Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2017-02-20

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:24 IRCFrEAK joined #gluster-dev
01:24 IRCFrEAK left #gluster-dev
02:30 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
02:31 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
02:48 ilbot3 joined #gluster-dev
02:48 Topic for #gluster-dev is now Gluster Development Channel - http://gluster.org | For general chat go to #gluster | Patches - http://review.gluster.org/ | Channel Logs - https://botbot.me/freenode/gluster-dev/ & http://irclog.perlgeek.de/gluster-dev/
03:24 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
03:29 ppai joined #gluster-dev
03:38 kdhananjay1 joined #gluster-dev
03:39 vimal joined #gluster-dev
03:40 atinm joined #gluster-dev
03:49 magrawal joined #gluster-dev
03:49 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
03:53 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:02 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
04:12 skumar joined #gluster-dev
04:16 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
04:24 vimal joined #gluster-dev
04:30 madgoat joined #gluster-dev
04:38 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
04:40 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
04:43 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
04:48 rafi joined #gluster-dev
04:49 ppai joined #gluster-dev
04:53 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
04:55 k4n0 joined #gluster-dev
04:55 skumar_ joined #gluster-dev
04:58 skumar joined #gluster-dev
04:59 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
05:03 skumar_ joined #gluster-dev
05:06 nthomas joined #gluster-dev
05:11 apandey joined #gluster-dev
05:13 susant joined #gluster-dev
05:17 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:32 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
05:36 susant joined #gluster-dev
05:38 prasanth joined #gluster-dev
05:38 riyas joined #gluster-dev
05:41 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
05:42 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
05:47 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
05:56 apandey joined #gluster-dev
05:59 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
06:03 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
06:13 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
06:16 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
06:18 Humble joined #gluster-dev
06:21 Humble joined #gluster-dev
06:21 asengupt joined #gluster-dev
06:22 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
06:46 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
06:50 rafi joined #gluster-dev
06:53 rastar joined #gluster-dev
06:56 rafi joined #gluster-dev
07:11 rafi joined #gluster-dev
07:15 rastar joined #gluster-dev
07:15 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
07:21 skumar joined #gluster-dev
07:25 anoopcs nigelb, misc: You can always make use of old BZ 789278 for sending fixes related to Coverity Scan report.
07:31 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
07:41 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
07:46 nigelb anoopcs: Dang, I had no idea.
07:47 rastar joined #gluster-dev
08:02 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
08:18 madgoat left #gluster-dev
08:30 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
08:35 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
08:36 apandey joined #gluster-dev
08:37 k4n0 joined #gluster-dev
08:47 misc neither did I
08:47 misc I was pondering on proposing something, cause 1 new bug report for each is annoying
08:48 anoopcs misc, nigelb: Now you know :-)
08:52 atinm joined #gluster-dev
08:56 misc I wonder if we shouldn't make a page somewhere saying "here is some small fix you can do to start working on gluster"
08:57 susant joined #gluster-dev
08:58 anoopcs misc, We usually triage those with Keyword was 'KeyFix'
08:58 anoopcs s/KeyFix/EasyFix
09:02 misc anoopcs: but that's the bug who is easyfix
09:02 misc do we have a page that list them, or something, and instruction on looking there ?
09:02 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
09:02 misc (cause I didn't search much doc, I knew how to push a patch )
09:04 anoopcs I am not aware of anything other than listing all those EasyFix bugs with a bugzilla query.
09:09 misc and do we use them for new developpers, or do we know if community use them ?
09:10 prasanth joined #gluster-dev
09:12 anoopcs misc, Is this something that you are looking for? --> https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Developer-guide/Easy-Fix-Bugs/
09:13 nbalacha nigelb, misc, we have some info in http://glusterfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Developer-guide/Fixing-issues-reported-by-tools-for-static-code-analysis/
09:14 misc anoopcs: yeah, that's a good start, but I think the discoverability from the website is not easy
09:14 misc anoopcs: and I also wonder about how effective they are into training newcomers :)
09:14 misc nbalacha: thanks
09:15 misc the doc still mention 3.6, shouldn'tit be removed ?
09:15 nbalacha doc definitely needs some updates
09:17 misc also, who are the admin of the coverty scan program ?
09:19 nbalacha probably vbellur
09:19 nbalacha for gluster that is
09:20 misc yeah, I think it woud have been illegal for him to be at RH and creating Coverty as a founder :)
09:21 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
09:22 nbalacha yep
09:22 nbalacha coverity is not our product
09:22 ppai joined #gluster-dev
09:22 nbalacha I think you can log in and set up scans for your project
09:22 nbalacha which I think vbellur has done
09:22 misc yeah, if that's free software
09:23 misc but I would feel better knowing that is not a personal account, or at least, being shared
09:23 nbalacha vbellur is the one to ask
09:23 nbalacha tbh I never thought abt it
09:24 misc that's why people hire profesionnal pessimist like me
09:24 misc (so people can focus on code)
09:31 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
09:38 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
09:52 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
10:04 nigelb misc: I have admin access to coverity.
10:05 nigelb I can give you access.
10:05 misc nigelb: well, so that's documented on who to contact and who have access ?
10:06 misc and the number of people too ?
10:06 * misc would like to have stuff tied to group in github automatically
10:07 ppai joined #gluster-dev
10:07 rastar joined #gluster-dev
10:11 nigelb It's not documented. And it's not tied to Github \o/
10:14 misc also, the email sent by gerrit are quite annoying
10:14 misc all have the same subject, which mean that I get a string of +1 from automated bots saying my patch work
10:17 anoopcs xavih, Did you happen to see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421649#c7?
10:17 glusterbot Bug 1421649: unspecified, unspecified, ---, aspandey, ASSIGNED , When using a fuse mount for client, EC volumes do not mount.
10:17 rjoseph joined #gluster-dev
10:18 xavih anoopcs: nop, it was not there the last time I looked at it...
10:19 xavih anoopcs: I'll answer
10:19 anoopcs xavih, Yeah..Siddharth made that comment as private. I asked him to revert the same. :-)
10:20 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
10:39 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
10:42 h4xr joined #gluster-dev
10:42 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
10:42 k4n0 joined #gluster-dev
10:51 atinm joined #gluster-dev
11:04 rastar joined #gluster-dev
11:12 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
11:33 susant joined #gluster-dev
11:44 ShwethaHP joined #gluster-dev
11:57 nigelb pkalever: I need admin on the repo.
11:57 nigelb Still only have push access
11:58 pkalever nigelb: I have given collaboration rights, is this different ?
11:58 nigelb Yep.
11:59 nigelb pkalever: You gave me "Write" Access under collaboration.
11:59 nigelb I need "Admin" from the same drop down.
12:00 pkalever nigelb: Trying to get it
12:03 pkalever nigelb: should I transfer the ownership to your github username ?
12:04 nigelb Yes, please.
12:04 pkalever nigelb: done thanks
12:05 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
12:08 nigelb Great, I get a server error from github.
12:10 pkalever nigelb: oh! was that while transferring ownership under gluster ?
12:10 nigelb no, to me.
12:10 nigelb Looks like a github bug.
12:11 asengupt joined #gluster-dev
12:11 pkalever nigelb: Okay! at least on my side I can see "This repository is being transferred to @nigelbabu."
12:12 itisravi_ joined #gluster-dev
12:15 nigelb yeah, it's a problem at github.
12:15 nigelb I should have generated a few tracebacks.
12:16 ppai kshlm: can you merged PR #242 ? I'll be sending a new PR soon based on top of that.
12:16 ndevos nigelb: that seems like a great oppertunity to try the GitHub support process ;-)
12:18 shyam joined #gluster-dev
12:18 nigelb I can report that they're very good.
12:18 nigelb They just let me know that they're aware and are fixing.
12:18 nigelb They'll let me know when it's fixed.
12:26 apandey joined #gluster-dev
12:34 ndevos cool, nice!
12:46 k4n0 joined #gluster-dev
13:04 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
13:16 susant left #gluster-dev
13:32 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
13:41 cholcombe joined #gluster-dev
13:41 cholcombe ndevos, thanks for the answer on the mailing list :)
13:45 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
13:48 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
13:51 pkalever left #gluster-dev
14:08 ndevos np, cholcombe!
14:18 ton31337 left #gluster-dev
14:19 h4xr joined #gluster-dev
14:42 ankitr_ joined #gluster-dev
14:43 gem joined #gluster-dev
15:06 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
15:07 ndevos kkeithle: btw, scripts for the CentOS Storage SIG builds are in this PR - https://github.com/gluster/release-tools/pull/10
15:08 ndevos kshlm, nigelb: maybe one of you wants to review ^ a little?
15:19 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
15:21 jiffin kkeithle: ping , HA solution for nfs-ganesha won't work in 3.10 until storhaug is released right?
15:21 kkeithle storhaug is already released
15:21 kkeithle it's even packaged in fedora
15:21 jiffin kkeithle: but there is a lot to do, right?
15:22 jiffin kkeithle: i tried storhaug today. I tried set up, it worked but throws smb related errors while setting up nfs-ganesha
15:23 jiffin kkeithle: plus there is no proper documentation for storhaug
15:23 kkeithle lol
15:24 kkeithle obnox will have jrivera get it all fixed up.
15:24 jiffin kkeithle: for existing gluster nfs-ganesha users in 3.8 , i won't recommend to upgrade to 3.10 with current storhaug
15:24 kkeithle sure, that's reasonable
15:27 jiffin kkeithley: IMO it is better to mention in release note for existing users in nfs-ganesha& gluster to wait until stable storhaug release for 3.10 upgrade
15:27 jiffin possible tentative release date as well
15:28 kkeithley I'm certainly planning on having storhaug in good shape at the same time 3.10 is released.
15:29 jiffin u mean by tomorrow ?
15:29 kkeithley the last email I saw was tagging RC1 tomorrow
15:31 kkeithley well, but now I see that comment that RC1 will become the release. So the reality may be 3.10.1 for storhaug
15:32 obnox kkeithley: i always told you to better keep ganesha-ha until everyhting works smoothly with storhaug...
15:32 obnox why remove it if it can coexist? ;-)
15:33 kkeithley I don't remember you telling me that. Which is besides the point. The old was never going to come out otherwise
15:34 kkeithley We can not take the two changes I have up for review. And put back the bits I already took out.
15:34 kkeithley Fine with me.
15:35 kkeithley Is that what everyone wants?
15:36 kkeithley I don't know how they can coexist. It doesn't seem like we'll ever switch over to storhaug otherwise
15:41 kkeithley and... crickets
15:46 shyam kkeithley: The change looks big, that is my concern at this stage of 3.10 release
15:47 kkeithley I'm not the one that wants this change. (But somehow I get to do all the heavy lifting.)
15:48 shyam 3.10 was to go out on 14th Feb, it was postponed to 21st, now it has a chance to get out by 28th, considering our release schedule I do not want to slip it any more (but you already know that :) ), is there anything we need to add/remove from the release-notes then?
15:48 kkeithley yup
15:49 shyam Does it come off the release notes from the features? Also, do we lose any existing functionality based on what is already committed in the code?
15:49 kkeithley If we're not making the change then I need to restore a a few files in .../extras/ganesha/
15:49 shyam Apologies for too many questions...
15:49 kkeithley that I removed earlier
15:50 kkeithley I'd rather ask the questions now...
15:50 shyam I guess we would have to do that then, unless you feel all this can be done in about 24 hours (sorry Kaleb, I am pulling out my whip! :/)
15:50 kkeithley don't be sorry
15:51 kkeithley Is it decided then?
15:51 kkeithley sounds like it is.
15:52 shyam From what I am hearing here, it looks like this may not make it by tomorrow, also I do see the other bugs being closed out by tomorrow, so...
15:52 kkeithley storhaug comes out of the release notes. I'll submit a patch that restores the files to 3.10.
15:52 obnox kkeithley: what I had been saying (possibly naively) that I think the work on and enablement of storhaug is independent on ganesha-ha (just need to disable it for a storhaug install?...).
15:52 kkeithley We'll proceed on master
15:52 obnox storhaug is an external project
15:53 shyam kkeithley:  Sure, thanks.
15:54 kkeithley yeah, I think that's a teeny bit naive
15:54 obnox And i guess it won't work like 'jose will fix it all' - jose had brought the project to a state when it worked for him, and the ganesha people should have taken it up and tested and improved it, etc.
15:54 obnox from there on it was supposed to be a multi-people project.
15:55 obnox :-)
15:56 kkeithley might be just as well. downstream will stay on ganesha-ha for their next release based on 3.10
15:57 obnox at least i have seen no PR to storhaug from the gluster-integration efforts
15:57 ankitr_ joined #gluster-dev
15:58 obnox which kind of told me it seemed to be working perferctly for your needs :-)
15:59 kkeithley obnox should consider a moonlighting as a stand up comedian
16:00 obnox kkeithley: how so?
16:01 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
16:02 kkeithley just sayin' that you're a funny guy, you could be a stand up comedian in your off hours.
16:02 kkeithley ;-)
16:02 kkeithley just kidding
16:09 obnox sure.
16:09 obnox I seem to be best at it when I actually want to be serious ... ;-)
16:09 kkeithley more to the point. We have lots of stuff in glusterd and the cli that violate layering that need to come out
16:09 kkeithley s/need/needs/
16:10 obnox in all honesty, I of course exaggerated my point a bit ;-)
16:10 obnox sure.
16:10 purpleidea just joining in now, but can confirm, obnox is funny.
16:10 obnox isn't the ganesha-ha triggered by event scripts?
16:10 obnox kkeithley^^
16:11 obnox purpleidea: cheers
16:11 purpleidea obnox: +1
16:11 purpleidea zomg, where's the +/- bot
16:11 obnox purpleidea: you're up at a strange time of the day
16:11 purpleidea tell me about it :P
16:11 obnox :-D
16:11 obnox purpleidea++
16:11 purpleidea someone scheduled a call at 9:30am :P
16:11 glusterbot obnox: purpleidea's karma is now 1
16:11 purpleidea obnox++
16:11 glusterbot purpleidea: obnox's karma is now 9
16:11 purpleidea obnox++
16:11 glusterbot purpleidea: obnox's karma is now 10
16:12 kkeithley in any event, the changes to remove ganesha-ha from glusterd and cli are still up for review for the master branch.
16:13 kkeithley This should be the motivator for fully switching to storhaug for 3.11
16:15 obnox ok. whatever works for you.
16:16 obnox kkeithley: but in all seriousness, I have so far only heard nebulous things why we can't use storhaug in parallel to a (configuratively disabled ganesha-ha) --- this is how jose had been doing his development and testing all the time
16:16 glusterbot obnox: -'s karma is now -7
16:16 obnox lol
16:16 kkeithley I'll still buy you beer the next time I see you
16:17 obnox kkeithley++ thanks :-)
16:17 glusterbot obnox: kkeithley's karma is now 163
16:17 kkeithley Well, I'm sure Jose is careful not to do any of the legacy ganesha-ha commands at the same time.
16:18 obnox certainly not
16:18 obnox (or he had a way to have them call the storhaug commands instead ... only he would be able to detail on that ...;-)
16:19 kkeithley The legacy ganesha-ha commands in gluster/glusterd. There aren't any storhaug commands in gluster/glusterd
16:19 obnox but this is of course a goo point :-)
16:19 obnox kkeithley: he migh have had a patch - or some other trick
16:21 obnox kkeithley: anyways, I am personally fine with moving that out to the next release.
16:21 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
16:22 obnox kkeithley: and also (regarding my initial statement above): i meant to mean s/i always told you to.../i always suggested to .../ -- just realizing that this might have sounded a bit ... rude (not intended)
16:22 obnox 'meant to mean' - my english is not getting better ... i should stop writing here ;-)
16:23 * obnox shuts up
16:27 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
16:43 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
16:53 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
17:21 ankitr_ joined #gluster-dev
17:27 obnox is jeff lurking behind any nick here? :-)
17:28 ankitr_ joined #gluster-dev
17:32 ankitr_ joined #gluster-dev
17:33 ankitr_ joined #gluster-dev
17:42 ankitr_ joined #gluster-dev
18:30 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
18:48 cholcombe joined #gluster-dev
19:13 vbellur obnox: jeff is vacationing this week
19:13 Humble joined #gluster-dev
19:15 misc speaking of that, I am going to be in Boston just before Vault (and after too), in case people want to see me
19:15 misc (or want to avoid me, it work both way)
19:23 vbellur misc: fantastic,  you will run into quite a few of us there!
19:23 shyam misc: Ah-ha!
19:53 kkeithley Are you going to be in Boston only, or will you trek out to the boonies to Westford?
20:26 misc I will be in Boston for the start of the week, then options are open (then back to Cambridge)
20:27 misc problem is I do not have a driving license, so I heard it was difficult in Westford
20:34 rastar joined #gluster-dev
20:42 kkeithley there is a shuttle bus from the T (our Metro). It runs at inconvenient times, and it's not free, or even cheap.
20:46 obnox vbellur: thanks!
20:47 obnox vbellur: can someone tell me how much multiplexing "brick multiplexing" will achieve, or point me to a document ?
21:45 atm joined #gluster-dev
21:46 ndevos vbellur: if you have time, maybe you can check https://review.gluster.org/16688 for me?
21:47 ndevos kkeithley: https://review.gluster.org/16649 is an other fix for python2 rpms, please have a look, I can backport it to 3.10 tomorrow
22:09 vbellur obnox: the goal is to get to about 150-200 volumes in a 3 node cluster
22:11 vbellur ndevos: done
22:54 cholcombe joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary