai package somewhere?
18:02 zigo Oh, it seems there's "ohai" already in Debian...
18:18 pboldin joined #fuel-dev
18:26 EeeBotu New bug #1393886 in fuel: "Fixed/Failed in email notifications should be the first word" [High, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393886
18:59 dshulyak joined #fuel-dev
18:59 amnk joined #fuel-dev
19:14 monester_laptop joined #fuel-dev
19:24 mgariepy joined #fuel-dev
19:25 dshulyak joined #fuel-dev
20:22 amnk joined #fuel-dev
20:22 dshulyak joined #fuel-dev
20:28 EeeBotu New bug #1393928 in fuel: "Several gerrit repositories have no tag 2014.1.3" [High, New] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393928
20:33 salmon_ joined #fuel-dev
20:57 angdraug joined #fuel-dev
20:58 AlexF joined #fuel-dev
20:59 xarses joined #fuel-dev
21:10 teran joined #fuel-dev
21:25 stamak joined #fuel-dev
21:42 gilmeir joined #fuel-dev
21:44 alexz joined #fuel-dev
22:19 amnk joined #fuel-dev
22:23 adanin joined #fuel-dev
22:38 monester_laptop joined #fuel-dev
23:15 ChanServ joined #fuel-dev
23:54 salmon_ joined #fuel-dev
23:55 akuznetsova_ joined #fuel-dev

| Channels | #fuel-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary