Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2013-11-11

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:01 yinyin joined #gluster-dev
03:01 vshankar joined #gluster-dev
03:09 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
03:21 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
03:29 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
03:50 vshankar joined #gluster-dev
03:53 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
03:58 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
03:59 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
04:08 ababu joined #gluster-dev
04:12 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
04:19 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
04:33 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
04:38 shyam joined #gluster-dev
04:47 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
04:49 ppai joined #gluster-dev
04:49 mohankumar joined #gluster-dev
04:54 mohankumar hagarth: ping
04:58 mohankumar i hope there is an issue with build test, all builds fail with:
04:58 mohankumar chown: changing ownership of `/build/install/bin/fusermount-glusterfs': Operation not permitted
04:59 mohankumar mount: unknown filesystem type 'glusterfs'
05:04 mohankumar but i see zerofill build succeeded on Nov 10 at 1.47PM
05:13 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:17 hagarth mohankumar: yeah, I think you can ignore that fusermount-glusterfs error
05:19 mohankumar hagarth: ah thanks,but it results in patch test failure
05:22 spandit joined #gluster-dev
05:24 hagarth mohankumar: I don't think so, I have seen it in regression runs that have passed too.
05:28 mohankumar hagarth: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5747/
05:28 mohankumar http://build.gluster.org/job/regression/2569/consoleFull : FAILED
05:30 vshankar joined #gluster-dev
05:33 hagarth mohankumar: if you scroll down to the test summary report
05:33 hagarth you will see a few failures from test cases
05:34 mohankumar hagarth: iiuc gluster mount didnt happend, i am seeing this failure message
05:34 mohankumar mount: unknown filesystem type 'glusterfs'
05:35 mohankumar /mnt/glusterfs/0/.: volume.type: Operation not supported
05:35 mohankumar /mnt/glusterfs/0/lv: glusterfs.gfid.string: Operation not supported
05:35 mohankumar so getfattr -n glusterfs.gfid.string operation fails, it means the path is not glusterfs mounted
05:35 mohankumar so EOPNOTSUPP returned
05:37 vshankar joined #gluster-dev
05:41 hagarth mohankumar: there has been a core dump too
05:45 mohankumar hagarth: may i get access to that dump? before posting the patches, i ran bd.t to verify all tests pass
05:47 hagarth mohankumar: let me check
05:52 hagarth mohankumar: can you run the entire test suite on the bd patches on your setup and see if it succeeds?
05:55 mohankumar hagarth: let me try
05:55 mohankumar hagarth: prove -r tests will run all the tests?
05:57 hagarth mohankumar: yes or you could just use ./run-tests.sh
06:17 bala joined #gluster-dev
06:43 vshankar joined #gluster-dev
06:49 asias_ joined #gluster-dev
06:54 johnmark asias_: greetings
06:54 johnmark asias_: you're the person I met at linuxcon, right?
06:54 asias_ asias_, right
06:54 johnmark asias_: based in beijing?
06:54 asias_ johnmark, yup
06:54 johnmark cool :)
06:54 asias_ johnmark, ;-)
06:54 johnmark asias_: I'm trying to figure out how to get some community events going in China
06:55 johnmark like, what's the best city to run them in, who can do it, etc.
06:55 johnmark asias_: do you know of anyone who would be interested in becoming the Gluster champion of China/
06:55 johnmark ?
06:55 asias_ johnmark, I guess Beijing or Shanghai would be the best place
06:56 bulde joined #gluster-dev
06:56 johnmark asias_: ok. I ran an event in Shanghai once. we could theoretically do anohter one, but I'm probably most interested in Beijing
06:56 johnmark asias_: and someone told me I should look into shenzhen or guangzhou
06:57 asias_ johnmark, try Beijing ;-)
06:57 johnmark asias_: heh... good idea :)
06:57 johnmark asias_: do you know where I could run a community event in Beijing?
06:57 asias_ johnmark, huge number of developers and companies are here
06:57 johnmark cool, ok
06:57 johnmark asias_: or better yet, do you know of any local companies who would be interested in sponsoring?
06:58 asias_ johnmark, I am not sure, but I would suggest to find sme local companies
06:58 asias_ johnmark, right
06:58 asias_ johnmark, grab users of gusterfs
06:58 asias_ johnmark, jd.com might be
06:58 asias_ johnmark, but not sure
06:59 johnmark asias_: ah, ok
06:59 hagarth johnmark: all set for the cloud night in singapore today? :)
06:59 johnmark asias_: think about it. I have to run to a meeting at the moment, but are you avialable later today to discuss?
06:59 johnmark hagarth: indeed :)
07:00 asias_ johnmark, probably yes
07:00 hagarth johnmark: great, have fun!
07:00 johnmark asias_: who do you work for, by the way? I had thought you were a RH employee, but I think I was wrong :)
07:00 asias_ johnmark, drop me a mail if you can not find me
07:00 johnmark asias_:
07:00 johnmark asias_: ok
07:01 hagarth mohankumar: any luck with the tests?
07:05 mohankumar hagarth: in bd.t i am getting failure for 21
07:05 mohankumar debugging that
07:05 hagarth mohankumar: ok
07:13 mohankumar hagarth: looks like timing is issue, after adding sleep 1 before TEST mkfs.ext4 -qF $M0/thin
07:13 mohankumar all 30 test cases in bd.t pass
07:14 mohankumar is it possible for you to update bd.t with this and check or shall i push bd.t patch?
07:14 mohankumar hagarth: ^^
07:33 hagarth mohankumar: it would be better to update bd.t and push it as a new submission
07:33 mohankumar hagarth: ok, with this change bd.t tests fully pass
07:33 mohankumar but when i run ./run-tests.sh i am seeing failures in other test cases such as
07:34 mohankumar [12:27:26] ./tests/bugs/bug-824753.t ......................... Failed 1/16 subtests
07:34 mohankumar [12:27:39] ./tests/bugs/bug-830665.t ......................... 1/23 No volumes present
07:34 mohankumar thats shoudl be fine right?
07:34 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
07:34 kshlm mohankumar: are those particular tests on nfs mounts?
07:35 kshlm i've always had failure with nfs mount tests when running local regression tests.
07:36 mohankumar kshlm: i am not sure, i should open that .t file and check
07:36 mohankumar i am seeing couple of other failures also
07:36 mohankumar [12:15:22] ./tests/basic/rpm.t ............................... 3/5
07:36 mohankumar not ok 3
07:36 hagarth mohankumar: we would need to clean them up
07:37 mohankumar hagarth: ok, i will post updated bd.t
07:37 mohankumar but the failures i have seen in the build log says unknown filesystem type glusterfs
07:38 mohankumar i have not seen that failure in my test setup
07:38 hagarth mohankumar: please go ahead and submit. Let us see how the regression tests run with the new patchset.
08:29 mohankumar hagarth: pushed the changes,
09:24 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
09:39 bulde1 joined #gluster-dev
09:57 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
10:26 hagarth mohankumar: there seem to be failures in the regression run
10:27 mohankumar hagarth: could you please share the logs?
10:30 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
10:32 mohankumar hagarth: ??
10:33 hagarth mohankumar: trying to pull it out
10:33 ppai joined #gluster-dev
10:34 mohankumar for my patches, still gerrit doesn't show anything related to regression
10:36 mohankumar on my test machine, bd.t passed
10:36 mohankumar [root@host glusterfs]# ./run-tests.sh
10:36 mohankumar Running all the regression test cases
10:36 mohankumar [15:33:31] ./tests/basic/bd.t ................................ ok    33392 ms
10:36 hagarth mohankumar: rpm.t failure - http://ur1.ca/g0ieq
10:50 hagarth mohankumar: can you add a bigger sleep interval in bd.t and try for the next iteration?
10:51 mohankumar hagarth: i'm not able to reproduce above build failure
10:51 ndevos mohankumar: it is possible that these rpm.t failures happen because the 'make dist' tarball does not contain all headers
10:52 mohankumar ndevos: but it complains about missing bd-aio.h
10:52 mohankumar bd-aio.h is added by one of the patches
10:52 ndevos mohankumar: I think that bd-aio.h should be listed in Makefile.am, is it there?
10:52 hagarth mohankumar: you need to add it here noinst_HEADERS = bd_map.h bd_map_help.h
10:52 hagarth in Makefile.am of xlators/storage/bd_map/src/
10:54 hagarth mohankumar: does bd-aio.h belong to bd_map/src?
10:55 mohankumar hagarth: it should be part of bd/src
10:55 mohankumar not bd_map
10:56 hagarth mohankumar: then we need to add it in the Makefile.am of bd/src
10:56 mohankumar hagarth: ok, why this error not captured in regular build?
10:57 hagarth mohankumar: this is seen only during rpmbuild
10:58 mohankumar hagarth: that should be triggered when i do make from Extras/LinuxRPM directory?
10:58 hagarth or if you attempt a "make dist" operation
10:58 mohankumar okie, let me fix this
11:09 mohankumar hagarth: is there any other test case that i have to check before submitting next patchset?
11:09 mohankumar i usually check bd.t only, now i will run make glusterrpms
11:12 hagarth mohankumar: this test failed in the last run
11:12 hagarth tests/bugs/bug-767095.t
11:12 hagarth mohankumar: would be good to have it covered too
11:14 mohankumar hagarth: sure
11:15 hagarth mohankumar: running all tests would be good to. It takes around 40 minutes to run all tests.
11:15 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
11:28 mohankumar hagarth: ndevos: during rpmbuild -ta glusterfs-3git.tar.gz --without rdma
11:29 mohankumar configure.ac error: required file 'rpc/rpc-transport/rdma/Makefile.in' not found
11:29 kshlm df -h
11:32 edward1 joined #gluster-dev
11:36 hagarth mohankumar: can you install libibverbs-dev and try configure with rdma?
11:36 mohankumar hagarth: sure
11:39 ppai joined #gluster-dev
11:48 ndevos mohankumar: ah, maybe that '--without rdma' is not passed on to ./configure :-/
11:49 ndevos hmm, well, it should, not sure whats up with that
11:50 mohankumar ndevos: i have to install rdma related devel package, now crossed that
11:51 ndevos mohankumar: oh, good, but its still a packaging bug, I'll try to remember and look at an other time
12:09 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
12:15 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
13:55 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
14:15 ira joined #gluster-dev
14:15 ira joined #gluster-dev
14:25 asias joined #gluster-dev
14:33 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
14:49 mohankumar joined #gluster-dev
15:14 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
15:21 lpabon joined #gluster-dev
15:51 bulde joined #gluster-dev
15:51 hagarth edward1: looks like the encryption patchset is hitting a rpm failure in regression tests, can you please take a look?
15:51 hagarth edward1: http://build.gluster.org/job/regression/2582/consoleFull - fyi
16:32 Technicool joined #gluster-dev
16:49 bulde joined #gluster-dev
17:07 bala joined #gluster-dev
17:32 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
18:22 bulde joined #gluster-dev
18:48 hagarth kkeithley: aborted regression run on 6236 by mistake. have queued it again
18:48 kkeithley no problem.
20:14 edward1 hagarth: OK, thanks, I'll take a look (it seems after vacations)..
20:22 ira joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary