Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2015-04-01

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:04 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
00:33 shyam joined #gluster-dev
02:09 anrao joined #gluster-dev
02:26 badone_ joined #gluster-dev
03:29 ppai joined #gluster-dev
03:42 overclk joined #gluster-dev
03:47 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
03:58 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
04:05 bala joined #gluster-dev
04:13 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
04:26 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
04:28 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
04:39 nkhare_ joined #gluster-dev
04:50 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
04:54 bala joined #gluster-dev
04:59 rafi joined #gluster-dev
05:01 rafi joined #gluster-dev
05:01 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
05:11 soumya joined #gluster-dev
05:14 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
05:17 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
05:18 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:18 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
05:26 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
05:32 shyam joined #gluster-dev
05:33 spandit joined #gluster-dev
05:33 vimal joined #gluster-dev
05:33 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
05:36 pppp joined #gluster-dev
05:50 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
05:51 tigert morning
05:55 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
05:56 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
05:58 sac joined #gluster-dev
05:58 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
05:59 hagarth overclk: ping, any known memory leaks in bitd?
06:01 gem joined #gluster-dev
06:10 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
06:10 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
06:10 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
06:16 anrao joined #gluster-dev
06:17 raghu joined #gluster-dev
06:30 deZillium joined #gluster-dev
06:40 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
06:45 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
07:00 overclk joined #gluster-dev
07:01 overclk joined #gluster-dev
07:19 Debloper joined #gluster-dev
07:20 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
07:31 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
07:32 badone__ joined #gluster-dev
07:43 overclk joined #gluster-dev
07:44 deZillium joined #gluster-dev
07:48 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
07:49 obnox hagarth: at least coverity does not report mem leaks in bitd
07:57 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
07:59 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
07:59 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
08:01 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
08:09 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
08:13 hagarth obnox: right, it might be something more involved like a missing ref which can be determined at runtime.
08:13 hagarth I noticed a RSS spike for bitd while running some tests in my setup
08:46 gem joined #gluster-dev
08:49 bala1 joined #gluster-dev
08:51 anrao joined #gluster-dev
08:52 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
08:53 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
08:53 atinmu hagarth, can u please take a look @ http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9613/
08:54 atinmu hagarth, this patch is crucial as it fixes rpc deadlock
08:54 hagarth atinmu: will do
08:54 atinmu hagarth, thanks
08:57 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
08:59 DV__ joined #gluster-dev
09:07 obnox I am slightly puzzled by apparently random failures of rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered on my review request(s)
09:08 obnox e.g.:
09:08 obnox http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-net​bsd7-regression-triggered/2579/consoleFull
09:08 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
09:08 obnox different subtests failing in two subsequent attempts
09:08 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
09:08 obnox and it is marking review with a red X, not verified
09:08 obnox is that expected?
09:09 obnox any hint on what to do in that case? retrigger?
09:10 obnox (I even think I have already retriggered it, but I can't see whether a new attempt has been done)
09:11 obnox oh, this seems to have succeeded. But it doesn not seem to have updated the review request.
09:11 obnox so this must be related to the thread on the mailing list...
09:13 ndevos obnox: yeah... some tests are not very stable :-/
09:13 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
09:14 ndevos when you go to http://build.gluster.org/job/racks​pace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/ you can search for your change request # and see if it is retriggered/running/finished
09:15 obnox ndevos: right. apparently user manu has retriggered it again and it succeeded
09:15 obnox but:
09:15 obnox http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-n​etbsd7-regression-triggered/2609/console
09:16 obnox in the end it does not list the gerrit update command
09:16 ndevos oh, maybe the NetBSD tests do not show the gerrit update command?
09:17 ndevos I guess that is enabled with some 'set -x' debugging in some shell script
09:17 obnox ok.
09:17 DV__ joined #gluster-dev
09:17 obnox but anyhow, it has not updated gerrit. so according to the mail thread I might have to do it manually?
09:18 ndevos oh, I think Manu disabled Gerrit updates for the time being?
09:18 ndevos there was an email about it too...
09:19 obnox right, but how to amend the review request?
09:19 obnox it is stuck in red X under review because of that (I think)
09:19 ndevos you can re-add the Linux regression test manually, that SUCCESS was overwritten by the NetBSD failure
09:19 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10061/
09:19 obnox ndevos: thanks for helping me here. still finding my way around..
09:19 ndevos http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-r​egression-2GB-triggered/6166/consoleFull set the Verified=+1
09:20 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
09:20 ndevos can you try the gerrit/ssh command from there? if you're missing permissions, I can do it too
09:20 obnox ndevos: and why does the gluster build system set red X for "Code Review" and not verified?
09:21 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
09:21 ndevos it should set it for verified?
09:21 obnox ndevos: that's what I would expect
09:21 ndevos I doubt the build bot reviews code...
09:22 obnox ndevos: look into the review request, please
09:22 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10061/
09:22 ndevos uh, but yes, indeed, that looks wrong
09:22 obnox maybe I should just re-push the patchset after rebasing on updated master
09:22 ndevos JustinClift: the regression tests should NOT set "code review" bits, they should stick with the "verified"
09:22 obnox so that the whole process is re-triggered
09:23 ndevos nah, you do not have to, I can correct it
09:24 obnox I am still not sure which exact command I should run under ssh to review.gluster.org
09:24 ndevos obnox: press F5 ?
09:24 ndevos ssh build@review.gluster.org gerrit review --message ''\''http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-r​egression-2GB-triggered/6166/consoleFull : SUCCESS'\''' --project=glusterfs --verified=+1 --code-review=0 7b65fd49b7415d5ec8400c8e70821ced6e9e21e3
09:24 obnox ndevos: heh :) thanks
09:24 ndevos but you need to run that as the jenkins user
09:24 obnox ndevos: 'the jenkins user' is build ?
09:25 ndevos obnox: on build.gluster.org, the "jenkins" users runs all the tests
09:25 ndevos user-s
09:25 obnox ndevos: right but the mails said to do ssh build@review.gluster.org ...
09:26 obnox ndevos: for this I wouldn't have had permissions. my key only works for my personal user.
09:26 obnox which is fine as long as someone helps out :)
09:26 ndevos obnox: ah, yes, the username in Gerrit is "build", but on build.gluster.org the user is called "jenkins"
09:26 obnox anyhow - fixed now as it seems - thanks!
09:26 ndevos sure, no problem
09:26 obnox ndevos: interestingly, there is another one:
09:26 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10056/
09:27 obnox this has review ticked already but not erified
09:27 obnox verified
09:27 obnox ndevos: but all tests seem to have succeede
09:27 obnox d
09:27 obnox maybe also here, the setting verified has not worked?
09:27 obnox or something is still missing?
09:28 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
09:28 ndevos no, the NetBSD regression removed the Verified=+1 for some reason...
09:29 obnox gnaa, so I was suffering from the same issue that was discussed on the list, right?
09:29 ndevos that was incorrect, I think people have been experimenting a little too much with the Jenkins config :-/
09:29 ndevos yes, but I did not really read all the details on the list (yet)
09:29 JustinClift ndevos: Not sure what you're maing with the "code review" thing?
09:30 ndevos JustinClift: Gerrit has two columns, "verified" and "code review"
09:30 JustinClift Sure
09:30 ndevos JustinClift: the Gluster Build System seemed to have set "code review" to -2
09:31 JustinClift Damn.  It's not supposed to affect the Code Review bits at all.
09:31 JustinClift Can you point me to where it failed?
09:31 ndevos JustinClift: automated tests do not do code reviews, they verify, and should not touch the "code review" bits
09:31 obnox JustinClift: that was in my case of request 10061. ndevos has fixed it
09:31 ndevos indeed :)
09:31 JustinClift k
09:31 JustinClift Yeah, it's never supposed to touch the code review bits
09:32 JustinClift I didn't design the system, but I've never seen it screw it up before
09:32 ndevos JustinClift: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10061 the comment before the last one
09:32 JustinClift That being said... it also wouldn't surprise me a whole bunch ;)
09:32 obnox :)
09:33 obnox if a request has review and verified ticked, is it automatically merged or is that done manually?
09:34 ndevos obnox: Is PATH_MAX defined as a string with a trailing \0, or not?
09:34 JustinClift ndevos: I'm not sure why the "Patch Set x" lines sometimes have Code Review words in them.  They don't seem to actually affect anything.
09:34 obnox ndevos: it is meant to include the 0
09:34 JustinClift I doesn't seem to have really done anything with it though, apart from having the words in the line there.
09:35 JustinClift s/I doesn't/It doesn't/
09:35 ndevos JustinClift: they do not affect anything if it is set to 0, if it is set to -2, it will affect things
09:35 ndevos obnox: ok
09:35 obnox ndevos: http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/man​ual/html_node/Limits-for-Files.html
09:35 JustinClift ndevos: I think either I'm misunderstanding you, or you're misunderstanding me. :)
09:35 JustinClift ndevos: What I'm meaning is that I don't think it ever changes the code review line.
09:36 JustinClift ndevos: From that I can see of 10061
09:36 JustinClift Looking at it now, there's only been one patch
09:36 JustinClift And it's never been code reviewed
09:36 JustinClift So, it's never had +anything
09:36 obnox JustinClift: ndevos has fixed it, and I don't have the screen shot any more...
09:36 JustinClift Ahhh gotcha
09:36 JustinClift So it did have values in the code review field then?
09:37 obnox JustinClift: there was the red X under code review in the row of Gluster Build System inserted byt a failed netbsd regression run
09:37 obnox JustinClift: and subsequent succeeding runs failed to update
09:37 obnox JustinClift: it did
09:37 JustinClift Ahhh.  I guess that's from when Manu had it set to allow voting
09:38 JustinClift Jeff Darcy saw it causing problems, and disabled it from voting and stuff
09:38 obnox JustinClift: this build introduced the problem:
09:38 obnox http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspac​e-netbsd7-regression-triggered/2579/
09:38 JustinClift Actually, I think he just disabled it completely, and Manu re-enabled it but with voting off
09:38 JustinClift obnox: Cool
09:38 ndevos obnox: that link says: The uniform system limit (if any) for the length of a file name component, not including the terminating null character.
09:39 obnox ndevos: no. it reads:
09:39 obnox "Macro: int PATH_MAX
09:39 obnox The uniform system limit (if any) for the length of an entire file name (that is, the argument given to system calls such as open), including the terminating null character. "
09:39 JustinClift obnox: We tried out some new settings with Jenkins and Gerrit last night.  That didn't work.
09:39 JustinClift I didn't realise they'd affect the Code Review field.  Now I know. ;)
09:39 JustinClift Sorry about that.
09:39 obnox JustinClift: no problem since I noticed, also noticed the mail thread, asked here and my cases got fixed
09:39 obnox :)
09:40 obnox ndevos: there is no 'not' in that line
09:40 obnox ndevos: not including is for NAME_MAX
09:40 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
09:40 obnox ndevos: I checked this before doing the patches :)
09:40 ndevos obnox: yeah, and I'm looking at NAME_MAX for http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10061
09:41 obnox oh
09:41 obnox looking
09:41 ndevos ah, I'm looking at NAME_MAX, but the patch has PATH_MAX
09:41 obnox yep. and the code before also used it. I just added checks/proper limits
09:42 ndevos NAME_MAX was a question on monday... this is so confusing
09:42 obnox ok
09:46 RaSTar hagarth: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9812/ has got 2 +1s. It is a 2 line change in iobuf.c , could you have a look at it and merge?
09:57 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
10:02 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
10:05 ira joined #gluster-dev
10:10 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
10:16 anrao joined #gluster-dev
10:27 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
10:28 ndevos RaSTar: I'm a big fan of having an explanation of why a change is needed, could you add that in the commit message of http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9812/ ?
10:30 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
10:34 RaSTar ndevos: done, thanks :)
10:37 ndevos RaSTar++ thanks!
10:37 glusterbot ndevos: RaSTar's karma is now 2
10:57 bfoster joined #gluster-dev
11:13 firemanxbr joined #gluster-dev
11:14 soumya joined #gluster-dev
11:15 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
11:16 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
11:17 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
11:26 soumya joined #gluster-dev
11:33 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
11:43 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
11:43 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
11:55 Gaurav_ joined #gluster-dev
12:00 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
12:02 ppai joined #gluster-dev
12:04 jdarcy joined #gluster-dev
12:10 soumya joined #gluster-dev
12:33 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
12:36 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
12:44 kshlm From where can I get the nfs-ganesha-gluster package?
12:45 kshlm I see that we now have a glusterfs-ganesha package which depends on the above.
12:45 * kshlm is just curious
12:46 ndevos kshlm: it should be in epel
12:47 kshlm I've got epel enabled, still don't find it.
12:50 kkeithley epel doesn't have it because epel doesn't have gluster(-devel)
12:50 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
12:50 ndevos wait, you mean glusterfs-api-devel is not available for EPEL?
12:51 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
12:51 kkeithley there's not gluster anything in EPEL
12:51 ndevos well, not in EPEL, but the base distribution should provide glusterfs-api-devel
12:51 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
12:51 kkeithley right now nfs-ganesha-gluster is only in fedora-22
12:52 ndevos hmm
12:52 ndevos or in https://copr.fedoraproject.o​rg/coprs/devos/nfs-ganesha/
12:52 ndevos :D
12:52 kkeithley one sec
12:52 kkeithley base distribution doesn't have -api-devel, I have a BZ, one sec
12:52 kkeithley https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1183698
12:52 glusterbot Bug 1183698: unspecified, unspecified, rc, barumuga, NEW , missing glusterfs-api-devel in RHEL 6
12:52 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
12:53 kkeithley yes, the COPR builds are probably the best place atm
12:54 kshlm Cool. I'll use the ndevos' COPR repo for now..
12:54 kkeithley and fwiw, the fsal-gluster package is renamed in 2.2. It was nfs-ganesha-fsal-gluster. In 2.2. it's nfs-ganesha-gluster
12:55 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
12:55 kkeithley hmm, reminds me, probably need an Obsoletes.  A few of them
12:55 kkeithley s/few/couple/
12:56 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
12:59 lpabon joined #gluster-dev
13:00 kkeithley Once nfs-ganesha-2.2 GAs we'll have all the pieces on download.gluster.org and in the CentOS Storage SIG repo.
13:00 ndevos yes, and the packages in the storage sig would become our reference
13:02 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
13:07 vipulnayyar joined #gluster-dev
13:08 DV__ joined #gluster-dev
13:09 bala joined #gluster-dev
13:25 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
13:35 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
13:36 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
13:36 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
13:41 kkeithley another big backlog of rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered
13:45 kkeithley 28 regressions queued up waiting
13:45 JustinClift Gah, slept through my alarm clock again. :(
13:45 JustinClift k, one min. Just woke up, need coffee.
13:47 JustinClift k, 2 slaves offline.  Rebooting them and getting them back into order.
13:48 JustinClift Looks like I turned off too many of the slave nodes.  We could probably use another hmmm 2-3 being online.
13:48 * JustinClift will do something about that after
13:58 JustinClift Both of those slaves back online.  Rebooting the two nbslaves that are offline too
14:00 hchiramm JustinClift, joining the call ?
14:00 hchiramm ndevos, ^^^
14:00 ndevos hchiramm: ah, yes!
14:07 vipulnayyar joined #gluster-dev
14:11 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
14:15 _Bryan_ joined #gluster-dev
14:17 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
14:22 JustinClift Gah, I'm still so sleepy :(
14:28 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
14:32 nkhare_ joined #gluster-dev
14:33 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
14:34 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
14:50 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
14:57 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
14:57 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
15:07 JustinClift Yep, we definitely need more VM's online for regression testing
15:07 JustinClift Spinning up more now
15:36 anrao joined #gluster-dev
15:45 misc wow
15:45 misc so I managed to install 1 server using centos 6, and use it to install the 2nd with pxe
15:53 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
15:57 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
16:02 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
16:02 JustinClift misc: With Salt?
16:03 misc JustinClift: no, they have basically no network access or anything
16:03 misc and I just found that the installer didn't do what i wanted to do
16:04 misc and that /boot is 500M
16:04 misc (without raid)
16:12 JustinClift In Rackspace?
16:15 misc mhh no, the 2 server in RH DC
16:16 misc the one I have been fighting since 3 days
16:19 vimal joined #gluster-dev
16:20 JustinClift Ahhhh
16:40 _Bryan_ joined #gluster-dev
16:40 soumya_ joined #gluster-dev
16:41 obnox hmmm, in gerrit, when I reply to a comment on a patch, it only shows up as draft.
16:41 obnox how can I send that patch-comment ?
16:41 ira joined #gluster-dev
16:52 obnox in gerrit, when I reply to a comment on a patch, it only shows up as draft. How can I send it?
16:52 kkeithley obnox: click on the "Add Comment" button at the bottom
16:54 obnox kkeithley: but that does not give me the comment I entered in reply to an in-patch-comment?
16:55 kkeithley it should, one sec
16:55 obnox there are  reply... and reply "done" buttons, but they only create draft comments
16:56 JustinClift kkeithley: Interesting thought... we have 10 regression test VM's online doing the CentOS 6 testing
16:56 kkeithley Make your in-patch comment, press Save.    Click the "up to change" link or "next->" link until you get through all the files.
16:57 JustinClift kkeithley: And 10 probably isn't enough.  Should be maybe 12-13
16:57 kkeithley Now press "Add Comment"   You should see you comment at the bottom, under the Cover Message
16:57 JustinClift kkeithley: So, we now get more testing done each hour (fairly consistently), than the old master server used to do in a full day of running
16:57 obnox kkeithley: strangely, I don't. tried it several times
16:58 obnox kkeithley: maybe I don't have the permissions. :)
16:58 kkeithley you're signed in, right?
16:58 obnox yep
16:58 kkeithley I'm not aware of any permissions
16:58 obnox i can also post comments
16:58 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10056/
16:58 JustinClift obnox: Screenshot the bottom part of the Gerrit UI, so we can see the buttons you have?
16:59 obnox i wanted comment on venky's comment on patchset #2, but it does not get through :)
16:59 obnox I also see the request under my draft comments
16:59 obnox but am too stupid to get the comment out of the door :D
17:00 JustinClift obnox: A screenshot would really help... ;)
17:00 obnox JustinClift: bottom of gerrit when the request is open?
17:00 kkeithley apparently it's not you. Not working for me either on this change
17:00 JustinClift The bottom of the Gerrit CR page
17:00 JustinClift the page for the CR :)
17:01 obnox CR ?
17:01 obnox *cough*
17:01 kkeithley change request (patch, whatever)
17:01 obnox k
17:01 kkeithley actually it is working for me now
17:05 JustinClift Sorry.  Got distracted replying to email
17:05 JustinClift obnox: Try now and see if it's working for you now too?
17:05 obnox https://www.samba.org/~obnox/tmp​/gerrit/gerrit-screenshot.1.png
17:06 obnox JustinClift: no
17:06 JustinClift :(
17:07 JustinClift k, there's nothing obviously wrong in the screenshot
17:07 JustinClift Hmmm....
17:07 JustinClift Screenshot of after you hit "Add Comment" ?
17:07 JustinClift Sorry, I just don't know a better way atm. ;)
17:08 obnox JustinClift: I can show you, but the comment window is simply empty
17:08 obnox JustinClift: creating more screenshots
17:08 Gaurav_ joined #gluster-dev
17:08 obnox JustinClift: also, I am sure you have more important things to do ..
17:09 kkeithley obnox: I don't see a draft comment in that pic.
17:09 JustinClift Ahhh.  It didn't catch the draft
17:10 JustinClift obnox: Well, I'm kind of doing stuff with spinning up VM's, unbreaking things, killing spam, and replying to email
17:10 JustinClift obnox: So, helping a dev do dev stuff is pretty much in line :)
17:11 obnox JustinClift: more screenshots here:
17:11 obnox https://www.samba.org/~obnox/tmp/gerrit/
17:11 obnox opening the patch, editing the draft, clocked on add comment
17:12 JustinClift And after you hit "Publish Comments" ?
17:12 JustinClift (needed to make it stick)
17:13 obnox nothing
17:14 obnox just the same as initially
17:14 obnox unless I manually enter a comment
17:14 obnox then it appears
17:14 obnox same as screenshot 1
17:15 kkeithley open the patch, edit comment, click "Save" button...   click on "Up to change" link..... click on "Add Comment" button.
17:15 obnox kkeithley: that is exactly what I did and screenshotted
17:16 kkeithley very strange
17:16 obnox can it be related to the fact that for some reason I am myself listed as reiviewer?
17:16 kkeithley that's normal
17:17 obnox oh. I removed me. and it does not make a change.
17:17 obnox would it have any effect if I review+-ed my own patch? :)
17:18 obnox anyways, I have to be afk now for a while.
17:18 kkeithley I don't know if you can do that
17:18 obnox JustinClift: kkeithley: thanks for your assistnace.
17:18 obnox I will check back later
17:18 kkeithley you can add comments, certainly. I've seen jdarcy do it
17:20 JustinClift k, try changing something in this one: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7011/
17:20 JustinClift obnox: ^ When you're back that is
17:20 JustinClift Try give it a +1 or -1 or something, and maybe screw with the verified flag as well.
17:20 JustinClift See if it lets you change them, and if it keeps comments when you do
17:20 * JustinClift uses that CR as a screw around CR
17:21 JustinClift As it seems like it won't ever get through anyway ;)
17:39 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
17:42 obnox JustinClift: it worked, i could comment on luis's in-patch comment
17:42 obnox w/o giving review +/-
17:42 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
17:48 JustinClift obnox: All good now then? :)
17:49 obnox JustinClift: except for my original CR :)
17:49 obnox but let's ignore that one as problematic
17:49 obnox if it occurs on another one, I'll re-ping you :)
17:50 JustinClift :)
17:50 JustinClift Btw, not sure having a ba
17:50 JustinClift brand with "SOS" in it will be great for marketing
17:50 JustinClift Makes for all kinds of snide comments ;)
17:51 JustinClift SOS == HELP! after all
17:52 obnox Gluster S(cale) O(ut) S(torage) -- here to save your data!
17:52 obnox but I agree that it might be misread as gluster calling out for help
17:53 JustinClift ;)
17:53 obnox i was thinking as someon calling out for gluster to help
17:53 JustinClift Yeah, understood
17:53 obnox anyways, just wanted to have that thought shared.
17:53 JustinClift :)
17:53 obnox bbl
17:53 JustinClift We're all for sharing thoughts and ideas, so all good. :)
18:00 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
18:21 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
18:22 vipulnayyar joined #gluster-dev
18:42 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
18:52 dlambrig1 joined #gluster-dev
19:04 dlambrig1 left #gluster-dev
19:11 vipulnayyar joined #gluster-dev
19:17 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
19:35 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
19:35 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
19:44 _Bryan_ joined #gluster-dev
19:51 anrao joined #gluster-dev
20:41 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
20:42 DV joined #gluster-dev
21:02 obnox JustinClift: ha, I just had the same phenomenon again with not being able to add a comment:
21:02 obnox JustinClift: is seems to be happening if I want to reply to a comment on an older, superseded patch.
21:03 obnox JustinClift: i.e. if I upload a new patchset (#2, say), then the comment draft I added for patch #1, does not show up when I press 'add comment'...
21:03 obnox maybe that gives a hint
21:06 obnox JustinClift: verified: if I add a comment to the latest patchset, it shows up when I press add comment.
21:59 JustinClift obnox: Interesting.  I'm not sure if that's a bug or not. :/
21:59 JustinClift It's an older version of Gerrit, and we'll be upgrading soon.
22:01 _Bryan_ joined #gluster-dev
22:02 badone__ joined #gluster-dev
22:04 obnox JustinClift: so worries
22:04 obnox no
22:04 JustinClift :)
22:16 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
22:20 ira joined #gluster-dev
22:36 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
23:04 _Bryan_ joined #gluster-dev
23:15 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
23:15 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
23:32 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
23:51 nkhare joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary