Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster-dev, 2017-08-24

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:58 federicoaguirre joined #gluster-dev
01:31 overclk joined #gluster-dev
01:50 rastar joined #gluster-dev
01:52 ilbot3 joined #gluster-dev
01:52 Topic for #gluster-dev is now Gluster Development Channel - https://www.gluster.org | For general chat go to #gluster | Patches - https://review.gluster.org/ | Channel Logs - https://botbot.me/freenode/gluster-dev/ & http://irclog.perlgeek.de/gluster-dev/
02:03 kdhananjay joined #gluster-dev
02:19 jarrpa joined #gluster-dev
02:25 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
02:26 humblec joined #gluster-dev
02:29 prasanth joined #gluster-dev
02:35 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
02:52 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
03:16 gyadav__ joined #gluster-dev
03:43 ppai joined #gluster-dev
03:49 riyas joined #gluster-dev
03:55 ppai nigelb, Hi. There's a problem with vredara's account (https://review.gluster.org/#/q/owner:vredara) on gerrit. I can't seem to be able to add him as a reviewer.
03:56 ppai nigelb, I can ask him to file a BZ or file one myself
04:04 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
04:04 nigelb ppai: it sounds like he hasn't set an email addres in gerrit?
04:05 nigelb ppai: Ask him to visit https://review.gluster.org/#/settings/ and verify if there's an email?
04:05 nigelb If not fix it up here: https://review.gluster.org/#/settings/contact
04:05 ppai nigelb: May be. I'll ask him. Thanks
04:09 jiffin joined #gluster-dev
04:18 nigelb ppai: Let me know if that doesn't fix it. I'll take a look.
04:19 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
04:24 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
04:24 gyadav_ joined #gluster-dev
04:25 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
04:26 luizcpg joined #gluster-dev
04:28 gyadav__ joined #gluster-dev
04:48 amarts joined #gluster-dev
04:52 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
05:00 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
05:09 skumar joined #gluster-dev
05:16 msvbhat joined #gluster-dev
05:34 hgowtham joined #gluster-dev
05:35 rafi joined #gluster-dev
05:44 gobindadas joined #gluster-dev
05:53 apandey joined #gluster-dev
05:53 ppai karthik_us++
05:53 glusterbot ppai: karthik_us's karma is now 1
05:53 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
06:08 pranithk1 joined #gluster-dev
06:09 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
06:11 sona joined #gluster-dev
06:12 susant joined #gluster-dev
06:19 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
06:20 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
06:25 amarts joined #gluster-dev
06:32 Venkata joined #gluster-dev
06:33 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
06:33 rafi2 joined #gluster-dev
06:35 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
06:37 Saravanakmr joined #gluster-dev
06:44 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
06:44 purpleidea joined #gluster-dev
06:59 Acinonyx joined #gluster-dev
07:20 ppai nigelb: setting up the name on gerrit account did the trick for him. Thanks
07:21 rafi joined #gluster-dev
07:40 kotreshhr joined #gluster-dev
07:50 nigelb ppai: aha
07:52 ashiq joined #gluster-dev
07:59 kotreshhr left #gluster-dev
08:22 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
08:33 itisravi joined #gluster-dev
08:39 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
08:43 karthik_us joined #gluster-dev
08:53 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
09:06 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
09:30 amarts joined #gluster-dev
09:33 ndevos amarts, itisravi: ENOTCONN or ENOSYS for https://review.gluster.org/18103 ?
09:33 * ndevos is tempted to change it to ENOSYS
09:34 itisravi ndevos: ENOTCONN from me
09:34 itisravi ENOSYS is not techically right.
09:34 itisravi the syscall still exists.
09:35 amarts ndevos, lets have it as ENOTCONN for now, once we have the internal error codes, we can deal with the proper errorcode
09:35 itisravi +1
09:38 amarts itisravi, i don't agree with the argument saying syscall exists.. think of it, for everyone above arbiter, that syscall is non-existing
09:38 amarts currently each errno is per layer
09:39 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
09:43 Acinonyx joined #gluster-dev
09:52 ndevos amarts, itisravi: ok, I'll keep it this way then
09:56 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
10:00 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
10:14 rafi joined #gluster-dev
10:21 shyam joined #gluster-dev
10:32 atinmu joined #gluster-dev
10:32 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
10:34 rastar joined #gluster-dev
10:35 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
10:43 amarts joined #gluster-dev
10:49 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
11:11 luizcpg joined #gluster-dev
11:14 psony joined #gluster-dev
11:15 apandey joined #gluster-dev
11:29 sanoj joined #gluster-dev
11:40 jstrunk joined #gluster-dev
11:54 shyam joined #gluster-dev
11:54 sona joined #gluster-dev
12:19 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
12:19 susant joined #gluster-dev
12:21 jiffin1 joined #gluster-dev
12:33 mchangir joined #gluster-dev
12:58 susant joined #gluster-dev
12:59 ankitr joined #gluster-dev
13:00 nbalacha joined #gluster-dev
13:02 susant left #gluster-dev
13:13 rraja joined #gluster-dev
13:16 rafi1 joined #gluster-dev
13:20 shyam joined #gluster-dev
13:20 baojg joined #gluster-dev
13:37 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster-dev
13:40 ndevos note to self: your laptop will run out of power if only one of the two plugs from the charger is connected
13:42 baojg joined #gluster-dev
13:42 riyas joined #gluster-dev
13:44 shyam joined #gluster-dev
13:48 baojg joined #gluster-dev
14:19 baojg joined #gluster-dev
14:26 baojg joined #gluster-dev
14:33 skoduri joined #gluster-dev
15:05 kkeithley shyam: should we not have asked to delete 3.8 as well?
15:07 wushudoin joined #gluster-dev
15:08 susant joined #gluster-dev
15:14 kkeithley shyam++
15:14 glusterbot kkeithley: shyam's karma is now 11
15:14 shyam kkeithley: Ah! yes, shall I file a separate request for that? ndevos thoughts? (context: removing 3.11 and 3.8 from the version field in bugzilla for new bugs)
15:17 kkeithley I'm don't remember the thinking about deleting the versions. We've only barely shipped 3.8.15 and 3.11.3. Wouldn't we allow people to file bugs for a little while before we insist that they try on a non-EOL version?
15:18 kkeithley Or are we just cutting them off — cold turkey?
15:20 prasanth joined #gluster-dev
15:20 kkeithley s/cold turkey/abruptly/
15:21 ndevos shyam: those versions should only be removed when 3.12 is released, right?
15:24 baojg joined #gluster-dev
15:38 shyam ndevos: kkeithley: In a way yes, but any bug will be fixed in 3.10 or 3.12, and we possibly will ask them to test those versions and report the bug there, and 3.12 is a week and a half away
15:39 baojg joined #gluster-dev
15:45 ndevos shyam: if there is something extremely urgent (security bug?) we would do an other 3.11 and 3.8 update
15:45 * ndevos expects the chance of that happening close to zero though
15:46 shyam ndevos: ok we can wait, not a real problem waiting on this.
15:46 ndevos shyam: yeah, lets stick to the release steps, I thought that requesting the version to be disabled/removed was mentioned there
15:47 ndevos oh, no, it is not there, maybe we should add it - https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/GlusterFS-Release-process/
15:47 * ndevos drops off for the day
15:48 shyam There is a ton of stuff that needs to be added there
15:48 shyam Also, cancelled the ticket for 3.11 version closure (just a heads up!)
16:10 susant joined #gluster-dev
16:36 luizcpg joined #gluster-dev
16:41 gyadav joined #gluster-dev
16:54 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
17:26 pkalever joined #gluster-dev
19:33 sac joined #gluster-dev
22:48 amarts joined #gluster-dev

| Channels | #gluster-dev index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary