Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2017-04-13

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:09 dlambrig_ joined #gluster-dev
01:48 ilbot3 joined #gluster-dev
01:48 Topic for #gluster-dev is now Gluster Development Channel - http://gluster.org | For general chat go to #gluster | Patches - http://review.gluster.org/ | Channel Logs - https://botbot.me/freenode/gluster-dev/ & http://irclog.perlgeek.de/gluster-dev/
02:22 susant joined #gluster-dev
03:11 susant left #gluster-dev
03:22 prasanth joined #gluster-dev
03:37 riyas joined #gluster-dev
03:58 atinm joined #gluster-dev
03:59 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
04:02 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
04:30 apandey joined #gluster-dev
04:36 apandey_ joined #gluster-dev
04:36 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
04:40 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:43 apandey joined #gluster-dev
04:50 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:53 ppai joined #gluster-dev
04:58 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
04:59 skumar joined #gluster-dev
05:04 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
05:06 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
05:09 susant joined #gluster-dev
05:13 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
05:15 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
05:16 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
05:16 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
05:17 poornima joined #gluster-dev
05:19 aravindavk joined #gluster-dev
05:20 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
05:32 susant joined #gluster-dev
05:35 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
05:36 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
05:36 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
05:37 amarts joined #gluster-dev
05:37 rafi joined #gluster-dev
05:40 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
05:51 ppai joined #gluster-dev
06:01 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
06:04 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
06:07 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
06:12 amarts joined #gluster-dev
06:15 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
06:21 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
06:23 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
06:47 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
06:53 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
07:05 rafi joined #gluster-dev
07:17 apandey_ joined #gluster-dev
07:30 ppai joined #gluster-dev
07:42 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
07:45 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
07:50 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
08:40 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
09:13 sona joined #gluster-dev
09:14 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
09:15 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
09:16 susant joined #gluster-dev
09:22 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
09:50 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
09:51 hgowtham_ joined #gluster-dev
10:13 ppai joined #gluster-dev
10:50 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
11:13 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
11:22 rraja joined #gluster-dev
11:25 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
11:27 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
11:29 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
11:39 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
12:00 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
12:05 gyadav_ joined #gluster-dev
12:31 kkeithley hmm, isn't `gluster volume set all cluster.enable-shared-storage enable` supposed to also mount that volume at /var/run/gluster/shared_storage/
12:31 kkeithley because glusterfs-3.10.1 on RHEL7 didn't
12:33 ppai joined #gluster-dev
12:36 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
12:43 kkeithley in my testing on a four node, four brick setup
12:45 kkeithley oh, maybe because I don't have the ports open for it in the firewall
12:45 ndevos I would expect it to be mounted, yes
12:49 kkeithley yeah, opening the ports in the firewall was the problem
13:03 shyam joined #gluster-dev
13:32 ira joined #gluster-dev
13:51 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
14:03 shyam joined #gluster-dev
14:05 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
14:06 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
14:13 atinm joined #gluster-dev
14:16 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
14:21 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
14:40 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
14:45 annettec joined #gluster-dev
14:49 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
14:51 susant left #gluster-dev
14:59 gyadav_ joined #gluster-dev
14:59 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
15:03 glusterbot` joined #gluster-dev
15:04 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
15:06 glustin_ joined #gluster-dev
15:06 nigelb joined #gluster-dev
15:09 JoeJulian_ joined #gluster-dev
15:09 esmiurium_ joined #gluster-dev
15:15 riyas joined #gluster-dev
15:19 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
15:20 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
15:32 major joined #gluster-dev
15:33 gyadav_ joined #gluster-dev
15:33 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
15:34 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
16:05 ndevos nigelb, misc: are you planning to have the commits done in gluster-block by a bot account? GitHub shows nigelbabu as committer, which is a little confusing
16:06 ndevos https://github.com/gluster/gluster-block/issues/13#ref-commit-310f791 for reference :)
16:07 nigelb It is a bot account.
16:08 nigelb But that's unfortunate.
16:08 nigelb I don't think I can do anything short-term.
16:08 nigelb Feel free to file a bug. Happy to consider fixing it long-term.
16:08 nigelb I'll need to get it to it around the time we get it ready for Gluster.
16:12 misc you mean nigelb is not a bot ?
16:12 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
16:14 ndevos if its on your radar already, then its all good :)
16:15 susant joined #gluster-dev
16:32 nixpanic_ joined #gluster-dev
16:32 ndevos joined #gluster-dev
16:32 ndevos joined #gluster-dev
16:32 nixpanic_ joined #gluster-dev
16:32 ndevos joined #gluster-dev
16:32 ndevos joined #gluster-dev
16:32 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
16:34 Acinonyx joined #gluster-dev
16:42 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
16:42 gyadav_ joined #gluster-dev
16:47 ndarshan joined #gluster-dev
16:59 susant left #gluster-dev
17:01 kkeithley ugh, I wanted to check my ganesha-ha.sh changes on an actual cluster before I merged them.
17:09 amarts joined #gluster-dev
17:19 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
17:32 Guest70845 joined #gluster-dev
17:43 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
17:45 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
18:03 major soo .. I have an array of structures of function pointers done as a fist pass approach .. but I am really not happy with the end result
18:06 major hmm
18:20 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
18:34 major never mind .. fix it all up
18:34 major am much happier now
18:58 nishanth joined #gluster-dev
21:25 major vbellur, code changes done and tested, Issue #145 updated
21:28 vbellur major: awesome!
21:29 major array of structures to function pointers working .. didn't really reduce the overall code complexity .. but it will make adding new backends less prone to 'hiccups'
21:29 major no one wants to go modify 10 different locations full of if/else checks for different backends :)
21:30 vbellur right :) .. atleast it simplified that part
21:30 major and it looks nice
21:30 major anyway .. gonna finish the zfs backend real fast and see about testing it
21:31 vbellur cool, will notify raghu to take a look RSN
21:38 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
21:38 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
21:38 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
21:42 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
21:45 amarts joined #gluster-dev
21:45 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
22:09 major well .. at least the zfs code compiles .. have to fix up the restore and missed methods .. but .. it looks to be working so far ..
22:10 major and by working I mean .. it compiles ;)
22:24 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
22:35 major go go automated testing
22:55 shyam joined #gluster-dev
23:14 major figures zfs would pose all new stupid problems over the dumb problems btrfs presented
23:14 * major sighs.
23:38 major soo .. it looks like 2 different chunks of code go about creating the same brickinfo->path for snapshots
23:39 major in one case .. the path looks to be created before the snapshot is taken, and then the same path is recreated as part of glusterd_snap_brick_create()
23:40 major more frustration is glusterd_snap_brick_create() "appears" to recreate the path already available in brickinfo->path, and then mount() it .. which as near as I can tell likely should have been done by create()
23:40 major since it already had the brickinfo->path .. and you can't call mount() against a ZFS volume :P
23:41 major making the backend ops handler responsible for mount/unmount of snapshots/clones/missed-snapshots would likely fix it all up .. I am just not certain in which condition brickinfo->path isn't already set ..
23:44 major its also kinda of wonky in that the entire snapshot can succeed .. but some later command might fail that leaves the snapshot in a wonky state

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary