Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2017-05-01

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:45 shyam joined #gluster-dev
01:49 ilbot3 joined #gluster-dev
01:49 Topic for #gluster-dev is now Gluster Development Channel - http://gluster.org | For general chat go to #gluster | Patches - http://review.gluster.org/ | Channel Logs - https://botbot.me/freenode/gluster-dev/ & http://irclog.perlgeek.de/gluster-dev/
02:56 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
03:52 riyas joined #gluster-dev
04:18 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
04:25 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
04:49 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
04:59 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
05:14 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
05:25 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
05:52 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
06:19 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
07:57 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
12:26 rraja joined #gluster-dev
12:33 shyam joined #gluster-dev
12:43 kkeithley ndevos: apropos timerwheel. check out  https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/sxQQh82MMT9ygqBSkkoZS15M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=/
12:43 kkeithley in particular notice the result of __fls() vs __ffs(). (both are from the kernel sources)
13:38 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
13:43 ndevos kkeithley: hmm, you mean bit 64 I guess? 64, 0x0, 0 63 4294967295
13:44 ndevos kkeithley: counting starts at 0, so bit 64 should not exist...
13:44 kkeithley yeah, nm, that test is flawed
13:44 ndevos other than that, I dont see a difference
13:45 ndevos oh, ok
13:58 vbellur1 joined #gluster-dev
13:59 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:01 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:01 shaunm joined #gluster-dev
14:15 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:16 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:16 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:17 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:17 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:23 amye joined #gluster-dev
14:27 ndevos kkeithley: shall I try and fix the .spec.in, or do you want to do that? http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2017-May/002522.html
14:30 kkeithley ndevos: I remembered how I arrived at my current prefered scheme for rc NVRs. We had various alphaX, betaX, rcX, qaX, etc., etc.
14:31 kkeithley and qaX before alpha and beta, so plain old NVRs like 3.5-qa7 does not update to 3.5-alpha1, and so on.
14:31 kkeithley I'll let you fix the .spec.in file.
14:32 ndevos kkeithley: yeah, we should definitely move from "dev" -> "rc" and not to "beta" because it sorts incorrectly
14:33 ndevos I guess 3.11dev is newer than 3.11.0beta1 as well :-/
14:33 ndevos oh, no, its not, so thats fine then :)
14:34 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
14:35 kkeithley ISTR having issues with, e.g., 3.4-beta1 not updating to 3.4.0-1 and stuff like that.
14:36 kkeithley You can just scroll through all the different combinations and permutations there have been in http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/
14:36 kkeithley it's a freakin' mess
14:37 ndevos we just need to have a scheme that works well, maybe v3.x.0dev followed by v3.x.0rcY fits that?
14:40 kkeithley at this point I don't care if we call them 3.11.0yak, 3.11.0rc1, 3.11.0alpha, and 3.11.0qa87, in that order.
14:40 kkeithley Because in fedora they're going to be 3.11.0-0.1yak, 3.11.0-0.2rc1, 3.11.0-0.3alpha, and 3.11.0-0.4qa87
14:42 kkeithley and when it GAs it'll be 3.11.0-1 and will all update/upgrade correctly
14:52 ndevos is there really a need to put the beta/rc in Fedora?
14:53 ndevos also, have you noticed that the glusterfs package is now marked as "critpath"?
14:55 ndevos https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_package - I'm not sure why glusterfs fits in there...
14:57 kkeithley In the past we put rcs in fedora, e.g. when libvirt needed it to make their deadline. In general I haven't been putting alpha/beta/rc/qa/yak releases in fedora
14:57 kkeithley sometimes I put rcs in rawhide
15:04 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
15:09 gem joined #gluster-dev
15:21 shyam joined #gluster-dev
15:26 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
15:32 riyas joined #gluster-dev
15:35 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
15:42 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
15:43 ndevos kkeithley, vbellur: care to review (+merge) the SELinux xlator? https://review.gluster.org/13762
15:43 shyam joined #gluster-dev
16:36 _nixpani1 joined #gluster-dev
16:37 _nixpani1 joined #gluster-dev
16:40 amye_ joined #gluster-dev
18:07 tdasilva joined #gluster-dev
18:22 gem joined #gluster-dev
19:16 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
20:29 shyam joined #gluster-dev
21:19 vbellur joined #gluster-dev
22:15 shaunm joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary