Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-08-06

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:24 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:48 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
00:53 lordd joined #openstack-rally
00:54 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
00:57 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add running environment for rally worker  https://review.openstack.org/103377
01:28 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
01:47 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:47 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, rediskin, andreykurilin, k4n0  Ã¢ËœÂ Open tasks https://trello.com/b/DoD8aeZy/rally ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Develop#How_to_contribute   ☁ Rally weekly updates:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Updates
01:52 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
02:17 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
02:38 aswadr rmk ping
02:55 lordd joined #openstack-rally
03:07 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:11 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
03:14 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:15 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
03:16 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:16 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:18 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
03:21 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add worker rpcapi  https://review.openstack.org/112181
03:22 aswadr boris-42: ping
03:55 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
03:55 lordd joined #openstack-rally
04:18 openstackgerrit Anusha Kadambala proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Volume type resource is added to basic resource types. Modified according to pep8  https://review.openstack.org/111935
04:20 debu_ joined #openstack-rally
04:30 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
04:45 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
04:47 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
04:54 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
04:57 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
05:02 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
05:06 coolsvap boris-42, hi there
05:07 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
05:16 coolsvap boris-42, https://github.com/openstack/python-neutronclient/blob/master/neutronclient/v2_0/client.py#L131
05:16 coolsvap k4n0, ^^
05:17 coolsvap http://logs.openstack.org/45/112045/1/check/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally/a8ef486/console.html
05:22 lordd joined #openstack-rally
05:27 openstackgerrit Swapnil Kulkarni proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Update rally neutronclient ca_cert option  https://review.openstack.org/112194
05:28 coolsvap boris-42, k4n0 andreykurilin ^^
05:45 lordd joined #openstack-rally
05:54 RainbowBastion joined #openstack-rally
06:02 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
06:03 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
06:16 Poornima_ joined #openstack-rally
06:16 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
06:17 Poornima|mtg joined #openstack-rally
06:28 openstackgerrit Swapnil Kulkarni proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Update rally neutronclient ca_cert option  https://review.openstack.org/112194
06:29 openstackgerrit Swapnil Kulkarni proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Update rally neutronclient ca_cert option  https://review.openstack.org/112194
06:41 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
07:02 debu_ boris-42: hi
07:04 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
07:23 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
07:33 gema joined #openstack-rally
07:34 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
07:40 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add worker rpcapi  https://review.openstack.org/112181
07:40 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add running environment for rally worker  https://review.openstack.org/103377
07:42 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
07:47 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Update rally neutronclient ca_cert option  https://review.openstack.org/112194
08:19 lordd joined #openstack-rally
08:43 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
08:47 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:54 mux joined #openstack-rally
08:54 gema joined #openstack-rally
08:57 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Mock open to prevent file creation  https://review.openstack.org/111973
09:08 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
09:17 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
09:26 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
09:37 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
09:44 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
09:48 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
10:05 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
10:44 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
10:45 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
10:47 Alexei_9871 joined #openstack-rally
11:02 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
11:05 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
11:27 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
11:45 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
11:47 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
11:54 openstackgerrit Aswad Rangnekar proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Remove openstack-rally entry point  https://review.openstack.org/112277
11:56 aswadr coolsvap: ping
11:56 coolsvap aswadr, pong
11:57 aswadr coolsvap: how are things going
11:58 aswadr coolsvap: there?
11:58 coolsvap aswadr, yes, its been good
11:58 coolsvap how about you?
11:58 aswadr coolsvap: doing well too thanks
11:59 aswadr coolsvap: Is is necessary to file bugs for rally trello tickets?
11:59 coolsvap aswadr, no i believe
11:59 coolsvap you can add the trello card info
12:00 coolsvap its kind of duplicating stuff around
12:00 aswadr how do i override the gerrit process in that case
12:07 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Amended sphinx documents  https://review.openstack.org/110738
12:14 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
12:14 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
12:24 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
12:27 lordd joined #openstack-rally
12:28 boris-42 coolsvap thanks for quick fix of neutron bug
12:29 boris-42 aswadr in case of bugs
12:29 boris-42 aswadr you should put to launchpad bug
12:29 boris-42 aswadr hi there
12:29 coolsvap boris-42, thanks for the update
12:30 coolsvap boris-42, i was also confused about whether to create a bug or not
12:32 coolsvap because I have not created one for the fix i did for one of the trello cards
12:34 coolsvap boris-42, for this card https://trello.com/c/8YdiRn6T/209-easy-move-atomic-actions-from-benchmark-scenario-utils-py-to-benchamrk-scenario-base-py
12:38 openstackgerrit Swapnil Kulkarni proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Refactor Move atomic actions from benchmark scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/112045
12:43 aswadr boris-42: ping
12:46 boris-42 aswadr pong
12:46 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
12:46 boris-42 coolsvap it's not a bug
12:46 boris-42 coolsvap bug is when something is broken
12:47 boris-42 coolsvap just refactoring is code (especially internal) is not a bug..
12:47 aswadr boris-42: so we just push it to gerrit without adding it to LP
12:47 boris-42 aswadr yep
12:48 boris-42 aswadr that is perfectly fine
12:48 boris-42 aswadr but in case of removing entrypoint
12:48 aswadr boris-42: noted
12:48 boris-42 aswadr it's better to link to launchpad
12:48 boris-42 aswadr cause it is user facing change
12:48 aswadr boris-42: ok, I was lucky then ;)
12:49 boris-42 aswadr yep=)
13:02 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Remove openstack-rally entry point  https://review.openstack.org/112277
13:06 tzabal joined #openstack-rally
13:06 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
13:10 rook-mtg boris-42: yo - you hit me up when I was in class a couple days ago, sup?
13:10 rook-mtg about to start the class again - but curious if it was something fast
13:14 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
13:29 boris-42 rook-mtg nope nothging to fast
13:30 boris-42 rook-mtg I just saw one nit in github
13:30 boris-42 rook-mtg your github account doesn't include email that you are using for openstack gerrit
13:30 boris-42 rook-mtg if you add it to your account contribution to rally will be bind to your profile =)
13:30 rook-mtg link?
13:30 boris-42 rook-mtg you are Joe Talerico ?)
13:30 rook-mtg That I am
13:31 boris-42 rook-mtg https://github.com/stackforge/rally/commits/master find it here
13:31 boris-42 rook-mtg it's not a link to your profile
13:32 rook-mtg that is weird - how is this remedied?
13:42 lordd joined #openstack-rally
13:47 boris-42 rook-mtg heh
13:48 boris-42 rook-mtg do you have in your github account email that you are using for gerrit?
13:48 boris-42 rook-mtg you can specify multiple
13:50 rook-mtg boris-42: should be linked now
13:51 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
14:07 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
14:08 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
14:33 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
14:34 lordd joined #openstack-rally
14:41 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
15:10 coolsvap boris-42, thanks, I was away when the trello discussion happened
15:14 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
15:15 coolsvap boris-42, andreykurilin can you guys have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112045/
15:16 coolsvap its quite a big change and reflects many places in code, it could get blocked in rebases if it got delayed
15:21 RainbowBastion joined #openstack-rally
15:29 andreykurilin coolsvap, hi! why you are importing rally.benchmark.scenarios.base as scenario_base, instead of using "base" name ?
15:29 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
15:29 RainbowBastion joined #openstack-rally
15:30 coolsvap there are occurrences where we are using different base classes, and when we are importing utils, we documented it the same way, but it was not done for base
15:31 coolsvap andreykurilin, ^^
15:35 RainbowBastion joined #openstack-rally
15:35 andreykurilin coolsvap, ok:)
15:35 coolsvap andreykurilin, i think i got a change already in my patch
15:35 coolsvap in the doc
15:36 andreykurilin coolsvap, yeah, i see
15:37 coolsvap andreykurilin, let me know if you have any other comments before i push the changes
15:37 coolsvap andreykurilin, i am submitting a new change set with the doc changes
15:37 openstackgerrit Swapnil Kulkarni proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Refactor Move atomic actions from benchmark scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/112045
15:38 andreykurilin coolsvap, no, i haven't any comments:) patch looks good to me
15:38 coolsvap andreykurilin, i got it myself
15:38 coolsvap sorry for resubmission but i dont wanted to let it remaining
15:39 andreykurilin coolsvap, please, look at  doc/source/benchmark.rst (line 97). s/@cenario/@scenario/
15:41 coolsvap andreykurilin, done!
15:41 openstackgerrit Swapnil Kulkarni proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Refactor Move atomic actions from benchmark scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/112045
15:42 andreykurilin coolsvap, i left several comments for typos in patch-set 3
15:43 coolsvap andreykurilin, all done
15:43 coolsvap wait
15:44 openstackgerrit Swapnil Kulkarni proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Refactor Move atomic actions from benchmark scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/112045
15:45 coolsvap 1 was missing, done!
15:45 ningy joined #openstack-rally
15:46 ningy hi boris-42, can I ask a question for nova test?
15:46 boris-42 ningy sure thing
15:46 ningy I basically can't run any nova test against my environment
15:46 ningy because it is using nova network command
15:46 ningy and we are using neutron
15:47 andreykurilin coolswap, thanks. +2 from me
15:47 andreykurilin *coolsvap
15:48 ningy is there any plan/test for nova test working with environment like the one I have?
15:48 ningy boris-42
16:02 boris-42 ningy hmm
16:02 boris-42 ningy it is using nova api
16:02 boris-42 ningy not nova network
16:02 boris-42 ningy there shouldn't be issues with that..
16:06 coolsvap boris-42, thx!
16:07 coolsvap andreykurilin, thx!
16:07 coolsvap invariably I type boris-42 :)
16:13 boris-42 coolsvap -)
16:13 boris-42 coolsvap heh sorry for not reviewing so fast
16:13 boris-42 coolsvap we are in incubation process
16:14 coolsvap boris-42, np, I am here to highlight if we need anything reviewed fast
16:14 coolsvap boris-42, yup I know :)
16:21 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
16:40 ningy boris-42, yes. using nova network api is the problem for me
16:41 ningy for example, nova boot server test
16:41 ningy in server.py, with nova list network call against my environment, it gets nothing back
16:45 rmk ningy: I had to remove that section of code as well, even though we run nova network.
16:45 rmk It's making an assumption it shouldn't be making.
16:46 rmk ningy: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/nova/utils.py#L101-L109 -- remove that entire block of code, it's not needed.
16:47 ningy rmk, is there new changes around the nova test area this week? I checked rally last week...
16:47 ningy k. let me try.
16:48 ningy also, rally show networks does not work for my environment as well
16:48 rmk I'm honestly not sure why that code is even present
16:49 rmk I could see it being part of a different test
16:49 rmk At the very least we can easily turn it into a toggled scenario argument
16:54 rmk If I'm reading that code right it's making an assumption about pool names and network names not overlapping.
16:54 rmk I don't understand why it's there at all.
16:55 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Whole scenario time measurement  https://review.openstack.org/105318
16:56 ningy rmk. I think you are right. should the test create a test network for boot server test?
16:56 rmk It doesn't need to do that
16:56 rmk Even for nova network deployments (like ours), it happens automatically
16:57 rook-mtg rmk - that code was added because previously rally would attempt to utilize networks with external = true
16:57 rmk I'm going to submit a patch for this
16:57 rook-mtg which would cause failures.
16:57 rook-mtg you cannot assign a guest to a network set as exteranl:true
16:57 rook-mtg external*
16:58 rook-mtg so if I had two networks, public/private, and public was used for floating ips, when you run the networks.list() it will return both networks, causing issues.
16:58 rmk rook-mtg: Yes, but that's assuming you're doing anything with networks.
16:59 rook-mtg so you are assuming the user isn't?
16:59 rmk rook-mtg: I understand the part about eliminating the floating IP range from the networks assigned.  I don't see why you need to assign networks in the first place.
16:59 rook-mtg so you are suggesting not to?
16:59 rmk If a project has no network assigned, nova-network will assign one on the first launch.
16:59 rmk So you don't need any of that code.
16:59 rook-mtg ok - in the presents of nova-network - got it.
16:59 rook-mtg maybe add a case to skip that code if nova-network is being used.
16:59 rmk Right. And this is nova-network specific anyway.
16:59 rook-mtg roger.
17:00 rook-mtg rmk makes sense to skip it.
17:00 rmk I don't mind submitting a patch for this.
17:00 ningy will the patch resolve my problem as well?
17:00 rmk I think the entire code block can go away unless there's some Neutron case I'm not considering?
17:00 rmk Do any of these calls even work with Neutron?
17:00 rook-mtg i needed this code for Neutron
17:00 rook-mtg without it, it would bomb out.
17:01 rook-mtg I opened a bug against it.
17:01 rmk Interesting, OK.
17:01 rmk Then we just need to make it an argument.
17:01 rook-mtg that is why I added the code... but I didn't think about nova network w/o networks
17:01 * rook-mtg doesn't do much with nova-network
17:02 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
17:02 ningy what's the bug number?
17:02 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
17:02 ningy rmk or rook-mtg?
17:05 rook-mtg https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1347653
17:06 rmk ningy: You're using Neutron right?
17:06 ningy right
17:06 rmk I'm curious why it isn't working for you if this is intended for Neutron.
17:07 rook-mtg ningy do you have networks defined?
17:07 ningy yes
17:07 rook-mtg are they set to shared?
17:08 ningy that I'm not 100% sure. let me check with my peer
17:08 rook-mtg roger.
17:08 rook-mtg I think this is the problem with dvsm tests - the networks are not set to shared, so all dvsm tests are failing
17:12 rmk There's another problem with this code.
17:13 rmk It'll assign a new network for every instance booted.
17:13 rmk So if you boot 5 in a single run and use one tenant, it'll try to allocate 5 networks to that tenant.
17:13 rmk There's nothing checking whether a network is allocated already.
17:13 rmk That's what was breaking for me now that I'm reading it my closely.
17:14 rook-mtg rmk it won't create a network - it is going to use a network already allocated.
17:15 rmk I understand that.
17:15 rmk It will associate a new network for every instance launched.
17:15 rmk Rather than check whether the project already has a network assigned, and use it.
17:16 rook-mtg if there are 2 networks public/private, it will only allocate private.
17:16 rmk What if there are a hundred networks available?
17:16 rook-mtg if there are > 2 networks it will grab the first one not associated with a floating ip pool.
17:16 rmk Yes and it will do that for every boot.
17:16 rook-mtg so you want it to round robin across your networks?
17:17 rmk So if you boot 5 instances in one tenant as part of your test, it will allocate a new network for each
17:17 rook-mtg shouldn't that be more of a Neutron scenario more than a Nova scenario?
17:17 rmk I want it to not take another network if it already has one
17:18 KimJ joined #openstack-rally
17:18 rook-mtg rmk -  I am not following. what is "it" ^, the guest or the tenant
17:19 lordd joined #openstack-rally
17:19 rmk The tenant
17:20 rook-mtg interesting - so you want the code to be aware of the networks used for a tenant.
17:20 rook-mtg IMHO this is more of a Neutron specific test
17:20 rook-mtg but, to implement would b ewasy.
17:20 rook-mtg be easy*
17:29 rmk I think I'm miscommunicating part of this
17:30 ningy rmk
17:30 rmk The way the code works right now, with nova network, every instance which is booted during a benchmark into the tenantA gets a unique network assigned to it.
17:30 ningy I see similar code for nic id is also in server.py
17:31 rmk We use nova-networks' vlan manager.  So we have hundreds of networks ready to be used when needed.
17:32 rmk When a new tenant is created, the instance is assigned to a compute node, which then asks for network information from nova-network.  nova-network will check whether the tenant already has a network *associated* to the tenant, and allocate an IP from that network accordingly.
17:32 rook-mtg rmk ningy there is some other code that I haven't touched... some code that uses a random function to determine the network.
17:32 rook-mtg Ah, rmk so nova vs neutron -- very different.
17:32 rook-mtg so, right
17:33 rmk OK so what is the neutron use case here?
17:33 rook-mtg nova-network will assign a network at guest boot.
17:34 rook-mtg neutron you have to specifically state a network, or the guest will not have any networks, by default.
17:34 rmk Right
17:34 rook-mtg rmk - if there are TWO networks, nova will bomb out, because you never told it WHICH network to use.
17:35 rmk I see the problem here then.
17:35 rook-mtg so with nova-network - we need to add a check to avoid this, because the guest will launch with a network by default
17:35 rmk When you run a networks.list() with Neutron in an admin context, do you get back the networks assigned to the project or ALL networks?
17:35 rmk Because nova-network returns *all* and that might be the difference here.
17:36 rook-mtg just the admin context -- if you create a demo tenant, and create networks, the admin doesn't see it.
17:36 rook-mtg unless it is set to "shared"
17:42 rook-mtg Hmmm
17:42 rook-mtg The above is incorrect. The Admin context sees all : https://gist.github.com/anonymous/ee442d94f82fdd745bf2
17:42 rook-mtg this didn't used to be the case*
17:43 rmk And that's my issue with nova-network as well
17:56 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
17:58 lordd joined #openstack-rally
18:02 boris-42 rmk rook-mtg  ^ I will read all above
18:02 boris-42 ningy rmk rook-mtg if there is issue with network and neutron we should make a bug
18:02 boris-42 ningy rmk rook-mtg could somebody make it?
18:03 rmk boris-42: Yeah, we're still determining what the bug is exactly.
18:03 rmk It's easy to fix it by adding config options but I think we can do better.
18:03 rook-mtg agreed - i am starting to think we need to break the scenarios - nova scenarios for nova-network and nova scenarios for neutron-networks
18:04 rook-mtg that is just a thought.
18:05 rmk rook-mtg: I don't know if I agree
18:05 rook-mtg there are some big differences between the two....
18:07 ningy k. I will submit an initial bug for current nova test won't work
18:07 ningy against our triple o environment
18:08 ningy with neutron networks
18:12 ningy https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1353622
18:12 ningy rmk boris-42
18:12 ningy feel free to add more details with today's discussion
18:21 rook-mtg ningy: can you add more detail?
18:21 rook-mtg ningy specifically what the error was maybe run with -vd
18:38 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
18:40 ningy added boot.json run result with --debug
18:40 ningy u can see the 404 error and stack trace for that call
18:42 ningy curl -i 'http://10.22.157.168:8774/v2/59ee49b7c3ed4dda879be6488c292b96/os-networks' -X GET -H "Accept: application/json" -H "User-Agent: python-novaclient" -H "X-Auth-Token: {SHA1}ba7525b7e0fea7e324d0ab6af5a24eabc0c6ab95"
18:42 ningy that's the call is failing in my env
18:47 rook-mtg This does not look like a neutron issue
18:48 ningy the nova call returns nothing in my environment is the problem
18:49 rook-mtg ok - I was under the assumption this was due to something else...
19:02 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:28 rook-mtg rmk is your issue related to ningy's?
19:28 rmk Nope
19:28 rook-mtg ok
19:29 rmk I'll provide the specifics of my issue as soon as i can
19:54 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
20:04 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
20:04 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
20:17 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
20:26 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Split user and admin cleanup to 2 separate classes  https://review.openstack.org/100590
20:30 boris-42 rmk rook-mtg ningy  around?
20:56 ningy yes. boris-42
20:56 boris-42 ningy so we have actually rally neutron gates
20:57 boris-42 ningy it means that we are running on every patch against neutron benchmarks
20:57 boris-42 ningy it seems that we should test this as well against neutron
20:57 boris-42 ningy if you put https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-scenarios/rally-neutron.yaml
20:57 boris-42 ningy here novaboot benchmark
20:57 boris-42 ningy wanna try?)
20:58 ningy json format one pls?
21:04 ningy how do I try that test run? boris-42
21:04 boris-42 ningy it yaml
21:05 boris-42 ningy both can be used
21:05 ningy sorry. more detail pls? I've never used yaml to run rally test
21:05 boris-42 ningy https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-scenarios/rally.yaml#L649-L806
21:11 ningy I see. you want me to try vm test scenario
21:11 ningy let me try
21:13 boris-42 ningy yep
21:13 boris-42 ningy so they will be run against neutron
21:13 boris-42 ningy seems like it is reasonable!=)
21:13 boris-42 ningy cause you are facing this issue
21:14 ningy what user I should use in arg?
21:14 boris-42 user?
21:14 boris-42 ningy use the similiar
21:15 boris-42 ningy it's job that is run against openstack with nova network
21:15 ningy this vm test takes args for "username"
21:15 boris-42 ningy don't put it
21:15 boris-42 ningy just selected
21:15 ningy k
21:19 ningy this test fail
21:19 ningy at 404
21:19 ningy <class 'novaclient.exceptions.NotFound'>
21:24 boris-42 ningy could you put patch on review?
21:24 boris-42 ningy so we will see this logs
21:24 boris-42 ningy true TDD
21:24 boris-42 ningy first func testing then fixing bug=)
21:32 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
21:59 ningy boris-42, patch?
21:59 boris-42 ningy ?
22:00 ningy sorry. was reading your early message
22:00 ningy what patch you mean?
22:01 ningy by "put patch on review"?
22:02 ningy are u talking about nova test in this file? https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-scenarios/rally.yaml#L649-L806
22:07 rook-mtg joined #openstack-rally
22:13 boris-42 ningy I mean just put this scenarions
22:13 boris-42 ningy "part of task"
22:13 boris-42 ningy to rally-neutron.yaml
22:13 boris-42 ningy and put patch on review with that
22:14 boris-42 ningy so we will gate how it perform in gates
22:21 lordd joined #openstack-rally
22:24 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
22:43 boris-42 ningy is it more clear now?
22:50 ningy yes. I'm trying to figure out how to do it though:)
22:50 ningy can I do online editing?
22:50 ningy or, do I need to check that file out, do the change, then submit it for review?
22:52 ningy this is the file you want me to add nova test scenario to. right? https://github.com/stackforge/rally/edit/master/rally-scenarios/rally-neutron.yaml
22:52 ningy boris-42. am I more clear for what you want me to do or I'm just getting more confused ;)
22:53 boris-42 ningy I thought you are working in nova?
22:53 ningy not really
22:53 boris-42 ningy ah okay
22:53 boris-42 ningy lemme just give you then instruction=)
22:54 ningy k. thanks
22:54 boris-42 ningy so you'll need to do all these steps https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Develop#How_to_contribute
22:54 boris-42 ningy in case of first time
23:12 boris-42 ningy if you have any questions just ping
23:38 ningy almost there.
23:39 ningy only problem. tox run failed
23:39 ningy can I just ignore this step ;)
23:40 ningy since it is just a yaml file change
23:40 ningy ...
23:41 boris-42 ningy yep
23:42 boris-42 ningy but tox checks that file
23:42 boris-42 ningy =)
23:42 boris-42 ningy just publish and let's see what will happen =)
23:55 ningy now having problem to connect to gerrit with git review
23:55 ningy anything could be wrong?
23:57 ningy will try again later tonight

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary