Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2017-01-27

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:50 lalatend1M joined #gluster-dev
00:51 sac` joined #gluster-dev
02:00 shyam joined #gluster-dev
02:12 shyam left #gluster-dev
02:35 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
03:01 skumar joined #gluster-dev
03:21 sac joined #gluster-dev
03:22 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
03:23 lalatenduM joined #gluster-dev
03:33 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
03:33 magrawal joined #gluster-dev
03:35 shyam joined #gluster-dev
03:47 riyas joined #gluster-dev
03:49 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
03:50 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
03:52 apandey joined #gluster-dev
03:58 atinm joined #gluster-dev
04:02 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
04:14 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
04:17 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
04:20 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
04:21 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
04:24 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
04:25 susant joined #gluster-dev
04:28 poornima_ joined #gluster-dev
04:28 ppai joined #gluster-dev
04:34 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
04:48 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
04:58 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
04:58 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
05:00 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
05:01 ppai joined #gluster-dev
05:03 susant joined #gluster-dev
05:05 ppai joined #gluster-dev
05:08 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
05:11 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
05:19 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
05:27 asengupt joined #gluster-dev
05:35 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
05:37 vimal joined #gluster-dev
05:38 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
05:43 riyas joined #gluster-dev
05:53 apandey joined #gluster-dev
06:21 gem joined #gluster-dev
06:34 rastar joined #gluster-dev
06:35 ankit_ joined #gluster-dev
06:43 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
06:51 Humble joined #gluster-dev
07:12 kkeithley1 joined #gluster-dev
07:15 ankit_ joined #gluster-dev
07:21 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
07:24 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
07:36 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
08:10 atinm sanoj, I'd like to get https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16383/ in 3.10, could you please address Mani's comments?
08:13 asengupt joined #gluster-dev
08:13 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
08:21 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
08:25 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
08:32 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
08:38 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
08:39 sanoj atinm, yes will do
08:45 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
08:49 Humble joined #gluster-dev
08:54 gyadav_ joined #gluster-dev
09:06 kkeithley1 joined #gluster-dev
09:12 kkeithley1 joined #gluster-dev
09:16 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
09:22 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
09:24 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
09:40 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
09:41 pranithk1 xavih: I found a bug in write-behind because of which size computation is going for a toss. I told Raghavendra G about it. He is looking into it.
09:41 pranithk1 xavih: I am disabling md-cache for now so that the test will pass.
09:48 pranithk1 xavih: sorry write-behind
09:48 xavih pranithk1: ok, thanks
09:51 pranithk1 xavih: hey, need one information
09:51 pranithk1 xavih: Are you available this Monday?
09:51 pranithk1 xavih: I mean for review. I am on a deadline to get something in by Tuesday, so wanted to know...
09:52 xavih pranithk1: probably yes, at least for some time
09:52 xavih pranithk1: which review ?
09:52 pranithk1 xavih: Okay. I will get locks patch in by today evening. My managers expect that to be in by Tuesday
09:52 xavih pranithk1: ah, ok
09:52 pranithk1 xavih: so just checking :-). I was supposed to send it on Friday but this lookup patch took more time than expected because of the failures...
09:53 pranithk1 xavih: took me 4 hours to find the write-behind bug
09:58 pranithk1 xavih: I will start working on the locks patch in some 30 minutes... Will ping you once I am done with the change and post it :-)
10:06 xavih pranithk1: it's fine. I'll review it as soon as possible
10:08 skoduri pranithk1, xavih , apandey Does LOOKUP fop fail if any of the EC subvols are down?
10:09 pranithk1 skoduri: no
10:11 skoduri pranithk1, could u please check https://paste.fedoraproject.org/537445/ and see if its expected then?
10:11 ndevos puiterwijk++ thanks for reviewing storhaug!
10:11 glusterbot ndevos: puiterwijk's karma is now 6
10:12 pranithk1 skoduri: We kind of need to know what happened on all the bricks
10:13 puiterwijk ndevos: np
10:13 skoduri pranithk1, as in ? LOOKUP failed on 2 (out of 6) subvolumes ..
10:14 skoduri pranithk1, can that result in failure in top xlators ?
10:18 ndevos nigelb: it seems the smoke test failed due to creation of the tarfile, have you seen that before? https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/32878/console
10:21 nigelb I have, in fact.
10:21 nigelb there's a bug on file for it.
10:21 nigelb Recheck should work. I plan to push a fix for it some time when I've got a free slot
10:21 nigelb (definitely not on a friday evening)
10:22 ndevos nigelb: thanks, just making sure I do not need create a new bug for it :)
10:23 kkeithley1 joined #gluster-dev
10:24 nigelb https://bugzilla.redhat.co​m/show_bug.cgi?id=1405390 if you're curious
10:24 glusterbot Bug 1405390: unspecified, unspecified, ---, nigelb, ASSIGNED , probable 'tar' failure after end of smoke test
10:26 pranithk1 xavih: question...
10:27 pranithk1 xavih: If we add finodelk for lk, lk will be wound only on good bricks...
10:27 pranithk1 skoduri: Not sure about that part. Do you have setup where this happens or complete logs of what happened?
10:28 skoduri yupp..I am CCin you in a bug with all the details logged
10:28 skoduri pranithk1, ^^
10:28 pranithk1 skoduri: perfect
10:29 pranithk1 skoduri: I need to send a patch today. Is it fine if I take a look at it after that?
10:29 xavih pranithk1: yes, as any other fop. Is this a problem ?
10:29 skoduri pranithk1, sure
10:29 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
10:29 pranithk1 xavih: Shouldn't be :-)
10:29 pranithk1 xavih: I didn't realize it when I first told you but just wanted to tell you about it
10:33 xavih pranithk1: there will be a corner case if lk fails on enough bricks to be considered a failure but finodelk succeeded. In this case, when unlocking we can see the same issue that we talked about. But I think this is a really remote case.
10:34 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
10:41 pranithk1 xavih: yes
11:10 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
11:12 ndevos pranithk1, xavih: small refcount API change review? https://review.gluster.org/16471
11:13 ndevos jiffin: is it cold over there?
11:18 xavih ndevos: done :)
11:19 ndevos xavih++ thanks!
11:19 glusterbot ndevos: xavih's karma is now 24
11:19 jiffin1 joined #gluster-dev
11:23 ndevos hmm, segfault, endless loop and added refcounting to some structures now makes an nfs/nlm test work, but getting a lock now takes 1h15m?!
11:23 * ndevos frowns
11:35 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
11:57 ndarshan|lunch joined #gluster-dev
11:58 shyam joined #gluster-dev
12:04 susant left #gluster-dev
12:20 pranithk1 xavih: "Congratulations, you passed the locking tests!"
12:20 pranithk1 xavih: sending the patch :-)
12:22 pranithk1 xavih: I will rework the lookup heal patch a bit later. For bitrot feature to work with EC In lookup missing file needs to be healed. So that needs to be handled...
12:23 rraja joined #gluster-dev
12:24 pranithk1 xavih: Let me know if the changes look good and I will go home and login from home... otherwise will go home after reworking the patch.. :-) It came out to be simpler than the earlier approach :-)
12:25 xavih pranithk|afk: will check...
12:30 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
12:30 kshlm atinm, Are you here?
12:31 xavih pranithk: only one comment...
12:31 pranithk xavih: checking
12:31 xavih pranithk: I think it's not necessary to do that
12:31 atinm kshlm, hey yes
12:31 atinm kshlm, saw your email, thanks!
12:31 atinm kshlm++
12:31 glusterbot atinm: kshlm's karma is now 135
12:32 pranithk xavih: oh yes! you are correct
12:32 pranithk xavih: Let me change this
12:32 pranithk xavih: I will retest and submit it again. 10-15 minutes?
12:32 xavih pranithk: sure. No problem
12:34 pranithk xavih: That dispatch inc code will go as well :-)
12:34 pranithk xavih: oh man, but it won't be backward compatible :-(
12:35 xavih pranithk: true...
12:35 pranithk xavih: We have to unfortunately keep it this way till may be next two releases
12:35 pranithk xavih: Let me update the patch
12:36 pranithk xavih: I updated with comment.
12:37 pranithk xavih: No other comments right?
12:39 xavih pranithk: no, everything seems fine. I've +2 the patch
12:39 pranithk xavih: cool
12:40 pranithk xavih: okay Xavi, I will be leaving for home now. Have a nice weekend! cya
12:46 shyam joined #gluster-dev
12:53 rastar joined #gluster-dev
13:25 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
13:37 rraja joined #gluster-dev
13:41 rastar joined #gluster-dev
13:44 shyam joined #gluster-dev
13:47 susant joined #gluster-dev
13:54 ira joined #gluster-dev
14:18 rraja_ joined #gluster-dev
14:58 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
15:07 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
15:13 raghu joined #gluster-dev
15:32 ankit joined #gluster-dev
16:07 raghu joined #gluster-dev
16:08 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
16:21 raghu joined #gluster-dev
16:28 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
16:33 annettec joined #gluster-dev
16:57 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
16:58 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
17:15 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
17:27 gnulnx left #gluster-dev
17:30 Humble joined #gluster-dev
18:04 susant left #gluster-dev
18:22 ankit joined #gluster-dev
18:32 ankit joined #gluster-dev
20:57 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
21:32 timotheus1 joined #gluster-dev
22:31 raghu joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary