Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2015-06-04

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:36 sankarshan_ joined #gluster-dev
01:33 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
01:48 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
02:12 RajeshReddy joined #gluster-dev
02:41 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
03:15 overclk joined #gluster-dev
03:22 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
03:28 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
03:58 ppai joined #gluster-dev
04:01 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
04:19 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
04:23 shubhendu_|afk joined #gluster-dev
04:30 Joe_f joined #gluster-dev
04:31 spandit joined #gluster-dev
04:33 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:36 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
04:37 shubhendu_ joined #gluster-dev
04:37 sakshi joined #gluster-dev
04:41 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
04:57 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
05:00 kanagaraj_ joined #gluster-dev
05:07 kanagaraj__ joined #gluster-dev
05:10 pppp joined #gluster-dev
05:10 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
05:12 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
05:16 gem joined #gluster-dev
05:18 hchiramm_pto joined #gluster-dev
05:18 soumya joined #gluster-dev
05:19 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
05:22 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
05:26 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
05:26 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
05:26 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
05:29 vimal joined #gluster-dev
05:34 anekkunt joined #gluster-dev
05:38 anekkunt kshlm,  This patch  http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10197/   is ready for merge .. can you merge this patch .
05:39 Joe_f joined #gluster-dev
05:39 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
05:42 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
05:43 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
05:49 atalur joined #gluster-dev
06:01 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
06:02 ppai joined #gluster-dev
06:02 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
06:05 ashishpandey joined #gluster-dev
06:15 krishnan_p joined #gluster-dev
06:24 schandra joined #gluster-dev
06:33 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
06:42 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
06:43 kp joined #gluster-dev
06:43 amukherj_ joined #gluster-dev
06:44 spalai joined #gluster-dev
06:44 RajeshReddy joined #gluster-dev
06:44 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
06:46 rgustafs joined #gluster-dev
06:47 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
06:54 raghu joined #gluster-dev
07:07 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
07:09 [o__o] joined #gluster-dev
07:10 ashishpandey joined #gluster-dev
07:13 saurabh_ joined #gluster-dev
07:15 hchiramm ndevos, are 3.5.4 scratch builds available ?
07:19 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
07:20 anrao joined #gluster-dev
07:25 kp joined #gluster-dev
07:35 ppai joined #gluster-dev
07:41 ndevos hchiramm: I dit not build them yet
07:41 hchiramm ndevos, oh..ok..
07:46 amukherj_ joined #gluster-dev
07:54 gem joined #gluster-dev
08:27 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
08:28 kp ndevos, any luck with gf_ref_t patch. I badly want that patch merged ;-)
08:29 ndevos kp: oh, I can post an update later today if you like
08:29 kp ndevos, I want to change as many places to use gf_ref_t in our codebase
08:29 ndevos kp: hey, I have that plan too!
08:29 kp ndevos, I am OK with the current form of the patch. We could always remove alloc, free later if there is consensus
08:30 kp ndevos, which is why I have given +1 as of now.
08:30 kp ndevos, great! we could split the change between us :)
08:30 ndevos kp: I have the patch here, making it a gf_ref_t instead of a struct
08:30 kp ndevos, could you send a reminder email nudging other potential reviewers to wake up and say something ;P
08:31 kp ndevos, what is the effect of making gf_ref_t as a struct? I was suggesting that all consumers of gf_ref actually embed it in their respective structures.
08:31 ndevos kp: no objections suggests we should click that [submit] button ;-)
08:32 kp ndevos, I think so to! Probably you could word your reminder email suggesting so.
08:32 ndevos kp: I think a typedef is more likely to get embedded than a struct, if I see "struct gf_ref" in an other struct, I often wonder why it is not a pointer
08:33 kp ndevos, OK. I didn't know about that.
08:36 overclk ndevos, kp: I'll probably have a look at gf_ref_t patch today...
08:37 ndevos overclk: thanks, I'll add you as a reviewer when I post the updated version
08:37 overclk ndevos, I've already gone through it once and looks good.. probably once more today.
08:37 overclk ndevos, thanks!
08:37 ndevos overclk: ah, nice!
08:42 kp overclk, thanks!
08:42 kp ndevos, there you go!
08:55 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
09:31 spandit_ joined #gluster-dev
09:50 ppai joined #gluster-dev
09:55 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
10:10 spandit joined #gluster-dev
10:12 vimal joined #gluster-dev
10:15 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
10:29 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
10:31 pranithk1 xavih: I sent the backport at http://review.gluster.org/11084
10:35 xavih pranithk1: done :)
10:36 hagarth hchiramm: ping, pm?
10:40 pranithk1 xavih: thanks xavi :-)
10:41 vimal joined #gluster-dev
10:42 ppai joined #gluster-dev
10:50 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
10:51 rgustafs joined #gluster-dev
10:53 spandit joined #gluster-dev
11:02 pranithk1 xavih: I forgot to add master branch's link in the commit message. I added it and resubmitted. Sorry about that :-(. You will have to give +2 again
11:03 xavih pranithk1: no problem :)
11:12 rafi1 hagarth: can you review and merge http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10750/ ?
11:14 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
11:19 ndevos kp, overclk: refcounting change updated again, I'd +1 this version myself ;-) http://review.gluster.org/11022
11:25 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
11:27 pranithk1 left #gluster-dev
11:27 kp ndevos, I take the hint and will do likewise ;)
11:30 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
11:43 rgustafs joined #gluster-dev
11:45 kkeithley2 joined #gluster-dev
11:47 jiffin1 joined #gluster-dev
11:48 nkhare joined #gluster-dev
11:49 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
11:49 ppai joined #gluster-dev
12:02 overclk ndevos, sure.
12:06 overclk ndevos, looks good. Holding back +2 in case someone else would like to peek...
12:07 ndevos overclk++ thanks! we can let kp +2 and merge it ;-)
12:07 glusterbot ndevos: overclk's karma is now 4
12:08 ndevos oh, maybe pranithk1 likes refcounting too? http://review.gluster.org/11022
12:10 Manikandan_ joined #gluster-dev
12:12 kp ndevos, aren't you going to maintain libglusterfs? I merge glusterd patches only. I have provided my +1.
12:15 ndevos kp: yeah, I'll maintain it together with pranithk1
12:15 ndevos ... once hagarth sends out the new maintainers!
12:15 overclk ndevos, np. given the goodiness that this patch brings, I'll probably ack+2 it :)
12:16 ndevos overclk, kp: hehe, if either of you +2 it, I'm more than happy to merge it once regression tests have passed :D
12:17 overclk ndevos, done.
12:18 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
12:18 ndevos wow, yoiu guys really want that!
12:18 pranithk1 ndevos: Shall I merge it?
12:19 pranithk1 ndevos: I understood the patch
12:19 ndevos pranithk1: be my guest :)
12:19 ndevos lol
12:19 pranithk1 ndevos: What happened to grapes?
12:19 ndevos pranithk1: I ate them
12:19 amukherj_ ndevos, :)
12:19 pranithk1 ndevos: hey, why are regression run results not there on the patch?
12:20 ndevos pranithk1: we need to encourage Jenkins a little to run faster?
12:20 * ndevos chearleaders Jenkins on o o| |o| |o/ /o/
12:21 ndevos ... thats doing a wave, btw
12:24 pranithk1 ndevos: okay ndevos, I will merge it once the regression results are in
12:25 ndevos pranithk1, kp, overclk: any suggestion what to do/change after jdarcy's comment?
12:28 overclk ndevos, well.. we could even do that later given that this is just the infra patch and noone actually uses it as of now.
12:29 ndevos overclk: or do it before anyone uses it? I have a follow-up change that uses it...
12:29 overclk ndevos, OK. 11023 uses it. I realized that later.
12:29 ndevos overclk: yes, indeed
12:29 ndevos overclk: I'm tempted to make the change and post the patch again
12:30 overclk ndevos, makes sense.
12:30 ndevos overclk: okay, I'll change then now :)
12:31 overclk ndevos, should not take long anyway IMO.
12:32 ndevos overclk: surely not, it only depends on the interruptions that pass by :)
12:32 hchiramm gem++
12:32 glusterbot hchiramm: gem's karma is now 12
12:36 raghu joined #gluster-dev
12:39 dlambrig joined #gluster-dev
12:48 ppai joined #gluster-dev
12:48 pranithk1 ndevos: could you take http://review.gluster.com/#/c/11048/
12:48 pranithk1 ndevos: you merged it upstream
12:48 pranithk1 ndevos: I mean master
12:54 ndevos pranithk1: you  still use the gluster.com domain?!
12:57 pranithk1 ndevos: I only type 'r' browser auto fills...
12:58 ndevos pranithk1: thats fine, I merged it never the less
12:58 pranithk1 ndevos: thanks!
13:04 deepakcs joined #gluster-dev
13:11 shyam joined #gluster-dev
13:16 pousley joined #gluster-dev
13:17 pppp joined #gluster-dev
13:33 kkeithley2 joined #gluster-dev
13:40 kkeithley2 tigert: can we update the "events" page to highlight the upcoming FUDCon Pune where we have several talks on Gluster?
13:49 ndevos hey, where did everyone go? I need reviewers for http://review.gluster.org/11022
13:54 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
14:10 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
14:11 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
14:14 shyam joined #gluster-dev
14:22 xavih ndevos: I've just done a review...
14:22 ndevos xavih: oh, no, there are ... at the end of your sentence
14:23 xavih ndevos: hehe :D
14:24 ndevos xavih++ thanks for the comments!
14:24 glusterbot ndevos: xavih's karma is now 15
14:24 xavih ndevos: yw
14:25 xavih ndevos: regarding the gf_lock_t as an argument, I think it would be very helpful. Even in the example you posted in the mailing list, another lock is needed to modify the lists
14:26 xavih ndevos: I think it would be very interesting to have this in mind to design gf_ref_t interface to avoid unnecessary locks
14:26 csim_ joined #gluster-dev
14:30 ndevos xavih: how do you mean "Since gf_ref_t is expected to be embedded into other structures, I think that adding a pointer to it as an argument would be very useful to access the containing structure without losing the user data pointer." ?
14:31 ndevos xavih: you would like to see a different release() function?
14:31 xavih ndevos: you currently use 'data' field of gf_ref_t to recover the pointer to the containing structure. This can be easily replaced by a macro (typically known as container_of)
14:32 ndevos xavih: ah, right!
14:32 xavih ndevos: this way you can remove the 'data' field, saving space, or even better (for a generic ref counting interface) let this field free for the user
14:32 ndevos xavih: do we have a container_of() define in our sources already?
14:32 xavih ndevos: I don't think so
14:33 csim joined #gluster-dev
14:33 ndevos xavih: hmm, I'll think about doing that
14:37 ndevos xavih: did you see the follow-up patch that adds the macros for simplified usage?
14:37 xavih ndevos: yes, it's ok for me. You added this while I was adding the comments :P
14:38 ndevos xavih: ok, thanks :)
14:38 xavih ndevos: I see a caa_container_of in glusterd-peer-utils.c, but I'm not sure where it's defined
14:39 xavih ndevos: it's defined in user mode rcu includes...
14:40 ndevos xavih: yeah, maybe some of the list includes provide container_of(), I'll check that
15:00 lpabon joined #gluster-dev
15:03 spalai joined #gluster-dev
15:05 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
15:07 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
15:07 atinmu spalai, ping
15:07 glusterbot atinmu: Please don't naked ping. http://blogs.gnome.org/markmc/2014/02/20/naked-pings/
15:08 atinmu spalai, it looks like 1227656 is a regression
15:08 atinmu spalai, http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10792/ has introduced it
15:10 spalai atinmu: checking
15:13 atinmu spalai, although I don't have strong reason why it crashed, but definitely the following line is incorrect when size of path is NAME_MAX
15:13 spalai atinmu: will send a patch for replacing NAME to PATH
15:13 spalai yes
15:13 spalai there was the problem
15:13 atinmu spalai, but it should not crash, should it?
15:13 spalai atinmu: Yes, If the src size is more than 255
15:14 atinmu spalai, are you referring to GLUSTERD_GET_DEFRAG_PROCESS ?
15:14 atinmu spalai, there we are either setting the path as "tier" or "rebalance" which should be less than 255
15:15 spalai atinmu: there we are giving PATH_MAX
15:15 atinmu spalai, IMO, its a typical coverity catch, but don't know why it will lead to a crash
15:15 atinmu spalai, do you agree?
15:16 spalai atinmu: hmm. But surely the code is wrong there. We should not write PATHMAX number of bytes after creating NAME_MAX buffer
15:16 atinmu spalai, yes, for sure
15:17 atinmu spalai, I would say you use NAME_MAX there instead PATH_MAX as source is NAME_MAX
15:17 atinmu spalai, I am assuming that you are going to send the patch for it ;)
15:17 spalai atinmu: agreed
15:17 spalai atinmu:yes
15:17 atinmu spalai, cool
15:17 kkeithley_bat smoke tests are now failing due to a compile error? on release-3.7
15:17 atinmu spalai, thanks
15:17 kkeithley_bat In dht
15:17 atinmu kkeithley_bat, arghhh!!!!
15:18 atinmu spalai++
15:18 glusterbot atinmu: spalai's karma is now 1
15:19 kkeithley_bat /home/jenkins/root/workspace/smoke/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c: In function ‘dht_file_setxattr_cbk’:
15:19 kkeithley_bat /home/jenkins/root/workspace/smoke/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c:3322: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dht_inode_ctx_get_mig_info’
15:20 kkeithley_bat /home/jenkins/root/workspace/smoke/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c:3324: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dht_mig_info_is_invalid’
15:20 atinmu spalai, mind looking into it ?
15:20 kkeithley_bat http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10788/
15:21 atinmu kkeithley_bat, ohh you already sent the fix
15:22 kkeithley_bat no, I haven't sent a fix
15:22 spalai atinmu: ?????
15:22 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
15:22 kkeithley_bat http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10968/ is probably the commit that broke it
15:23 atinmu kkeithley_bat, ohh ok..
15:23 kkeithley_bat (not 10788)
15:23 atinmu spalai, I was asking you whether you can look at the smoke failure in 3.7
15:24 spalai atinmu: will look tomorrow :D Is that fine ?
15:25 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
15:25 atinmu spalai, cool
15:31 kkeithley_bat BTW, I know a lot of people are lingering on older fedora releases for development. In f22 there is now gcc-5.1, which is a lot pickier about things. It would be a Good Thing if everyone would get their devel boxes updated to a later version. F22 even!
15:37 dlambrig on F22 DNF replaced yum. DNF seems to work fine, but I like the name “yum” better.. ;)
15:37 ndevos kkeithley_bat: maybe we should add smoke compile tests on fedora 22 in Jenkins?
15:39 kkeithley_bat ndevos: great idea
15:39 * ndevos will be back later, squash!
15:41 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
15:42 dlambrig another nice thing about gcc-5.1, you can write c++ code like this:
15:42 glusterbot dlambrig: c's karma is now 9
15:42 dlambrig int x = 4;
15:42 dlambrig auto y = [&r = x, x = x+1]()->int {
15:42 dlambrig r += 2;
15:42 dlambrig return x+2;
15:42 dlambrig }();  // Updates ::x to 6, and initializes y to 7.
15:46 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
15:50 anekkunt joined #gluster-dev
15:56 kkeithley_bat dlambrig: maybe you can write code like that. ;-)
16:03 JustinClift dlambrig: Just because you can do that, doesn't mean it's a good idea ;)
16:06 Gaurav__ joined #gluster-dev
16:19 shyam joined #gluster-dev
16:56 spalai joined #gluster-dev
17:23 ndevos dlambrig: you call that "nice"?
17:24 dlambrig lol
17:24 dlambrig I am being sarcastic. C++ code standards keep finding innovative ways to make the language more complex.
17:24 glusterbot dlambrig: C's karma is now 10
17:26 ndevos dlambrig: I assumed you were is too close contact with Ceph developers ;-)
17:27 ndevos is? in!
17:31 hagarth i am glad that whenever somebody refers to C++, C's karma gets improved
17:31 glusterbot hagarth: C's karma is now 11
17:31 ndevos I dont like C++ too much
17:31 glusterbot ndevos: C's karma is now 12
17:31 ndevos but I agree with glusterbot!
17:31 hagarth have you read Stroustroup's interview spoof on why he designed C++?
17:31 glusterbot hagarth: C's karma is now 13
17:32 ndevos no, I did not, and I have no interest in reading too much about C++
17:32 glusterbot ndevos: C's karma is now 14
17:32 hagarth ndevos: spare time reading - http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/susan/joke/cpp.htm
17:33 ndevos hagarth: ok,  I'll read that later :)
17:36 spalai left #gluster-dev
17:37 vimal joined #gluster-dev
17:40 hagarth ndevos: we need to re-kindle the kerberos discussion
17:40 ndevos hagarth: did atin speak to you?
17:41 ndevos hagarth: or, is that only coincidence?
17:41 hagarth ndevos: not in particular about this. this is plain coincidence if he did that with you :).
17:41 ndevos hagarth: I sent an email earlier today, to Atin and Simo :D
17:42 hagarth ndevos: great, ahead of me (as ever) :D
17:42 ndevos hagarth: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/kerberos-for-gluster contains some notes where we'll start a more discussion with
17:42 hagarth ndevos: cool
17:43 ndevos hagarth: I have not spoken much about it with Atin and Simo, when we have a more complete plan/idea, we'll post the notes and all to the -devel list
17:43 hagarth ndevos: ok
17:43 ndevos hagarth: I might be travelling next week, so we'll setup a call for the week after (if not earlier)
17:44 hagarth ndevos: sounds good
17:53 hchiramm_afk kkeithley1, ndevos packages are available at http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.5/3.5.4
17:53 ndevos hchiramm++ you are amazing!
17:53 glusterbot ndevos: hchiramm's karma is now 38
17:54 hchiramm_afk ndevos, :)
17:54 hagarth hchiramm++
17:54 glusterbot hagarth: hchiramm's karma is now 39
17:54 hchiramm_afk yw!
17:54 hagarth hchiramm_afk: was about to provide the afk a ++ ;)
17:54 hchiramm_afk :P
17:56 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
17:56 hchiramm_afk http://gluster.readthedocs.org/ ndevos regarding the missing bits in one of the document
17:57 hchiramm_afk its due to mkdocs bug..
17:57 hchiramm_afk we have opened an upstream bug against mkdocs
17:57 ndevos hchiramm_afk: sounds like we need proof readers of the docs?
17:57 hchiramm_afk not really..
17:58 hchiramm_afk due to that bug, some documents are not rendering properly
17:58 hchiramm_afk hopefully it will be fixed it soon
17:58 ndevos hchiramm_afk: okay, thanks
17:58 hchiramm_afk however proof readers are always welcome
17:58 hchiramm_afk if github render the correct content and RTD failed, its due to that bug
17:58 ndevos hchiramm_afk: I also very concerned about people changing pages in the wiki... that still is happening :-/
17:59 hchiramm_afk I changed couple of settings in mediawiki without result
17:59 hagarth is there a magic stroke to turn the wiki ro?
17:59 hchiramm_afk I couldnt see any more options in my panel
17:59 hchiramm hagarth, I tried "disabling edit" options..etc in prefernece page
18:00 hchiramm it didnt help
18:00 ndevos I have no idea how that would be done... dont allow the database user to make modifications in the database?
18:00 hagarth sankarshan_away might be able to help here
18:00 hchiramm hagarth, oh.. yeah , thanks for the pointer
18:00 hchiramm I will check with Sankarshan
18:01 hchiramm hagarth++ ndevos++
18:01 glusterbot hchiramm: hagarth's karma is now 63
18:01 glusterbot hchiramm: ndevos's karma is now 145
18:01 hchiramm kkeithley1++
18:01 glusterbot hchiramm: kkeithley1's karma is now 2
18:03 hchiramm tdasilva, ping :) regarding http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10256/
18:04 ndevos hchiramm: did you already start a package review for fedora?
18:04 ndevos :)
18:04 hagarth hchiramm: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgReadOnly
18:04 hchiramm yes, almost 1.5/2 weeks back
18:04 hchiramm ndevos, :)
18:05 hchiramm its stalled due to couple of upstream patches
18:05 hchiramm hagarth, checking
18:05 ndevos hchiramm: oh, okay, whats the BZ?
18:05 * hchiramm ahhhhhhhh.. I failed to inform u :(
18:05 hchiramm fetching the bz url
18:12 hchiramm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223461
18:12 glusterbot Bug 1223461: medium, medium, ---, panemade, ASSIGNED , Review Request: python-glusterfs-api - python bindings of libgfapi library
18:12 hchiramm ndevos, ^^^
18:12 ndevos hchiramm: thanks!
18:13 hchiramm last few defects will be fixed by couple of upstream patches..
18:13 hchiramm waiting for its merging
18:14 ndevos hchiramm: okay, seems to be on track then
18:14 hchiramm yes, its on track ..
18:14 ndevos cool :)
18:15 hchiramm sorry again :) , I missed to inform
18:15 ndevos no problem, I told Vivek to ask you about it, and that I thought you were working on it - I've seen some of teh changes in Gerrit :)
18:16 hchiramm oh..ok
18:16 kkeithley_bat hchiramm++
18:16 glusterbot kkeithley_bat: hchiramm's karma is now 40
18:16 ndevos that was after he asked me, of course ;-)
18:16 kkeithley_bat ndevos: 3.5.4 rpms are up on d.g.o
18:16 hchiramm ndevos, :)
18:17 ndevos kkeithley_bat: yes, hchiramm mentioned that about 20 minutes ago :)
18:17 * kkeithley_bat should read the scrollback
18:17 ndevos kkeithley_bat: thanks for building them?
18:17 kkeithley_bat yw
18:17 ndevos or was that hchiramm too?
18:17 ndevos kkeithley++ :)
18:17 glusterbot ndevos: kkeithley's karma is now 72
18:17 kkeithley_bat I built them, hchiramm signed them and built the repos
18:18 ndevos teamwork++
18:18 glusterbot ndevos: teamwork's karma is now 5
18:18 hchiramm team work++
18:18 glusterbot hchiramm: work's karma is now 1
18:18 ndevos work--
18:18 glusterbot ndevos: work's karma is now 0
18:18 hchiramm teamwork++ :)
18:18 glusterbot hchiramm: teamwork's karma is now 6
18:18 kkeithley_bat teamwork ftw
18:19 ndevos actually I dont think I've got a bad job ;-)
18:19 ndevos but, I'm hungry after sports, so I'll make myself something to eat now - and I'll be back later, working from balcony
18:20 hagarth hchiramm: will you be in BLR from Monday?
18:21 hchiramm yes
18:21 hagarth hchiramm: ok cool
18:25 hchiramm hagarth++
18:25 glusterbot hchiramm: hagarth's karma is now 64
18:33 [o__o] joined #gluster-dev
18:33 kkeithley_bat anyone know anything about Ubuntu Launchpad?
18:43 kkeithley_bat ndevos: 3.5.4 rpms are up on d.g.o ... and you should consider announcing before you call it a day.
18:43 kkeithley_bat ;-)
18:45 ndevos kkeithley_bat: yeah, I plan to do that
18:45 ndevos kkeithley_bat: care to review https://review.gerrithub.io/235200 ?
18:45 * ndevos will have food now, ttyl!
19:47 dlambrig left #gluster-dev
19:48 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
20:37 spalai joined #gluster-dev
20:53 ira joined #gluster-dev
21:16 dlambrig_ left #gluster-dev
21:16 JustinClift Gah.  I'm going to have to find a different Python GitHub library. PyGithub is just too buggy. :(
21:17 JustinClift Shame, because it doesn't OAuth. :/
21:17 JustinClift s/doesn't/does/
21:40 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
22:27 ndk joined #gluster-dev
22:36 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
23:54 kkeithley1 joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary