Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-09-30

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:21 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
00:21 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
00:27 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
00:43 shakayumi joined #openstack-rally
01:01 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
01:18 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
01:20 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
01:26 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
01:26 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add detailed description for rally commands  https://review.openstack.org/124910
01:29 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
02:16 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
02:49 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
02:52 shakayumi joined #openstack-rally
02:56 alexiz joined #openstack-rally
03:24 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
04:03 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
04:05 marcoemorais1 joined #openstack-rally
04:39 vaidy joined #openstack-rally
04:52 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:02 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
05:36 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
06:27 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
06:34 vaidy_ril joined #openstack-rally
06:36 k4n0 boris-42, ping
06:42 boris-42 k4n0 pong
06:42 k4n0 boris-42, I was fixing this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1351567
06:42 k4n0 boris-42, I will check if "use_public_urls" is configured
06:43 k4n0 boris-42, if not configured , do we use endpoint_type as "admin" or "internal" ?
06:46 boris-42 k4n0 manage network
06:46 boris-42 k4n0 so as far as I know it's internal
06:46 boris-42 k4n0 but not sure 100%
06:46 boris-42 k4n0 I would prefer to refactor this code
06:46 k4n0 boris-42, you want to fix this bug?
06:47 boris-42 k4n0 so we will be able to setup one of networks
06:47 boris-42 k4n0 I mean can you refactor this arguments
06:47 k4n0 boris-42, sure
06:48 boris-42 k4n0 use_network: "internal"/"manage"/"amdin"
06:48 boris-42 k4n0 so user will be able to specify any of them
06:49 k4n0 boris-42, got it, this will also need change to deployment json ?
06:49 boris-42 k4n0 ya
06:49 k4n0 boris-42, ok
06:49 k4n0 boris-42, on it
07:57 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
08:14 boris-42 msdubov around?
08:20 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:30 cdent joined #openstack-rally
08:36 vaidy_ril joined #openstack-rally
08:57 lordd joined #openstack-rally
09:13 boris-42 amaretskiy hi there
09:13 boris-42 amaretskiy any progress on new plot2html ?
09:17 amaretskiy boris-42 hi
09:17 amaretskiy boris-42 yes there is a progress but not ready to submit the WIP patch
09:18 amaretskiy boris-42, I need more time
09:18 amaretskiy boris-42 I'm trying to get rid of jquery at all
09:18 boris-42 amaretskiy why?
09:18 amaretskiy boris-42 also I use responsive layout
09:19 amaretskiy boris-42 I'm getting rid of jquery because of comment in code - it sounds reasonable
09:19 boris-42 amaretskiy nope it's not reasonable
09:19 boris-42 amaretskiy we are going to add a lot of functionality
09:21 amaretskiy boris-42 https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/processing/src/index.mako#L13
09:21 amaretskiy but we can remove jquery
09:22 amaretskiy boris-42 the idea to use minimum of js libs is great
09:23 boris-42 amaretskiy I don't thing so
09:23 amaretskiy boris-42 why do not make the html better
09:23 boris-42 amaretskiy you won't it make a better if you remove query =)
09:23 boris-42 jquery
09:23 amaretskiy d3js can do most of jquery tasks
09:23 boris-42 amaretskiy it can't do task of angular
09:23 boris-42 amaretskiy that I was supposing to add to make really clean code
09:23 amaretskiy boris-42, ok, btw I know jquery very well so that is simplier solution
09:24 amaretskiy boris-42 - angular seems to be the 'cannon for birds'
09:25 amaretskiy boris-42 why to load a heavy lib to make simple task that jquery does perfect
09:25 amaretskiy boris-42, the angular is not a problem, I will use it
09:26 boris-42 amaretskiy nope it's just a nice lib
09:26 boris-42 amaretskiy including billions of things that we are going to make in our report
09:26 amaretskiy boris-42 the only confusion for me is using too many libs (d3js jquery angular) for very simple page
09:27 boris-42 amaretskiy it's not simple page
09:27 amaretskiy boris-42 i can make great pagewith only d3
09:27 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
09:28 amaretskiy boris-42 let me use d3 only and submit a WIP?
09:28 amaretskiy boris-42 and if something is wrong - we can use other libs
09:52 openstackgerrit A change was merged to stackforge/rally: Added cleanup for Zaqar objects  https://review.openstack.org/124115
09:58 rvcehimanshu1 joined #openstack-rally
10:29 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
10:49 tzabal joined #openstack-rally
11:11 pboros joined #openstack-rally
11:13 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
11:39 openstackgerrit Rohan Kanade proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Allow user specified endpoint_type in config  https://review.openstack.org/125012
12:08 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
12:18 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
12:18 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
12:33 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Improve CLI functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/124378
12:35 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Improve CLI functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/124378
12:59 rook joined #openstack-rally
13:02 vaidy_ril joined #openstack-rally
13:28 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Testing bug #1372691  https://review.openstack.org/125051
14:03 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
14:14 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
14:16 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Improve CLI functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/124378
14:16 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Improve CLI functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/124378
14:19 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/rally: remove two unused exceptions  https://review.openstack.org/125068
14:23 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
14:26 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Remove two unused exceptions  https://review.openstack.org/125068
14:44 RaginBaj_ joined #openstack-rally
14:46 RaginBaj_ joined #openstack-rally
15:24 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
15:58 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
15:58 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
16:17 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
16:24 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
16:30 rook boris-42 !! no questions about Rally in the User Survey!?
16:31 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
16:51 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed a change to stackforge/rally: (WIP) Improvements for task plot2html  https://review.openstack.org/125119
16:56 amaretskiy1 joined #openstack-rally
16:56 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
16:59 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
17:02 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
17:03 k4n0 boris-42, msdubov meeting?
17:05 msdubov_ k4n0, boris-42 seems to be offline at the moment, I'm currently onthe go so I can't chair the meeting either
17:05 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:05 msdubov_ k4n0 You can start it if you wish
17:05 k4n0 Ill start
17:06 msdubov_ k4n0 thanks!
17:41 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed a change to stackforge/rally: Add detailed description for rally commands  https://review.openstack.org/124910
17:55 boris-42 rook we are not an official project
17:55 rook boris-42 oh ....
17:55 rook i thought it got voted in?!
17:56 boris-42 rook sooo that means that TC don't care about us
17:56 boris-42 rook nope
17:56 rook dumb
17:56 rook ;(
17:56 boris-42 rook they said that we are duplicating tempest
17:56 boris-42 rook so we shouldn't be in openstack
17:56 boris-42 rook so no survey
17:59 rook bummer
18:01 rook boris-42: can you tell me about RaaS? Rally as a service, and how I can use it?
18:03 boris-42 rook it's in progress
18:05 boris-42 rook yingjun and andreykurilin are working on it
18:48 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
19:02 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
19:48 cdent joined #openstack-rally
20:02 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
20:04 dpaterson Does rally follow the same gerrit/git review process?  I have implemented a blueprint and would like to submit my code for review but not seeing anything on the Rally wiki
20:15 openstackgerrit David Paterson proposed a change to stackforge/rally: New feature to compare verification results  https://review.openstack.org/125184
20:23 openstackgerrit David Paterson proposed a change to stackforge/rally: New feature to compare verification results  https://review.openstack.org/125184
20:27 openstackgerrit David Paterson proposed a change to stackforge/rally: New feature to compare verification results  https://review.openstack.org/125184
20:54 oanufriev dpaterson: >> Does rally follow the same gerrit/git review process   Yes, it does
20:57 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
20:57 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
21:03 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:20 boris-42 dpaterson hi there

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary