Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2014-04-11

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:27 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
00:28 awheeler_ joined #gluster-dev
00:43 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
00:44 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
01:25 awheeler_ joined #gluster-dev
01:26 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
02:40 badone joined #gluster-dev
03:07 bharata-rao joined #gluster-dev
03:10 badone joined #gluster-dev
03:45 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
03:54 ceez joined #gluster-dev
04:04 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
04:06 hchiramm__ joined #gluster-dev
04:12 spandit joined #gluster-dev
04:13 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
04:15 pk joined #gluster-dev
04:17 atinm joined #gluster-dev
04:31 pk joined #gluster-dev
04:34 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
04:41 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
04:43 pk left #gluster-dev
04:49 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
05:11 raghu joined #gluster-dev
05:23 ppai joined #gluster-dev
05:29 bala joined #gluster-dev
05:51 sahina joined #gluster-dev
05:56 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
06:06 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
06:16 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
06:16 nthomas joined #gluster-dev
06:16 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
06:21 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
07:18 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
07:41 ndevos xavih: just a reminder in case it got lost in yesterdays chat
07:41 ndevos packages available for testing http://koji.fedoraproject.org​/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6725197 , download becomes available at http://koji.fedoraproject.or​g/scratch/devos/task_6725197
07:41 glusterbot Title: build (f20-candidate, wireshark-1.10.1-1.fc20.0.xavih.src.rpm) | Task Info | koji (at koji.fedoraproject.org)
07:42 ndevos well, packages are available already :)
07:43 ndevos xavih: the patch works for me, someone made the decoding little-endian, but that should be big-endian (rpc/xdr standard)
07:44 xavih ndevos: yes, sorry, I was in a meeting yesterday until late and I couldn't test it
07:44 xavih ndevos: I need to finish a couple of things and I'll test it
07:44 xavih ndevos: thanks :)
07:44 ndevos xavih: no worries, its not urgent for me :)
08:17 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
08:18 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
08:35 xavih ndevos: the 'flags' field of OPEN calls shows correctly now, but the 'mode' field of CREATE calls still seems to be interpreted in the wrong order
08:39 ndevos xavih: oh, hmm, lets see if I can find a CREATE somewhere, maybe its done separate :-/
08:41 ndevos xavih: right, got it
08:43 ndevos xavih: seems the mount-flags in a STATFS Reply has similar issues
08:43 raghu joined #gluster-dev
08:43 ndevos xavih: you want a new package for testing?
08:44 xavih ndevos: as you prefer, no problem from my side
08:45 ndevos xavih: me neither, I can build you one if you like, I'm not on Fedora so I wont build it for myself - it's just two commands to get it for you
08:46 xavih ndevos: if it's not much trouble, then yes, I'll test it :)
08:51 ndevos xavih: building here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org​/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6726825 use http://koji.fedoraproject.or​g/scratch/devos/task_6726825 for downloading when it's finished
08:51 glusterbot Title: build (f20-candidate, wireshark-1.10.1-1.fc20.0.xavih.1.src.rpm) | Task Info | koji (at koji.fedoraproject.org)
08:51 xavih ndevos: thank you very much :)
08:51 ndevos xavih: no problem at all, glad someone else uses it :)
08:52 xavih ndevos: it's great to see what is really happening when you get a mess :P
08:53 ndevos xavih: :) in case your xlator adds new fops, point me to the code and I can add those fops to wireshark too
08:54 xavih ndevos: nothing new yet, though I overloaded some of the existing fops...
08:55 ndevos xavih: only if the parameters changed it would matter
08:55 xavih ndevos: no, nothing modified in the protocol
08:56 ndevos xavih: okay, sounds good to me then, just let me know if those new packages fix the flags/mode for now ;)
08:57 ndevos well, still building...
08:57 xavih ndevos: sure :)
09:03 ndevos jclift, lalatenduM: is it Asciidoc or Markdown?
09:03 ndevos xavih: build finished :)
09:04 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
09:06 ndevos jclift, lalatenduM: it seems doc/ contains mostly .md files, I'll take it we're doing Markdown?
09:06 lalatenduM jclift, ndevos , as of now it is markdown, but Iam in favor of ascii doc
09:07 ndevos lalatenduM: I dont have an opinion, just need a format that I can use to submit a patch...
09:07 lalatenduM ndevos, jclift we need to fix few thing before we move to acsii doc, I will reply to jclift's mail
09:07 lalatenduM ndevos, you can use markdown as of now
09:07 ndevos lalatenduM: okay, I'll do that :)
09:08 lalatenduM ndevos, we can do a mass conversion of md to ascii some day
09:13 ndevos lalatenduM: do you know of a markdown editor that I can use to check the generated output?
09:13 xavih ndevos: now it works perfectly :)
09:13 xavih ndevos: thanks
09:13 ndevos xavih: awesome, thanks for reporting and testing!
09:14 xavih ndevos: no problem
09:33 lalatenduM ndevos, check this https://forge.gluster.org/met​a_xlator_glusterfs/pages/Home
09:33 glusterbot Title: Meta_xlator_GlusterFS - Home - Open wiki - Gluster Community Forge (at forge.gluster.org)
09:35 ndevos lalatenduM: looks interesting :)
09:36 lalatenduM ndevos, once something available will let you know , so that you can try/test
09:36 lalatenduM ndevos, as of now it is just an idea :)
09:37 ndevos lalatenduM: oh, I googled and found http://markable.in/editor/
09:37 glusterbot Title: Editor - Markable.in (at markable.in)
09:38 lalatenduM ndevos, the same is mentioned in https://forge.gluster.org/met​a_xlator_glusterfs/pages/Home
09:38 glusterbot Title: Meta_xlator_GlusterFS - Home - Open wiki - Gluster Community Forge (at forge.gluster.org)
09:38 lalatenduM soory wrong link
09:38 lalatenduM ndevos, here it is  http://www.gluster.org/community/documentatio​n/index.php/Submitting_Documentation_Patches
09:38 glusterbot Title: Submitting Documentation Patches - GlusterDocumentation (at www.gluster.org)
09:38 ndevos lalatenduM: ah, right :)
09:39 lalatenduM ndevos, the editor is really cool and helpful :)
09:46 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
09:57 lalatenduM ndevos, I am not able to add as reviewer in review.gluster.org, "Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>"
09:57 lalatenduM s/add/ add you/
09:57 ndevos lalatenduM: try niels@nixpanic.net - the accounts in Gerrit are weird
09:58 ndevos it'll land at my @redhat.com address anyway...
09:58 lalatenduM ndevos, yeah cool
10:13 ndevos lalatenduM: I like http://dillinger.io/ more :)
10:13 glusterbot Title: Online Markdown Editor - Dillinger, the Last Markdown Editor ever. (at dillinger.io)
10:37 lalatenduM ndevos, yup, I can see why :), may be we should put its reference in the wiki page
10:38 lalatenduM ndevos, awesome, I can import a doc from github in to http://dillinger.io/
10:38 glusterbot Title: Online Markdown Editor - Dillinger, the Last Markdown Editor ever. (at dillinger.io)
10:39 ndevos lalatenduM: oh, you can? I did not look at any features, just copy/pasted the feature page in there for editing
10:39 tdasilva left #gluster-dev
10:39 lalatenduM ndevos, yeah we can, check the upper task bar
10:40 ndevos lalatenduM: yeah, just looking at it, quite nifty
10:41 lalatenduM ndevos, you need to link your github account from the editor, then you can import markdown documents from your repos
10:46 lalatenduM msvbhat, which markdown editor you are using?
10:48 msvbhat lalatenduM: vi :P
10:48 msvbhat lalatenduM: First I wrote the content using markable.in and then copied the text to my vi  editor
10:49 msvbhat lalatenduM: I used dillinger as well. Felt markable bit more comfortable.
10:50 lalatenduM msvbhat, cool, just check if the current document is properly rendered in any markdown edititor
11:09 ndevos msvbhat: you did not file the change against a bug, you can use your feature bug for it if it is not closed yet
11:10 ndevos msvbhat: if that bug is still open, you can add the bug-alias glusterfs-3.5.0 to the "blocks" field too, that way we can track which bugs need to be fixed for the 3.5 release
11:11 ndevos lalatenduM: if you are aware of any new doc bugs, you could do ^ for them too
11:14 lalatenduM ndevos, yeah agree, we can use the 3.5 tracking bug for doc patches
11:14 ndevos lalatenduM: I'd prefer to have a bug per feature, and add that bug to the tracker, it's just cleaner
11:15 kkeithley jclift: ping
11:16 ndevos lalatenduM: that also makes it easier listing which bugs need work: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependenc​ytree.cgi?id=1049981&amp;hide_resolved=0
11:16 lalatenduM ndevos, got it, yup it is cleaner and right thing to do
11:16 glusterbot Title: Dependency tree for Bug 1049981 (at bugzilla.redhat.com)
11:17 ndevos lalatenduM: I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1086700 , maybe we should file one for each feature?
11:17 glusterbot Bug 1086700: unspecified, unspecified, ---, ndevos, POST , Add documentation for the Feature: Brick Failure Detection
11:17 ndevos hmm, unspecified should probably be changed...
11:18 lalatenduM ndevos, yeah it is a good idea, we can track these bugs through the release tracker bugs :)
11:18 ndevos lalatenduM: yeah, see that ^ url for the dependencytree
11:18 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
11:19 lalatenduM ndevos, and these bugs will blocking the release also
11:19 * ndevos likes a little order in bugs
11:19 lalatenduM ndevos, yeah the tree was cool
11:19 ndevos lalatenduM: yeah, hence the "blocks" glusterfs-3.5.0 field
11:20 lalatenduM ndevos, yesh
11:21 ndevos lalatenduM: you want to file the bugs, or shall I try to do that?
11:22 * ndevos would like to test the bugzilla command one day, but that day does not need to be today
11:22 lalatenduM ndevos, so each bug per http://www.gluster.org/community/d​ocumentation/index.php/Planning35
11:22 glusterbot Title: Planning35 - GlusterDocumentation (at www.gluster.org)
11:22 lalatenduM ?
11:23 ndevos lalatenduM: one bug per feature that jclift listed in his email, the others (and brick-failure-detection) already should be good
11:25 lalatenduM ndevos, cool, lets divide the list between you and me file bugs
11:26 lbalbalba joined #gluster-dev
11:26 lbalbalba left #gluster-dev
11:27 kkeithley jclift: or anyone!!!!!   Anyone know why glusterfs-devrpms jobs are backing up in jenkins?
11:27 ndevos kkeithley: I never touched that job/test :-/
11:27 lalatenduM kkeithley, me neither
11:28 ndevos lalatenduM: 26 in total, 13 each?
11:28 lalatenduM kkeithley, I tried the 3.5 beta5 rpms, on RHEL 6.5, got error http://fpaste.org/93469/72156481/
11:28 glusterbot Title: #93469 Fedora Project Pastebin (at fpaste.org)
11:29 lalatenduM ndevos, yes lets do it, I am taking the last 13
11:29 lalatenduM :)
11:29 ndevos lalatenduM: like http://paste.fedoraproject.org/93472/21575713
11:29 glusterbot Title: #93472 Fedora Project Pastebin (at paste.fedoraproject.org)
11:29 ndevos lalatenduM: I think we agree :)
11:29 kkeithley lalatenduM: I'll look in a bit
11:30 lalatenduM ndevos, yup :)
11:30 kkeithley oh, that's a bad repo file. :-(
11:31 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
11:31 lalatenduM ndevos, I think in my list I need to file bugs for 3.4 doc e.g. libgfapi
11:32 ndevos lalatenduM: yes, thats correct
11:32 lalatenduM ndevos, we can make them blocker for 3.4.4 :)
11:32 ndevos lalatenduM: well, no need to file bugs for 3.4 doc, just a bug for 3.5 should be sufficient
11:33 kkeithley I've recreated the repo files. Try `yum clean all` then retry your install/update
11:33 ndevos lalatenduM: we'll leave it up to kkeithley if he wants the doc backports for a 3.4 release
11:33 lalatenduM ndevos, yeah , will file on 3.5
11:33 lalatenduM kkeithley, on it
11:34 kkeithley I'm not in charge.  johnmark said no 3.5.0 until we had docs for all the new features in 3.4 and 3.5.
11:34 kkeithley but I'm not in charge. ;-)
11:35 lalatenduM kkeithley, yeah it worked , thanks :)
11:37 lalatenduM kkeithley, did you see the recent mail in centos-devel about storage-sig repo ?
11:37 kkeithley yup
11:37 kkeithley saw it
11:38 ira_ joined #gluster-dev
11:39 lalatenduM kkeithley, cool , we will get a koji instance for sig in couple of weeks
11:39 ira_ joined #gluster-dev
11:39 kkeithley that, and a git repo to put src.rpms in,
11:40 lalatenduM kkeithley, yes, once I get access I will add you, hchiramm_  and purpleidea :)
11:41 kkeithley sounds good
11:44 lalatenduM ndevos, there should be a component as doc in bugzilla for GlusterFS
11:44 kkeithley maybe jrivera for Samba. Is Sateesh the new hire hagarth is grooming to take over community builds? Maybe him too.
11:44 kkeithley cross that bridge when we get there
11:45 lalatenduM kkeithley, yeah agree
11:45 ndevos lalatenduM: yes, but I'm filing bugs against the component that introduces the feature
11:47 kkeithley pffft. This time the rpm.t worked for my argp-standalone build patch
11:48 kkeithley btw, 3.4.3 reached 7 days in Bodhi. The rpms are migrating to Fedora updates repo (from updates-testing)
11:49 kkeithley 3.4.3 for f19 actually got +3 karma from users. I think that's the first time that's happened
11:49 kkeithley and 3.4.3 for f20 got +2.
11:55 msvbhat ndevos: Sorry, I just saw your message
11:56 msvbhat ndevos: Shall I add it to the existing feature/generic bug or open a new one and add *that* to the tracker bug?
11:57 ndevos msvbhat: probably create a new bug for it, were doing that for the other missing doc pieces too
11:57 lalatenduM msvbhat, we are filing bugs, you should get a bug number shortly
11:57 ndevos or that way
11:57 ndevos lalatenduM: are you also assigning the bugs to the feature owners?
11:58 msvbhat lalatenduM: Looks good. Assign those bugs to me.
11:58 ndevos lalatenduM: I dont think I'll do that, figuring out the emails would be time consuming
11:58 msvbhat lalatenduM: Only those two I mean
11:58 itisravi_ joined #gluster-dev
11:59 lalatenduM ndevos, nope, I am stuck at remove-brick change, actually the change in behavior is in master not in 3.5
12:00 lalatenduM ndevos, the remove-brick patch in 3.5 only contain a usage change
12:01 ndevos lalatenduM: hmm, not sure what to do with that...
12:01 lalatenduM atinm, ping, should I the remove-brick doc bug to you?
12:01 lalatenduM ndevos, atinm here is the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1086737
12:01 glusterbot Bug 1086737: unspecified, unspecified, ---, rwheeler, NEW , Add documentation for the Feature: Remove brick CLI change
12:02 ndevos lalatenduM: I'm also just going blindly on the list from jclift, not checking pages/patches if I dont have to
12:05 atinm lalatenduM, I will take it in my name
12:05 lalatenduM atinm, awesome , thanks :)
12:09 lalatenduM ndevos, what to do if we dont have a feature page e.g.  RDMA-connection manager (RDMA-CM)
12:10 ndevos lalatenduM: I point to the http://www.gluster.org/community/d​ocumentation/index.php/Planning35 page
12:10 glusterbot Title: Planning35 - GlusterDocumentation (at www.gluster.org)
12:11 lalatenduM ndevos, ok
12:17 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
12:19 lalatenduM msvbhat, here is the bug for geo-rep https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1086747
12:19 glusterbot Bug 1086747: unspecified, unspecified, ---, rwheeler, NEW , Add documentation for the Feature: Distributed Geo-Replication
12:20 msvbhat lalatenduM: Cool... Thanks
12:24 ndevos lalatenduM: filing bugs by script now, /me crosses fingers
12:24 ndevos this is actually quite cool :D
12:24 ndevos lalatenduM: https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1086748 is one of those batch-filed bug... not really perfect though :-/
12:24 * ndevos looks for the 'modify' feature
12:24 glusterbot Bug 1086748: low, urgent, ---, kaushal, NEW , Add documentation for the Feature: AFR CLI enhancements
12:25 lalatenduM ndevos, awesome :)
12:33 ndevos lalatenduM: and modified too now :)
12:33 lalatenduM ndevos, I need the script now :)
12:34 ndevos lalatenduM: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/93486/13972196 for the filing, http://paste.fedoraproject.org/93487/97219648 for the fix
12:34 glusterbot Title: #93486 Fedora Project Pastebin (at paste.fedoraproject.org)
12:35 ndevos lalatenduM: it seems not possible to set the --keywords=Documentation when filing, so the mod is needed anyway :-/
12:35 lalatenduM ndevos, yes
12:35 lalatenduM ndevos, tryin the scripts
12:35 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
12:36 ndevos lalatenduM: just dont file them again :)
12:46 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
12:48 ndevos lalatenduM: I'll send an email to gluster-devel@ to inform everyone that we have filed bugs, is that okay with you, or shall I wait until you're completely done?
12:52 lalatenduM ndevos, wait for me :)
12:53 lalatenduM ndevos, I am logged in in bugzilla through firefox , the script returns error "'You must log in before using this part of Red Hat Bugzilla.'>
12:53 lalatenduM "
12:54 ndevos lalatenduM: bugzilla login
12:54 ndevos lalatenduM: that command fetches a cookie for subsequent bugzilla commands
12:58 lalatenduM ndevos, thanks :), I had forgotten my bugzilla passowrd as firefox remain logged in , finally remembered it
12:59 ndevos lalatenduM: :)
13:03 ndevos lalatenduM: I'll go for a quick lunch, I'll be back in 30 minutes or so
13:03 lalatenduM ndevos, cool,
13:03 ndevos lalatenduM: in case you're gone by then, just leave a note here for me :)
13:04 lalatenduM ndevos, sure, 99% I will be thr :)
13:04 ndevos lalatenduM: ttyl then!
13:04 lalatenduM ndevos, have a good lunch ;)
13:15 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
13:22 lalatenduM ndevos, I am done with filing bugs, however the remove-brick doc bug is not in 3.5, it would be in 3.6
13:23 kkeithley jclift: ping ping ping
13:31 lpabon joined #gluster-dev
13:32 lpabon jenkins update -- looking at the issue which is causing the devrpms jobs to backup.. seems that the node on rackspace is having some issues
13:38 ndevos lalatenduM: awesome, email sent
13:39 lalatenduM ndevos, yw!!
13:44 msvbhat lalatenduM: You have raised a bug in master as well? For this?
13:44 msvbhat https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1086747
13:44 glusterbot Bug 1086747: low, urgent, ---, vbhat, NEW , Add documentation for the Feature: Distributed Geo-Replication
13:44 msvbhat lalatenduM: ^^
13:44 lalatenduM msvbhat, nope, only for 3.5
13:49 lpabon jenkins update -- Two nodes in rackspace have been fixed and now the queue is up again
13:50 lpabon Jenkins is running more jobs again.. i mean
13:52 ndevos lpabon: are those jenkins jobs in a git repository on the forge?
13:53 lpabon ndevos: no, all it does is run a mock to create the rpm
13:54 ndevos lpabon: but maybe we should think of putting those tests somewhere?
13:54 ndevos lpabon: also, does it replace tests/basic/rpm.t?
13:54 lpabon ndevos: no, it doesn't replace it, it is really not a test
13:54 ndevos lpabon: hmm, okay
13:54 lpabon ndevos: it is just  a way to create rpms and have Jenkins archive them
13:56 lpabon ndevos: i agree if they were tests they should definitely go into git, but its just a line of bash to create rpms for Jenkins to archive and provide rpms to developers
13:58 ndevos lpabon: that sounds helpful, did you announce that to a list?
13:58 kkeithley it just occurred to me why it might have been stuck.  The first version of my argp-standalone patch had an inadvertent endless loop.  Maybe there should be a timeout? Is that possible?
13:59 ndevos kkeithley: hmm, I was thinking of dropping the whole argp-standalone - I could not think of a real use-case for not using the system provide version?
14:03 kkeithley Probably not a good idea. MacOS XCode sdk doesn't have argp.h. Maybe the MacOS port uses a third-party package for it?
14:05 ndevos I dont know, but I dont like the bundling of libraries :-/
14:05 kkeithley I can't get to a NetBSD box, but FreeBSD doesn't have it either.
14:05 ndevos netbsd seems to have it, or at least there is a port for it
14:06 kkeithley yeah, might be a port on FreeBSD too for all I know.
14:07 ndevos xavih: merged! the next wireshark version (1.11?) should have the fix: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1066
14:07 glusterbot Title: Gerrit Code Review (at code.wireshark.org)
14:09 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
14:10 kkeithley yes, FreeBSD has a port, argp-standalone-1.3.2.
14:12 kkeithley nearly irrelevant, but I should get the FreeBSD port that Mike Ma did last year for GSOC into a patch in gerrit
14:13 tdasilva joined #gluster-dev
14:18 kkeithley which would be almost irrelevant, unless/until I get the FreeBSD port that Mike Ma did last year for GSOC into a patch in gerrit
14:19 kkeithley Or into a project on Forge
14:30 jobewan joined #gluster-dev
14:32 jclift kkeithley: Not sure why they're backing up.  I haven't touched build.gluster.org for a few days.  Have you got it sorted since the ping?
14:39 systemonkey joined #gluster-dev
14:40 kkeithley jclift: yes, all sorted now
14:40 jclift Cool
14:42 ndevos jclift: you were writing docs for libgfapi, right? https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1086766
14:43 glusterbot Bug 1086766: low, urgent, ---, rwheeler, NEW , Add documentation for the Feature: Libgfapi
14:43 jclift ndevos: Different docs.  Quick reference stuff.
14:44 jclift Though, I do mean to get into proper, full docs down the track
14:45 jclift Hmmm, Libgfapi is maintained by Avati according to the MAINTAINERS file.
14:45 jclift Wonder if that's correct these days?
14:47 ndevos jclift: correct, more or less, but I doubt we should wait for him to write docs
14:48 jclift Thiago da Silva maybe?
14:49 jclift tdasilva: You're the best person to write the feature docs for Libgfapi in short order aren't you?
14:53 lpabon afaik tdasilva would be a backup person to write it but not point.. maybe a reviewer
14:54 jclift lpabon: We're not after full docs here before the release.  Just the a) b) c) stuff.  eg feature description, how to get started with them, any useful commands.  It can definitely say to "look in the source code" for function descriptions and stuff
14:54 lpabon from https://github.com/gluster/glust​erfs/blame/master/api/src/glfs.h it looks like avati and kkeithley are the maintainers
14:54 glusterbot Title: gluster/glusterfs at master · GitHub (at github.com)
14:54 ndevos jclift: also, the quick referenc is just passing glfs.h though doxygen :P
14:54 jclift Heh
14:55 jclift Ultra quick reference ;)
14:55 lpabon ndevos: it needs to be doxygen'ized.. comments have /* instead of /** and so on
14:56 ndevos lpabon: I did not look at the details, but glfs.h is pretty well documented
14:56 lpabon The comments for the headers are also incorrect for doxygen, for example, it would grab "SYNOPSIS" as the brief description to each of the api functions :)
14:56 lpabon ndevos: i think it is about 25% well documented :-)
14:56 ndevos lpabon: have you seen the rest of the gluster sources? glfs.h is AMAZING
14:57 lpabon ndevos: yes 0.00000000000000000001 is > than 0 :-D
14:57 ndevos :)
15:22 jclift Wow, this is a lot of overnight IRC history to read.
15:22 jclift About 1/2 way through.
15:23 jclift I was probably wrong to add the remove-brick feature for 3.5 (it was near end of day :/).  We can probably do it as a 3.6 feature, and not include the docs for that for 3.5.  The release notes mention the 3.5 deprecation for remove-brick.
15:30 jclift Heh, I've never really understood what the argp-standalone stuff is for.
15:30 jclift We could definitely ask the guys working on the Gluster-OSX port if they make use of it.
15:31 jclift Hmm, gotta go for a bit
16:21 lalatenduM jclift, ndevos, johnmark purpleidea , you guys see my mail on gluster-user and devl on CentOS storage SIG? did I miss anything
16:22 ndevos lalatenduM: what email from you?
16:22 lalatenduM ndevos, subject "Packages For CentOS Storage SIG"
16:23 ndevos lalatenduM: no, and http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.c​omp.file-systems.gluster.devel is pretty fast in catching up on mails
16:23 glusterbot Title: Gmane Loom (at thread.gmane.org)
16:23 ndevos or http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.​comp.file-systems.gluster.user fwiw
16:23 glusterbot Title: Gmane Loom (at thread.gmane.org)
16:25 lalatenduM ndevos, I can see the mail in sent items directory but not reached the mailing list yet
16:25 ndevos lalatenduM: maybe the outgoing mailserver has a delay...
16:49 purpleidea which mail
16:50 purpleidea @later tell lalatenduM which mail??
16:50 glusterbot purpleidea: The operation succeeded.
18:29 xavih ndevos: great. Thanks :)
18:35 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
18:36 lalatenduM purpleidea, somehow the mail didn't reach gluster mailing lists, I have sent it gain
18:38 purpleidea lalatenduM: saw it now :)
18:39 lalatenduM purpleidea, not sure what happened to my previous mail :),
18:39 purpleidea lalatenduM: when you're actually ready a new build of the puppet-gluster RPM's, let me know and I'll generate some. Code base seems to be changing a lot right now, so I'll wait until the last minute before I make new ones.
18:40 purpleidea lalatenduM: typically the NSA will kill some emails in transit, if they think they help empower the Free Software community :P
18:41 lalatenduM purpleidea, sure (regarding the puppet-gluster)
18:42 * lalatenduM wants some magic to happen and world will be free from NSA. May be heartbleed will help them :(
19:07 purpleidea lalatenduM: let me know if there's any patches you need :)
19:08 lalatenduM purpleidea, as of kb is trying put together the infra for all this, once infra is ready , we can create rpms for puppet also
19:09 lalatenduM purpleidea, btw you need access to storage sig page, I think i can give you access
19:09 lalatenduM ?
19:12 lalatenduM purpleidea, is "purpleidea" is your CentOS wiki name
19:13 purpleidea lalatenduM: okay cool
19:13 purpleidea yeah i'm purpleidea of course
19:15 lalatenduM purpleidea, oops , I dont have admin rights :(
19:24 purpleidea no worries. not needed i don't think
19:25 lalatenduM purpleidea, I will make sure that I have admin rights on the wiki page of storage sig, so that all can collaborate for the documentations
19:26 hchiramm__ jclift++ u rock!
19:31 jclift hchiramm__: We're not finished yet. ;)
19:32 lalatenduM jclift, hchiramm_ whats up guys ? ;)
22:41 awheeler joined #gluster-dev
23:26 hagarth joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary