Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-09-01

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:00 zhiyan_ joined #openstack-rally
00:02 clee joined #openstack-rally
00:02 nikhil___ joined #openstack-rally
00:06 rook joined #openstack-rally
00:33 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:36 rook joined #openstack-rally
00:43 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
00:54 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
01:21 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:26 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:55 mmalam joined #openstack-rally
01:55 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
01:55 rook joined #openstack-rally
02:03 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
02:27 mmalam joined #openstack-rally
02:32 mmalam joined #openstack-rally
02:32 mmalam hi
02:32 boris-42_ mmalam hi there
02:32 boris-42_ mmalam I catch you!=)
02:32 mmalam same here.
02:32 mmalam how are you doing.
02:32 boris-42_ mmalam so actually please just don't go to offiline
02:33 boris-42_ mmalam and we will reply you
02:33 mmalam sure
02:33 boris-42_ mmalam so about your question are you using neutron for boot-runcommand?
02:33 mmalam please see this error: 2014-08-30 08:39:40.806 4938 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task 582164ff-c063-4ebb-8d4e-af3f554f8d76 | ITER: 0 START
02:33 mmalam 2014-08-30 08:39:40.808 4939 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task 582164ff-c063-4ebb-8d4e-af3f554f8d76 | ITER: 1 START
02:33 mmalam 2014-08-30 08:39:49.519 4939 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task 582164ff-c063-4ebb-8d4e-af3f554f8d76 | ITER: 1 END: Error <type 'excepror'>: Server rally_novaserver_wrawyjlxmt is not attached to network private1. Attached networks are: []
02:33 boris-42_ mmalam neutron?
02:34 mmalam this is the benchmark: /home/stack/rally/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand-delete.json
02:34 mmalam yes
02:34 mmalam Neutron
02:34 boris-42_ mmalam so in case of neutron it doesn't work
02:34 boris-42_ mmalam without special context
02:34 mmalam how we will  make it work..........
02:34 boris-42_ mmalam that is still WIP but will be soon merge
02:35 mmalam but then how can i make the VMTasks work?
02:35 boris-42_ mmalam with benchmark context that creates networks
02:35 boris-42_ mmalam https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300/
02:35 mmalam I am trying to setup Iperf
02:35 mmalam as we talked last time.
02:36 mmalam as we talked last time. : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300/1/rally/benchmark/context/neutron_network.py will it work?
02:37 boris-42_ mmalam yep
02:37 boris-42_ mmalam it should work
02:37 mmalam i will chnage then the neutron_network.py file
02:37 mmalam and try.
02:39 mmalam This also requires change: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/vm
02:39 boris-42_ mmalam why are you going to chagne it?
02:39 boris-42_ mmalam I mean neutron context?
02:39 mmalam i am trying to run the VMTasks benchmark, as discussed last time for installation of iperf and then measuing the tcp/udp connection bandwidth
02:40 boris-42_ mmalam you have almost everything ready
02:40 boris-42_ mmalam with neutron context VMTask will work
02:40 mmalam you mentioned that VMTasks benchmark can be reused
02:41 boris-42_ mmalam so first of all take a look here http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cloud.openstack.devel/34078
02:41 boris-42_ mmalam guy have the similar issue with running VMTask
02:41 mmalam currently, no file for neutron_network.py here: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/rally/benchmark/context
02:41 boris-42_ mmalam cherry-pick
02:42 boris-42_ mmalam whole patch
02:43 mmalam after patch it will then work.
02:43 boris-42_ mmalam you need to specify it explicity
02:43 boris-42_ mmalam like in reply in mailing list
02:43 mmalam ok.
02:43 boris-42_ mmalam and about writing new benchmark
02:43 mmalam let me look the mailing list answer in detail.
02:43 boris-42_ mmalam from Timur*
02:44 boris-42_ mmalam about writing benchmark I think that you should just use the similar stuff to VMTask
02:44 boris-42_ mmalam but first of all is to get everything installed
02:44 mmalam yes, its important.
02:45 boris-42_ mmalam boot N vas / install iperf on all of them / run all iperf / delete all vms
02:45 boris-42_ N vas / N vms
02:45 mmalam yes
02:53 boris-42_ mmalam btw are you subscribed to mailing list?
02:53 boris-42_ mmalam openstack?
02:53 mmalam yes, openstack and openstack-dev
02:53 mmalam any other mailing list you are referring to?
02:54 boris-42_ mmalam in openstack-dev is some discussion (cisco guys) would like to add similar benchmark
02:54 boris-42_ mmalam lemme find the topic
02:54 mmalam please
02:54 boris-42_ mmalam "Performance Tests" do you see this in openstack-dev?
02:55 boris-42_ mmalam I know topic is not the best, I asked them to put normal but seems like they forgot..
02:55 mmalam ok, let me check
02:56 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
02:56 rook joined #openstack-rally
02:59 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
02:59 mmalam not able to find the correct thread
02:59 mmalam i think i have deleted it.
02:59 mmalam also not here: http://search.gmane.org/?query=performance+tests&amp;group=gmane.comp.cloud.openstack.devel
03:06 boris-42_ mmalam crap.. Okay I'll ask them to put normal email to mailing list
03:06 boris-42_ mmalam so please track openstack-dev mailing list
03:06 mmalam fine.
03:06 boris-42_ mmalam great, but you can start working
03:07 boris-42_ mmalam as I really don't see any better solution, until we make mini framework for this
03:07 boris-42_ yingjun hi man
03:07 yingjun boris-42_, hi
03:07 boris-42_ yingjun how are you?)
03:07 mmalam yes, the link you have given is certainly useful
03:07 mmalam i have seen it.
03:07 yingjun boris-42_, good, you?
03:08 boris-42_ yingjun me too, thanks
03:08 boris-42_ yingjun so are you still busy in internal stuff?
03:08 yingjun boris-42_, no, i get some spare time now!
03:08 boris-42_ yingjun that sound great
03:09 boris-42_ yingjun so do you need help about SLA stuff?
03:14 boris-42_ mmalam aroudn?
03:14 mmalam yes
03:14 yingjun boris-42_, yes, need some details
03:14 boris-42_ mmalam (yingjun  and you too) I introduced recently feature_request mechanism in rally
03:15 boris-42_ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/doc/feature_request
03:15 boris-42_ mmalam yingjun  ^  so if you some ideas how to make rally better for users you can share them
03:15 boris-42_ mmalam yingjun  it's quite simple now
03:16 yingjun boris-42_, that’s great
03:16 boris-42_ mmalam yingjun  yep it allows to simplify understanding of where we are going
03:17 boris-42_ you can left some comments here [openstack-dev][rally] Introduction to feature request mechanism in Rally =)
03:18 yingjun boris-42_, so if the feature is implemented, should we move this to a separate dir?
03:18 boris-42_ yingjun I do think so
03:18 boris-42_ yingjun there should be folder "resolved"
03:19 yingjun boris-42_, good
03:19 boris-42_ yingjun so the idea is to isolate end users from too much tech details
03:19 boris-42_ yingjun btw I am working on one part https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116766/
03:19 boris-42_ yingjun of LDAP stuff
03:26 yingjun boris-42_, is this to allow normal user to benchmark?
03:26 boris-42_ yingjun ya some kind of that
03:26 boris-42_ yingjun if you have just account to non admin user
03:26 boris-42_ yingjun you'll be able to benchmark with it
03:28 yingjun boris-42, so how do i know which benchmarks are allowed if i’m a non admin?
03:28 boris-42_ yingjun so with decorators
03:28 boris-42_ yingjun https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/keystone/basic.py#L23
03:28 boris-42_ yingjun but I am going to move it in separated validator
03:28 boris-42_ yingjun e.g.
03:29 yingjun boris-42_, ok
03:29 boris-42_ yingjun @validation.required_openstack(users=True, admin=False)
03:29 boris-42_ so there will be 4 possiblites
03:29 boris-42_ no admin no users (actually doesn't benchmark oepnstack)
03:30 boris-42_ only users, only admin, both admin and users
03:30 yingjun boris-42_, that looks good
03:30 boris-42_ depending on that in future benchmark.engine will make decisions
03:30 boris-42_ during validation can it perform task with current situation
03:30 boris-42_ yingjun but I decided to split this work in few patches
03:32 boris-42_ yingjun so if you have some free time could you review it?
03:33 yingjun boris-42_, ok, and about the SLA could you give me more details?
03:33 boris-42_ yingjun yep
03:34 boris-42_ yingjun one sec
03:34 boris-42_ yingjun actually few minutes be back soon
03:34 yingjun boris-42_, ok
03:39 boris-42_ yingjun so the issue is next
03:40 boris-42_ yingjun it's hard to work with sla currently
03:40 boris-42_ yingjun e.g. if you run "rally task results"
03:41 boris-42_ yingjun you won't see in JSON results of SLA stuff
03:41 yingjun boris-42_, yes
03:41 boris-42_ yingjun and that sux actually=)
03:42 boris-42_ yingjun so here we are storing results of 1 benchmark from task https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/engine.py#L241-L242
03:42 boris-42_ yingjun it makes sense to put here one more section: sla
03:42 boris-42_ yingjun and results for current operation
03:43 boris-42_ yingjun so we won't do this in CLI https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L384-L386
03:43 boris-42_ yingjun but in benchmark.engine
03:43 boris-42_ yingjun and here we will just display results
03:44 boris-42_ yingjun is it clear now?
03:44 asalkeld where is the profiler repo?
03:44 boris-42_ asalkeld https://github.com/stackforge/osprofiler
03:44 boris-42_ asalkeld ^ here is it
03:44 yingjun boris-42_, make sense to me
03:44 boris-42_ yingjun great
03:44 asalkeld thanks, boris-42_ for some reason I was looking in openstack/
03:44 boris-42_ asalkeld nope we are not so cool
03:44 boris-42_ asalkeld waiting for miracle
03:45 boris-42_ asalkeld actually for this probably https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825/
03:46 asalkeld boris-42_, looks like it needs updating with the spello's etc..
03:47 boris-42_ asalkeld lol
03:47 boris-42_ asalkeld you mean that spec?
03:47 asalkeld yeah
03:48 boris-42_ asalkeld nope we decided to merge it and create one more patch
03:48 boris-42_ asalkeld that fixes issues
03:48 asalkeld really?
03:48 boris-42_ asalkeld yep
03:48 boris-42_ asalkeld the idea is to get alignment between different projects (a tons of +1)
03:48 boris-42_ asalkeld not to practice in grammar=)
03:50 asalkeld i suppose if you update it all the +1's get wiped
03:57 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
03:57 rook joined #openstack-rally
03:57 boris-42_ asalkeld yep)
03:58 boris-42_ asalkeld so i won't do that)
04:11 vaidy joined #openstack-rally
04:53 Poornima_ joined #openstack-rally
04:58 rook joined #openstack-rally
04:58 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
05:13 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
05:32 asalkeld boris-42_, you about?
05:32 Poornima_ joined #openstack-rally
05:32 asalkeld boris-42_, heat calls many clients
05:33 asalkeld boris-42_, I am just wondering what is the best way of passing the trace info from heat-engine to the nova/cinder/... clients
05:36 asalkeld seems like is should just work
05:49 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
05:59 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
05:59 rook joined #openstack-rally
06:04 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
06:07 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:15 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:37 asalkeld joined #openstack-rally
06:38 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:41 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
06:49 openstackgerrit Endre Karlson proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Designate Records scenarios and tests  https://review.openstack.org/116406
06:59 rook joined #openstack-rally
06:59 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
07:03 debu_ joined #openstack-rally
07:05 mmalam|2 joined #openstack-rally
07:06 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
07:38 mmalam|2 # rally -v task start rally/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand-delete.json
07:38 mmalam|2 Command failed, please check log for more info
07:38 mmalam|2 2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 CRITICAL rally [-] ParserError: while parsing a flow mapping
07:38 mmalam|2 in "<string>", line 23, column 24:
07:38 mmalam|2 "context": {
07:39 mmalam|2 joined #openstack-rally
07:39 mmalam|3 joined #openstack-rally
07:40 mmalam|3 # rally -v task start rally/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand-delete.json
07:40 mmalam|3 Command failed, please check log for more info
07:40 mmalam|3 2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 CRITICAL rally [-] ParserError: while parsing a flow mapping
07:40 mmalam|3 in "<string>", line 23, column 24:
07:40 mmalam|3 "context": {
07:40 mmalam|3 ^
07:40 mmalam|3 expected ',' or '}', but got '<scalar>'
07:40 mmalam|3 in "<string>", line 28, column 18:
07:40 mmalam|3 "neutron_network": {
07:40 mmalam|3 ^
07:40 mmalam|3 2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 TRACE rally Traceback (most recent call last):
07:40 mmalam|3 2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 TRACE rally   File "/usr/local/bin/rally", line 10, in <module>
07:40 mmalam|3 hi boris
07:40 mmalam|3 i am getting some syntax error
08:00 rook joined #openstack-rally
08:00 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
08:06 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Cleanup refactoring(WIP)  https://review.openstack.org/116269
08:27 temujin joined #openstack-rally
08:44 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
08:49 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Fix AttributeError in admin_cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/118106
09:01 rook joined #openstack-rally
09:01 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
09:05 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
09:08 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Sahara Cluster and EDP contexts  https://review.openstack.org/115962
09:10 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
09:12 boris-42_ yingjun_ please don't touch cleanup
09:13 boris-42_ yingjun_ they are heavy under progress https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116269/
09:15 yingjun_ boris-42_, there is a AttributeError in my environment when running benchmark in rally/benchmark/wrappers/keystone.py
09:16 boris-42_ yingjun_ hm
09:16 rediskin joined #openstack-rally
09:17 yingjun_ boris-42_, i have reported a bug here https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1363888
09:19 boris-42_ rediskin ^
09:19 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
09:19 boris-42_ yingjun_ it's really strange
09:19 boris-42_ yingjun_ how tenantId can be None?
09:23 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Autoadd user stories,samples and feature requests to sphinx  https://review.openstack.org/113454
09:23 yingjun_ boris-42_, seems like it because that one of the user ‘heat_domain_admin’ don’t have tenant attached
09:23 yingjun_ boris-42_, in my environment
09:24 boris-42_ yingjun_ so the reason why I am asking is that rally is used own users
09:24 boris-42_ yingjun_ and they all have tenantsId
09:24 boris-42_ yingjun_ or we made some mistake in users context
09:25 yingjun_ boris-42_, no clue about this:<
09:39 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
09:39 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Autoadd user stories, samples and feature requests to sphinx  https://review.openstack.org/113454
09:42 asalkeld boris-42_, I am just testing out this profiler patch
09:43 asalkeld and everything looks ok, execpt osprofiler show is not working
09:43 boris-42_ asalkeld and how that goes?
09:44 asalkeld in the engine i am getting the profile stuff decoding
09:44 asalkeld (in the context)
09:44 asalkeld all seems right to me
09:44 boris-42_ asalkeld so what command are you running?
09:45 asalkeld heat --profile <bla> list
09:45 boris-42_ asalkeld list?
09:45 boris-42_ asalkeld show?
09:45 asalkeld list
09:45 boris-42_ asalkeld ah
09:45 asalkeld it still reads from the db
09:45 boris-42_ asalkeld I mean what osprofiler command
09:45 asalkeld osprofiler trace show --html c45da952-aad8-40d2-bc90-12b3f2ce4137
09:45 boris-42_ asalkeld and what it says?
09:46 boris-42_ asalkeld wrong one of next points?
09:46 asalkeld now it works - it must have known i was talking to you :-O
09:46 boris-42_ asalkeld btw something it takes some amount of time
09:46 boris-42_ asalkeld to ceilometer to actually write records
09:46 boris-42_ asalkeld especially under heavy load
09:47 asalkeld ok, forgot about that
09:47 boris-42_ asalkeld so it works?)
09:47 asalkeld yeah, but can't see much as it's in a vagrant vm
09:47 asalkeld but html flew out
09:48 boris-42_ asalkeld I am using .github.io
09:48 boris-42_ asalkeld to push htmls to github
09:48 asalkeld ok
09:48 boris-42_ asalkeld and then watch in my browser
09:48 asalkeld is it static?
09:49 boris-42_ asalkeld html?
09:49 asalkeld yeah
09:50 boris-42_ asalkeld yep it is static
09:50 asalkeld ok, so it's running on the engine
09:50 asalkeld but not on the api
09:51 boris-42_ asalkeld hm ?
09:51 boris-42_ asalkeld how it got in engine? if it didn't go through api?
09:51 asalkeld it went tho'
09:52 asalkeld aaa, I need to set the program binary
09:52 asalkeld (in the api)
09:52 asalkeld boris-42_, looking forward to creating a big stack as it should go to all the other projects too
09:53 boris-42_ asalkeld it won't work
09:53 asalkeld it's in nova and cinder - right?
09:53 boris-42_ asalkeld it won't work yet
09:53 asalkeld boris-42_, why not?
09:53 boris-42_ asalkeld cause other projects sux
09:53 boris-42_ asalkeld you need patches for them
09:53 asalkeld :-O
09:53 boris-42_ asalkeld they didn't merge
09:53 asalkeld i see
09:53 boris-42_ asalkeld like in nova it's -2 cause of Joe Gordon
09:53 asalkeld why?
09:54 boris-42_ asalkeld he is waiting for approval of that doc
09:54 asalkeld i see
09:54 boris-42_ asalkeld spec*
09:54 boris-42_ asalkeld so he decided to put -2
09:54 asalkeld you got a pointer to the nova review
09:54 boris-42_ asalkeld as usually on my patches
09:54 asalkeld so I can apply locally
09:54 boris-42_ asalkeld https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105096/
09:54 boris-42_ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105089/
09:54 asalkeld (hopefully, it will all be sorted out)
09:55 boris-42_ asalkeld and you need to change in cinder.conf
09:55 boris-42_ asalkeld to turn on profiling
09:55 asalkeld yeah
09:55 boris-42_ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103359/ and this patch
09:55 boris-42_ so you'll get nova/glance/cinder
09:55 boris-42_ as well you can use this
09:55 boris-42_ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103368/
09:56 boris-42_ but here you need to add to paste.ini as well
09:56 boris-42_ (cause they think that it's okay to left user change that)
09:56 asalkeld sure, I got the hang of ti
09:56 boris-42_ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114856/
09:56 boris-42_ and this one
09:56 boris-42_ =)
09:57 asalkeld boris-42_, how do i add my own trace points?
09:57 boris-42_ asalkeld read reame
09:57 asalkeld :-)
09:57 asalkeld np
09:57 boris-42_ https://github.com/stackforge/osprofiler/blob/master/README.rst
09:57 boris-42_ I described
09:57 boris-42_ asalkeld "4 ways to add a new trace point"
09:58 boris-42_ asalkeld it will be simpler then in irc=)
09:58 asalkeld sure
10:00 asalkeld boris-42_, https://review.openstack.org/118115
10:00 asalkeld i haven't checked the tests
10:00 asalkeld but it works
10:00 boris-42_ asalkeld could you actually put commit message?
10:00 boris-42_ asalkeld so other can try it as well
10:01 asalkeld boris-42_, i got docs ;)
10:01 asalkeld https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118115/1/doc/source/getting_started/on_devstack.rst
10:01 rook joined #openstack-rally
10:02 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
10:05 asalkeld https://review.openstack.org/118118
10:13 boris-42_ asalkeld great=)
10:13 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
10:22 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Autoadd user stories, samples and feature requests to sphinx  https://review.openstack.org/113454
10:31 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Sahara Job Execution benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/116881
10:33 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Sahara Cluster and EDP contexts  https://review.openstack.org/115962
10:33 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Sahara Job Execution benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/116881
10:57 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
10:59 asalkeld_afk boris-42_, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2663410/stack2.html
10:59 asalkeld_afk nova not working yet
11:02 rook joined #openstack-rally
11:02 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
11:12 boris-42_ asalkeld it should
11:12 boris-42_ asalkeld I was testing those patches
11:12 boris-42_ asalkeld did you change paste.ini files?
11:13 asalkeld boris-42_, the nova one is enabled
11:13 asalkeld (already)
11:13 boris-42_ asalkeld hm so it works?)
11:13 asalkeld let me try again
11:14 boris-42_ asalkeld so you need to chagne paste.ini restart all services and cherry-pick 2 patches
11:14 boris-42_ asalkeld probably you'll need to restart heat as well
11:14 boris-42_ asalkeld cause it already use old version of nova python client
11:18 asalkeld boris-42_, this is a bit better: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2663410/stack2.html
11:18 asalkeld no keystone, but nova is there
11:19 boris-42_ asalkeld hm why just few calls?)
11:19 asalkeld it's nova boot and and nova get's
11:19 boris-42_ asalkeld oh requesting 3 times heat_kye
11:19 boris-42_ asalkeld seems not optimal ^_^
11:20 asalkeld yeah, there is a validate phase the happens twice i think
11:20 asalkeld 2*flavor lookup too
11:20 asalkeld and glance to see if the image exists
11:20 boris-42_ asalkeld ya so that's why I think osprofiler is essential )
11:21 asalkeld yeah nice,
11:21 boris-42_ asalkeld so I hope we will get this in Heat in Juno?)
11:22 asalkeld shrug, I'll try
11:23 boris-42_ asalkeld https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118115/
11:23 asalkeld ok, will do
11:34 rook joined #openstack-rally
11:37 mmalam joined #openstack-rally
11:38 mmalam hi boris
11:58 mmalam hi
12:00 boris-42_ mmalam pls write full (boris-42)
12:00 boris-42_ mmalam otherwise I don't get notification
12:03 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
12:05 mmalam boris-42_: there?
12:06 boris-42_ mmalam yep
12:10 asalkeld boris-42, how does the keystoneclient work if it doesn't set headers?
12:10 boris-42 asalkeld it set=)
12:10 boris-42 asalkeld they merged one patch
12:10 asalkeld I see
12:10 asalkeld ok, thx
12:11 boris-42 asalkeld https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103367/
12:12 asalkeld yeah, that looks familia
12:14 mmalam joined #openstack-rally
12:16 mmalam http://paste.openstack.org/show/104194/
12:17 boris-42 mmalam ^ so the bug is in line 29
12:17 boris-42 mmalam "," at the end
12:18 mmalam fine
12:18 mmalam let me try
12:26 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
12:43 mmalam boris-42: Error changed. see here: http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fpaste.openstack.org%2Fshow%2F104204%2F&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-FjpARSQFoupqUk0iBnlqccmsnw
12:43 mmalam http://paste.openstack.org/show/104204/
12:47 asalkeld boris-42, finally got keystone working: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2663410/stack2.html
12:48 boris-42 mmalam hm
12:48 boris-42 asalkeld your morderd~
12:49 boris-42 asalkeld don't kill keyston!
12:49 boris-42 =)
12:49 boris-42 mmalam hm
12:49 mmalam yes
12:49 boris-42 mmalam it's useless for me
12:49 boris-42 mmalam if you don't share together with task config
12:49 mmalam are you referring to the python code?
12:50 boris-42 mmalam nope
12:50 boris-42 mmalam you still don't put proper input config
12:50 mmalam problem in the JASON file?
12:52 boris-42 mmalam yep it clearly says that to you..
12:53 boris-42 mmalam I don't know why it didn't put name, reason, config
12:53 mmalam should i execute it with -vd?
12:53 boris-42 mmalam nope
12:54 asalkeld i am off to bed: thanks for the help boris-42
12:54 boris-42 asalkeld see you
12:54 boris-42 mmalam one more time
12:54 boris-42 mmalam unit you don't share input config
12:54 boris-42 mmalam I can't help you
12:54 mmalam please guide me what input config you are referring to.
12:55 mmalam input JASON file, python code or what?
12:55 boris-42 json*
12:55 boris-42 that is task config*
12:55 boris-42 mmalam I don't know what you are running, how can I help you?
12:56 mmalam openstack
12:57 boris-42 mmalam ?
12:57 mmalam yes boris
12:57 boris-42 mmalam please provide JSON with task configuration that you are running with "rally task start --file SOME_FILE"
12:57 boris-42 SOME_FILE is interesting for me
12:57 boris-42 otherwise I really can't help
12:58 mmalam rally -v task start rally/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand-delete.json
12:58 boris-42 yep
12:58 boris-42 but you change it
12:58 mmalam yes
12:58 boris-42 so I don't know what you are running
12:59 mmalam modified jason file here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/104203/
12:59 boris-42 mmalam so you have syntax error
13:00 boris-42 at line 27
13:00 boris-42 mmalam missing ",
13:00 boris-42 ","
13:00 mmalam even if we put ",", it wont help much
13:00 boris-42 mmalam it will help
13:00 boris-42 mmalam cause it is JSON
13:00 mmalam wait a sec
13:01 boris-42 mmalam and without it is not valid task configuartion
13:01 mmalam let me try with "," and grespond.
13:01 mmalam respond*
13:01 boris-42 mmalam you can use this site http://www.jslint.com/
13:01 boris-42 mmalam to check manually syntax
13:01 boris-42 mmalam it has pretty ouput
13:04 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
13:04 mmalam Error changed http://paste.openstack.org/show/104217/
13:05 boris-42 mmalam please
13:05 boris-42 mmalam share every time task config
13:06 mmalam ok fine
13:07 mmalam config+Error: http://paste.openstack.org/show/104218/
13:10 ekarlso boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116406/5/rally/benchmark/scenarios/designate/basic.py < how can we track create time and list time ?
13:10 ekarlso ehm, delete :)
13:10 boris-42 ekarlso one sec =)
13:10 boris-42 mmalam seems like mini bug in rally
13:10 boris-42 mmalam lemme analyze it
13:14 boris-42 mmalam ya it's bug
13:14 boris-42 mmalam wanna fix it?
13:18 boris-42 yingjun aryound?
13:21 Poornima_ joined #openstack-rally
13:48 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
13:49 ekarlso joined #openstack-rally
13:52 boris-42 ekarlso so about your patch
13:52 boris-42 ekarlso lemme see
13:58 boris-42 ekarlso so why not just (create X) and then (delete X)
14:05 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
14:06 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
14:25 ekarlso boris-42: ?
14:25 boris-42 ekarlso I'll left comment in code
14:25 boris-42 I thought I left it lol
14:26 mmalam joined #openstack-rally
14:27 mmalam boris-42: I think there is no problem in Rally
14:27 boris-42 mmalam there is
14:27 mmalam the error is in our settings.
14:27 boris-42 mmalam we caught bug
14:27 boris-42 mmalam in rally
14:27 boris-42 stannie is going to fix it
14:27 boris-42 stannie =)
14:27 mmalam the reason is that why cisco guy then run it.
14:27 mmalam the email thread you forwarded to me, has successfuly run it.
14:27 mmalam http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cloud.openstack.devel/34078
14:30 openstackgerrit Pierre Padrixe proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Fix wrong parameter used by raise of InvalidBenchmarkConfig  https://review.openstack.org/118169
14:32 stannie done :)
14:32 boris-42 stannie merged
14:32 boris-42 stannie =)
14:32 stannie yea thank you
14:32 mmalam this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118169/
14:33 ekarlso boris-42: awesome
14:33 boris-42 ekarlso does that works for you?
14:34 mmalam boris-42: this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118169/
14:35 boris-42 mmalam ya this makes sense
14:35 boris-42 mmalam lemme show you difference
14:36 boris-42 mmalam http://paste.openstack.org/show/104258/
14:37 mmalam got it boss
14:37 boris-42 mmalam so did you find the source of issue?
14:37 mmalam not yet
14:37 mmalam let me merge it again.
14:37 boris-42 mmalam so you can cherry-pick that patch
14:37 boris-42 mmalam and try to re-run
14:37 mmalam yes
14:38 mmalam i will paste my results.
14:43 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Sahara Job Execution benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/116881
15:06 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
15:08 DuncanT-1 left #openstack-rally
15:16 openstackgerrit Endre Karlson proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Designate Records scenarios and tests  https://review.openstack.org/116406
15:16 ekarlso https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116406 guys :)
15:17 ekarlso git oh, dang
15:17 ekarlso I see I forgot to update the concurrency amount
15:44 openstackgerrit Lingxian Kong proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add new "volumes" context  https://review.openstack.org/116446
15:46 openstackgerrit Lingxian Kong proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add cinder snapshot scenario tests  https://review.openstack.org/110360
15:51 openstackgerrit Lingxian Kong proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add cinder snapshot scenario tests  https://review.openstack.org/110360
15:53 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
16:01 openstackgerrit Endre Karlson proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Designate - update example quotas in scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/118188
16:02 openstackgerrit Endre Karlson proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Designate Records scenarios and tests  https://review.openstack.org/116406
16:03 ekarlso boris-42: that should do it : )
16:06 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
16:17 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Fix wrong parameter used by raise of InvalidBenchmarkConfig  https://review.openstack.org/118169
16:27 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
17:07 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
17:42 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
17:44 penguinRaider joined #openstack-rally
17:57 rook joined #openstack-rally
18:08 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
19:02 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
19:07 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
19:07 jjmb2 joined #openstack-rally
19:15 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
19:30 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Impove benchmark validation and cleanup benchmarks decorators  https://review.openstack.org/111989
19:31 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Impove benchmark validation and cleanup benchmarks decorators  https://review.openstack.org/111989
19:59 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
20:10 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
20:20 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Impove benchmark validation and cleanup benchmarks decorators  https://review.openstack.org/111989
20:20 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Improve usability of base.Scenario.validate()  https://review.openstack.org/118212
20:25 boris-42 rmk around?
20:33 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Testing crap  https://review.openstack.org/116603
21:30 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
21:34 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Impove benchmark validation and cleanup benchmarks decorators  https://review.openstack.org/111989
21:35 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
21:47 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
21:50 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
22:05 asalkeld joined #openstack-rally
22:13 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Improve usability of base.Scenario.validate()  https://review.openstack.org/118212
23:00 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Designate - update example quotas in scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/118188
23:44 rediskin left #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary