Camelia, the Perl 6 bug

IRC log for #gluster, 2012-11-17

| Channels | #gluster index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:04 genewitch does a gluster client need to be the exact same minor version as the servers?
00:04 genewitch 3.3.0 and 3.3.1
00:23 chandank left #gluster
00:28 duffrecords ah, I found the old patch I used this summer, and it's been merged.  http://review.gluster.com/#change,3617
00:28 glusterbot Title: Gerrit Code Review (at review.gluster.com)
00:29 genewitch hmm, it's either a weird firewall issue or 3.3.0 can't mount 3.3.1
00:30 duffrecords so in order to use this patch http://review.gluster.org/#change,4201 do I need to apply it to glusterfs-3.3.1.tar.gz or check out the very latest code with git?
00:30 glusterbot Title: Gerrit Code Review (at review.gluster.org)
00:50 quillo joined #gluster
01:06 TSM joined #gluster
01:29 nightwalk joined #gluster
01:44 stopbit joined #gluster
01:49 nightwalk joined #gluster
02:33 bala joined #gluster
02:33 duffrecords left #gluster
03:04 ika2810 joined #gluster
03:27 esm_ joined #gluster
03:30 nightwalk joined #gluster
03:55 quillo joined #gluster
03:57 nightwalk joined #gluster
04:17 quillo joined #gluster
04:46 nightwalk joined #gluster
05:05 JoeJulian duffrecords: it looks like it should apply cleanly to 3.3.
05:09 JoeJulian genewitch: 3.3.1 /should/ be able to mount 3.3.0, but due to an overflow bug in 3.3, I wouldn't be surprised if there were circumstances where it might not work.
05:10 JoeJulian s/in 3.3/in 3.3.0/
05:10 glusterbot What JoeJulian meant to say was: genewitch: 3.3.1 /should/ be able to mount 3.3.0, but due to an overflow bug in 3.3.0, I wouldn't be surprised if there were circumstances where it might not work.
05:28 ika2810 left #gluster
06:05 ika2810 joined #gluster
06:07 nightwalk joined #gluster
06:25 ika2810 joined #gluster
06:42 ika2810 joined #gluster
06:45 ika2810 left #gluster
07:39 pithagorians joined #gluster
08:02 rudimeyer joined #gluster
08:04 lh joined #gluster
08:08 raghu joined #gluster
09:42 inodb joined #gluster
09:50 pithagorians left #gluster
09:50 pithagorians joined #gluster
09:56 badone joined #gluster
10:07 badone joined #gluster
10:13 badone_ joined #gluster
10:16 hurdman joined #gluster
10:59 gbrand_ joined #gluster
11:04 inodb joined #gluster
11:32 nueces joined #gluster
11:38 rudimeyer_ joined #gluster
12:11 nightwalk joined #gluster
12:30 Azrael808 joined #gluster
12:31 mohankumar joined #gluster
12:42 pithagorians joined #gluster
12:51 inodb left #gluster
13:04 pithagorians joined #gluster
13:14 nightwalk joined #gluster
13:24 pithagorians joined #gluster
13:35 pithagorians joined #gluster
13:52 mnaser Is this a mistake in the documentation?  http://www.gluster.org/community/d​ocumentation/index.php/QuickStart --- mentions "gluster volume create gv0 replica 2 <………>" but later it says "You should see an average of about 50 per server using the method we listed here. In a replicated setup (not detailed here), you should see 100"
13:52 glusterbot <http://goo.gl/OEzZn> (at www.gluster.org)
13:52 mnaser isn't replica 2 = replicated?
14:02 pithagorians joined #gluster
14:06 davdunc joined #gluster
14:06 davdunc joined #gluster
14:52 nightwalk joined #gluster
14:59 ika2810 joined #gluster
15:37 robo joined #gluster
15:40 nightwalk joined #gluster
15:42 lh joined #gluster
15:51 sunus joined #gluster
15:57 sunus joined #gluster
16:08 pithagorians joined #gluster
16:17 nightwalk joined #gluster
16:40 elyograg mnaser: I think that sentence should actually say "in a distributed setup (not detailed here)"
16:41 elyograg mnaser: and the numbers are backwards.  You would see fewer on each node in a distributed setup.
16:44 sunus joined #gluster
16:45 elyograg wow, bugzilla is not loading.
16:48 theguidry joined #gluster
16:54 elyograg glusterbot should be informing us pretty soon about the doc bug I just filed.
17:00 dalekurt joined #gluster
17:13 TSM joined #gluster
17:14 sunus joined #gluster
17:21 robo joined #gluster
17:21 glusterbot New news from newglusterbugs: [Bug 877649] Error in Quickstart: per-server file count <http://goo.gl/jkfcZ>
17:35 JoeJulian elyograg: It /is/ a wiki, you know... :)
17:37 elyograg JoeJulian: I actually did not realize that.  I thought it was a generated page from some kind of source file in the version control system.
17:40 JoeJulian Oh! Nope, only that @#%^ pdf is source controlled. Even that should be managed differently. We keep talking about getting it on github, or something like github, but we really want it to be on the gluster.org domain.
18:00 sunus joined #gluster
18:03 JoeJulian elyograg: That's fixed. I have no management ability in bugzilla so could you close your own bug?
18:03 nick5 joined #gluster
18:06 lh joined #gluster
18:36 sunus joined #gluster
19:02 Daxxial_ joined #gluster
19:02 cyberbootje joined #gluster
19:39 nightwalk joined #gluster
20:20 elyograg JoeJulian: which closed reason do I put for this?  Looking at the choices, CURRENTRELEASE or UPSTREAM seem like possible choices, but I am unsure what works best for normal workflow.
20:43 JoeJulian elyograg: I'd do currentrelease.
21:00 atrius joined #gluster
21:04 tryggvil joined #gluster
21:21 atrius joined #gluster
21:34 pithagorians joined #gluster
21:40 glusterbot New news from resolvedglusterbugs: [Bug 877649] Error in Quickstart: per-server file count <http://goo.gl/jkfcZ>
21:55 Daxxial_1 joined #gluster
22:42 nightwalk joined #gluster
23:55 robo joined #gluster

| Channels | #gluster index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary