Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2016-05-02

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:53 ndevos oh, you guys are asleep already?
01:24 ndevos atalur++ spalai++
01:24 glusterbot ndevos: atalur's karma is now 14
01:24 glusterbot ndevos: spalai's karma is now 4
02:51 josferna joined #gluster-dev
03:10 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
03:13 atalur_ ndevos, I slept at around 5.. Didn't realize when I dozed off. Saw that you merged the patch. Hats off to you for patience and help :) ndevos++
03:13 glusterbot atalur_: ndevos's karma is now 253
03:27 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
03:30 samikshan joined #gluster-dev
03:38 josferna joined #gluster-dev
03:44 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
03:52 rafi joined #gluster-dev
03:52 atinm joined #gluster-dev
04:09 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:09 overclk joined #gluster-dev
04:10 gem joined #gluster-dev
04:11 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:11 josferna joined #gluster-dev
04:15 prasanth joined #gluster-dev
04:16 ppai joined #gluster-dev
04:19 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
04:24 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
04:26 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
04:31 sakshi joined #gluster-dev
04:50 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
04:54 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
05:12 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:14 Debloper joined #gluster-dev
05:17 Apeksha joined #gluster-dev
05:29 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
05:30 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
05:31 sakshi joined #gluster-dev
05:33 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
05:36 karthik___ joined #gluster-dev
05:36 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
05:40 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
05:49 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
05:53 rastar joined #gluster-dev
05:53 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
05:56 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
05:57 asengupt joined #gluster-dev
05:57 vimal joined #gluster-dev
06:07 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
06:09 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
06:13 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
06:15 pur joined #gluster-dev
06:15 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
06:18 atinm joined #gluster-dev
06:22 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
06:24 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
06:29 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
06:29 rastar joined #gluster-dev
06:33 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
06:39 atinm joined #gluster-dev
07:03 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
07:05 atinm joined #gluster-dev
07:15 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
07:35 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
07:44 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
07:59 karthik___ joined #gluster-dev
08:03 atinm joined #gluster-dev
08:04 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
08:06 sakshi joined #gluster-dev
08:18 vmallika joined #gluster-dev
08:35 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
08:35 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
09:17 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
09:25 gem joined #gluster-dev
09:33 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
09:34 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
09:41 post-factum itisravi: on http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14126/
09:41 post-factum itisravi: i see there are issue with removing bricks
09:42 itisravi post-factum: yup..It needs to be reworked.
09:42 post-factum itisravi: probably, you should allow removing only arbiter first, and only then removing the replica
09:42 post-factum itisravi: is that what you said?
09:42 itisravi post-factum: right, that was what I mentioned in the review comments..
09:42 itisravi post-factum: yeah
09:42 post-factum itisravi: aha, now I've got the point. ok, thx
09:43 itisravi post-factum: cool.
09:43 post-factum itisravi: nevertheless, i'd like to have it cherry-picked for 3.7, even unofficially :)
09:43 itisravi post-factum: If you are in charge of your cluster, I guess it should be safe to take it in.
09:44 itisravi I mean no one upgrading just one node to a newer version and so on.
09:44 post-factum itisravi: for sure, i'm the only person who understads how that cluster works. also, i'm in charge of it to have the same version on all nodes
09:44 post-factum itisravi: so, no problems with that
09:44 itisravi awesome.
09:44 post-factum *understands
09:45 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
09:45 post-factum itisravi: just curious, what about arbiter count >1?
09:46 itisravi post-factum: you mean the validation? The add-brick command would fail.
09:46 post-factum itisravi: nope, I mean if it is planned to be supported
09:47 itisravi post-factum: no not really. but curious why would you want it to be more than 1?
09:48 post-factum itisravi: HA with quorum. let's say you have 5 nodes, 3 of those are full replica and 2 arbiters. in this case, i believe 2 of 3 replicas could fail without bringing the cluster down
09:48 atinm joined #gluster-dev
09:49 post-factum OTOH, replica 5, even with 2 arbiters, would be very slow :(
09:51 itisravi post-factum: true but instead of using too many replicas I guess it would be better to invest in having a robust network without much disconnects.
09:51 itisravi yeah it would be slow because all entry fops have to be wound to all 5 bricks.
09:51 itisravi entry + metadata/
09:52 post-factum true
09:52 post-factum ok, thx
09:58 gem joined #gluster-dev
09:58 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
10:17 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
10:37 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
10:37 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
10:37 hagarth1 joined #gluster-dev
10:37 kotreshhr1 joined #gluster-dev
10:38 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
10:38 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
11:15 ndevos Manikandan, vmallika: could the NetBSD issue have started to happen after this change? http://review.gluster.org/14064
11:15 ndevos that was merged like 7 days ago...
11:17 Manikandan ndevos, we observed that happened atleast 4 days ago
11:18 Manikandan ndevos, looking on the patch
11:18 ndevos Manikandan: can you checkout some of the the git commits where the tests failed, and see if that patch is included in the tree?
11:19 ndevos Manikandan: the patch looks solid to me, but maybe threading on netbsd is a little different...
11:19 ndevos misc: you have the POWER :D , but https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1330225 might have broken something :-/
11:19 glusterbot Bug 1330225: unspecified, unspecified, ---, mscherer, ASSIGNED , gluster is not using pthread_equal to compare thread
11:19 Manikandan ndevos, the tests fails inconsistently
11:19 Manikandan ndevos, we will check and update on this
11:19 ndevos Manikandan: sounds like a race condition, and could be related to threading :)
11:19 Manikandan ndevos, most probably
11:24 misc ndevos: mhh, that would be strange
11:24 misc ndevos: but I can take a look after eating
11:24 gem joined #gluster-dev
11:25 kkeithley ndevos++
11:25 glusterbot kkeithley: ndevos's karma is now 254
11:26 ndevos misc: no problem, lets see if Manikandan can confirm it a bit more
11:28 misc now, maybe the patch do stuff "correctly" and thus trigger a problem
11:29 ira_ joined #gluster-dev
11:39 atinm joined #gluster-dev
11:47 overclk joined #gluster-dev
11:48 ppai joined #gluster-dev
11:49 anoopcs ndevos++
11:49 glusterbot anoopcs: ndevos's karma is now 255
11:56 ndevos anoopcs++
11:56 glusterbot ndevos: anoopcs's karma is now 30
11:57 anoopcs rastar++
11:57 glusterbot anoopcs: rastar's karma is now 35
12:08 ndevos hey ppai, do you plan to send backports of https://review.gluster.org/14095 to 3.8 and earlier too?
12:14 ppai ndevos, yes
12:15 ppai ndevos, just noticed that it's merged
12:16 rastar joined #gluster-dev
12:18 ndevos ppai++ great, thanks!
12:18 glusterbot ndevos: ppai's karma is now 11
12:32 kkeithley version 3.9de?  Fedora has seen a GlusterFS 3.9de somewhere?  There's no glusterfs-3.9de.tar.gz on bits.gluster.org, which is the canonical source (for Fedora RPMs)   Was there a glitch? One that was already cleaned up?
12:33 luizcpg joined #gluster-dev
12:36 kkeithley ndevos: ^^^ ?
12:36 ppai joined #gluster-dev
12:37 kkeithley bits.gluster.org is Source: in the Fedora glusterfs.spec, but I see that Fedora is looking at the github repo.
12:37 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
12:40 kkeithley Maybe it's just picking up on the new v3.9dev tag?
12:42 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
12:48 ndevos kkeithley: I guess it picks the v3.9dev tag from github?
12:48 ndevos kkeithley: and, maybe it drops all the 'v' from it
12:51 ndevos kkeithley: via https://admin.fedoraproject.org​/pkgdb/package/rpms/glusterfs/ -> [Anitya] -> https://release-monitoring.org/project/8873
12:51 ndevos kkeithley: I guess you can see if you can 'flag' or 'report' the issue there
12:51 kkeithley yes, that's what I'm looking at.  Or I can edit the config myself.  /me is trying to figure out a good regex.
12:52 ndevos oh, I've not clicked through it more that that
12:52 ndevos *than that
12:57 rraja joined #gluster-dev
13:01 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
13:08 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
13:17 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
13:21 kkeithley uh, shard xlator is in features, not cluster, like afr, dht, ec, and stripe?
13:24 kkeithley maybe it's time to drop the rot-13 encryption xlator?
13:28 ndevos kkeithley: yeah, sharding does not really do clustering things, it sits on top of dht/afr/..
13:31 shyam joined #gluster-dev
13:36 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
13:46 EinstCrazy joined #gluster-dev
13:57 lpabon joined #gluster-dev
13:57 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
14:05 anoopcs ndevos, https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/pull/106
14:06 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
14:08 ndevos anoopcs++ thanks!
14:08 glusterbot ndevos: anoopcs's karma is now 31
14:10 EinstCrazy joined #gluster-dev
14:11 anoopcs ndevos, :-)
14:21 pkalever left #gluster-dev
14:28 hagarth1 kkeithley: I would retain rot-13 in codebase to serve as a reference for somebody who wants to write a new xlator
14:32 EinstCrazy joined #gluster-dev
14:47 jiffin ndevos++ thanks for the help
14:47 glusterbot jiffin: ndevos's karma is now 256
14:51 josferna joined #gluster-dev
15:04 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
15:08 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
15:09 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
15:12 kkeithley hargarth1: don't we have a better example now, e.g. xlators/playground/template ?
15:16 PotatoGim_ joined #gluster-dev
15:16 hagarth1 kkeithley: template is dummy and does nothing.. rot-13 is very easy to follow in terms of code. I have used rot-13 to explain the xlator model and that usually helps in understanding our fops/xlator model very well.
15:20 shyam joined #gluster-dev
15:22 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
15:22 kkeithley can we stop building it at least?
15:23 samikshan joined #gluster-dev
15:31 Chr1st1an joined #gluster-dev
15:41 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
15:42 dlambrig_ left #gluster-dev
15:46 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
15:52 ppai joined #gluster-dev
16:29 overclk joined #gluster-dev
16:47 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
16:48 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
16:48 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
16:52 shyam joined #gluster-dev
16:55 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
17:00 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
17:10 gem joined #gluster-dev
17:12 shyam1 joined #gluster-dev
17:43 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
17:46 dlambrig left #gluster-dev
18:24 luizcpg_ joined #gluster-dev
18:25 gem joined #gluster-dev
18:49 kkeithley why are we doing smoke tests on netbsd6 and not netbsd7?
19:05 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
19:18 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
19:53 post-factum kkeithley: i'd rephrase that: how many netbsd+glusterfs users do you know?
20:11 jefbrown joined #gluster-dev
20:14 misc kkeithley: I guess because manu didn't had time to push for a 7.0 slave
20:24 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
20:28 cogsu joined #gluster-dev
20:28 semiosis_ joined #gluster-dev
20:29 semiosis joined #gluster-dev
22:55 shyam joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary