Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-11-13

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:02 marcoemorais1 joined #openstack-rally
00:12 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor UserGenerator  https://review.openstack.org/119297
00:17 Viswanath joined #openstack-rally
00:21 flwang1 boris-42: no worries, I fixed it
00:24 boris-42 flwang1: great=)
00:25 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:47 flwang1 boris-42: still around?
00:47 boris-42 flwang1: yep
00:47 flwang1 boris-42: could u pls take a look at this http://paste.openstack.org/show/132578/ ?
00:49 boris-42 flwang1:  hm seems like a bug in glance context
00:49 flwang1 boris-42: ok, let me try another scenario
00:49 boris-42 flwang1:  don't put image context
00:51 flwang1 boris-42: now i'm running cinder test
00:52 flwang1 boris-42: http://paste.openstack.org/show/132579/
00:52 flwang1 seems it doesn't correct
00:53 flwang1 i'm running rally for an existing cloud with SSL enabled
00:53 boris-42 flwang1: ah
00:53 boris-42 flwang1:  for that stuff you need to specify special argument in rally.conf
00:53 boris-42 flwang1:  one second
00:54 boris-42 flwang1: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/etc/rally/rally.conf.sample#L146-L150
00:54 boris-42 flwang1:  that should fix everything=)
00:54 flwang1 boris-42: i have configured it
00:55 boris-42 flwang1: so it doesn't work with that configuration?
00:56 flwang1 boris-42: I set https_insecure=True, now I'm going to keep it as false and set the cert to try again
00:56 flwang1 boris-42: we really want to leverage rally for performance test :)
00:57 boris-42 flwang1:  so actually it should work..
00:57 boris-42 flwang1:  at least it worked in case of SSL
00:57 boris-42 flwang1:  are you sure that you specify everything as required?)
00:57 boris-42 flwang1:  and this stuff as well https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/etc/rally/rally.conf.sample#L150 ?)
00:58 boris-42 flwang1:  so here is the code https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/osclients.py
00:59 boris-42 flwang1:  we are passing that argument.. maybe we are missing something=)
01:00 flwang1 boris-42: got the same result :(
01:00 boris-42 flwang1:  sooo actually you can see osclients code
01:00 boris-42 flwang1:  maybe we missed something...
01:00 flwang1 rally show images
01:00 flwang1 the command works
01:01 boris-42 flwang1: hmhm
01:01 flwang1 so it means the connect to openstack is correct
01:01 flwang1 so the problem is why the scenario test doesn't work
01:01 boris-42 flwang1: it's almost the same code
01:01 flwang1 yep, that's my question :D
01:01 boris-42 flwang1: except that we are using temporary created tenant and user
01:02 boris-42 flwang1: and in rally show images we are using admin user (that is passed)
01:05 boris-42 flwang1:  that can make sense?
01:05 flwang1 boris-42: make sense for me, but I still got the same error :(
01:05 boris-42 flwang1:  why it make sense for you lol
01:05 boris-42 ?
01:06 boris-42 flwang1:  i mean maybe it SSL doesn't work for some reason for pre created users and so on
01:07 flwang1 boris-42: I got different error for different components now :(-------------
01:07 boris-42 flwang1: ?
01:07 flwang1 Reason: Invalid scenario argument: 'You should specify 'users' context'
01:08 boris-42 so it's validation error of rally
01:08 boris-42 I mean task is wrong
01:08 boris-42 you need to sepcify in conext section "users"
01:08 flwang1 in rally.conf?
01:08 boris-42 no
01:08 boris-42 in task
01:08 boris-42 that you are trying to run
01:09 flwang1 but I'm using the latest version of Rally
01:09 flwang1 I assume the code should be workable ;)
01:09 boris-42 You specified wrong task it's not about version of Rally
01:09 boris-42 "tasks" are not "code"
01:09 boris-42 "tasks" are what you are running
01:09 boris-42 You can specify anything in file
01:09 boris-42 and rally will say you if it is wrong
01:10 boris-42 or not
01:10 flwang1 so you means the tasks I'm running from doc/samples maybe deprecated/out-of-date ?
01:10 boris-42 and won't allow you to run wrong task
01:10 boris-42 nope they can't
01:10 boris-42 but there are few of them
01:10 boris-42 without "users" section
01:10 boris-42 in "context"
01:10 boris-42 you should put it
01:10 flwang1 that doesn't make sense for me
01:10 boris-42 please
01:11 boris-42 what task you are using?
01:11 boris-42 I will send you fixed..
01:11 flwang1 doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/ceilometer/list-meters.json
01:11 flwang1 boris-42: my point is, after every change of Rally, I think all the samples scenarios should be run to make sure they are workable, right?
01:12 flwang1 because most of the rally user just want to leverage the existed task instead of creating new
01:12 boris-42 flwang1:  http://paste.openstack.org/show/132580/
01:13 boris-42 flwang1: "task are just samples"
01:13 boris-42 flwang1:  in doc samples to not write from scratch and put values that you want
01:14 flwang1 boris-42: but even document, we should make sure they're update to date, agree?
01:14 boris-42 flwang1: you can update it
01:14 boris-42 flwang1:  I'll merge that patch
01:14 flwang1 boris-42: lol
01:15 boris-42 flwang1: but that case can't be checked for now in gates
01:15 flwang1 boris-42: so why not add this as a gate ?
01:15 boris-42 flwang1:  becasue of billions reasons=)
01:15 flwang1 :-/
01:15 boris-42 flwang1: this is run in gates https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/rally-scenarios
01:16 boris-42 flwang1:  that one someday will be tested better
01:16 flwang1 boris-42: ok
01:17 boris-42 flwang1: they are actually aready tested
01:17 boris-42 flwang1:  but not fully..
01:17 boris-42 flwang1:  so this case with context can't be tested without cloud for now..
01:17 flwang1 http://paste.openstack.org/show/132582/
01:18 flwang1 boris-42: ah, that makes sense
01:18 boris-42 flwang1:  I am actually refactoring that at moment lol
01:18 flwang1 after add the context, I got the same error, kill me please
01:18 boris-42 flwang1: what you are expecting?
01:18 boris-42 flwang1:  to get another error? it will be strange..
01:19 flwang1 boris-42: are you kidding me?
01:19 flwang1 boris-42: i'd like to get it works :D
01:19 boris-42 flwang1:  you won't get it worked, if you just try to pick random tasks
01:20 boris-42 flwang1:  something is broken with your rally.conf (and configuration of ssl) or in code
01:20 flwang1 boris-42: gosh
01:20 Andy_Yan joined #openstack-rally
01:20 boris-42 flwang1:  can you share rally.conf that you are using in /etc/rally/rally.conf ?
01:21 flwang1 boris-42: sure
01:22 flwang1 http://paste.openstack.org/show/132583/
01:22 flwang1 I will be happy to know if i missed something
01:22 boris-42 https_insecure=False
01:22 boris-42 flwang1:  ^ hMM
01:22 boris-42 flwang1: it should be True..
01:29 boris-42 аflwang1 does it make any sense?
01:33 flwang1 boris-42: sorry, but no
01:33 boris-42 flwang1: hmhm
01:33 flwang1 let me explain
01:33 flwang1 boris-42: True means you can talk with openstack without cert but with credentials
01:34 flwang1 False mean you must provide the cert
01:34 flwang1 boris-42: I tried both, got the same error, so i'm a little bit confused
01:34 flwang1 and given the command 'rally show images' works, so I'm not sure if there is any issue with other configuration
01:35 flwang1 boris-42: as you mentioned, rally is using the same clients for scenario test and command 'rally show', so the should work both or not
01:36 boris-42 flwang1: yep
01:36 boris-42 flwang1:  and as well I said that only difference is
01:36 boris-42 flwang1: that in scenario we are using pre created users and tenatns
01:37 boris-42 flwang1:  instead of admin
01:37 boris-42 flwang1:  can you try this one https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/keystone/create-and-delete-user.json
01:37 boris-42 flwang1:  it uses only admin access
01:40 flwang1 boris-42: this task works
01:40 boris-42 flwang1:  so
01:40 flwang1 at least, it's still running
01:40 boris-42 flwang1:  can you do next step
01:40 boris-42 flwang1:  use keystone cli to create some tenant & user
01:41 boris-42 flwang1:  then try to login with them and boot vm for example
01:41 flwang1 OK, good point
01:41 boris-42 flwang1:  I mean from cli*
01:41 boris-42 flwang1: that will help us to understand where is the issue=)
01:41 flwang1 boris-42:  i can see your point
01:41 flwang1 check if the client works or not, right?
01:42 boris-42 flwang1: check if non admin user work*
01:42 flwang1 boris-42: ah, there is a backgroud
01:42 flwang1 our env is running icehouse
01:42 boris-42 flwang1: hm it shouldn't be a big deal..
01:42 flwang1 so maybe the client has some compatiable issue with the server/service
01:43 boris-42 flwang1: could you just try to do what I said?
01:43 flwang1 doing
01:43 boris-42 flwang1:  thanks
01:43 boris-42 flwang1: actually ice house should work IMO
01:51 boris-42 flwang1: hm?)
01:52 flwang1 boris-42: running into some issue for network creating
01:52 boris-42 flwang1: hmhm
01:52 flwang1 boris-42: I will confirm with our devops guy
01:52 boris-42 flwang1:  why do you need network for project?
01:52 flwang1 boris-42: thank you so much for your support, man
01:52 boris-42 flwang1:  so seems like there are some issues with usage of non-admin users
01:52 flwang1 I'm creating instance
01:52 flwang1 boris-42: maybe
01:53 flwang1 boris-42: you gave me a good point
01:53 boris-42 flwang1: in any case we will test tomorrow
01:53 flwang1 boris-42: thank you soooooooo much
01:53 boris-42 flwang1: cause it's 5 a.m. everybody is sleeping lol=)
01:53 flwang1 boris-42: really appreciate for your time
01:53 flwang1 oh, your mom is going to beat you, boy
01:54 boris-42 flwang1:  np, I'll ping you tomorrow =) for now you can play with keysotne benchmark that are run from admin (like in keystone/*)
01:54 boris-42 flwang1: hehe tsss she doesn't know=)
01:58 flwang1 boris-42: have a good night
01:59 boris-42 flwang1:  so please keep me up to date about this, if we have issues with ssl in rally we should fix it=)
01:59 boris-42 flwang1:  unfortunatelly we don't test this..
01:59 flwang1 boris-42: sure, I will bug you later ;)
02:14 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
02:25 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
02:26 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
02:33 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
02:45 erkules_ joined #openstack-rally
03:01 lordd joined #openstack-rally
03:02 openstackgerrit 7.NoJ proposed stackforge/rally: It will run into exception of 'KeyError': 0, because it should get 'subnets' first from the dictionary. link: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/pull/5 Signed-off-by: Jiantao He hejiantao5@gmail.com Change-Id: I74ca5ab53610e28d3933bad8a24c4272c51f92c4  https://review.openstack.org/134106
03:10 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor generic cleanup mechanism part 3  https://review.openstack.org/129060
03:10 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor generic cleanup mechanism part 2  https://review.openstack.org/132437
03:10 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor generic cleanup mechanism part 1  https://review.openstack.org/132436
03:22 erkules joined #openstack-rally
03:28 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
03:49 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
03:50 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
03:52 lordd joined #openstack-rally
03:52 lordd joined #openstack-rally
03:57 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
04:05 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
04:11 igormarnat_ joined #openstack-rally
04:11 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
04:12 mitz joined #openstack-rally
04:12 jseutter joined #openstack-rally
04:13 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
04:14 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:18 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
04:21 vaidy joined #openstack-rally
04:46 fandi joined #openstack-rally
04:59 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
05:04 Andy_Yan joined #openstack-rally
05:15 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
05:17 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
05:17 marcoemorais1 joined #openstack-rally
05:19 neeti joined #openstack-rally
05:23 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:03 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
06:08 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
06:09 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:27 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
06:43 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
07:11 ehaselwanter joined #openstack-rally
07:40 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
07:41 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
07:43 erwan_taf hi there
07:46 openstackgerrit 7.NoJ proposed stackforge/rally: Fix tempest.conf subnets configuration  It will run into exception of 'KeyError': 0, because it should get 'subnets' first from the dictionary. Change-Id: I74ca5ab53610e28d3933bad8a24c4272c51f92c4  https://review.openstack.org/134106
07:46 openstackgerrit 7.NoJ proposed stackforge/rally: Fix tempest.conf subnets configuration  It will run into exception of 'KeyError': 0,  because it should get 'subnets' first from the dictionary. Change-Id: I74ca5ab53610e28d3933bad8a24c4272c51f92c4  https://review.openstack.org/134106
07:46 openstackgerrit 7.NoJ proposed stackforge/rally: Fix tempest.conf subnets configuration   It will run into exception of 'KeyError': 0,  because it should get 'subnets' first from the dictionary.  https://review.openstack.org/134106
08:04 lordd joined #openstack-rally
08:06 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
08:31 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
08:37 fandi joined #openstack-rally
09:10 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
09:14 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:38 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
09:40 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor UserGenerator  https://review.openstack.org/119297
09:48 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
10:46 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
10:57 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
11:09 rook joined #openstack-rally
11:18 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix tempest.conf subnets configuration   It will run into exception of 'KeyError': 0,  because it should get 'subnets' first from the dictionary.  https://review.openstack.org/134106
11:22 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Base HTML templates and improvements for task report  https://review.openstack.org/131844
11:31 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
11:50 fandi joined #openstack-rally
11:53 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:54 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
12:04 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Refactor UserGenerator  https://review.openstack.org/119297
12:09 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
12:10 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
12:10 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
12:12 lordd joined #openstack-rally
12:26 rook joined #openstack-rally
12:34 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:38 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
12:42 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
13:01 pboros joined #openstack-rally
13:16 fandi joined #openstack-rally
13:56 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
13:59 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
14:11 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
14:28 lordd joined #openstack-rally
14:44 rook joined #openstack-rally
14:46 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Base HTML templates and improvements for task report  https://review.openstack.org/131844
15:13 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
15:29 lordd joined #openstack-rally
15:51 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
15:52 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
15:58 ntrueblood joined #openstack-rally
16:02 lordd joined #openstack-rally
16:05 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Refactor generic cleanup mechanism part 1  https://review.openstack.org/132436
16:31 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor generic cleanup mechanism part 3  https://review.openstack.org/129060
16:31 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor generic cleanup mechanism part 2  https://review.openstack.org/132437
17:02 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:03 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: add 'rally task list' filters  https://review.openstack.org/131005
17:03 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: add ability to refer deployment by uuid or name  https://review.openstack.org/131463
17:11 ntrueblood joined #openstack-rally
17:33 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:34 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
17:37 ntrueblood joined #openstack-rally
17:43 lordd joined #openstack-rally
17:46 leeantho joined #openstack-rally
17:51 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add Dockerfile  https://review.openstack.org/132556
18:02 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
18:03 marcoemorais1 joined #openstack-rally
18:04 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
18:09 lordd joined #openstack-rally
18:20 ntrueblood joined #openstack-rally
18:20 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
18:33 mcaulfie_ joined #openstack-rally
18:42 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
18:49 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
18:53 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
18:53 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
18:54 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
19:00 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:01 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:02 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:10 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
19:18 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
19:29 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:31 marcoemorais1 joined #openstack-rally
19:53 ekarlso boris-42: think you could help on getting osprofiler into designate?
19:58 lordd joined #openstack-rally
20:05 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
20:20 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
20:29 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
20:31 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Refactor generic cleanup mechanism part 2  https://review.openstack.org/132437
21:02 rook joined #openstack-rally
21:02 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
21:05 ekarlso boris-42: you up ?
21:09 rook joined #openstack-rally
21:19 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
21:32 lordd joined #openstack-rally
21:55 boris-42 ekarlso: a bit lol
22:11 lordd joined #openstack-rally
22:13 rook joined #openstack-rally
22:36 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/134386
22:40 vhosakot joined #openstack-rally
23:00 lordd joined #openstack-rally
23:01 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:04 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
23:07 boris-42 ekarlso: so?
23:07 ekarlso boris-42: look above (help add osprofiler to designate) ? )
23:12 boris-42 ekarlso: oh ffuu i missed that
23:13 boris-42 ekarlso: so it's quite simple
23:13 boris-42 ekarlso:  I can make some patch
23:13 ekarlso boris-42: would be awesome!
23:13 boris-42 ekarlso: great
23:13 boris-42 ekarlso: btw any updates about fixing designate client?
23:13 boris-42 ekarlso:  or rally init and so on
23:14 ekarlso boris-42: not had the chance to look yet :)
23:14 ekarlso will tmrw
23:14 ekarlso I hope
23:14 boris-42 ekarlso: okay, btw are you interested to have rally job in designate?
23:14 ekarlso boris-42: yeah
23:14 boris-42 ekarlso: as far as I remember redixin fixed quota stuff
23:14 ekarlso would be nice :)
23:14 boris-42 ekarlso: so we can make some scale testing=)
23:15 boris-42 ekarlso: okay I'll add one more patch lol
23:15 boris-42 ekarlso:  I'll make non voting job on every check?
23:15 ekarlso cool :)
23:15 boris-42 ekarlso: I'll need +1 from your PTL =
23:15 boris-42 =)
23:16 ekarlso cool enough :)
23:34 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:37 openstackgerrit Anthony Lee proposed stackforge/rally: Add a servers context and a cinder stress scenario  https://review.openstack.org/127392

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary