Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-08-11

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:13 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:15 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
00:18 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:18 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:19 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
00:20 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:22 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
00:23 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:26 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:27 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
00:30 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:46 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add worker rpcapi  https://review.openstack.org/112181
00:46 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add running environment for rally worker  https://review.openstack.org/103377
00:50 boris-42 yingjun hi
00:51 boris-42 yingjun can you help with reviewing patches in rally-pythonclient?
00:51 yingjun boris-42, hi
00:51 boris-42 yingjun and how are you?)
00:51 yingjun boris-42, good
00:51 yingjun boris-42, ok
01:07 boris-42 yingjun hehe I should as well do some contribution to rally lol
01:08 boris-42 yingjun btw are you going to France?
01:11 yingjun boris-42, could you help to add the worker rpcapis? i’m not so familiar with that part:(
01:11 boris-42 yingjun sure I think we all are going to help with that part
01:12 yingjun boris-42, i have added the initial version https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112181/
01:12 yingjun boris-42, not sure yet
01:15 yingjun boris-42, i’ll go there if our talks are adopted
01:18 boris-42 yingjun heh why didn't you say that you have talks =(
01:19 boris-42 yingjun i didn't know =( so didn't vote for yours..
01:22 yingjun boris-42, +(, did you get any talks about rally?
01:22 boris-42 yingjun i have 2 talks (one is with k4n0) and coolsvap as well has separated talk
01:23 boris-42 yingjun but there is no results yet
01:29 yingjun boris-42, good, i hope to see your rally talks if i going to attend the summit:)
01:29 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
01:50 boris-42 yingjun hm
01:50 boris-42 yingjun do you really think that we should have separated bug tracker for rally client?
01:51 boris-42 yingjun I mean it's one project, just 2 parts..
01:55 yingjun boris-42, i think it will make it easier to track bugs for rallyclient since it actually in a separate repo.
01:55 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Remove magic() method from context manager  https://review.openstack.org/104962
01:56 boris-42 yingjun yep but we as a cores will have 2 bug trackers to track
01:56 boris-42 yingjun and users will face as well complexity
02:00 yingjun boris-42, yes, it makes things clear but complexity for 2 bug trackers.
02:02 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
02:02 yingjun boris-42, it’s fine for me now since there are not many bugs for rally and rallyclient.
02:04 boris-42 yingjun yep we don't' have scale issues
02:04 boris-42 yingjun like nova has
02:04 boris-42 yingjun with over 1k open bugs
02:29 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Remove magic() method from context manager  https://review.openstack.org/104962
02:46 openstackgerrit Rafi Khardalian proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Do not assume networks should be assigned  https://review.openstack.org/113096
02:58 boris-42 yingjun we will need to do something with new SLA that we added to gate
02:58 boris-42 yingjun e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1354683
03:02 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Remove magic() method from context manager  https://review.openstack.org/104962
03:04 yingjun boris-42, yes
03:04 boris-42 yingjun at least jenkins is catching such stuff now
03:06 yingjun http://logs.openstack.org/77/103377/11/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/e76dacb/rally-plot/sla.txt
03:10 boris-42 yingjun yep yep
03:10 yingjun boris-42, success 66.7% for boot_and_bounce_server in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103377/
03:10 boris-42 | NovaServers.boot_and_bounce_server                            | 0   | max_failure_percent | False   |
03:11 boris-42 yingjun yep it's terrible
03:11 boris-42 yingjun btw wanna work on SLA stuff?
03:11 boris-42 yingjun there are couple small tasks if you would like
03:11 yingjun boris-42, sure
03:14 boris-42 yingjun so as you see it's hard for usage
03:14 boris-42 yingjun e.g. in table we don't have any details about why it failed
03:14 boris-42 | NovaServers.boot_and_bounce_server                            | 0   | max_failure_percent | False   |
03:15 boris-42 and you need to go to another file and analyze by your eyes this stuff
03:15 boris-42 yingjun https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/sla/base.py#L86-L88
03:15 boris-42 yingjun I do think that we should extend output
03:15 boris-42 yingjun like we  have in benchmark validation
03:16 boris-42 yingjun https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/validation.py#L28
03:16 boris-42 yingjun so we can have something similar there SLAResult
03:16 boris-42 yingjun so we will be able to put message
03:16 yingjun boris-42, ok, make sense to me
03:16 boris-42 yingjun like "Required 0% failures, actually 44%"
03:17 boris-42 yingjun so it will be much more usefull
03:17 boris-42 yingjun then another task I will give you later in details
03:17 boris-42 yingjun but in high level it's related to next issue
03:17 boris-42 yingjun we have all results in results.json
03:17 yingjun boris-42, yes
03:17 boris-42 yingjun but we are storing just SLA, not processed
03:18 boris-42 yingjun so it makes sense as well to put "results" of checking SLA in DB
03:19 boris-42 yingjun so if you can do this it will be simpler to work on these issues in gates
03:20 yingjun boris-42, a little confused about put ‘results’ of checking SLA in DB
03:21 yingjun boris-42, do you mean that we should store something like ‘| NovaServers.boot_and_bounce_server                            | 0   | max_failure_percent | False   |’ to DB?
03:21 boris-42 yingjun nope
03:21 boris-42 yingjun let's do step by step
03:22 boris-42 yingjun first patch and when you will start working on second (storing results to DB) we will discuss in details
03:22 boris-42 yingjun does it work for you?
03:23 yingjun boris-42, allright
03:23 boris-42 yingjun just it will require some discussion with others
03:23 boris-42 yingjun about format and so on
03:23 boris-42 yingjun cause it changes structure of stroing in DB object
03:23 boris-42 yingjun so we need to be 100% sure
03:24 yingjun boris-42, yes, discussion would be good
03:35 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
03:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:09 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
04:20 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
04:57 openstackgerrit Rafi Khardalian proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add support for Nova live migrations  https://review.openstack.org/111444
04:59 rmk boris-42: I dont know how to test https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111444/5/rally/benchmark/scenarios/nova/utils.py, so if it's required I'll abandon
05:38 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
05:39 vaidyanath joined #openstack-rally
06:08 Sahil__ joined #openstack-rally
06:13 Sahil__ left #openstack-rally
06:20 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
06:35 openstackgerrit shiyanchdev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Adds deleting routers scenario for Neutron:  https://review.openstack.org/113177
06:44 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
07:14 gema joined #openstack-rally
07:24 penguinRaider joined #openstack-rally
07:35 rediskin joined #openstack-rally
07:49 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Fix partial results sending in rps runner  https://review.openstack.org/110007
07:52 zarric_ joined #openstack-rally
08:59 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
09:01 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
09:09 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
09:09 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Fix partial results sending in rps runner  https://review.openstack.org/110007
09:10 nkhare_ joined #openstack-rally
09:18 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
09:18 lordd_ hi guys,
09:23 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
09:27 vaidyanath joined #openstack-rally
09:28 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
09:30 flwang_ joined #openstack-rally
09:31 flwang_ boris-42: ping
09:31 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
09:51 boris-42 flwang_ pong
09:51 boris-42 flwang_ nice to see you here=)
09:55 boris-42 lordd_ hi
09:55 boris-42 k4n0 around?
09:55 lordd_ hi
09:56 boris-42 lordd_ how are you?
09:56 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
09:56 lordd_ boris-42 doing well, but had some difficulties using http-proxy + pip scripted installs
09:57 lordd_ I still don't understand why, pip install works with the environment http_proxy variables
09:57 lordd_ but when I run either the rally install script or the tempest install
09:57 lordd_ it fails, so I have to do it manually
09:57 lordd_ no idea why though
09:59 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
10:05 boris-42 rediskin ^ do you know anything about this?
10:07 rediskin boris-42 lordd_ sudo may drop envvars
10:08 rediskin lordd__ try to edit pip.conf
10:09 lordd_ thanks, i'm checking it
10:14 lordd_ rediskin what is the option for the pip.conf file, is index-url?
10:15 lordd_ I think that is for caching, but I can't find any other option around..
10:17 rediskin lordd_ [global] proxy = http://proxy:3128
10:18 lordd_ rediskin ok, makes sense thanks
10:22 lordd_ rediskin, check out this log excerpt: http://paste.openstack.org/show/93319/
10:22 lordd_ this is odd as it is only the last line that fails
10:23 lordd_ the others install as expected
10:24 lordd_ and that is already installed
10:24 rediskin omg dat pip
10:24 rediskin pip's error messages is something
10:25 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
10:35 lordd_ in any case I just commented the requirements.txt at the base
10:35 lordd_ and installed them externally
10:38 lordd_ I do agree that the excerpt isn't helpful at all though.. :P
10:50 vaidyanath boris-42, ngpi
10:50 vaidyanath boris-42, ping
10:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
10:59 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
11:00 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
11:01 boris-42 vaidyanath hi there
11:01 boris-42 vaidyanath sorry for long reply
11:01 boris-42 vaidyanath so what's up?
11:01 flwang_ boris-42: sorry for the late reponse
11:01 boris-42 flwang_ no worries
11:02 flwang_ boris-42: may I ask a question about Rally?
11:02 boris-42 flwang_ so any questions?
11:02 boris-42 flwang_ sure
11:02 flwang_ boris-42: is there any known issue about SSL support of Rally?
11:02 boris-42 flwang_ ah you need to turn it on
11:03 boris-42 flwang_ one sec
11:03 boris-42 flwang_ did you try to update https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/etc/rally/rally.conf.sample#L146-L147 ?
11:04 flwang_ boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72920/ ?
11:04 boris-42 flwang_ yep
11:04 boris-42 flwang_ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/etc/rally/rally.conf.sample#L146-L147 so did you try to turn it on ?
11:04 boris-42 flwang_ if it doesn't mean => it's bug and we will fix it
11:04 boris-42 work*
11:04 boris-42 mean/work*
11:05 flwang_ boris-42: not yet, our devops guy are trying to use Rally for performance test, but they were running into some issues about SSL, so I just confirm with you guys if there is any 'tips' :)
11:06 vaidyanath boris-42, i have assigned one of the bug to myself
11:06 flwang_ flwang_: I was using Rally + devstack, everything work great
11:06 boris-42 flwang_ so that stuff should help =) at least I didn't hear anything from miranits team for a while=)
11:06 flwang_ but I didn't enable the SSL
11:06 boris-42 flwang_ btw you have it in glance gates
11:06 boris-42 flwang_ did you know?)
11:06 vaidyanath i am stuck as in where to start
11:06 boris-42 vaidyanath okay did you read our wiki page?
11:07 flwang_ boris-42: I know Glance has enable Rally as Gate, but I'm not sure if it's enable SSL at the same time
11:07 boris-42 flwang_ nope =)
11:07 boris-42 flwang_ it's not enabled
11:07 boris-42 flwang_ heh soon we will get profiling in that gate as well!
11:07 boris-42 flwang_ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112816/
11:08 boris-42 flwang_ this should enable it
11:08 boris-42 vaidyanath so first of all you should start from http://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
11:08 boris-42 vaidyanath but if we skip this
11:08 boris-42 vaidyanath the structure of project is next
11:08 boris-42 contrib -> rally plugin for devstack
11:09 boris-42 doc -> documentation/samples/use_stories
11:09 boris-42 etc -> configuration files
11:09 flwang_ boris-42: awesome, good to know
11:09 flwang_ boris-42: I love Rally, it's great and I love the HTML format output
11:09 boris-42 rally-scenarios -> here are plugins for rally & task that will be run in CI on every patch
11:09 flwang_ it's fantistic
11:09 boris-42 flwang_ lol=) I was going to refactor that sh***=)
11:09 vaidyanath boris-42, thanks
11:10 flwang_ boris-42: so you'r current focus is Rally, right?
11:10 vaidyanath boris-42, this makes more sense to me. let me go through this and should be able to take it up from there
11:10 boris-42 vaidyanath rally -> main source
11:10 boris-42 vaidyanath tests -> unit tests (have the same structure as rally)
11:11 boris-42 vaidyanath tests_ci -> scripts that are required for running functional testing
11:11 boris-42 vaidyanath tools -> different crap
11:11 boris-42 vaidyanath install_rally.sh -> on click rally setup-er
11:11 boris-42 vaidyanath inside rally code (where is the main source)
11:12 boris-42 rediskin you have aas -> related to Rally as a Service mode (not yet ready)
11:12 boris-42 rediskin sorry&
11:12 boris-42 vaidyanath ^
11:12 boris-42 vaidyanath in benchmark - everything related for rally benchmark system
11:12 boris-42 vaidyanath in cmd -> rally comman line interface
11:12 boris-42 vaidyanath in db -> everything related to DB layer
11:13 boris-42 vaidyanath deploy -> rally part related for creating or using existing deployment
11:13 boris-42 vaidyanath objects -> it's business logic on top of DB records to simplify work with them
11:13 boris-42 vaidyanath openstack -> common code from github.com/openstack/oslo-incubator
11:14 boris-42 vaidyanath orchestrator -> it's the last common part for 2 modes a-a-S and cli tool
11:14 boris-42 vaidyanath verification - rally & tempest integration http://www.mirantis.com/blog/rally-openstack-tempest-testing-made-simpler/
11:14 boris-42 vaidyanath so it's all=)
11:14 boris-42 flwang_ actually no
11:14 vaidyanath boris-42, eventually these tests call tempest test if i am not wrong
11:15 boris-42 flwang_ mostly I am focused at this point of integration of osprofiler to all projects
11:15 boris-42 flwang_ and making osprofiler lib work for every project
11:15 boris-42 flwang_ and integration it in rally & gates
11:15 flwang_ boris-42: ah, I saw your patch in Glance
11:15 vaidyanath boris-42, woooh this is a comprehensive list.. needs some time to take it all.. :)
11:15 boris-42 vaidyanath yep try to read the docs they should explain a lot
11:16 vaidyanath boris-42, sure.. thanks for pointing it out.. happy that i am getting the help i wanted
11:16 boris-42 flwang_ yep so we should make similar patches to all projects and so on
11:16 boris-42 flwang_ it's great that zhiyan is helping about htis
11:16 boris-42 flwang_ cause it's really huge amount of work
11:17 flwang_ flwang_: I haven't much bandwidth recently on Glance, since my focus is changing a little bit, I have to take more internal work
11:19 boris-42 flwang_ heh =(
11:20 boris-42 flwang_ so say to your internal team to join irc chat
11:20 flwang_ boris-42: haha, I'm doing that indeed
11:20 boris-42 flwang_ hehe=)
11:21 flwang_ boris-42: acutally, we're running a public cloud, so i have to take more devops related work
11:21 boris-42 flwang_ then you are more then welcome here=)
11:21 flwang_ boris-42: i will :)
11:22 boris-42 flwang_ btw I am trying to start https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/doc/user_stories
11:22 boris-42 flwang_ so guys if you have anything to say about experience with rally and testing something from real life
11:22 boris-42 flwang_ it will be nice if somebody contribute here=)
11:22 flwang_ boris-42: good idea, I will see what I can do
11:22 boris-42 flwang_ and there will be one more directory
11:23 flwang_ boris-42: i believe we can contribute some feedback
11:23 boris-42 flwang_ usage_issues
11:23 flwang_ boris-42: hmm... what's the usage_issues really mean?
11:23 boris-42 flwang_ e.g. you are trying to use rally
11:23 boris-42 flwang_ and not able to cover your use case
11:23 boris-42 flwang_ you don't have enough time to make a technical stuff (like write BP that explains what to do)
11:24 boris-42 flwang_ but you would like to get it done
11:24 flwang_ boris-42: more like a feature request?
11:24 boris-42 flwang_ so you can write something like: "Rally doesn't work if cloud is using LDAP "
11:24 boris-42 flwang_ not only features sometimes there are real issues=)
11:24 boris-42 flwang_ but feature_request sounds better=)
11:24 boris-42 flwang_ so yep
11:25 flwang_ boris-42: I think it's a good idea
11:25 boris-42 flwang_ the goal is to make it simple for OPS that don't' have enough time to this all crap
11:25 flwang_ I'm saying I love the user stories
11:25 boris-42 flwang_ to say their opinion and put some requests
11:25 flwang_ awesome
11:25 boris-42 flwang_ so need to make it somehow more noticeable*
11:26 boris-42 flwang_ probably it makes sense to put this on top directory?
11:26 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
11:27 boris-42 flwang_ noooo https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104691/ =((
11:27 boris-42 flwang_ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw2sex1mJNI ^
11:29 flwang_ haha, re osprofier, it's a good idea, you guys did a great job
11:31 boris-42 flwang_ thanks =)
11:32 boris-42 flwang_ when we get it in gates, I believe we will fix a loot of issues with perromance=)
11:32 flwang_ boris-42: yep, challenge is coming....
11:36 boris-42 flwang_ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWMjR3r-nsI challenger is coming **
11:36 boris-42 flwang_ =)
11:39 flwang_ beautiful car
11:39 boris-42 flwang_ 707 hp (6.2 liter)
11:39 boris-42 flwang_ 0-60 3.5 sec )
11:39 boris-42 flwang_ and stick!
11:39 boris-42 =)
11:40 flwang_ yep, super cool
11:52 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
12:25 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/python-rallyclient: Base structure and stuff code  https://review.openstack.org/66919
12:25 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/python-rallyclient: Base structure and stuff code  https://review.openstack.org/66919
12:31 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Remove magic() method from context manager  https://review.openstack.org/104962
12:35 boris-42 rmk around?
12:36 rook joined #openstack-rally
12:40 KiKs joined #openstack-rally
12:41 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
12:41 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add required_contexts validator  https://review.openstack.org/111603
12:44 boris-42 rediskin andreykurilin ^ please could you review this patch?
12:44 boris-42 rediskin andreykurilin  it's blocking NikitaKonovalov patches in sahara
12:52 andreykurilin boris-42, ok. i will do it now
12:54 tzabal joined #openstack-rally
13:00 boris-42 tzabal I updated your patch
13:00 boris-42 tzabal to speed up process=)
13:01 tzabal boris-42 thanks i just saw that
13:02 tzabal boris-42 as i can see now in gates everything is stuck :P
13:03 tzabal boris-42 in contract with that is happening during the weekend
13:03 boris-42 е =)
13:03 boris-42 tzabal =) as usually=)
13:03 tzabal boris-42 i think that this shows some things about who develops openstack
13:05 boris-42 tzabal just don't write something like that to mailing list ^ ;)
13:06 boris-42 tzabal actually it's really hard stuff to scale well when there are so many projects and chagnes=)
13:06 tzabal boris-42 for sure
13:07 tzabal boris-42 i just want to make the point that openstack is not made from hackers on their free time (i.e. usually weekends) - that's not a bad thing of course, just a point
13:07 boris-42 tzabal =)
13:07 boris-42 tzabal actually all cores and PTL are usually quite well paid
13:10 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Extend sla output result  https://review.openstack.org/113253
13:11 boris-42 rediskin we discussed today morning ^ about this
13:11 boris-42 rediskin e.g. we should extend SLA to provide human readable messages
13:11 boris-42 rediskin you can take a look at history of chat for more details
13:11 rediskin boris-42: sure
13:12 boris-42 rediskin yingjun as well we would like to discuss about next refactoring
13:12 boris-42 rediskin yingjun after task is executed run SLA check and put results of this check to DB
13:12 boris-42 rediskin yingjun  it makes sense cause there are bunch of people that is fetching JSON from DB and do some logic outside of Rally on them
13:13 boris-42 rediskin yingjun so they are not able to consume results of SLA without dart magic and dirty hacks
13:13 boris-42 rediskin yingjun thougths?
13:13 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
13:16 yingjun boris-42, maybe we could just add the SLA APIs by using the base sla module when the rally API is ready ?
13:18 boris-42 yingjun hm we already have CLI command for this
13:18 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
13:18 boris-42 yingjun it won't help as I described alreayd
13:18 boris-42 yingjun user would like to get results in JSON
13:18 boris-42 yingjun and at this moment there is no results of SLA check inside it
13:24 yingjun boris-42, yes, right:)
13:46 flwang_ joined #openstack-rally
13:49 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/python-rallyclient: Add RallyShell  https://review.openstack.org/112612
13:50 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/python-rallyclient: Add RallyShell  https://review.openstack.org/112612
13:52 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Extend sla output result  https://review.openstack.org/113253
13:55 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/python-rallyclient: Add RallyShell  https://review.openstack.org/112612
14:01 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/python-rallyclient: Add RallyShell  https://review.openstack.org/112612
14:16 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Remove magic() method from context manager  https://review.openstack.org/104962
14:17 boris-42 rediskin andreykurilin ^ this is ready we should get it in
14:17 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:18 boris-42 coolsvap hi there
14:18 boris-42 coolsvap are you working on this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111989/ ?
14:19 boris-42 coolsvap be later*
14:19 * boris-42 I'll be back lol
14:38 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
15:02 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
15:13 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
15:15 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Add required_contexts validator  https://review.openstack.org/111603
15:39 tzabal left #openstack-rally
15:47 flwang_ joined #openstack-rally
15:52 ajayaa joined #openstack-rally
16:20 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
16:25 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
16:27 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
16:34 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
16:44 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
16:57 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
17:48 flwang_ joined #openstack-rally
18:05 rmk boris-42: I am now
18:05 boris-42 rmk hi there
18:05 rmk hi
18:06 boris-42 rmk btw interesting will bootVM work
18:06 boris-42 rmk with your patch against neutron?
18:07 rmk Im not sure why it wouldn't?
18:07 rmk I don't have a neutron deployment to test against
18:07 boris-42 rmk we actually are facing some issues already
18:08 boris-42 rmk btw in your patch you forgot to add functional testing
18:08 boris-42 https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-scenarios/rally.yaml#L645
18:08 boris-42 ^ you should put here one more configuration for booting with nic
18:08 rmk ok
18:19 openstackgerrit Yan Ning proposed a change to stackforge/rally: add nova scenarios to rally-neutron.yaml  https://review.openstack.org/112684
18:27 coolsvap joined #openstack-rally
18:30 ningy joined #openstack-rally
18:47 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
18:55 penguinRaider boris-42, hi I made the patch for http_request based on what I understood would be thankful if you review it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113119/
19:22 boris-42 penguinRaider thanks I will
19:25 AlexF_ joined #openstack-rally
19:44 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
19:47 KimJ joined #openstack-rally
19:49 flwang_ joined #openstack-rally
20:16 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
20:45 gema_ joined #openstack-rally
21:02 gema joined #openstack-rally
21:12 gema_ joined #openstack-rally
21:15 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Extend sla output result  https://review.openstack.org/113253
21:17 gema joined #openstack-rally
21:22 gema_ joined #openstack-rally
21:50 flwang_ joined #openstack-rally
22:32 KimJ joined #openstack-rally
22:44 rediskin left #openstack-rally
23:36 asalkeld joined #openstack-rally
23:45 lordd_ joined #openstack-rally
23:48 boris-42 asalkeld hi there=)
23:48 asalkeld hi boris-42
23:48 boris-42 asalkeld any questions about Rally?=)
23:50 asalkeld hey boris-42 not really, I haven't dug into it yet
23:50 asalkeld just dropping in
23:50 flwang_ joined #openstack-rally
23:50 boris-42 asalkeld so this is the major place for discussion =) so welcome=)
23:51 asalkeld thx!
23:51 boris-42 asalkeld btw somebody from zhiyan team is working on patches for integration of osprofiler in heat
23:51 asalkeld ok, I'll keep an eye out for them
23:51 boris-42 asalkeld and plus https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112816/ and success=)
23:52 boris-42 asalkeld we will be able to understand "what" works slow under load=)
23:53 asalkeld that will be good
23:53 asalkeld ceilometer is keen to improve things
23:53 boris-42 asalkeld especially for heat that is on top of everything
23:53 asalkeld yeah

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary