Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2016-07-27

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:15 penguinRaider joined #gluster-dev
00:38 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
00:46 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
00:49 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
01:38 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
01:57 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
02:05 julim joined #gluster-dev
02:23 ankitraj joined #gluster-dev
02:50 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
03:16 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
03:20 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
03:26 magrawal joined #gluster-dev
03:42 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
03:46 penguinRaider joined #gluster-dev
03:47 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
03:57 atinm joined #gluster-dev
03:59 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:02 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
04:06 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
04:11 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
04:22 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
04:34 rafi joined #gluster-dev
04:34 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
04:42 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
04:45 spalai joined #gluster-dev
05:02 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
05:03 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
05:05 sakshi joined #gluster-dev
05:08 ankitraj joined #gluster-dev
05:09 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
05:13 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:13 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
05:16 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
05:19 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
05:21 shubhendu_ joined #gluster-dev
05:27 Muthu_ joined #gluster-dev
05:29 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
05:31 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
05:31 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
05:32 karthik_ joined #gluster-dev
05:32 spalai left #gluster-dev
05:34 rafi joined #gluster-dev
05:40 Apeksha joined #gluster-dev
05:43 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
05:48 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
05:48 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
05:48 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
05:49 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
05:49 rastar joined #gluster-dev
05:50 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
05:51 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
05:54 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
05:55 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
05:56 ppai joined #gluster-dev
05:59 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
06:02 aspandey_ joined #gluster-dev
06:03 devyani7_ joined #gluster-dev
06:11 asengupt joined #gluster-dev
06:13 ramky joined #gluster-dev
06:14 spalai joined #gluster-dev
06:17 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
06:20 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
06:25 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
06:30 devyani7_ joined #gluster-dev
06:37 spalai joined #gluster-dev
06:57 sakshi joined #gluster-dev
07:20 spalai1 joined #gluster-dev
07:25 aspandey joined #gluster-dev
07:25 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
07:32 itisravi_ joined #gluster-dev
07:34 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
07:40 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
07:40 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
07:41 karthik_ joined #gluster-dev
07:42 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
08:02 ndevos jiffin: I left a comment in http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14701/6 , do you want to make those changes, or shall I do that?
08:09 glustin joined #gluster-dev
08:09 loadtheacc joined #gluster-dev
08:09 kkeithley joined #gluster-dev
08:11 ramky joined #gluster-dev
08:14 shubhendu_ joined #gluster-dev
08:15 pur joined #gluster-dev
08:23 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
08:29 Rick_ joined #gluster-dev
08:32 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
08:32 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
08:49 atinm joined #gluster-dev
08:56 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
08:57 ppai ndevos, Hi. Is it ok to merge trivial fixes (like typos, log entry, warnings..) without a BZ ? Was wondering what the norm is.
08:59 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
09:12 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
09:14 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
09:16 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
09:19 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
09:22 ndevos ppai: some people do that, I do not think we have strict requirements for it - a BZ is better if the change needs some form of tracking
09:23 ndevos ppai: we could always use bug 1193929 for anything else ;-)
09:23 glusterbot Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com:​443/show_bug.cgi?id=1193929 unspecified, unspecified, ---, bugs, NEW , GlusterFS can be improved
09:23 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
09:24 ppai ndevos, 1193929 is cool! Just what I needed.
09:25 ndevos ppai: some components have their own "maintenance" BZs, that causes the people on the BZ to get an email that a new patch arrived
09:26 ndevos ppai: search for "minor improvements" in http://bugs.cloud.gluster.org/
09:26 ppai ndevos, do you know if 1193929 is considered by smoke tests, just in case if it has to be used for backports
09:26 karthik_ joined #gluster-dev
09:27 ndevos ppai: the bug check in the smoke test looks at the branch the patch was sent, and the version of the BUG:
09:27 ppai ndevos, sometimes we find very minor issues having no visible user impact and having to file 3 BZs is a waste of time.
09:28 ndevos ppai: so, for backports you would need a different BZ, and we should not need to backport trivial changes in any case
09:28 ppai ndevos: I see. Thanks
09:29 jiffin ndevos: checking the comment
09:29 ndevos ppai: well, if there is a real bug, we need a BZ for it, and a BZ for backports if that really is needed
09:29 ndevos ppai: we've been working on backport acceptance criteria, see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.f​ile-systems.gluster.maintainers/694 for the general requirements
09:30 ndevos jiffin: call?
09:31 ppai ndevos: ok
09:32 jiffin1 joined #gluster-dev
09:39 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
09:43 rraja joined #gluster-dev
09:50 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
09:51 nigelb ndevos: so, I have an awkward question. I have commit access to gluster because I maintain our gerrit. But do we have a protocol for requesting access?
09:51 nigelb I've been only giving out +1 rather than +2 because I've been unsure.
10:00 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
10:03 shubhendu_ joined #gluster-dev
10:08 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
10:09 jiffin1 joined #gluster-dev
10:09 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
10:12 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
10:19 ndevos nigelb: I think everyone can give +2, but the person merging the change should check/know if a component-maintainer also approved it
10:20 ndevos nigelb: not everyone can submit changes, that really is something that is for the maintainers, but maintainers can merge anything, also changes for other components
10:20 ndevos "can" does not mean they should, or it is smart to do so
10:22 rastar joined #gluster-dev
10:24 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
10:30 nigelb ndevos: I was touching a script in extras/
10:30 nigelb which probably doesn't have an explicit maintainer.
10:31 gem joined #gluster-dev
10:35 ndevos nigelb: indeed, not really, so it falls back to the architects that are listed in the MAINTAINERS file
10:35 ndevos nigelb: and, mostly it helps to add people who modified those files on CC of the change
10:35 ira joined #gluster-dev
10:36 ndevos we should have something like the linux kernel getmaintainer.pl script, I guess
10:37 atinm joined #gluster-dev
10:41 ppai joined #gluster-dev
10:49 shubhendu__ joined #gluster-dev
10:56 asengupt joined #gluster-dev
11:24 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
11:28 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
11:32 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
11:38 pkalever_ joined #gluster-dev
11:38 pkalever left #gluster-dev
11:39 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
11:41 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
11:41 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
11:51 kshlm Weekly community meeting starts in 10 minutes in #gluster-meeting
11:59 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
12:02 pkalever1 joined #gluster-dev
12:02 pkalever1 left #gluster-dev
12:04 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
12:04 jdarcy joined #gluster-dev
12:08 kkeithley ankitraj++
12:08 glusterbot kkeithley: ankitraj's karma is now 1
12:18 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
12:22 pkalever1 joined #gluster-dev
12:24 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
12:25 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
12:39 pkalever1 left #gluster-dev
12:42 pranithk1 ndevos: could you review/merge http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15024
12:42 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
12:50 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
12:51 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
13:01 dlambrig joined #gluster-dev
13:13 kkeithley kshlm++
13:13 glusterbot kkeithley: kshlm's karma is now 96
13:13 ndevos kshlm++
13:13 glusterbot ndevos: kshlm's karma is now 97
13:13 kshlm rjoseph, Are you still around?
13:14 ndevos pranithk1: if you get a review from someone else, you could merge it too...
13:15 rjoseph kshlm: yes
13:15 ndevos nigelb: I was wondering if we should have a project status page like http://status.fedoraproject.org/ - but with jenkins test results, number of bugs reported/updated in the last x days, etc..
13:16 kshlm rjoseph, I checked the situation we discussed.
13:16 ndevos nigelb: really like a project dashboard for developers, if something is red/orange/yellow it needs action
13:16 kshlm If the rpc connectoin fails, the fuse mount also should just hang for ever. Like what you see with gfapi.
13:17 rjoseph kshlm: ok, I tested the code with manually sending CHILD_DOWN event
13:17 rjoseph it seems to be wokring
13:17 rjoseph *working
13:17 kshlm But the mount.glusterfs script does  a check and kills the mount process if the mount is hung.
13:17 kshlm So the mount process doesn't hang forever.
13:17 rjoseph ok
13:18 ppai joined #gluster-dev
13:18 ndevos nigelb: I'll see the developer of that page on Friday, we'll co-work and I can ask him about it
13:18 kshlm rjoseph, That's good! That needs to be added to my patch then right?
13:18 rjoseph I need to see if sending CHILD_DOWN there is the correct approach or not
13:18 rjoseph but it seems to be working
13:19 kshlm Okay. I'll wait for your confirmation then.
13:20 rjoseph kshlm: Sure, let me check this out and I will update
13:23 poornimag joined #gluster-dev
13:24 poornimag nigelb, can you please abort this regression https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-n​etbsd7-regression-triggered/18376/console  its hung
13:24 kaushal_ joined #gluster-dev
13:25 spalai1 left #gluster-dev
13:26 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
13:32 pranithk1 ndevos: yeah, it is late... not a lot of people are around...
13:35 pranithk1 ndevos: anyways, if you don't get time to merge it, I will get it merged tomorrow. I saw some regression failures because of this, so wanted to get this in sooner...
13:35 pranithk1 ndevos: cya dude
13:44 ppai joined #gluster-dev
13:45 jiffin1 joined #gluster-dev
13:47 mchangir dlambrig, are you there?
13:50 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
13:53 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
14:06 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
14:15 ppai joined #gluster-dev
14:15 dlambrig mchangir: ping
14:15 glusterbot dlambrig: Please don't naked ping. http://blogs.gnome.org/mark​mc/2014/02/20/naked-pings/
14:18 mchangir dlambrig, as per Rafi's comments, he wanted my patch to skip file migrations if ever the tier_get_fs_stat() function returns with an error value instead of continuing with the next file and skipping the current file. His rationale was that if statfs() fails then there's a high probability that it'll fail again if attempted in quick succession.
14:22 dlambrig mchangir: right
14:23 kshlm joined #gluster-dev
14:24 kaushal__ joined #gluster-dev
14:26 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
14:44 mchangir nigelb, looks like the CentOS CI farm is hosed
14:50 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
14:50 shubhendu joined #gluster-dev
14:52 nigelb ndevos: yes, possible. I come from this world -> http://treeherder.mozilla.org/
14:52 nigelb mchangir: nothing I can do about it.
14:57 nigelb poornimag: Killed.
14:57 ndevos nigelb: that is overwheming, I would like something simple that I can have as a start-page and others can display on screens in the office :)
14:57 nigelb There's a dependency chain to get there.
14:58 nigelb We need to get our CI system in order to be able to do something like that accurately.
14:58 nigelb But yes, I'd like to do that.
15:00 Bhaskarakiran joined #gluster-dev
15:00 nigelb ndevos: that's how I'd like our tests to be, tbh.
15:01 nigelb Each component can be run on it's own.
15:04 ndevos nigelb: well, the jobs in the centos CI are increasing, and I do not really want to send out reports to mailinglists when something fails, it'll get ignored
15:05 nigelb ndevos: I may bring back some of that to our CI.
15:05 nigelb and move our regression into Centos CI
15:05 ndevos nigelb: start small and add more status' when that is available
15:05 nigelb Or get CentOS CI to report somewhere not a mailing list.
15:05 nigelb It's a problem I want to solve anyway.
15:05 ndevos nigelb: its not only gluster stuff, also for nfs-ganesha
15:05 nigelb Because the regression report going to mailing list is a good recipe to get ignored.
15:06 ndevos yeah, hence the status page suggestion
15:06 nigelb I've been thinking on those lines as well.
15:06 nigelb Just waiting for more space on my plate before I do it :)
15:07 ndevos sure, its good to know that I'm not the only one who would like it :)
15:07 atinm nigelb, http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14973/ - can you revert the verified -1 ?
15:07 atinm nigelb, thanks in advance :)
15:07 nigelb dammit, what's putting a verified -1
15:08 nigelb ah, aborted job.
15:11 nigelb atinm: done.
15:16 rraja joined #gluster-dev
15:42 atinm nigelb++
15:42 glusterbot atinm: nigelb's karma is now 17
16:03 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
16:25 s-kania joined #gluster-dev
16:29 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
16:34 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
16:36 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
16:37 gem joined #gluster-dev
16:56 kkeithley nigelb: er, when did aborted jobs start putting Verified -1? That's annoying
17:16 dlambrig left #gluster-dev
17:17 penguinRaider joined #gluster-dev
17:31 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
17:32 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
17:50 rafi joined #gluster-dev
17:52 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
17:57 penguinRaider joined #gluster-dev
17:59 prasanth joined #gluster-dev
17:59 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
18:19 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
18:57 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
19:11 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
19:21 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
19:30 Manikandan joined #gluster-dev
19:48 rafi joined #gluster-dev
20:05 hagarth joined #gluster-dev
20:21 rafi joined #gluster-dev
20:30 rafi joined #gluster-dev
21:05 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
22:21 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
23:05 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
23:22 hchiramm joined #gluster-dev
23:25 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
23:34 penguinRaider joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary