Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-08-04

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:24 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:26 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:49 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
01:01 openstackgerrit Tzanetos Balitsaris proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add required_context validator  https://review.openstack.org/111603
01:09 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:16 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
01:45 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
01:53 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
01:55 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:58 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:00 zhiyan boris-42: hi
02:05 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:29 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:31 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:35 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
02:36 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
03:11 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
03:29 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/111530
03:53 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
04:16 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:35 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:54 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
05:09 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
05:23 boris-42 k4n0 ping
05:23 k4n0 boris-42, Hello
05:23 boris-42 k4n0 hi
05:23 boris-42 yingjun ping
05:24 yingjun boris-42 pong
05:24 boris-42 yingjun k4n0  okay 2 news
05:24 boris-42 yingjun k4n0  first of all our chat is logged finally
05:24 yingjun boris-42 good
05:25 k4n0 boris-42, great !
05:25 boris-42 yingjun k4n0  logs can be find now here http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally
05:25 boris-42 yingjun k4n0  second news I would like to restore trello
05:25 boris-42 yingjun k4n0  actually I already started
05:25 k4n0 boris-42, I could see some emails from trello rally board
05:25 boris-42 yingjun k4n0  I made it simpler https://trello.com/b/DoD8aeZy/rally
05:25 lordd joined #openstack-rally
05:26 k4n0 boris-42, looks simpler now
05:26 boris-42 k4n0 could you fill there part of tasks that you are not working on
05:27 k4n0 boris-42, yes, ill do it today
05:27 boris-42 k4n0 cause I know you have many different tasks
05:27 boris-42 k4n0 ok great
05:27 boris-42 yingjun btw thanks for review=)
05:27 k4n0 boris-42, I have been bit busy due to few internal tasks
05:27 boris-42 yingjun going to finish today that patch
05:27 boris-42 k4n0 it happens
05:27 yingjun boris-42, that’s fine
05:27 boris-42 k4n0 I am as well busy, but mostly cause of osprofiler
05:31 boris-42 coolsvap hi there
05:31 boris-42 yingjun btw are you going to work on worker patch?
05:31 boris-42 yingjun seems like it becomes quite critical for us
05:32 boris-42 yingjun and I just rethink one more time arch, and okay let's do it in this way for the begging
05:32 yingjun boris-42, yes
05:32 boris-42 yingjun there will b a loot of work
05:32 boris-42 )
05:32 yingjun boris-42, if no problem for current arch, i’ll start to work on it again
05:33 boris-42 yingjun yep sorry for such lag
05:33 boris-42 yingjun as I said I was really busy with osprofiler stuff
05:35 coolsvap boris-42, hi
05:35 * boris-42 I hope osprofiler will be in in Juno
05:35 boris-42 coolsvap how is your progress?
05:35 boris-42 coolsvap on your tasks?
05:36 coolsvap boris-42, bit slow :( i didnt had a chance to make much progress this weekend
05:36 boris-42 coolsvap heh no worries
05:37 yingjun boris-42, i’ll update this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103377/ today according to your comments, and thanks for your review
05:37 boris-42 yingjun so you can keep context as is
05:37 boris-42 yingjun actually we can ask zhiyan why they remove it in glance?
05:38 yingjun boris-42, ok
05:38 boris-42 zhiyan hi, do you know why context was totally refactored in glance?
05:41 zhiyan boris-42: what do you mean on "refactored"? actually glance use own context implementation instead of oslo one
05:41 boris-42 zhiyan yep, so why?)
05:41 boris-42 zhiyan I saw it was quite recent change
05:42 zhiyan boris-42: i don't know. we i join team, glance already use it. frankly. but iirc, the one in oslo has already been marked DEPRECATED.
05:43 zhiyan s/we/when
05:43 boris-42 zhiyan ah
05:43 boris-42 yingjun ^ maybe it makes sense to do like in glance then?
05:44 zhiyan boris-42: and, btw, because it being deprecated, oslo.db removed the usage of context obj from internal.
05:45 boris-42 zhiyan nope actually that is not the real reason
05:45 boris-42 zhiyan the real reason is dependency hell
05:45 zhiyan boris-42: oh, details?
05:45 boris-42 zhiyan I mean when you are doing libs, you should avoid too much cross dependencies
05:45 zhiyan boris-42: yes, so, imo, we'd better don't use that olso one.
05:45 zhiyan oslo*
05:45 boris-42 zhiyan =)
05:46 boris-42 zhiyan heh btw they are doing great work in oslo
05:46 boris-42 zhiyan creating from code libs
05:46 zhiyan ok, but why DEPRECATED?
05:46 zhiyan i just interested in
05:46 boris-42 zhiyan hm maybe there will be lib?
05:46 zhiyan i don't know
05:46 boris-42 zhiyan today dhellmann is going to be back from vacation
05:46 boris-42 zhiyan so I'll ask him
05:47 zhiyan hum. anyway, currently glance own one is good enough for us
05:47 zhiyan great
05:47 zhiyan let me know if you ok. (just leave one msg to me)
05:48 boris-42 zhiyan yep it seems ok
05:48 zhiyan boris-42: btw, saw your reply in my glanceclient change, will push a ps very soon.
05:49 boris-42 zhiyan ya i think that it's okay to add just --profile stuff without sending notifications
05:49 boris-42 zhiyan probably we can send notifications somewhere else in client?
05:49 boris-42 zhiyan that will be used by internal services
05:49 zhiyan yep
05:50 zhiyan client obj is better place to add more trace-point, in near feature
05:50 zhiyan future*
05:50 zhiyan boris-42: thanks for your input/review :)
05:50 boris-42 zhiyan thanks for helping with this=)
05:50 zhiyan ah, np at all.
05:51 boris-42 zhiyan need to get this in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107161/
05:51 boris-42 zhiyan and we will be able to cut new release
05:51 boris-42 zhiyan with entry point
05:51 zhiyan yes.
05:52 zhiyan btw,https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108314/ is a really worth stuff.
05:52 boris-42 zhiyan yep
05:52 boris-42 zhiyan probably we will have 2 more commands in feature
05:52 boris-42 zhiyan to list all traces
05:52 zhiyan make more sense
05:52 boris-42 zhiyan and to delete
05:53 boris-42 zhiyan delete is not supported operation by ceilometer
05:53 boris-42 zhiyan but I'll ask ceilometer people
05:54 zhiyan boris-42: for "list-all-traces", do you think we can just list 'base_id' ? or..
05:55 boris-42 zhiyan base_id, when it was created & what request was that
05:55 boris-42 zhiyan we can use complex queries to retrieve this info
05:55 zhiyan boris-42: oh, one point probably need you note...in my patch, i used "--profiling" instead of "--profiler" which you mentioned in oslo spec
05:55 zhiyan is it ok/better for you?
05:55 boris-42 zhiyan --profiling
05:55 boris-42 or even better
05:55 boris-42 zhiyan --profile
05:55 boris-42 zhiyan let's keep --profile
05:56 zhiyan ok, you oslo spec proposed that right?
05:56 zhiyan your*
05:57 boris-42 zhiyan I am not sure
05:57 boris-42 zhiyan spec is more about convincing people
05:57 boris-42 zhiyan I will update it at the end when all teams will get familiar
05:57 boris-42 zhiyan and left their comments
05:58 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
05:58 zhiyan ok, checked, spec mentioned "--profiler".
05:58 zhiyan but anyway, i can use "--profile <key>"
05:58 boris-42 zhiyan left just comment in spec
05:58 zhiyan np. let's keep those cents :)
05:58 boris-42 zhiyan I'll update it at the end
05:59 zhiyan sure (and i commented yesterday, my tz)
06:00 boris-42 zhiyan btw could you update main patch?
06:00 boris-42 zhiyan it has -1 cause of leak of documentation
06:00 zhiyan for doc?
06:00 zhiyan sure thing
06:00 zhiyan a easy one
06:00 zhiyan :)
06:01 boris-42 zhiyan yep but it is blocking stuff
06:01 boris-42 =)
06:01 zhiyan heh
06:01 boris-42 zhiyan I am going to work on cinder patches
06:01 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:06 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
06:28 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
06:38 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
06:45 penguinRaider__ joined #openstack-rally
06:51 coolsvap boris-42, all have a look at https://www.openstack.org/vote-paris/Presentation/lightweight-openstack-benchmarking-service-with-rally-and-docker
06:56 boris-42 coolsvap I vote already
06:56 boris-42 coolsvap saw it in red hat blog
06:56 boris-42 coolsvap btw
06:57 boris-42 coolsvap in rally we have user stories section
06:57 boris-42 coolsvap https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/doc/user_stories
06:57 boris-42 coolsvap you can make contribution there
06:58 coolsvap boris-42, yup
07:03 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
07:20 boris-42 coolsvap so are you going to push on this week
07:20 boris-42 coolsvap refactoring of validation stuff?
07:21 coolsvap boris-42, yes I will do
07:21 coolsvap in couple of days
07:21 boris-42 coolsvap ok great
07:46 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
07:47 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add running environment for rally worker  https://review.openstack.org/103377
07:50 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
07:54 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
08:05 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
08:59 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
09:01 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
09:19 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
09:25 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
09:26 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Amended sphinx documents  https://review.openstack.org/110738
10:29 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
10:48 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
10:49 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add "rally info" command  https://review.openstack.org/102853
10:51 tzabal joined #openstack-rally
10:51 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting scenarios for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/111463
10:52 boris-42 ^ 1000 commit!!
11:02 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Whole scenario time measurement  https://review.openstack.org/105318
11:04 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/111530
11:14 lordd joined #openstack-rally
11:49 rook joined #openstack-rally
11:58 lordd joined #openstack-rally
12:15 openstackgerrit Timur Nurlygayanov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add NeutronNetwork context  https://review.openstack.org/96300
12:20 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
12:48 lordd joined #openstack-rally
13:04 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/111530
13:08 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:09 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
13:28 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add "rally info" command  https://review.openstack.org/102853
13:30 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add "rally info" command  https://review.openstack.org/102853
13:31 penguinRaider__ joined #openstack-rally
14:02 sahil__ joined #openstack-rally
14:22 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add "rally info" command  https://review.openstack.org/102853
14:23 boris-42 sahil__ hi
14:41 openstackgerrit Tzanetos Balitsaris proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add required_contexts validator  https://review.openstack.org/111603
14:49 sahil__ boris-42 hi
14:49 sahil__ boris-42 Sorry was away
14:49 sahil__ boris-42 Need to ask 1 thing from the community -- regarding cleanup of the test cases
14:50 sahil__ boris-42 Specifically targetting neutron API's
14:51 sahil__ Create_and_list_networks -- Need to know after executing the scenario with concurrency n------how the cleanup is invoked and does it cleanup all the networks created by the scenario
14:52 temujin joined #openstack-rally
15:07 KimJ joined #openstack-rally
15:08 temujin joined #openstack-rally
15:23 boris-42 sahil__ sorry for long reply
15:24 boris-42 sahil__ lemme point you to the code
15:24 boris-42 sahil__ so this code
15:24 boris-42 sahil__ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/context/cleanup/cleanup.py#L57
15:24 boris-42 sahil__ will be executed after benchmark
15:45 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
15:49 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
15:57 lordd joined #openstack-rally
16:02 openstackgerrit_ joined #openstack-rally
16:06 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
16:26 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
16:35 rmk I'm noticing tests which timeout don't get reported as failures.
16:36 rmk As in, if there's one interation of a test and it times out, it doesn't show up on the console report at all.
16:48 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
17:20 ningy joined #openstack-rally
17:21 ningy hi boris-42
17:21 boris-42 ningy hi there
17:21 boris-42 rmk holly crap
17:21 ningy I just checked out rally last Friday. and couple rally command failed
17:21 ningy like rally deployment check
17:21 boris-42 ningy oh
17:22 ningy not sure if u have any clue?
17:22 boris-42 ningy could you present to me deployment config
17:22 boris-42 ningy and output of rally -vd deployment check
17:22 ningy 1 min
17:23 boris-42 ningy and use paste.opnestack.org
17:23 boris-42 paste.openstack.org **
17:24 boris-42 rmk so and you use continuous runner?
17:24 ningy (rally)cetest@cer305n0019:~/ningy$ rally deployment list
17:24 ningy sorry. cp paste seems not working for me
17:25 ningy 2014-08-04 17:23:45.836 25280 DEBUG rally.cmd.cliutils [-] INFO logs from urllib3 and requests module are hide. run /opt/rally/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rally/cmd/cliutils.py:128
17:25 ningy can I just email you?
17:27 boris-42 ningy it's better to use paste.openstack.org
17:27 boris-42 ningy or something other similar
17:27 boris-42 ningy gist.github.com
17:27 boris-42 ningy so everybody will be able to see
17:27 ningy k
17:28 ningy pasted
17:28 ningy 90036
17:29 boris-42 ningy next time send pls full link
17:29 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
17:30 boris-42 http://paste.openstack.org/show/90036/
17:30 ningy k
17:31 boris-42 ningy hm what version of keystone you are using
17:31 ningy 0.10
17:31 boris-42 ningy heh should work =(
17:31 ningy 0.10.1
17:32 boris-42 ningy could you run
17:32 boris-42 ningy rally show images?
17:32 boris-42 ningy or rally show flavors
17:32 ningy that one works
17:32 ningy rally show network does not work as well
17:33 boris-42 ningy heh
17:33 boris-42 ningy could you put some paste for that as well
17:33 ningy k
17:33 ningy rally show flavors works as well
17:33 boris-42 ningy this is in gate
17:33 boris-42 ningy http://logs.openstack.org/53/102853/8/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/8970ba8/console.html
17:33 boris-42 ningy on every patch we are install openstack with devstack
17:34 boris-42 ningy and then running rally deployment check
17:34 boris-42 so seems like some interesting bug=)
17:34 ningy I'm not running devstack
17:34 ningy but should be working
17:34 boris-42 ningy I know but it should be indented
17:34 boris-42 ningy I am just saying that on every patch we are testing this funciton
17:35 boris-42 ningy so we will need to find the real reason
17:35 boris-42 ...
17:35 ningy k
17:35 boris-42 why it's is failing in your case
17:35 ningy don't know. first time see it fails. it worked fine with older version
17:35 boris-42 ningy hm
17:35 boris-42 ningy maybe that is the reason
17:35 boris-42 ningy so you have already installed rally
17:36 boris-42 ningy and then just tried to update?
17:36 ningy I actually did reinstall
17:37 boris-42 ningy ya that make sense
17:37 boris-42 ningy cause on every installation we have new vm
17:37 boris-42 ningy could you file a bug?
17:37 ningy k
17:37 boris-42 https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally
17:38 boris-42 like reinstalling is failing
17:39 ningy https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1352477
17:42 boris-42 ningy okay let's try to make some trick
17:42 boris-42 ningy maybe it will help
17:43 boris-42 ningy could you remove rally from site packages
17:43 ningy let me try
17:43 boris-42 ningy and remove inside rally directory build and egg directories
17:44 boris-42 ningy and then run sudo python setup.py install
17:49 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:51 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
17:57 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
18:06 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
18:07 ningy boris-42
18:07 ningy I'm behind a proxy
18:07 ningy anyway to add my proxy for setup.py to run successfully?
18:09 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
18:09 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
18:10 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
18:12 lordd joined #openstack-rally
18:21 boris-42 ningy hm yep you should
18:21 ningy looks like it installed
18:21 ningy but it's global install
18:21 boris-42 ningy yep
18:21 ningy and can't connect to db
18:21 ningy for some reason
18:23 ningy can I just run the sh script to install in a ven?
18:28 boris-42 ningy yep you can
18:34 tzabal joined #openstack-rally
18:38 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
18:39 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
18:43 lordd joined #openstack-rally
18:45 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Split user and admin cleanup to 2 separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/100590
18:48 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
19:05 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Amended sphinx documents  https://review.openstack.org/110738
19:37 boris-42 ningy any updates?
20:17 ningy yes. still does not work
20:17 ningy I mean same error for rally deployment check
20:35 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
20:42 ningy boris-42 are u able to reproduce?
20:53 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
21:09 lordd joined #openstack-rally
21:23 afazekas joined #openstack-rally
21:32 ningy hi boris-42
21:33 ningy I think I know the reason for rally deployment check failure in my environment
21:35 ningy boris-42, I have two "nova" verions and the service.name returned are same "nova"
21:36 ningy the keystoneclient/openstack/common/apiclient/base.py line 488 does not like same service.name returned. I think.
21:37 ningy if I took the service .name out from deployment.py line 186, rally deployment check works fine
21:37 ningy this might be a new change in python-keystoneclient 0.10.1 ?
21:37 boris-42 heh
21:37 boris-42 ningy yep it may
21:38 ningy next question. is rally going to support case like this? :)
21:38 ningy have keystoneclient change probably harder
21:39 ningy however, it does not impact my test for now :)
21:46 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
21:47 boris-42 ningy heh we will need to get this some how repeatable in gates..
21:47 boris-42 ningy in any case this should be addressed
21:52 lordd joined #openstack-rally
22:03 lordd joined #openstack-rally
22:22 rmk boris-42: there?
22:22 boris-42 rmk here
22:22 rmk cool question ..
22:23 boris-42 rmk btw are you going to publish that change?
22:23 boris-42 rmk with entry point type?
22:23 rmk yep
22:23 boris-42 rmk great
22:23 rmk if I want to have a specific benchmark iteration report failure, do I just throw an exception?
22:24 boris-42 rmk yep
22:24 boris-42 rmk that is the only way
22:24 boris-42 rmk no exception => success
22:27 rmk OK, I'm changing my approach with live migration is why i asked
22:27 rmk The way I have it working now is that it fails by hitting the timeout
22:27 rmk Doesn't need for that to happen
22:27 boris-42 rmk but actually it strange that timeout is not catches..
22:28 boris-42 catch
22:28 rmk yeah that's a major problem imo
22:28 boris-42 rmk https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/runners/constant.py#L85-L89
22:28 boris-42 rmk are you using constant runner?
22:29 rmk yes
22:29 boris-42 rmk https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/runners/base.py#L38-L44
22:30 boris-42 rmk and this in case of normal exectuion
22:30 boris-42 rmk https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/runners/base.py#L84-L88
22:30 boris-42 rmk btw does rally fails in case of timeout?
22:31 rmk Everything seems to work but the timed out benchmarks don't get counted for reporting
22:31 boris-42 rmk ah can you share result?
22:31 rmk yeah
22:31 boris-42 rally detailed
22:43 boris-42 rmk aroudn?
22:43 rmk yes
22:43 boris-42 rmk I wanna sleep)
22:43 boris-42 rmk are you going to publish soon any results?
22:44 rmk probably not for a bit so morning for you :)
22:44 boris-42 rmk ya it's a bit late almost 3a.m.
22:44 rmk OK I threw an exception this time and it still does not show up in the report
22:44 boris-42 rmk share pls
22:44 boris-42 rmk results
22:44 rmk ok one sec
22:45 rmk https://gist.github.com/rmk40/3651322f729c87695ed7
22:45 boris-42 rmk so and what you dislike?
22:46 boris-42 rmk seems like valid output
22:46 rmk The report doesn't indicate that live_migrate should have run and failed
22:46 rmk It shows that boot_server worked, not that live_migrate had a 0% success rate
22:46 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
22:47 boris-42 rmk yep
22:47 boris-42 rmk it can related to output only https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L106
22:47 boris-42 rmk could you share rally task results --pretty=json
22:47 rmk sure
22:48 rmk added a comment to that gist
22:49 boris-42 rmk and could you share code?
22:51 rmk https://gist.github.com/rmk40/3144c99e959ea42ead9e
22:53 boris-42 rmk so okay
22:53 lordd joined #openstack-rally
22:53 boris-42 rmk the issues is here
22:53 boris-42 rmk https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/utils.py#L140-L142
22:53 boris-42 rmk if we are getting here exception it won't un self._add_atomi_actions
22:53 rmk Hmm
22:55 rmk I think we always need that decorator to run
22:55 boris-42 yep
22:55 boris-42 seems like we need something like
22:55 boris-42 try:
22:55 boris-42 finally:
22:55 boris-42 =)
22:56 rmk yep
22:58 rmk Is there another way to signal task failure other than an exception?
22:59 boris-42 rmk nope
22:59 boris-42 rmk it's standard way to signal that it failed
22:59 rmk Figured, just wanted to check
22:59 boris-42 rmk but why do you need?
22:59 rmk And yeah that's standard
23:00 boris-42 rmk you would like to capture atomic actions that failed?
23:02 boris-42 rmk actually I agree that this can be nicer
23:03 rmk boris-42: yeah definitely would like to capture the failures
23:03 boris-42 rmk I mean you are caputuring
23:03 rmk yes but it's not really reported on
23:03 boris-42 rmk you don't just have atomic_action name
23:03 boris-42 rmk in table
23:03 rmk right
23:03 boris-42 rmk if all failed
23:03 boris-42 but I agree that it is bad=)
23:04 boris-42 rmk I added to trello board https://trello.com/b/DoD8aeZy/rally
23:05 boris-42 rmk it will be actually interesting task=)
23:09 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
23:33 marcoemorais1 joined #openstack-rally
23:38 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
23:46 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:47 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:58 jjmb joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary