Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2016-02-10

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:24 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
00:37 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
01:38 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
01:59 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
02:00 shyam joined #gluster-dev
02:12 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
02:58 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
03:05 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
03:06 shyam joined #gluster-dev
03:41 gem joined #gluster-dev
03:43 atinm joined #gluster-dev
04:01 shyam1 joined #gluster-dev
04:08 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
04:10 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
04:11 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
04:19 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
04:35 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:51 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
04:56 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
04:56 kanagaraj joined #gluster-dev
04:59 rafi joined #gluster-dev
05:11 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
05:14 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
05:19 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:35 Apeksha joined #gluster-dev
05:40 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
05:43 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
05:46 suliba joined #gluster-dev
05:47 pppp joined #gluster-dev
05:48 karthikfff joined #gluster-dev
05:48 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
05:51 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
05:54 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
06:03 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
06:08 kshlm Is the netbsd-regression supposed to pass for release-3.6?
06:08 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
06:08 kshlm I don't remember if it was 3.6 or 3.5 where they were supposed to be skipped as they wouldn't pass.
06:09 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
06:10 vimal joined #gluster-dev
06:11 ppai joined #gluster-dev
06:12 obnox joined #gluster-dev
06:16 skoduri kshlm, https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-net​bsd7-regression-triggered/14139/consoleFull the final result was failure even though all tests passed
06:16 skoduri kshlm, probably because a core was generated..can I get access to any netbsd machine to analyze the core?
06:20 kshlm skoduri, I don't have the access details to netbsd slaves.
06:22 skoduri kshlm, oh okay
06:24 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
06:24 josferna joined #gluster-dev
06:34 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
06:35 rraja joined #gluster-dev
06:35 atalur joined #gluster-dev
06:38 ggarg joined #gluster-dev
06:47 atinm kshlm, we should skip NetBSD vote in 3.6
06:48 kshlm atinm, So I guess I remembered correctly.
06:48 atinm kshlm, so answer is both :)
06:48 kshlm IIRC, manu had a check in the job script.
06:48 kshlm Now I need to find who changed it.
06:49 kshlm rastar, You have any idea about this ^
06:49 kshlm You've been tinkering with the jobs in jenkins.
06:51 rastar kshlm, https://www.mail-archive.com/glust​er-devel@gluster.org/msg07547.html
06:51 rastar my hypothesis: we check for cores only in /core.* in run-tests.sh and no cores are found so run-test.sh passes
06:52 rastar on NetBSD regression.sh has been changed to check for cores in /d/backends too
06:52 rastar it is regression.sh which finds core and returns 1 and fails the test
06:56 rastar I downloaded the core archive and checked for core name, it is glusterfsd
06:56 rastar as it is a brick process it is very well possible that core was in /d/backends
06:56 rastar refer to this explanation by manu https://www.mail-archive.com/glust​er-devel@gluster.org/msg07552.html
06:57 kshlm rastar, I wasn't talkin of cores.
06:58 kshlm I was talking about skipping netbsd regression for 3.6.
06:58 kshlm The job was supposed to automark success for 3.6 IIRC.
06:58 kshlm But now it doesn't.
06:58 rastar kshlm: Oh ok. I know how to make it skip 3.6
06:59 rastar not sure of how to automark success.
06:59 kshlm manu had done it once.
06:59 rastar kshlm: Yes, my changes could have removed that
07:02 rastar kshlm: I have made the change in jenkins
07:02 rastar kshlm: is this the patch? http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13349/
07:02 kshlm To skip test and vote?
07:03 rastar skip test yes
07:03 kshlm That is the change that fails.
07:03 kshlm But I need a +1 NetBSD to merge
07:03 rastar kshlm: vote no, not yet. Checking , will re-trigger the check once
07:06 rastar kshlm: did not work, it does not start the build for 3.6 anymore, hence no vote.
07:19 rastar kshlm: search previous patches
07:19 rastar http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12665/
07:19 rastar i don't think there was a auto vote
07:20 rastar as long as netbsd did not run and centos gave a +1 verified things would work
07:20 rastar we need to think of a solution now...
07:26 anrao joined #gluster-dev
07:35 rastar kshlm: does gerrit allow you to set requirements per branch
07:35 rastar kshlm: it would be cleaner if you could relax requirements for merge on release-3.6 branch to only smoke and centos regression
08:03 josferna joined #gluster-dev
08:04 post-factum am i correct saying that patches mentioned in https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1295107 are the only two memleak-related patches not yet merged?
08:04 glusterbot Bug 1295107: medium, unspecified, ---, skoduri, POST , Fix mem leaks related to gfapi applications
08:04 post-factum 1) http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13125/
08:05 post-factum 2) http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13096/
08:05 skoduri post-factum, I guess so.. pranithk ?
08:05 post-factum skoduri: should i test them?
08:06 skoduri post-factum, yes..it shall be really great if you could test them..I have made some modifications to one of those patches
08:07 post-factum skoduri: and this one: "gfapi: Fix inode nlookup counts" is not relevant anymore?
08:08 post-factum seems like replaced by "gfapi: Use inode_forget in case of handle objects"
08:08 post-factum am i correct?
08:08 skoduri post-factum, correct
08:08 skoduri the latest changes shall address the handle objects related leaks..
08:08 post-factum great, i got that. will test asap
08:09 skoduri post-factum, thanks
08:11 post-factum btw, any rpms yet?
08:16 post-factum found them, nvm
08:17 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
08:19 pranithk skoduri: yes, they are the only ones I skipped. Rest are merged as per my understanding...
08:19 pranithk post-factum: ^^
08:21 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
08:21 post-factum pranithk: thx
08:22 dlambrig_ left #gluster-dev
09:01 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
09:01 Manikandan_ joined #gluster-dev
09:03 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
09:04 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
09:21 atinm joined #gluster-dev
09:23 ppai joined #gluster-dev
09:23 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
09:23 atalur joined #gluster-dev
09:32 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
09:44 hgowtham_ joined #gluster-dev
09:52 fedele joined #gluster-dev
09:52 gem joined #gluster-dev
10:04 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
10:05 hgowtham_ joined #gluster-dev
10:15 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
10:17 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
10:34 ppai joined #gluster-dev
10:34 ppai
10:34 ppai goo.gl/0P9Oma
10:34 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
10:34 ppai rastar, goo.gl/0P9Oma
10:35 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
10:37 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
10:39 fedele left #gluster-dev
10:44 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
10:46 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
10:51 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
10:51 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
10:52 atinm joined #gluster-dev
10:54 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
10:59 ppai joined #gluster-dev
11:07 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
11:14 Bhaskarakiran_ joined #gluster-dev
11:16 Manikandan kshlm, could you merge this patch? http://review.gluster.org/13309
11:16 kshlm Manikandan, what is it about?
11:16 Manikandan kshlm, It is a simple cli change
11:17 kshlm Okay.
11:20 Manikandan kshlm++, thanks for merging it :)
11:20 glusterbot Manikandan: kshlm's karma is now 55
11:30 hgowtham_ joined #gluster-dev
11:30 Manikandan kshlm, the same patch passed in 3.7, can you merge that too? http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13417/
11:30 kshlm Can you check with pranith?
11:31 Manikandan kshlm, sure
11:31 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
11:43 jiffin1 joined #gluster-dev
11:45 ira joined #gluster-dev
11:47 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
11:49 kshlm Weekly community meeting starts in 10 minutes on #gluster-meeting
12:09 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
12:12 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
12:23 pranithk joined #gluster-dev
12:42 josferna joined #gluster-dev
12:59 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
13:18 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
13:20 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
13:24 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
13:35 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
13:47 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
13:50 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
13:55 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
14:12 atalur joined #gluster-dev
14:20 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
14:24 shyam joined #gluster-dev
14:43 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
14:48 post-factum anyone knows, if that is possible to convert 2-replicated volume into 2+arbiter? or is that planned to be implemented?
15:07 shyam joined #gluster-dev
15:10 raghu joined #gluster-dev
15:12 hagarth post-factum: planned to be implemented
15:19 post-factum hagarth: thanks
15:22 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
15:26 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
15:26 kshlm pranithk, I did the release-announcement for 3.7.8
15:37 pranithk kshlm++
15:37 glusterbot pranithk: kshlm's karma is now 56
15:51 luizcpg joined #gluster-dev
16:18 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
16:38 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
16:57 rraja joined #gluster-dev
16:59 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
17:10 atinm joined #gluster-dev
17:12 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
17:48 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
18:17 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
18:25 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
19:29 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
19:52 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
21:39 [1]Ethical2ak joined #gluster-dev
21:42 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
21:42 wushudoin| joined #gluster-dev
22:35 jwang joined #gluster-dev
23:24 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
23:35 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary