Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2014-09-26

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:08 an joined #gluster-dev
01:12 bala joined #gluster-dev
01:40 aviksil_ joined #gluster-dev
02:28 bharata-rao joined #gluster-dev
03:13 anoopcs joined #gluster-dev
03:17 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
03:26 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
03:35 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
03:50 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
03:52 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
04:30 anoopcs joined #gluster-dev
04:32 Rafi_kc joined #gluster-dev
04:32 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
05:02 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
05:04 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
05:11 spandit joined #gluster-dev
05:12 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:15 atalur joined #gluster-dev
05:16 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
05:18 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
05:24 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
05:29 aviksil_ joined #gluster-dev
05:31 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
05:40 raghu joined #gluster-dev
05:42 ppai joined #gluster-dev
06:02 bala joined #gluster-dev
06:08 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
06:11 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
06:21 _Bryan_ joined #gluster-dev
06:31 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
06:55 bala joined #gluster-dev
07:28 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
07:32 ndevos wow, hchiramm, you're fast@
07:32 ndevos !
07:32 Humble ndevos, :P :)
07:33 Humble it depends on the window which is active on your browser :)
07:33 ndevos Humble: I think we broke Gerrit on that commit, the change does not have our names as reviewer... oh well
07:34 hagarth do we have a problem with Gerrit now?
07:34 * Humble not seeing any issues
07:34 ndevos hmm, maybe? the patch I just wanted to merge is in status: Submitted, Merge Pending
07:34 ndevos Submitted, Merge Pending
07:35 ndevos copy/paste fail -> http://review.gluster.org/8855
07:36 Humble but I see only one patch is in that status
07:36 Humble is//
07:37 ndevos and patch #6 has the updated commit message with my review: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8855/6//COMMIT_MSG
07:37 hagarth ndevos: submitted, merge pending is a bad state :(
07:38 hagarth ndevos: that is symptomatic of the problem I had with release-3.6 a few weeks back
07:38 hagarth we need to review carefully if there are missing patches..
07:39 ndevos hagarth: I'm not sure what you did, but Gerrit still shows the same status for that patch?
07:39 hagarth ndevos: it is best to abandon such patches and send out new ones
07:39 ndevos argh...
07:41 Humble yep , there had some issues in past and atleast 3 were in merge pending status.. then realized some of the merges were not recorded.
07:43 Humble ndevos, do u want to review http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8866/ again /
07:44 ndevos Humble: nah, thats not needed
07:44 Humble ok.. :)
07:45 ndevos Humble, hagarth: uh, sending a new patch gets into the same state... http://review.gluster.org/8866
07:47 * ndevos has no idea what he can do about it, and will make himself a coffee
07:47 ndevos coffee++
07:47 glusterbot ndevos: coffee's karma is now 1
07:58 hagarth ndevos: 8866 is merged?
07:58 hagarth coffee++ too
07:58 glusterbot hagarth: coffee's karma is now 2
08:00 vimal joined #gluster-dev
08:00 ndevos hagarth: no, both are in "Submitted, merged pending" status
08:01 ndevos last commit in master, after fetching is http://review.gluster.org/8761
08:01 ndevos which matches http://review.gluster.org/#/q/p​roject:glusterfs+status:merged,n,z
08:01 hagarth right .. saw that now
08:02 hagarth let me check if I can notice anything in r.g.o
08:02 ndevos only these two patches seem to be in this state: http://review.gluster.org/#/q/pr​oject:glusterfs+status:submitted,n,z
08:02 ndevos okay, let me know if you want me to do anything
08:03 hagarth there are primary key violations as per gerrit logs ;)
08:07 xavih joined #gluster-dev
08:07 ndevos *gulp*
08:42 ppai joined #gluster-dev
08:43 hagarth ndevos: what is the commit id of the patch you submitted in your local repository?
08:44 ndevos hagarth: fc86e9ae2aa7719b01ec9b45aab2f04e8372df02
08:44 ndevos hagarth: that would be the 2nd patch, http://review.gluster.org/8866
08:44 hagarth ndevos: right
08:46 ndevos hagarth: Gerrit munged the 1st patch and added the review url in the commit message, that resulted in commit 8d2dd5976c33b3f261051e43e6d9b0cb8ad37ccf
08:46 ndevos http://review.gluster.org/8855 patch #6
08:47 hagarth ndevos: abandoned it now
08:48 ndevos hagarth: okay, thanks, you must have super powers :)
08:48 ndevos hagarth: so, maybe abandon 8866 too?
08:48 hagarth ndevos: can you re-submit the patch by ammending the change-id?
08:48 * ndevos has an abandon button on that one
08:48 hagarth ndevos: done that as well :D
08:48 ndevos oh, lol
08:49 ndevos http://review.gluster.org/8867  is up
08:50 ndevos hagarth: you want to try and submit that one?
08:50 hagarth ndevos: yeah, maybe let me do that
08:51 hagarth ndevos: done!
08:52 ndevos hagarth++ thanks, you fixed it!
08:52 glusterbot ndevos: hagarth's karma is now 12
08:52 hagarth probably abandon + re-submit with a different change-id is the workaround we can use for these scenarios
08:53 hagarth several folks have suggested tweaking db through the gsql interface .. but probably not worth it if this workaround continues to work
08:53 ndevos okay, and only admins and original submitters can abandon patches
08:53 hagarth ndevos: right
08:53 ndevos who are the Gerrit admins that can abandon any patch, in case the original submitter is not available?
08:54 hagarth ndevos: me, avati and Humble atm
08:54 ndevos okay, that should cover my needs :)
08:55 Humble ndevos, gluster infra is notified about the issue..
08:55 hagarth i hope we don't run into this again
08:55 hagarth however it has happened a few times in the recent past
08:55 Humble please feel free to add details, if any.
08:56 ndevos and this is supposed to be fixed with a newer Gerrit version?
08:56 hagarth ndevos: not quite :(
08:56 hagarth folks had reported seeing this in 2.8.4 too
08:56 ndevos oh :-/
08:56 hagarth not sure about 2.9
08:59 Humble hagarth, is it a known issue ?  I remember u had references , but I am not sure this was the issue covered there
09:00 hagarth Humble: yes, a known issue with gerrit
09:00 Humble oh..ok
09:01 hagarth I had posted some links in the release-3.6 patches which describe the issue better
09:01 Humble oh.. ok..
09:04 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
09:10 xavih I've a bug that was only partially solved. Do I put it again in the ASSIGNED state and send another patch or I have to create a new bug id ?
09:24 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
09:29 RaSTar joined #gluster-dev
09:32 ndevos xavih: whatever you like :)
09:34 xavih ndevos: thanks. I'll reuse the same bug... :)
09:35 ndevos xavih: a new bug is easier to track... you can then also close the old bug as a duplicate of the new one
09:35 spandit joined #gluster-dev
09:36 * ndevos has to think about how to detect FailedQA bugs and not move them to ON_QA with a next release if there wasnt an other patch
09:37 xavih ndevos: the bug solved some issues between 32/64 bits architectures, but another patch sent before but not yet merged also had some issues with 32/64 bits that the patch didn't solve
09:38 xavih ndevos: I need to send a patch for this newly added issues
09:38 ndevos xavih: okay, so it is something like a follow-up patch?
09:39 ndevos xavih: anyway, a new bug is easier to track, you can add a reference in the 1st bug to the 2nd and explain why the 2nd bug+patch fix a similar issue
09:39 ndevos xavih: but well, feel free to do whatever you think makes most sense :)
09:40 xavih ndevos: yes, the first patch was incomplete because it only solved the issues currently present on master
09:40 xavih ndevos: ok, then I'll create a new one
09:40 ndevos xavih: right, so the 1st bug is solved, and a 2nd bug got introduces somewhere along the way
09:40 ndevos *introduced
09:40 xavih ndevos: yes, it can be seen this way :P
09:41 ndevos xavih: I see it that way, and it makes things easier ;-)
09:41 xavih ndevos: then I'll create another bug for this new problem
09:41 xavih :)
09:41 xavih ndevos: thanks :)
09:42 ndevos xavih: sounds good to me, thanks1
09:42 ndevos uh, !
09:52 bala joined #gluster-dev
10:00 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
10:00 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
10:17 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
10:26 an joined #gluster-dev
10:44 ira joined #gluster-dev
10:50 shyam joined #gluster-dev
11:33 tdasilva joined #gluster-dev
11:35 shyam joined #gluster-dev
11:43 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
11:49 kkeithley ndevos: phone call!
11:51 ppai joined #gluster-dev
12:16 itisravi_ joined #gluster-dev
12:30 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
13:36 aviksil_ joined #gluster-dev
13:40 shyam joined #gluster-dev
13:55 anoopcs joined #gluster-dev
14:36 jobewan joined #gluster-dev
14:38 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
15:46 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
16:01 JustinClift ndevos: Ahhh, good workaround there for the Gerrit problem.
16:02 * JustinClift wasn't sure how we're handling that
16:03 hagarth JustinClift: I think we should take up gerrit upgrade sometime soon .. once you are done with the backups etc.
16:03 hagarth I would also like to integrate sonar with gerrit and the current lower version of gerrit hampers us
16:06 JustinClift hagarth: Makes sense
16:06 JustinClift I've kind of been letting everything else get in front of the backups stuff
16:06 JustinClift I need to figure out how to backup the H2 database in gerrit properly
16:06 JustinClift There are several pages open with various methods
16:06 * JustinClift goes off to try them now
16:08 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
16:08 hagarth JustinClift: maybe we can check with the ovirt folks, have seen them doing gerrit/jenkins upgrades
16:08 hagarth to see if they have a documented procedure that works
16:09 JustinClift hagarth: They have their process online (no documented restore proces though!)
16:09 JustinClift hagarth: They use PostgreSQL instead of H2 as the database
16:09 JustinClift So, it's not useful to us
16:10 hagarth JustinClift: I see, ok
16:12 JustinClift hagarth: We may need to adopt an approach of shutting down Gerrit each night, backing up the files, and starting it up again
16:13 JustinClift hagarth: Coping the actual files takes less than 30 seconds
16:13 JustinClift So, I don't think it would have much impact
16:13 hagarth JustinClift: yeah. If it is a short window, we can do that.
17:17 vikumar joined #gluster-dev
17:24 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
17:35 tdasilva joined #gluster-dev
18:06 JustinClift sync
18:12 JustinClift misc: Do you have time to update the bash package on download.gluster.org again?
18:12 JustinClift misc: It's not finding the updated-update either
18:13 JustinClift The other boxes all seem fine.  Doing the slaves now.
18:19 JustinClift misc: Ignore that, I'm on it
19:06 an joined #gluster-dev
20:31 lalatenduM kkeithley, abt building http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/​glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/RHEL/epel-7/SRPMS/ without building fsal for ceph
20:32 lalatenduM kkeithley, I have just have to change "global with_cephfs  false" right?
20:32 lalatenduM kkeithley, I mean "global with_cephfs  true" to "global with_cephfs  false"
20:50 JustinClift Hmmm, I have a test restored Gerrit server working in a VM
20:50 JustinClift OpenID auth isn't working to sign into it though
20:51 * JustinClift suspects OpenID server is seeing the VM as some kinda bogus thing
20:55 JustinClift Hmmm, bugzilla hooks.  Better disable those while mucking around too
20:57 JustinClift Ahhh.  Isolated VM network, thus the OpenID problem.
20:59 JustinClift NOTE - I've just turned off the gerrit server on review.gluster.org (on purpose)
20:59 JustinClift Doing a full file level backup of it (to be safe) :)
20:59 JustinClift Gimme 5 mins
21:07 JustinClift Ok, make that 10
21:07 JustinClift Fixing a few ownership/perms problems on the review box, now that there's a backup
21:15 JustinClift k, it's back up
21:29 an joined #gluster-dev
21:32 MacWinner joined #gluster-dev
23:09 MacWinner joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary