Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2015-12-09

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:05 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
00:06 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
00:55 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
01:03 EinstCrazy joined #gluster-dev
01:06 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
01:36 zhangjn_ joined #gluster-dev
03:38 sakshi joined #gluster-dev
03:39 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
03:45 cholcombe joined #gluster-dev
04:02 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
04:18 hagarth hchiramm: ping, around?
04:19 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
04:19 ppai joined #gluster-dev
04:26 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
04:29 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
04:41 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
04:41 atinm joined #gluster-dev
04:42 JoeJulian Cheater. That was a naked ping. :P
04:43 hagarth JoeJulian: I manage to find workarounds for most problems ;)
04:44 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
04:44 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
04:55 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
04:56 pranithk left #gluster-dev
04:56 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
04:57 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
04:58 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
04:59 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
05:07 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
05:14 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:15 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
05:25 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
05:26 Apeksha joined #gluster-dev
05:28 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
05:33 Humble joined #gluster-dev
05:35 anekkunt joined #gluster-dev
05:37 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
05:41 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
05:41 rafi joined #gluster-dev
05:41 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
05:41 pppp joined #gluster-dev
05:47 Apeksha_ joined #gluster-dev
05:48 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
05:48 hchiramm_ joined #gluster-dev
05:52 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
06:01 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
06:02 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
06:07 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
06:17 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
06:18 spalai joined #gluster-dev
06:29 ppai pranithk, some info on who else might need compound fops : https://www.gluster.org/community/documentat​ion/index.php/Features/composite-operations
06:29 ppai pranithk, the info there could be really old though
06:30 overclk joined #gluster-dev
06:56 ggarg joined #gluster-dev
07:02 pranithk ppai: thanks :-)
07:06 atalur joined #gluster-dev
07:13 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
07:23 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
08:00 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
08:30 itisravi atinm: Please review/merge http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12843/ and its backport http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12905 when you have a moment
08:31 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
08:39 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
08:40 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
08:41 obnox it really seems close to impossible currently to get patches through gerrit/jenkins verification...
08:42 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
08:45 obnox oh, eb1a6e9f88cfd4c80c6af7260e5e6537cb76b6c0 seems to have broken the build?
08:46 obnox https://build.gluster.org/job/glusterfs-devrpm​s-el7/6031/artifact/RPMS/el7/x86_64/build.log says:
08:46 obnox glusterd-utils.c:630:20: error: 'glusterd_volinfo_t' has no member named 'quota_version'
08:48 obnox interesting, the build failure was actually caught in the gerrit build verification runs:
08:48 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12881/
08:48 obnox https://build.gluster.org/job/glusterfs-rpms/2585/
08:48 obnox but it was still flagged verified
08:55 obnox aha, found the bug
09:01 obnox ==> http://review.gluster.org/12918
09:01 obnox patch to fix the build, up for review
09:01 ppai joined #gluster-dev
09:01 obnox the problem here is really that gerrit does not support patchsets.
09:03 poornimag i guess the cherrypick should have failed as it rebases the patch to latest and runs  the regression again
09:03 obnox no
09:03 obnox cherry-pick was fine
09:03 obnox but the build fails
09:03 obnox interestingly, gerrit caught it, but still marked the review as verified green ... :-o
09:04 obnox so the gluster build system test results from jenkins do not seem to get interpreted. only the regression runs (if they are run)
09:04 obnox (cherry-pick was fine because there was no overlapping context with the preceding patch
09:05 obnox and patch eb1a6e9f88cfd4c80c6af7260e5e6537cb76b6c0 was correct before patch 156022b67f5da2ca27a607ee9e7608fdf5e91a20 which renamed quota_version to quota_xattr_version
09:06 poornimag ahh looks like, yes i meant the merge shud have a failed as result of build fail, but as you said something broken there..
09:06 obnox right
09:06 obnox oh, I see what has happened:
09:06 obnox in stead of clicking rebase which would have cleared the verify+ tags, atin seems to have cherry-picked the patch
09:07 obnox that has left the verify+ of the regression runs
09:07 obnox and only re-triggered the build tests (or some of them)
09:07 obnox they failed, but did not flag anything as failed
09:22 Saravana_ joined #gluster-dev
09:22 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
09:50 poornimag obnox, after discussing here with the team, once the cherry pick is done and merged, the regression is run, but the failure is not update in the verified column(Something to be fixed) and this could happen quite often as the rebase merge could cause some breaks
09:57 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
11:12 badone joined #gluster-dev
11:13 Apeksha joined #gluster-dev
11:16 overclk joined #gluster-dev
11:20 josferna joined #gluster-dev
11:26 atinm obnox, poornimag : 2nd patch should have been a dependent one to avoid it
11:27 atinm obnox, thanks for fixing it
11:32 obnox atinm: has it been pushed to release-3.7 but not to master?
11:34 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
11:35 obnox atinm: forget this. it was a race. ;-) just reached 3.7 first ;-)
11:35 atinm obnox, yup :)
11:35 atinm obnox, i didn't want for regression to pass it the current code is broken
11:36 obnox :-) ok thanks
11:42 kkeithley1 joined #gluster-dev
11:49 ppai joined #gluster-dev
11:49 zhangjn joined #gluster-dev
11:51 atinm REMINDER: Gluster community weekly meeting to start in ~10 minutes
11:51 EinstCrazy joined #gluster-dev
12:08 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
12:19 anekkunt joined #gluster-dev
12:33 Saravana_ joined #gluster-dev
12:43 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
12:49 kkeithley_ atinm++
12:49 glusterbot kkeithley_: atinm's karma is now 45
12:54 ira joined #gluster-dev
12:59 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
13:03 ppai joined #gluster-dev
13:10 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
13:18 spalai left #gluster-dev
13:31 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
13:35 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
13:38 Manikandan josferna++, thanks :-)
13:38 glusterbot Manikandan: josferna's karma is now 1
13:50 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
14:17 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
14:45 lpabon joined #gluster-dev
14:47 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
14:59 shyam joined #gluster-dev
15:07 ggarg joined #gluster-dev
15:08 cholcombe joined #gluster-dev
15:53 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
16:14 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
16:20 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
16:35 overclk joined #gluster-dev
16:37 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
16:47 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
16:58 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
17:00 obnox feels like the arbiter-statfs test fails on netbsd-regression like 9 times out of 10. or 99 times out of 100, not sure ;-)
17:03 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
17:03 obnox rjoseph: ping
17:03 glusterbot obnox: Please don't naked ping. http://blogs.gnome.org/mark​mc/2014/02/20/naked-pings/
17:04 obnox glusterbot: I don't agree. I think naked ping is ok. At least I don't mind receiving one myself.
17:04 obnox glusterbot: and the request is vain. I can do this:
17:04 obnox rjoseph: ping regarding stuff
17:05 obnox glusterbot: that silences you but still carries no extra info ;-)
17:05 rjoseph obnox, :)
17:05 obnox rjoseph: hey, which code path triggers calling the hook scripts?
17:06 rjoseph for samba?
17:06 rjoseph or any gluster related command?
17:10 obnox rjoseph: specifically looking at the samba related ones of course
17:10 kkeithley_ talking to glusterbot is nearly the same as talking to yourself.
17:10 obnox kkeithley_: of course
17:11 obnox kkeithley_: sometimes it just makes you feel better ... ;-)
17:11 obnox kkeithley_: and now that real people are here, I don't need to talk to glusterbot anymore
17:13 rjoseph obnox, basically all hook scripts are run from glusterd_hooks_run_hooks function as part of gluster op commit
17:14 owlbot joined #gluster-dev
17:14 owlbot joined #gluster-dev
17:14 rjoseph obnox, based on the op there are sub-directories and script added in that sub directories are run
17:15 obnox rjoseph: ok
17:15 owlbot` joined #gluster-dev
17:17 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
17:29 ggarg joined #gluster-dev
17:32 obnox rjoseph: thanks.
17:32 obnox rjoseph: does that mean that e.g. in the volume start post operation, all scripts in start/post/ are called?
17:33 obnox rjoseph: and the individual script is just referenced by its existence and nothing in the code?
17:33 rjoseph obnox: yes, each file in that folder is run
17:34 obnox okay
17:41 obnox rjoseph: there is a comment at the top of the S29CTDBsetup.sh script: "RHS-2.0 only"
17:41 obnox rjoseph: but I think it is still used? ...
17:53 obnox the non-portable RHS-2.0 only remarks at the top of the S29CTDB* hook scripts - they are are not precise any more - right?
17:53 obnox like, also used in newer RHS ...
17:58 * obnox afk -- bbl
18:09 pranithk hagarth: there?
18:22 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
18:53 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
19:00 ira obnox: Why do we reference RHS at all, in those scripts... Upstream != Downstream.
19:01 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
19:03 obnox ira: indeed
19:03 obnox next patch upcoming...
19:03 ira obnox: If you didn't I was going to ;)
19:03 ira Already did the grep.
19:04 obnox ira: http://review.gluster.org/12930
19:04 obnox that is the one why I looked at the scripts
19:04 obnox first part of cleanup
19:04 obnox these scripts also could use some config file or so
19:05 obnox bbl (afk for dinner...)
19:18 mmckeen joined #gluster-dev
19:38 rafi joined #gluster-dev
19:47 RedW joined #gluster-dev
20:01 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
20:36 obnox incredible, this review request now has full build/regression verification:
20:36 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12830/
20:36 obnox :-)
20:49 obnox it would be really really neat if someone could waive these patches through to master, so that we have better changes of getting stuff verified:
20:49 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12925
20:49 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12929
20:49 obnox http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12931
20:49 obnox (of course they will conflict upon rebasing once one of them is merged, but that is trivial to resolve)
21:45 obnox not many gluster people around at this time of the day... ;-)
21:46 kkeithley_ no, not usually.
21:46 kkeithley_ where are ira and jose?
21:46 obnox where are vijay, shyam, jeff, ... ;-)
21:47 kkeithley_ touché. probably the same place
21:47 obnox kkeithley_: well, I can always talk to glusterbot ...
21:47 obnox ;-)
21:47 obnox kkeithley_: or you ... ;-)
21:48 kkeithley_ glusterbot might offer more intelligent conversation.
21:48 kkeithley_ But I buy beer
21:49 kkeithley_ for those people who drink beer
21:50 * obnox joins
21:50 obnox ;-)
22:07 obnox I think we will need to push at least patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12929 and http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12931 together (merged), otherwise they will mutually prevent each others's netbsd regression verification...
23:02 obnox alternatively, we can have one single patch that adds all the known spurious tests to the bad list
23:02 obnox here is the next one http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12932/
23:03 obnox so that makes four of them (that I am aware of)
23:35 cristov joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary