| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:37 |
|
|
pjb joined #mojo |
| 00:50 |
|
|
preflex joined #mojo |
| 01:05 |
|
jmmills |
anyone have a recipe for renaming the (perl) namespace a mojo app is in? |
| 01:05 |
|
jmmills |
I built a small app as a PoC for someone but need to change it's name |
| 01:08 |
|
|
yko joined #mojo |
| 02:02 |
|
|
rwstauner joined #mojo |
| 02:11 |
|
|
blabos joined #mojo |
| 02:17 |
|
|
xaka joined #mojo |
| 02:24 |
|
|
echosystm joined #mojo |
| 02:24 |
|
echosystm |
how many (non-trivial) requests would a typical VM be able to sustain using fastcgi? |
| 02:25 |
|
echosystm |
lets take the example of fetching data from a db, encoding the data as json and then returning it |
| 02:26 |
|
echosystm |
i see all these benchmarks, but all theyre doing is showing how many connections can stay open at once |
| 02:31 |
|
|
mattastrophe joined #mojo |
| 02:54 |
|
|
mattastrophe joined #mojo |
| 02:56 |
|
|
mattastrophe joined #mojo |
| 03:00 |
|
|
edenc joined #mojo |
| 03:46 |
|
jmmills |
Anyone know of any code snippets that may hint at how to use to helpers (for templates) from inside javascript |
| 03:46 |
|
jmmills |
i.e. I'm trying to get a url_for to use in a jquery ajax request |
| 04:45 |
|
bzero |
<script>ajax_request('<%== url_for('ajaxroute') %>', 'pupum')</script> |
| 04:45 |
|
bzero |
Like this ^^^? :) |
| 04:58 |
|
|
mattastrophe joined #mojo |
| 05:16 |
|
|
Shaeto joined #mojo |
| 05:19 |
|
Shaeto |
have to redirect user to REST original request path, $self->req->url->path gives me path to controller without /xxx/yyy params. how to get full path ? reconstruct using base path + parameters ? |
| 05:44 |
|
Shaeto |
well, $self->req->url returns necessary path :) thanks |
| 06:13 |
|
|
koban joined #mojo |
| 06:18 |
|
|
edenc joined #mojo |
| 06:18 |
|
|
Firkin joined #mojo |
| 06:29 |
|
|
njlg joined #mojo |
| 06:34 |
|
|
arpadszasz joined #mojo |
| 07:02 |
|
|
random joined #mojo |
| 07:07 |
|
|
judofyr joined #mojo |
| 07:07 |
|
|
AmeliePoulain joined #mojo |
| 07:27 |
|
|
arne joined #mojo |
| 07:40 |
|
|
arpadszasz joined #mojo |
| 07:42 |
|
|
eugen joined #mojo |
| 07:45 |
|
|
Eugene joined #mojo |
| 08:03 |
|
|
cosmincx joined #mojo |
| 08:07 |
|
|
devogon joined #mojo |
| 08:09 |
|
perlrocks |
Twitter: "Test::Mojo – Intro into testing with CSS3 selectors: Testing with Mojo is great fun. The Mojolicious framework p... http://t.co/MmjNNKr" --vorcidel http://twitter.com/vorcidel/st[…]11350239595724800 |
| 08:11 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 08:13 |
|
|
cosmincx joined #mojo |
| 08:13 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 08:22 |
|
judofyr |
sri: would you accept a patch that makes it possible to mark a attributes in Mojo::Base as weak? |
| 08:27 |
|
|
judofyr_ joined #mojo |
| 08:44 |
|
sri |
judofyr: nope |
| 08:45 |
|
sri |
unless of course you find a really sleek solution that just works in all cases and doesn't affect performance |
| 08:46 |
|
sri |
but i doubt that's possible |
| 08:49 |
|
judofyr_ |
sri: I'm seeing cycles like these in TT-renderer plugin: http://pastie.org/2496142 |
| 08:50 |
|
judofyr |
but no matter what I weaken, I can't get them to go away :/ |
| 08:50 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 08:52 |
|
|
Properler joined #mojo |
| 08:52 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 08:52 |
|
sri |
weaken $provider->{renderer} |
| 08:52 |
|
sri |
the ttrenderer code is a mess |
| 08:53 |
|
|
spleenjack joined #mojo |
| 08:53 |
|
judofyr |
yeah, I figured it out now |
| 08:54 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 08:55 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 08:57 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 08:58 |
|
judofyr |
sri: if I'm writing a test for cycles, how can I only run it if Devel::Cycle is available? |
| 08:58 |
|
judofyr |
I tried to wrap it in eval {}, but the "use"-statement still throws an exception |
| 09:10 |
|
judofyr |
sri: I sent a pull request: https://github.com/abh/mojox-renderer-tt/pull/18 |
| 09:13 |
|
|
sromanov joined #mojo |
| 09:14 |
|
sri |
judofyr: you should ask marcus these standard perl questions |
| 09:14 |
|
sri |
https://github.com/kraih/mojo/[…]master/t/pod.t#L6 |
| 09:15 |
|
judofyr |
sri: I know, but he's not here right now |
| 09:16 |
|
sri |
btw. the problem with weaken is making this form work without screwing up performance… package Foo; has 'bar', weaken => 1; … Foo->new(bar => $baz); |
| 09:17 |
|
judofyr |
yeah, I noticed that too. right now you just bless the HASHREF, right? |
| 09:17 |
|
sri |
ye |
| 09:18 |
|
judofyr |
couldn't you just have a list of weakened attributes? weaken($_[0]->{$_}) for @list |
| 09:19 |
|
sri |
sure, but that needs to be profiled seriously |
| 09:19 |
|
judofyr |
sri: would you consider this a better test case? http://d.pr/Jl8o |
| 09:19 |
|
sri |
i'm also rather opposed to using singletons |
| 09:20 |
|
judofyr |
I guess I should really move it into another file |
| 09:20 |
|
judofyr |
but it makes much more sense to check for cycles in the app we're already testing |
| 09:20 |
|
sri |
no, optional stuff always gets its own test file in my code |
| 09:21 |
|
judofyr |
it would lead to duplicate code here though |
| 09:21 |
|
sri |
there are also Test:: modules for cycle detection you could use |
| 09:21 |
|
judofyr |
there is? |
| 09:21 |
|
sri |
many |
| 09:21 |
|
|
eugen joined #mojo |
| 09:21 |
|
sri |
just don't ask me which one is the best ;p |
| 09:21 |
|
judofyr |
so which should I use? |
| 09:21 |
|
judofyr |
haha |
| 09:23 |
|
judofyr |
okay, I'm just going to leave the test case and let the maintainer decide how he wants it |
| 09:23 |
|
judofyr |
seems like there's 10 different way to write it |
| 09:24 |
|
|
bzero left #mojo |
| 09:27 |
|
judofyr |
sri: I opened an issue: https://github.com/kraih/mojo/issues/216 |
| 09:27 |
|
judofyr |
what do you use to profile such things? |
| 09:28 |
|
sri |
NYTProf |
| 09:33 |
|
|
arpadszasz joined #mojo |
| 09:34 |
|
sri |
judofyr: closed the issue with a comment -.- |
| 09:34 |
|
judofyr |
heh, can't stand an open issue? :-) |
| 09:34 |
|
sri |
nope :) |
| 09:35 |
|
sri |
i've tried to use issues as a todo list in the past, but it didn't work so well |
| 09:35 |
|
judofyr |
where's your TODO list now? |
| 09:35 |
|
judofyr |
why not btw? |
| 09:35 |
|
sri |
there is none |
| 09:35 |
|
sri |
don't know why, nobody participated in discussions |
| 09:36 |
|
sri |
maybe it's because we overuse irc a bit |
| 09:41 |
|
sri |
judofyr: btw. first start with "perldoc Benchmark" |
| 09:50 |
|
DaTa |
I \N{HEAVY BLACK HEART} Mojo::DOM https://gist.github.com/1200065 |
| 10:18 |
|
sri |
:D |
| 10:56 |
|
|
spleenjack joined #mojo |
| 11:12 |
|
sri |
http://www.playframework.org/2.0 # oh, i like how they show the differences between major releases |
| 11:16 |
|
sri |
haha, they have a razor like template system now |
| 11:16 |
|
sri |
i somehow was expecting a java framework to pick that up |
| 11:17 |
|
sri |
https://github.com/playframewo[…]n/list.scala.html |
| 11:17 |
|
sri |
good example |
| 11:17 |
|
purl |
rumour has it good example is the OLE shit |
| 11:18 |
|
sri |
no purl, good example is <reply> NO IT ISN'T! |
| 11:18 |
|
purl |
okay, sri. |
| 11:18 |
|
DaTa |
good example |
| 11:18 |
|
purl |
NO IT ISN'T! |
| 11:19 |
|
sri |
no purl, good example is <reply> NO IT IS NOT! |
| 11:19 |
|
purl |
okay, sri. |
| 11:26 |
|
sri |
yko: what do you think about weaken support in Mojo::Base? |
| 11:29 |
|
judofyr |
yko: I've already found two cases in the TT-renderer-plugin where a "has 'foo', weaken => 1" would fix a memory leak |
| 11:29 |
|
sri |
judofyr: that's not correct |
| 11:29 |
|
judofyr |
no? |
| 11:30 |
|
sri |
proper use of weaken() would have fixed it too |
| 11:30 |
|
yko |
i was reading that issue, but did not found what to say more than sri said |
| 11:30 |
|
judofyr |
yes |
| 11:30 |
|
judofyr |
yes, but even my little fix isn't perfect |
| 11:30 |
|
|
Alias joined #mojo |
| 11:30 |
|
judofyr |
weaken => 1 would be more robust |
| 11:31 |
|
yko |
it is possible to implement has(foo => 1, weaken => 1), and I could support that in Mojo::Base::XS, but that will slow down performance |
| 11:31 |
|
judofyr |
e.g. I don't handle resetting of $provider->renderer, which would be rather awkward way to fix now :/ |
| 11:31 |
|
judofyr |
s/way// |
| 11:32 |
|
yko |
and I think that reference count is more author responsibility |
| 11:33 |
|
judofyr |
yko: how would you suggest to handle MyThing->new(app => $app)? |
| 11:34 |
|
judofyr |
as an author, I would have to override ::new |
| 11:35 |
|
judofyr |
which isn't very elegant IMO :/ |
| 11:35 |
|
judofyr |
because then I'll have to call SUPER and whatnot |
| 11:35 |
|
judofyr |
but yeah, it's about trade-offs |
| 11:36 |
|
yko |
you need to weaken references in constructor, but most people - don't |
| 11:36 |
|
sri |
wow, performance cost is *HUGE* |
| 11:36 |
|
yko |
^^^ |
| 11:36 |
|
judofyr |
sri: what's so slow? |
| 11:36 |
|
purl |
it has been said that so slow is the only reason this isn't in widespread use? |
| 11:37 |
|
|
noganex_ joined #mojo |
| 11:37 |
|
yko |
so, i think it's better if 3-4 authors define own constructor that calls SUPER than whole framework will loose it's speed |
| 11:37 |
|
yko |
i't only my opinion, though |
| 11:38 |
|
judofyr |
sri: here's my silly implementation: https://gist.github.com/1200345 |
| 11:38 |
|
judofyr |
(but remember that I don't really know Perl) |
| 11:39 |
|
judofyr |
sri: how do you store the weakened attributes? |
| 11:39 |
|
sri |
yours is even more expensive |
| 11:39 |
|
judofyr |
wait, couldn't we also compile a new ::new? |
| 11:40 |
|
judofyr |
I'm not surprised :) |
| 11:40 |
|
|
shonorio joined #mojo |
| 11:40 |
|
sri |
http://pastie.org/2496705 |
| 11:41 |
|
judofyr |
sri: why do you weaken everything? |
| 11:41 |
|
sri |
goes from 1010101.01/s now to 293255.13/s |
| 11:42 |
|
sri |
i would do it differently for real use |
| 11:42 |
|
sri |
but for my Foo->new benchmark it didn't matter |
| 11:42 |
|
sri |
just wanted to see how much the side effects cost |
| 11:43 |
|
sri |
rigth way would be to check the cache keys |
| 11:44 |
|
sri |
anyway, this benchmark was without any actual attributes |
| 11:44 |
|
judofyr |
sri: a fair comparison would be (1) performance of no weakened attributes (before vs. after) and (2) performance of weaked => 1 vs. manually overriding ::new/accessors |
| 11:45 |
|
sri |
it doesn't really matter, there is no way you could get even remotely close to the current numbers |
| 11:46 |
|
sri |
and no, i don't think compiling a fresh new is an option |
| 11:47 |
|
sri |
no it isn't |
| 11:47 |
|
purl |
oh yes it is! |
| 11:48 |
|
* sri |
kicks purl |
| 11:48 |
|
purl |
NEWSFLASH: LAMER ATTACKS INFOBOT. FILM AT 11 |
| 11:48 |
|
sri |
-.- |
| 11:48 |
|
judofyr |
what matters is: do we slow down the common case (no weakened attributes)? |
| 11:48 |
|
sri |
yes we do as shown above |
| 11:48 |
|
sri |
by 2/3 |
| 11:49 |
|
sri |
btw. compiling a constructor doesn't work because some people use Foo->attr() to make new attributes on the fly |
| 11:50 |
|
yko |
judofyr, why don't you do just as I did via -infect interface |
| 11:50 |
|
stephan48 |
infect? |
| 11:50 |
|
purl |
i heard infect was a Damian Conway module |
| 11:50 |
|
judofyr |
yko: what's that? |
| 11:50 |
|
purl |
somebody said that was what I'm trying to figure out. The session that is listening on the port. |
| 11:50 |
|
yko |
for example use Mojo::Base::XS -infect; bites Mojo and makes whole framework 15-20% faster |
| 11:51 |
|
sri |
monkey patching perl style :) |
| 11:51 |
|
judofyr |
sri: ah, I think I misunderstood the code… that code doesn't even call weaken()? |
| 11:51 |
|
yko |
it's V style! you became faster and harder but well.. you need to hide from lights :) |
| 11:52 |
|
* sri |
hands yko a bottle of true blood |
| 11:53 |
|
* yko |
drinks and burps |
| 11:55 |
|
yko |
most of users don't need weaken feature but they would suffer from it,. Mojolicious uses attributes and constructors very often, speed will decrease |
| 11:55 |
|
sri |
judofyr: http://pastie.org/2496761 # an actual implementation |
| 11:55 |
|
yko |
why don't have subclassed base for those, who need 'weaken' ? |
| 11:56 |
|
judofyr |
yko: what if you need to subclass something *and* add a weakened attribute? |
| 11:57 |
|
sri |
yko: i have to admit the weaken($stream->{ioloop}) calls we have in Mojolicious annoy me a little too |
| 11:57 |
|
yko |
sri: i know :) |
| 11:57 |
|
sri |
then again, maybe there's just a better pattern that wants to be discovered |
| 11:59 |
|
yko |
did you measure the speed if no weakened attributes defined? |
| 11:59 |
|
sri |
that's what i measured |
| 12:00 |
|
sri |
costs 2/3 |
| 12:00 |
|
sri |
no sttributes at all |
| 12:00 |
|
|
arpadszasz joined #mojo |
| 12:00 |
|
sri |
it only gets more costly |
| 12:01 |
|
judofyr |
use Mojo::Base -weaken; use Mojo::Base '-weaken Mojolicious::Controller'; |
| 12:01 |
|
judofyr |
is that a solution? |
| 12:01 |
|
sri |
eww |
| 12:01 |
|
yko |
wait... perl -E 'my %x; print $x{foo} || 1; say exists $x{foo} ? "OK" : "FAIL"' |
| 12:01 |
|
judofyr |
as yko suggested |
| 12:02 |
|
sri |
don't think that's what yko suggested |
| 12:02 |
|
yko |
%{$CACHE->{$class} || {}} -- does not actually create hash element, so you create new anon hashref every time |
| 12:02 |
|
yko |
maybe %{$CACHE->{$class} ||= {}} would help? |
| 12:03 |
|
sri |
yko: i actually let import set a hash every time |
| 12:03 |
|
sri |
so it's a noop |
| 12:04 |
|
judofyr |
sri: why no -weaken btw? |
| 12:04 |
|
sri |
it's ugly |
| 12:04 |
|
sri |
doesn't fit in at all |
| 12:05 |
|
yko |
judofyr, i meant subclassing, not patching Mojolicious kernel |
| 12:05 |
|
judofyr |
yko: ah |
| 12:05 |
|
yko |
also... $CACHE elements better would be array rather than hash |
| 12:05 |
|
sri |
true |
| 12:06 |
|
sri |
oh |
| 12:06 |
|
yko |
um? |
| 12:06 |
|
sri |
now we have jumped to 529100.53/s |
| 12:06 |
|
judofyr |
sri: what's the problem we re-defining ::new again? even if someone calls Foo->attr('foo'), we could re-define it, no? |
| 12:06 |
|
yko |
:D |
| 12:06 |
|
yko |
only 2 times slower? |
| 12:07 |
|
sri |
judofyr: it might be overloaded, and we redefine the overloaded one |
| 12:07 |
|
sri |
yko: half as fast |
| 12:07 |
|
judofyr |
sri: ah, good point |
| 12:08 |
|
yko |
well, if you really want that in core... |
| 12:09 |
|
sri |
i'm not convinced either |
| 12:09 |
|
yko |
one thing I don't like it's you loose control a bit. you should exactly know is setter of this attribute weak or no |
| 12:09 |
|
yko |
and you maybe have to document it for each weak accessor too |
| 12:09 |
|
sri |
weaken is such an ugly mechanic… |
| 12:10 |
|
judofyr |
PERL SUCKS |
| 12:10 |
|
yko |
both variants are bad |
| 12:10 |
|
* sri |
nods |
| 12:10 |
|
yko |
as much as love, House MD approved that |
| 12:11 |
|
judofyr |
just because it's half as fast doesn't mean that it will speed down an actual application though. how much time is actually spent in a constructor? |
| 12:12 |
|
sri |
we use that constructor everywhere |
| 12:12 |
|
yko |
huh. if you implement that i'll have another thing on my todo list -_- |
| 12:12 |
|
yko |
mojolicious actually constructs and destroys tons of objects |
| 12:12 |
|
sri |
even for very tiny objects that get instantiated maybe a thousand times per request |
| 12:13 |
|
sri |
like yko said, his xs implementation makes mojolicious apps 10% faster |
| 12:13 |
|
yko |
sri: about 20% on 'Not found' page. I didn't 'real solid mature benchmarks' for sure, but... |
| 12:13 |
|
sri |
and it will only matter more the higher level we go in the future |
| 12:15 |
|
yko |
exactly. that's why I care about XS - we can shut up any mouthhole who will complain about speed :) |
| 12:15 |
|
sri |
for now the best option i think would be a Mojo::Base fork with weaken support |
| 12:15 |
|
yko |
sri++ |
| 12:15 |
|
sri |
if you care that much about it |
| 12:16 |
|
yko |
few times i was insist on some features in core, but then i realized: wait. it's actually only me who wants such specific thing to be in core |
| 12:17 |
|
yko |
next 3 years maybe there will be 2 or 3 users who use it. so why it should be in core then? |
| 12:18 |
|
sri |
maybe we can also come up with a better idiom |
| 12:18 |
|
yko |
it's cool to have things you want just appear in framework, but if it's needed by minority and affects majority... |
| 12:18 |
|
sri |
an alternative to attributes for stuff that needs to be weakened |
| 12:19 |
|
yko |
sri: since you are interested, I believe it's coming soon :) |
| 12:19 |
|
sri |
don't count on it, i've been trying to solve this problem ever since i rewrote ioloop :/ |
| 12:20 |
|
sri |
did you know that in the beginning Mojo::Base actually had "weaken => 1"? :) |
| 12:21 |
|
yko |
lol. i didn't |
| 12:21 |
|
sri |
and it was just like you said… "wait, there is only one person using this feature…yada yada" |
| 12:23 |
|
sri |
https://github.com/kraih/mojo/[…]Mojo/Base.pm#L203 |
| 12:23 |
|
sri |
there were even a few more flags |
| 12:25 |
|
judofyr |
sri: that doesn't seem to weaken in the constructor |
| 12:25 |
|
sri |
it didn't |
| 12:26 |
|
sri |
i never said it was good ;p |
| 12:26 |
|
judofyr |
:) |
| 12:44 |
|
|
spleenjack joined #mojo |
| 12:58 |
|
|
njlg joined #mojo |
| 13:23 |
|
rhaen |
hello world. |
| 13:23 |
|
purl |
hello world. are you here? |
| 13:24 |
|
|
rwstauner joined #mojo |
| 13:26 |
|
rhaen |
hej rwstauner :) |
| 13:33 |
|
perlrocks |
Twitter: "http://t.co/wMpLbZJ MOJOLICIOUS CARDS PULLED TODAY (1/1's)!!!!!!" --bizbrine http://twitter.com/bizbrine/st[…]11431887318298624 |
| 13:33 |
|
perlrocks |
Twitter: "http://t.co/GWCxeAY MOJOLICIOUS CARDS PULLED TODAY (1/1's)!!!!!!" --bizbrine http://twitter.com/bizbrine/st[…]11431933539524608 |
| 13:33 |
|
perlrocks |
Twitter: "http://t.co/dX4xtEl MOJOLICIOUS CARDS PULLED TODAY (1/1's)!!!!!!" --bizbrine http://twitter.com/bizbrine/st[…]11431992222027777 |
| 13:53 |
|
|
jfuller joined #mojo |
| 13:53 |
|
|
DaniBunny joined #mojo |
| 13:53 |
|
jfuller |
Any tips for converting a catalyst application to mojolicious? |
| 13:53 |
|
DaniBunny |
Holiday in Brazil = Coding @ Home |
| 13:56 |
|
crab |
jfuller: read the guides |
| 13:58 |
|
|
DaniBunny joined #mojo |
| 14:00 |
|
Grauwolf |
yay. akron forked my newsthingy |
| 14:00 |
|
rwstauner |
rhaen: hey |
| 14:01 |
|
stephan48 |
Grauwolf: cool :) |
| 14:01 |
|
stephan48 |
Grauwolf: it works good |
| 14:01 |
|
stephan48 |
althou i jus tested it few mins :) |
| 14:03 |
|
Grauwolf |
stephan48, well, the feed management page can only list feeds and delete them. if you want to add a feed you have to do it manually in the db |
| 14:04 |
|
stephan48 |
yap |
| 14:04 |
|
Grauwolf |
ord edit |
| 14:04 |
|
stephan48 |
already done that |
| 14:04 |
|
Grauwolf |
*or |
| 14:04 |
|
|
Akron joined #mojo |
| 14:04 |
|
Grauwolf |
but the next weekend will come and hopefully i'll be motivated enough |
| 14:04 |
|
|
DaniBunny joined #mojo |
| 14:05 |
|
Akron |
Grauwolf: I like it. Hopefully I will be able to contribute something to it. |
| 14:05 |
|
stephan48 |
:) |
| 14:05 |
|
stephan48 |
maybe some sort of auth? |
| 14:05 |
|
Grauwolf |
Akron, would be awesome |
| 14:06 |
|
Grauwolf |
stephan48, currentlich i'm using it behind an nginx which handles the auth |
| 14:06 |
|
Grauwolf |
but why not :) |
| 14:06 |
|
stephan48 |
k |
| 14:06 |
|
|
spleenjack1 joined #mojo |
| 14:07 |
|
|
Properler|2 joined #mojo |
| 14:32 |
|
|
black joined #mojo |
| 14:36 |
|
|
koban left #mojo |
| 14:37 |
|
|
sugar joined #mojo |
| 14:45 |
|
|
montezuma joined #mojo |
| 14:52 |
|
|
abra joined #mojo |
| 15:11 |
|
|
DaniBunny joined #mojo |
| 15:22 |
|
elb0w |
i love mojo |
| 15:24 |
|
|
eugen joined #mojo |
| 15:36 |
|
|
j-v-e joined #mojo |
| 15:45 |
|
|
xaka joined #mojo |
| 15:49 |
|
marcus |
i love lucy |
| 15:49 |
|
perlrocks |
Twitter: "Trying some small prototyping in Mojolicious. It's really impressive, the best Perl web framework." --JP_Pandey http://twitter.com/JP_Pandey/s[…]11466216538914816 |
| 15:51 |
|
jmmills |
I love mojo |
| 15:51 |
|
jmmills |
... |
| 15:51 |
|
jmmills |
jojo |
| 15:53 |
|
|
njlg joined #mojo |
| 15:54 |
|
marcus |
bestraffe mich! |
| 16:01 |
|
marcus |
fucking google requires a post method to get a token, while facebook uses get \o/ |
| 16:01 |
|
marcus |
hmm the spec says post |
| 16:01 |
|
marcus |
fucking facebook then, I guess |
| 16:02 |
|
elb0w |
google's token bigger? |
| 16:05 |
|
marcus |
I'll show you a bigger token! |
| 16:06 |
|
|
grim_fandango joined #mojo |
| 16:10 |
|
* elb0w |
is sick of aws |
| 16:20 |
|
marcus |
Sehnsucht! |
| 16:29 |
|
Akron |
marcus: Achtung! |
| 16:31 |
|
|
Foxcool joined #mojo |
| 16:42 |
|
|
kaare_ joined #mojo |
| 16:53 |
|
grim_fandango |
Shouldn't app->req->url->base work from within a template? I must be missing something. |
| 16:54 |
|
grim_fandango |
I would appreciate a clue if anyone has one! |
| 16:59 |
|
alnewkirk |
grim_fandango, probably not, probably $self->req->url->base |
| 16:59 |
|
grim_fandango |
Thanks alnewkirk, that works. |
| 16:59 |
|
alnewkirk |
yup :} |
| 17:00 |
|
grim_fandango |
I didn't realize you could do $self from within these templates. |
| 17:00 |
|
perlrocks |
Twitter: "Mojolicious-Plugin 0.4 for OAuth2 MRAMBERG - http://t.co/LyNUlqT" (af) --cpan_new http://twitter.com/cpan_new/st[…]11483981614166018 |
| 17:00 |
|
alnewkirk |
grim_fandango, yup, and the helpers are included also |
| 17:01 |
|
grim_fandango |
Noted! |
| 17:10 |
|
|
arpadszasz joined #mojo |
| 17:18 |
|
|
Eugene joined #mojo |
| 17:38 |
|
rhaen |
booh! |
| 17:42 |
|
* sri |
falls off chair |
| 17:42 |
|
rhaen |
:) |
| 17:43 |
|
rhaen |
what about the proxy thing? Should I include it in Mojolicious::Guides::Cookbook and send you a pull request? |
| 17:54 |
|
sri |
not sure yet how and where it will fit in |
| 17:56 |
|
sri |
it basically needs to replace the mode_perl recipe and move 2 places up or so |
| 17:58 |
|
rhaen |
ok, I'll pull you then |
| 18:01 |
|
sri |
if you already have something send a pull request so i can take a look |
| 18:01 |
|
rhaen |
sure |
| 18:02 |
|
rhaen |
will do, dinner first :) |
| 18:02 |
|
sri |
puny humans |
| 18:05 |
|
rhaen |
life is no ponylicking |
| 18:07 |
|
|
preflex joined #mojo |
| 18:38 |
|
grim_fandango |
Is there a way to get to a stash value from the layout template that has been set via $self->stash(message => "foo") in the controller? |
| 18:39 |
|
grim_fandango |
I've tried setting something in the controller but stash 'message' in the layout template doesn't give me anything. |
| 18:52 |
|
|
Eugene joined #mojo |
| 18:54 |
|
|
Firkin left #mojo |
| 18:59 |
|
|
GitHub33 joined #mojo |
| 18:59 |
|
GitHub33 |
[mojo] kraih pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/i0cang |
| 18:59 |
|
GitHub33 |
[mojo/master] moved mod_perl recipe to the wiki - Sebastian Riedel |
| 18:59 |
|
|
GitHub33 left #mojo |
| 19:00 |
|
sri |
rhaen: actually i'm not sure anymore, maybe mod_proxy shouldn't be in the cookbook |
| 19:01 |
|
sri |
maybe nopaste your config so i can think it over |
| 19:01 |
|
|
lammel2 joined #mojo |
| 19:06 |
|
|
mattastrophe joined #mojo |
| 19:11 |
|
sri |
http://news.netcraft.com/archi[…]erver-survey.html # not unrelated, apache and nginx usage is exploding |
| 19:12 |
|
|
shonorio joined #mojo |
| 19:13 |
|
sri |
rhaen: guess it depends how close the config is to the nginx one |
| 19:14 |
|
sri |
a direct translation could be quite useful |
| 19:15 |
|
bpaluch_ |
if I want to set up a websocket connection, and then come back to it later I should use the connection function to get its id, and then use the same function to return the transaction later right? |
| 19:30 |
|
tempire |
What's the google server? |
| 19:30 |
|
tempire |
app-engine? |
| 19:33 |
|
|
Eugene joined #mojo |
| 19:35 |
|
rhaen |
sri: basic one is https://gist.github.com/1201496 |
| 19:39 |
|
sri |
rhaen: does that set all the special headers the nginx config sets? |
| 19:40 |
|
rhaen |
let me check, I am an apache person. I'll check the nginx config |
| 19:40 |
|
sri |
basically what i'm looking for is a 1:1 translation |
| 19:41 |
|
sri |
oh, what i wanted to ask, does mod_proxy support keep alive to backend servers? |
| 19:43 |
|
rhaen |
sri: sure it does. |
| 19:43 |
|
sri |
neat |
| 19:43 |
|
rhaen |
http://mojo.fcntl.de/welcome - here is a nice error page so you see what apache sets for headers |
| 19:43 |
|
sri |
because nginx doesn't |
| 19:43 |
|
rhaen |
sri: plus you can configure timeouts, balance servers, balance ratios etc.. |
| 19:46 |
|
rhaen |
the apache modules mod_proxy, mod_proxy_balancer are usually sold under its value |
| 19:46 |
|
rhaen |
plus - fun stuff: |
| 19:47 |
|
rhaen |
ProxyPassMatch ^.*\.(gif|png|js|css) ! |
| 19:47 |
|
rhaen |
is a rule to tell apache to serve image stuff and don't pass it through the proxy rules. |
| 19:50 |
|
rhaen |
oh did I mentioned configurable memory caching for proxy elements? |
| 19:50 |
|
rhaen |
*sober* |
| 19:52 |
|
bpaluch_ |
should Mojo::Transaction->connection($connectionID) return a Mojo::Transaction::Websocket object if the original connectionID was a ws? like this http://pastebin.com/X6vAs1H9 |
| 19:53 |
|
rhaen |
sri: oh, you have to enable keepalive, tho. Gist updated. |
| 19:54 |
|
grim_fandango |
Huh, seems to be working now. |
| 19:54 |
|
|
gshank_ joined #mojo |
| 19:56 |
|
|
tabbi joined #mojo |
| 19:56 |
|
|
tabbi left #mojo |
| 20:10 |
|
|
shonorio joined #mojo |
| 20:35 |
|
elb0w |
Whats stopping someone from using this to spy on someone else? http://preyproject.com/ |
| 20:49 |
|
grim_fandango |
I use a motion-activated webcam that looks over my office when I'm away. Works well. |
| 20:49 |
|
grim_fandango |
Never seen prey before. |
| 20:49 |
|
grim_fandango |
Interesting. |
| 21:01 |
|
|
rwstauner joined #mojo |
| 21:14 |
|
|
GitHub32 joined #mojo |
| 21:14 |
|
GitHub32 |
[mojo] kraih pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/kraih/mojo/[…]c456e508714e4de0e |
| 21:14 |
|
GitHub32 |
[mojo/master] improved CSS of all built in templates - Sebastian Riedel |
| 21:14 |
|
|
GitHub32 left #mojo |
| 21:15 |
|
sri |
typography should be a lot better |
| 21:15 |
|
sri |
it's live on http://mojolicio.us now |
| 21:15 |
|
sri |
no more text shadows |
| 21:18 |
|
sri |
bye bye serifs |
| 21:30 |
|
|
GitHub176 joined #mojo |
| 21:30 |
|
GitHub176 |
[mojo] kraih pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/kraih/mojo/[…]6b201a2f9cda7ca86 |
| 21:30 |
|
GitHub176 |
[mojo/master] small css tweak - Sebastian Riedel |
| 21:30 |
|
|
GitHub176 left #mojo |
| 21:31 |
|
perlrocks |
Twitter: "Tweaked the #mojolicious documentation browser a bit, typography should be a lot more pleasant now. http://t.co/iSEHZGI #perl" --kraih http://twitter.com/kraih/statu[…]11552218376835072 |
| 21:51 |
|
sri |
rhaen: what about X-Forwarded-HTTPS? |
| 21:53 |
|
sri |
or any other random X-Forwarded-* headers, are they just passed through? |
| 21:57 |
|
|
arpadszasz joined #mojo |
| 22:26 |
|
|
shonorio joined #mojo |
| 22:36 |
|
sri |
tempire: think i'd like to change the link in the menu to Screencasts |
| 22:38 |
|
|
GitHub166 joined #mojo |
| 22:38 |
|
GitHub166 |
[mojo] kraih pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/kraih/mojo/[…]27fa5bf51561127a3 |
| 22:38 |
|
GitHub166 |
[mojo/master] renamed Mojocasts link to Screencasts - Sebastian Riedel |
| 22:38 |
|
|
GitHub166 left #mojo |
| 22:38 |
|
sri |
it looks better imo |
| 22:45 |
|
tempire |
fine with me |
| 22:46 |
|
tempire |
it does look better |
| 22:46 |
|
tempire |
more obvious |
| 22:46 |
|
purl |
i heard more obvious was that even possible? |
| 22:46 |
|
sri |
\o/ |
| 22:47 |
|
sri |
no purl, more obvious is <reply> is that even possible? |
| 22:47 |
|
purl |
okay, sri. |
| 22:48 |
|
* sri |
wonders if anyone will even notice the new typography |
| 23:12 |
|
|
shonorio joined #mojo |
| 23:14 |
|
|
arne joined #mojo |
| 23:15 |
|
tempire |
I noticed |
| 23:15 |
|
tempire |
in the navigation bar at least |
| 23:16 |
|
tempire |
kind of dark, though |
| 23:17 |
|
tempire |
the black on white text in the rest of the page looks great, though |
| 23:23 |
|
|
GitHub121 joined #mojo |
| 23:23 |
|
GitHub121 |
[mojo] kraih pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/kraih/mojo/[…]330b44785fba707e5 |
| 23:23 |
|
GitHub121 |
[mojo/master] CSS tweaks - Sebastian Riedel |
| 23:23 |
|
|
GitHub121 left #mojo |
| 23:24 |
|
sri |
tempire: better? |
| 23:26 |
|
tempire |
better |
| 23:35 |
|
|
shonorio joined #mojo |
| 23:47 |
|
|
preflex_ joined #mojo |
