Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #gluster, 2017-07-24

| Channels | #gluster index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:05 blu_ joined #gluster
00:05 blu__ joined #gluster
00:57 Vaelatern joined #gluster
01:05 atalur joined #gluster
01:11 wushudoin joined #gluster
01:12 nbalacha joined #gluster
01:53 ilbot3 joined #gluster
01:53 Topic for #gluster is now Gluster Community - https://www.gluster.org | Documentation - https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ | Patches - https://review.gluster.org/ | Developers go to #gluster-dev | Channel Logs - https://botbot.me/freenode/gluster/ & http://irclog.perlgeek.de/gluster/
01:55 noobineer joined #gluster
01:59 shdeng joined #gluster
02:07 Vaelatern joined #gluster
02:10 jiffin joined #gluster
02:11 prasanth joined #gluster
02:20 thatguy joined #gluster
02:21 thatguy hi got a question. if I only mount clients on localhost, but use a public network for IPs, do I only need to enable ssl for server communication... will this work?
02:21 thatguy gluster volume set gv0 server.ssl on ?
02:30 thatguy My goal is to not needlessly incur the overhead of encrypted traffic when it doesn't leave localhost (between client and server), but do prevent MITM snooping of unencrypted traffic transmitted between servers for replication.
02:31 thatguy Would I also want to enable management encryption then? So server plus touch the file for management encrypt, but leave out the client. Would that suffice?
03:07 major joined #gluster
03:29 nbalacha joined #gluster
03:45 riyas joined #gluster
04:00 susant joined #gluster
04:07 itisravi joined #gluster
04:13 kramdoss_ joined #gluster
04:18 kdhananjay joined #gluster
04:19 riyas joined #gluster
04:22 armyriad joined #gluster
04:28 Alghost_ joined #gluster
04:32 shdeng joined #gluster
04:35 dominicpg joined #gluster
04:36 atinm joined #gluster
04:50 ppai joined #gluster
04:53 rastar joined #gluster
04:58 poornima joined #gluster
04:59 Shu6h3ndu joined #gluster
04:59 hgowtham joined #gluster
05:01 skumar joined #gluster
05:07 ashiq joined #gluster
05:11 msvbhat joined #gluster
05:14 dominicpg joined #gluster
05:17 jiffin joined #gluster
05:25 aravindavk joined #gluster
05:27 Karan joined #gluster
05:28 buvanesh_kumar joined #gluster
05:32 ndarshan joined #gluster
05:35 dominicpg joined #gluster
05:36 ankitr joined #gluster
05:36 e1z0 left #gluster
05:42 kotreshhr joined #gluster
05:48 apandey joined #gluster
05:49 atinm joined #gluster
05:56 atalur joined #gluster
06:08 sona joined #gluster
06:08 Prasad joined #gluster
06:08 Saravanakmr joined #gluster
06:22 sanoj joined #gluster
06:29 jtux joined #gluster
06:30 hgowtham joined #gluster
06:32 Prasad_ joined #gluster
06:39 skoduri joined #gluster
06:45 jtux joined #gluster
06:54 kramdoss_ joined #gluster
06:57 atinm joined #gluster
06:59 Karan joined #gluster
07:11 Prasad__ joined #gluster
07:27 jkroon joined #gluster
07:36 msvbhat joined #gluster
07:42 ivan_rossi joined #gluster
07:50 rastar joined #gluster
07:51 jkroon joined #gluster
07:58 _KaszpiR_ joined #gluster
08:01 Wizek_ joined #gluster
08:11 _KaszpiR_ joined #gluster
08:25 msvbhat joined #gluster
08:32 awoelfel Hey lads and gents.
08:32 awoelfel I have 6 gluster peers "glusterfs-0[1-6]"
08:32 awoelfel "glusterfs-03" shows "glusterfs-02" as disconnected (using gluster peer status)
08:32 awoelfel but
08:32 awoelfel "glusterfs-02" shows "glusterfs-03" connected as expected (using gluster peer status)
08:32 awoelfel anybody had similar effects?
08:34 Prasad_ joined #gluster
08:42 wobu joined #gluster
08:49 sahina joined #gluster
08:53 atalur joined #gluster
08:53 ashiq joined #gluster
08:56 ahino joined #gluster
09:08 [diablo] joined #gluster
09:14 jkroon joined #gluster
09:15 susant joined #gluster
09:19 Prasad joined #gluster
09:43 MrAbaddon joined #gluster
09:48 ppai joined #gluster
10:20 foster joined #gluster
10:32 hgowtham joined #gluster
10:38 aravindavk joined #gluster
10:57 DV joined #gluster
11:06 baber joined #gluster
11:10 hgowtham_ joined #gluster
11:15 WebertRLZ joined #gluster
11:22 DV joined #gluster
11:22 ankitr joined #gluster
11:49 koolfy is there a way to track the progress of a full heal on a volume?
12:09 msvbhat joined #gluster
12:18 mb_ joined #gluster
12:20 nbalacha joined #gluster
12:24 rwheeler joined #gluster
12:52 sona joined #gluster
13:07 jiffin1 joined #gluster
13:19 susant joined #gluster
13:20 sanoj joined #gluster
13:39 aravindavk joined #gluster
13:40 snehring joined #gluster
13:43 skylar joined #gluster
13:45 atalur joined #gluster
13:47 baber joined #gluster
13:51 plarsen joined #gluster
13:54 jiffin joined #gluster
14:29 nbalacha joined #gluster
14:33 aardbolreiziger joined #gluster
14:33 kotreshhr joined #gluster
14:35 aravindavk joined #gluster
14:38 farhorizon joined #gluster
14:40 aravindavk joined #gluster
14:44 jstrunk joined #gluster
14:46 sportman joined #gluster
14:49 jstrunk joined #gluster
14:55 rastar joined #gluster
14:59 aravindavk joined #gluster
15:03 wushudoin joined #gluster
15:25 aravindavk joined #gluster
15:38 nbalacha joined #gluster
15:59 ankitr joined #gluster
16:07 kotreshhr joined #gluster
16:18 baber joined #gluster
16:22 msvbhat joined #gluster
16:25 skoduri joined #gluster
16:29 JoeJulian thatguy: ,,(mount server)
16:29 glusterbot thatguy: (#1) The server specified is only used to retrieve the client volume definition. Once connected, the client connects to all the servers in the volume. See also @rrdns, or (#2) One caveat is that the clients never learn of any other management peers. If the client cannot communicate with the mount server, that client will not learn of any volume changes.
16:30 JoeJulian So, thatguy, yes. You want encryption when using a volume across a public network (unless you don't care if someone else can read your data and use your volume).
16:31 JoeJulian awoelfel: I have. Restarting glusterd resolved it for me.
16:32 msvbhat joined #gluster
16:32 JoeJulian koolfy: try gluster volume heal $vol statistics
16:32 johnnyNumber5 joined #gluster
16:32 farhorizon joined #gluster
16:34 JoeJulian major: I've been thinking about doing a banana pi per disk and doing something similar.
16:42 farhorizon joined #gluster
16:55 armyriad joined #gluster
17:01 johnnyNumber5 joined #gluster
17:10 baber joined #gluster
17:19 jiffin joined #gluster
17:20 farhorizon joined #gluster
17:39 msvbhat joined #gluster
18:09 javi404 joined #gluster
18:15 farhorizon joined #gluster
18:24 farhorizon joined #gluster
18:40 pdrakeweb joined #gluster
19:07 dylan_ joined #gluster
19:11 johnnyNumber5 joined #gluster
19:32 kotreshhr left #gluster
19:33 rwheeler joined #gluster
19:53 bowhunter joined #gluster
20:01 jkroon_ joined #gluster
20:17 pcdummy joined #gluster
20:34 johnnyNumber5 joined #gluster
21:03 shlant joined #gluster
21:04 shlant does anyone know why my rsync from a gluster volume to another server (non gluster) would suddenly become VERY slow? like rsync from non-gluster to non-gluster is 50MB/s whereas from gluster to non-gluster is >50kb/s
21:04 shlant CPU and memory seem fine on both servers
21:07 shlant I see this in logs: Unable to get transaction opinfo for transaction ID
21:07 shlant just one instance though from today
21:33 Peppard joined #gluster
21:46 _KaszpiR_ joined #gluster
22:12 farhorizon joined #gluster
22:48 thatguy Okay so even though it is configured localhost:gv0 this is only for beginning operation. It will then use all servers (local and remote) for accessing/managing data. End result if encryption is used, it MUST be set for both client and server (also managment because why not?)
22:48 thatguy Got it
23:05 JoeJulian +1
23:27 om2 joined #gluster
23:30 Alghost joined #gluster
23:31 zeio joined #gluster

| Channels | #gluster index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary