Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-11-18

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:07 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
00:20 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:37 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed stackforge/rally: Sync oslo-incubator  https://review.openstack.org/134847
00:40 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed stackforge/rally: Sync oslo-incubator  https://review.openstack.org/134847
00:48 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed stackforge/rally: Port to use oslo.config.fixture  https://review.openstack.org/135138
00:54 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Fix defect of 'separate log level for Rally'  https://review.openstack.org/134968
01:02 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
01:04 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
01:13 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:25 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
01:25 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
01:27 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed stackforge/rally: Port to use oslo.config.fixture  https://review.openstack.org/135138
01:36 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
02:13 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
02:15 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
02:33 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
02:37 erkules_ joined #openstack-rally
02:38 Viswanath joined #openstack-rally
02:43 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
02:59 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
03:31 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
03:42 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
03:54 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
03:57 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
04:50 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
04:51 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:52 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
04:52 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
04:53 rvcehimanshu left #openstack-rally
05:36 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
05:50 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
06:02 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:22 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
06:54 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:57 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
07:12 ehaselwanter joined #openstack-rally
07:22 berserker joined #openstack-rally
07:27 berserker boris-42: hello. I gave it a try, what you explained to me on friday. When running the task with the pre created user credentials, I get an error like this: http://pastebin.com/6Bpifcre
07:28 berserker Do you see anything wrong with this Benchmark configuration?
07:34 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
07:36 fandi joined #openstack-rally
07:40 boris-42 berserker: I believe you hacked in wrong way user context..
07:41 berserker boris-42: ok. is there an attribute missing?
07:42 openstackgerrit Sergey Murashov proposed stackforge/rally: Add benchmarks for murano  https://review.openstack.org/127491
07:42 boris-42 berserker: I don't know what you did in user context...
07:42 boris-42 berserker: seems like a bug in your user context.. not benchmakr configuration..
07:43 berserker boris-42: https://github.com/CSC-IT-Center-for-Science/rally/commit/c3efd3f11d1e4a1803189c294c7fa5d5fcc5ab51
07:43 berserker boris-42: this is what I patched
07:47 boris-42 berserker: you can't put username to "id":
07:47 boris-42 berserker: 222 line
07:48 berserker boris-42: ok. but I since I don't create the user, I don't have the id. When I list users, id and user_name are the same
07:49 boris-42 berserker: impossible=)
07:49 boris-42 berserker:  are you sure?
07:49 berserker boris-42: "keystone user-list"
07:49 berserker id, name, enabled, email are the fields. id and name are the same
07:50 berserker ahh one more thing, the credentials are coming from ldap.
07:50 berserker they are not in the OS db
07:50 boris-42 berserker:  it doesn't matter
07:52 boris-42 berserker: i'll test your patch lemme get OpenStack
07:53 boris-42 berserker: could you pleasre remove publish() / consume() stuff
07:53 boris-42 berserker: cause it makes thing unclear
07:53 boris-42 berserker: maybe you'll find the issue
07:54 berserker boris-42: ok
08:02 boris-42 berserker: btw can you add some LOG.warning() to setup()
08:02 boris-42 berserker:  and print what you have at the end in tenants/users
08:02 berserker boris-42: yes
08:05 salmon_ joined #openstack-rally
08:39 openstackgerrit Sergey Murashov proposed stackforge/rally: Add benchmarks for murano  https://review.openstack.org/127491
08:42 stannie joined #openstack-rally
09:18 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
09:24 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed stackforge/rally: Sync oslo-incubator  https://review.openstack.org/134847
09:31 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed stackforge/rally: Port to use oslo.config.fixture  https://review.openstack.org/135138
09:44 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
09:44 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy, k4n0  ☁ Open tasks https://trello.com/b/DoD8aeZy/rally ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Develop#How_to_contribute   ☁ Rally weekly updates:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Updates
09:46 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
09:48 berserker joined #openstack-rally
09:50 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:55 berserker boris-42: I did the changes, but still have the same error http://pastebin.com/H5WLnLY2
09:55 berserker this time I used a devstack environment
09:56 salmon_ left #openstack-rally
10:16 ilyashakhat joined #openstack-rally
10:28 berserker boris-42: i have it running now. It was the user_id from the very beginning. it was missing as "id" field in the user dictionary
10:32 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: show verification results in gates  https://review.openstack.org/135216
10:37 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
11:11 berserker joined #openstack-rally
11:12 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Base HTML templates and improvements for task report  https://review.openstack.org/131844
11:24 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Improvements for HTML output of rally verify results  https://review.openstack.org/135232
11:28 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
11:29 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: show verification results in gates  https://review.openstack.org/135216
11:29 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Improvements for HTML output of rally verify results  https://review.openstack.org/135232
11:37 chandan_kumar joined #openstack-rally
11:38 Harikrishna joined #openstack-rally
11:43 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Fix defect of 'separate log level for Rally'  https://review.openstack.org/134968
12:09 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
12:16 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
12:19 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
12:20 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
12:22 rdas joined #openstack-rally
12:24 boris-42 berserker: nice
12:25 berserker boris-42: only one thing is a bit strange to me. The context options from the json file describing the scenario, seem not to be pasted in the first call to UserGenerator class
12:26 berserker that seems to be when engine.py _validate_config_semantic() is executed
12:27 berserker I can see for example that "resource_management_workers" is 30. I set it to 1 in the json file. Later gets passed to UserGenerator
12:38 boris-42 berserker: ?
12:38 boris-42 berserker: validate_config_semantic() requires to have at least one user*
12:38 boris-42 berserker: so we are running user generator context to create 1 tenant with 1 user and use it to check that all validation passes
12:39 boris-42 berserker: "resouce_managment_workers" is just about what amount of threads to use to create tenant and users
12:39 berserker boris-42: right. What I mean is, this option can be set in json file right? When doing the validation, this option is not passed on
12:40 boris-42 berserker: yep
12:40 berserker boris-42: but later on when the task is really running, it is passed on
12:40 boris-42 berserker: cause why?
12:40 boris-42 berserker: why to pass it when validating is done?
12:40 berserker yeah I wanted to put my credentials in there :)
12:41 berserker validation must be done with an auto generated tenant and user
12:41 boris-42 berserker: one more hack
12:41 boris-42 berserker: here is context https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/engine.py#L130
12:42 boris-42 berserker: inside it you have context["users"]
12:42 boris-42 berserker: oh sorry here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/engine.py#L150
12:43 boris-42 berserker: config is what is passed for task, so you can fetch data about user context and pass it
12:43 boris-42 berserker: and it will work
12:44 ehaselwanter joined #openstack-rally
12:46 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Fix html rendering on failed functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/135274
12:46 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
12:50 chandan_kumar joined #openstack-rally
12:50 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
13:01 pboros joined #openstack-rally
13:08 stannie1 joined #openstack-rally
13:21 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Fix defect of 'separate log level for Rally'  https://review.openstack.org/134968
13:29 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Remove check of verification smoke tests  https://review.openstack.org/135216
14:15 cdent joined #openstack-rally
14:17 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
14:21 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: add 'rally task list' filters  https://review.openstack.org/131005
14:21 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: add ability to refer deployment by uuid or name  https://review.openstack.org/131463
14:23 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
14:33 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
14:40 berserker boris-42: many thanks! It's a nasty hack, but it seems to be working.
14:40 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
14:41 boris-42 berserker: lol
14:42 boris-42 berserker:  ya I hope to make this work out of box soon
14:42 berserker boris-42: that would be very useful!
14:42 boris-42 berserker:  I know
14:42 boris-42 berserker:  I am already refactoring Rally for 8 months) to implement that stuff lol
14:42 boris-42 berserker: these benchmark.context was part of refactoring*
14:46 berserker boris-42: yeah it is quite a clockwork
14:46 boris-42 berserker: the one very last thing that is stopping me is context validation
14:47 boris-42 berserker: I want to refactor it to use the similar approach to scenario validation
14:47 boris-42 berserker: actually not similiar, "same"
14:50 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
14:52 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
15:00 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
15:01 igormarnat_ joined #openstack-rally
15:02 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
15:02 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
15:04 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
15:19 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
15:19 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
15:22 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
15:34 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
15:36 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
15:48 tfz joined #openstack-rally
15:54 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
15:57 tfz left #openstack-rally
15:58 boris-42 pboros: hi there
16:02 pboros hi boris-42
16:08 fandi joined #openstack-rally
16:12 boris-42 pboros: how are you?)
16:13 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
16:16 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
16:17 pboros boris-42, good good, you?
16:17 arcimboldo Does rally run against a Folsom cloud?
16:18 boris-42 arcimboldo: to be honest I didn't try
16:18 arcimboldo It creates the tenant, and then I get an exception
16:18 boris-42 arcimboldo: we started Rally in Havana
16:18 boris-42 arcimboldo: oh
16:19 arcimboldo do you want to see the backtrace?
16:19 arcimboldo http://paste.openstack.org/show/134422/
16:19 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
16:20 boris-42 arcimboldo: sure
16:20 boris-42 arcimboldo: can you re run task
16:20 boris-42 arcimboldo: with "rally -v -d"
16:20 boris-42 arcimboldo: and share with me log
16:21 boris-42 (full log)
16:21 arcimboldo does passwords are included in the full log?
16:21 boris-42 arcimboldo: they may...
16:21 boris-42 arcimboldo: actually they are
16:23 arcimboldo http://paste.openstack.org/show/134423/
16:23 arcimboldo I don't see the password, maybe it failed too soon :)
16:24 arcimboldo seems like you are calling nova service-list
16:26 boris-42 arcimboldo: yep
16:26 boris-42 arcimboldo:  to understand is there nova-network or not
16:26 arcimboldo yes, I'm using nova-network
16:27 boris-42 arcimboldo: sooo
16:27 boris-42 arcimboldo: but nova service-list
16:27 boris-42 arcimboldo: is failing
16:27 arcimboldo yes, it returns 404
16:27 arcimboldo os-services is an extension, so maybe can be enabled/disabled
16:27 arcimboldo http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2-ext.html
16:28 boris-42 arcimboldo: yep
16:28 boris-42 arcimboldo:  so this https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/context/users.py#L120
16:29 boris-42 arcimboldo: this line https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/utils.py#L147
16:30 arcimboldo yep
16:30 arcimboldo maybe I should downgrade the python-novaclient api? :)
16:30 Poornima joined #openstack-rally
16:31 arcimboldo there was an option already in folsom, for nova.conf: osapi_compute_extension=nova.api.openstack.compute.contrib.standard_extensions
16:31 arcimboldo it's disabled in my installation
16:37 arcimboldo it seems that have been added with havana
16:37 arcimboldo sorry, grizzly
16:40 boris-42 arcimboldo: so
16:40 boris-42 arcimboldo: dirty hack is remove that part of code lol
16:41 boris-42 arcimboldo: so put here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/context/users.py#L109 return
16:49 boris-42 pboros: good as well
16:49 boris-42 pboros: so wanna join our todays irc meeting?)
16:55 frobware is there a means to use some of the 'rally task' commands against a sqlite database that is not specified in the /etc/rally/rally.conf file?
16:58 pboros boris-42, sure
16:58 pboros when are the meetings?
16:59 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
16:59 boris-42 pboros: it's now
16:59 boris-42 pboros: lol
17:00 boris-42 pboros: in #openstack-meeting room
17:02 boris-42 dmellado: ehaselwanter ekarlso- frobware  jlk paboldin rediskin vkmc vaidy zhiyan rally meeting in #openstack-meeting room=)
17:04 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
17:07 zhiyan yes
17:11 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
17:13 arcimboldo boris-42, I just return from the _remove_associated_networks?
17:13 boris-42 arcimboldo: ya just to skip that code
17:14 arcimboldo boris-42, thnx, I'll try that.
17:15 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:17 arcimboldo boris-42, so far, it's running, it's creating the VMs.
17:18 arcimboldo btw, I'm impressed...
17:20 boris-42 arcimboldo:  ?)
17:21 arcimboldo by rally, it's a really nice tool.
17:22 boris-42 arcimboldo: thanks=)
17:22 arcimboldo thanks to you !
17:23 arcimboldo About what we were discussing yesterday, the setup.py, a very simple solution is to use relative path instead full path for /etc/bash_completion.d, but this means that bash_completion is installed in /usr/local/etc (following the FHS, btw)
17:24 boris-42 arcimboldo: so basically it will work out of box
17:24 boris-42 arcimboldo: but won't require admin credentials
17:25 boris-42 arcimboldo:  right?)
17:26 arcimboldo yes, but if you install it as admin, it will install the bash comletion in /usr/local/etc
17:26 arcimboldo and I don't know if by default files are read from that location too
17:28 boris-42 arcimboldo: hm we can at least try to play with it
17:28 boris-42 arcimboldo: droping admin requirments to setup.py is actually nice stuff=)
17:29 boris-42 arcimboldo: and we can have some extra code if user decided to use install_rally.sh that requires admin
17:29 arcimboldo especially because as it is rally does not need root privileges.
17:29 boris-42 arcimboldo: to do all required changes
17:29 boris-42 arcimboldo: yep
17:29 boris-42 arcimboldo: so are you going to try to make a patch?)
17:29 arcimboldo boris-42, the installer can easily check if it is run under virtualenv or not
17:29 arcimboldo yes, unless you are in a hurry...
17:30 arcimboldo so my idea would be the following:
17:30 arcimboldo by default, it's installed in VIRTUALENV/etc/bash_completion.d or in /usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d
17:30 arcimboldo the install_script will check if you are root or not.
17:30 boris-42 arcimboldo: le'ts move to "openstack-meeting"
17:30 boris-42 arcimboldo: it's good topic to discuss there
17:30 arcimboldo ok, sorry
17:30 boris-42 arcimboldo: and it's meeting=)
17:30 boris-42 arcimboldo: it's only 1 time per week=)
17:31 arcimboldo ok
17:31 boris-42 arcimboldo:  so I think it's good that you are online=)
17:34 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Base HTML templates and improvements for task report  https://review.openstack.org/131844
17:44 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:44 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:46 leeantho joined #openstack-rally
17:59 boris-42 arcimboldo: ya it will be good if you make a bug report
17:59 boris-42 arcimboldo: cause maybe somebody is facing same issue=)
18:00 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
18:00 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
18:02 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
18:09 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Improvements for HTML output of rally verify results  https://review.openstack.org/135232
18:09 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
18:12 arcimboldo boris-42, I've opened two bug report, https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1393891 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1393887 I will read the how-to-contribute page and try to propose a patch
18:18 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Remove check of verification smoke tests  https://review.openstack.org/135216
19:06 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
19:08 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
19:10 jlk Hey all, I'm having a problem where I've got an admin_port set to something other than default, and that gets used fine for a variety of things. But when I try the authenticate/keystone.json scenario, part way through the test it switches to using the default admin port, 35357
19:12 jlk yeah
19:13 jlk looks like rally/objects/endpoint.py isn't getting admin_port passed in correctly
19:21 boris-42 jlk: hm
19:22 boris-42 jlk:  can you report a bug?
19:22 jlk I hard set the port there and it started working
19:22 jlk yeah, I'll want to do some more debugging and tracing
19:22 boris-42 jlk: ok great
19:23 boris-42 jlk:  actualy I really dislike that part
19:23 boris-42 jlk: with port magic
19:27 jlk yeah?
19:31 boris-42 jlk: yaaa
19:31 boris-42 jlk:  it's terrible
19:31 boris-42 jlk: )
19:32 jlk well, authenticate works now, but boot test is failing. Interesting
19:36 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:37 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:40 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
19:46 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/135250
19:57 jlk boris-42: is there a way to do the boot test without creating users? If I just take out the users from the context, will that do it?
19:58 tfz joined #openstack-rally
20:00 mcaulfie joined #openstack-rally
20:04 tfz hi all, have a question: can I use rally without an admin account ? (I saw https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116766/, but is this already usable or a work in progress ?)
20:13 msdubov_ jlk Well if you just take out users Rally will create one temporary user anyway.
20:13 msdubov_ jlk But we are on the way to implementing passing to the context users that already exist
20:14 msdubov_ tfz Not yet, but this functionality will be there very soon.
20:15 tfz yes I saw, that you store admin credentials in DB to create users, but I like to avoid that, and use some existing users. But I could not figure out if this should already work, or if its implementation in progress.
20:15 msdubov_ tfz In progress, we've refactored Rally code recently, so we are going to implement passing existing users in the nearest future.
20:15 tfz msdubov: great !
20:16 tfz msdubov: is there already some code for review ?
20:17 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
20:17 boris-42 jlk: everybody is asking that feature
20:17 boris-42 berserker: actually made small patch that hacks it
20:17 boris-42 jlk: and it's one of our most high priority tasks
20:18 boris-42 jlk: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/doc/feature_request/LDAP_support.rst
20:18 boris-42 tfz: hi there
20:18 boris-42 tfz: I am working on that feature
20:18 boris-42 tfz:  so I didn't publish yet that code
20:19 boris-42 tfz: but I understand how it's important and I belive that we are quite close to it's implementation
20:19 tfz boris-42: Thanks !
20:20 tfz boris: great to hear. I'm really willing to test.
20:21 boris-42 tfz:  for now you can use hack from berserker
20:22 tfz boris oh great ! is there a link ?
20:24 boris-42 tfz: heh berserker should know lol=)
20:24 boris-42 tfz:  https://github.com/CSC-IT-Center-for-Science/rally/commit/a0d9f13ea26deab633725ef18fd12a648e3ec9c2
20:24 boris-42 tfz:  this patch is hacking stuff
20:25 tfz boris: your'e my hero of the day ;) Thanks a lot
20:25 tfz boris I will try.
20:32 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
20:38 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Fix issue with Pre-Grizzly deployment, where nova-api do not implement `os-services` extension. Instead of raising an exception, log a warning and proceed. Fixes bug 1393891 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1393891)  https://review.openstack.org/135419
20:39 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
20:40 arcimboldo boris-42, I've made my first gerrit review :) https://review.openstack.org/135419 is there a specific way to link it in the bug report?
20:42 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
20:43 boris-42 arcimboldo: )
20:43 boris-42 arcimboldo: one sec
20:45 boris-42 arcimboldo:  I put review there are some nits around commit message
20:46 boris-42 arcimboldo: and one question inline
20:48 boris-42 arcimboldo: so one nit
20:48 boris-42 arcimboldo: don't touch change-id in commit message
20:48 boris-42 arcimboldo: )
20:48 arcimboldo boris-42, how can I fix this? revert and commit again, and then submit?
20:49 boris-42 arcimboldo: so make your changes
20:49 boris-42 arcimboldo: git commit --amend
20:49 boris-42 Keep Change-id!=)
20:49 boris-42 and re-run "git review"
20:49 boris-42 arcimboldo: ^
20:50 arcimboldo ok. About the commit on where to put the code, the problem I can see is that if you call again client.services() in some other part of the code, it will fail again
20:51 boris-42 arcimboldo: ya but probably it's okay* otherwise we will hide that..
20:51 arcimboldo also, the exception raised (NotFound) is raised by client.services.list() (novaclient.Client class)
20:51 boris-42 arcimboldo:  ok
20:52 boris-42 arcimboldo: let's keep it for now there
20:52 arcimboldo I'm checking specifically for novaclient.exceptions.NotFound, and it makes sense to catch it there, where you know about nova
20:52 arcimboldo in users, you don't know about nova...
20:52 arcimboldo there == users.py or utils.py?
20:52 boris-42 arcimboldo: hm?
20:52 arcimboldo (and a mathematician would just say "yes")
20:52 boris-42 arcimboldo: lol
20:52 arcimboldo "let's keep it for now there" => let's keep it in utils.py
20:52 arcimboldo ?
20:52 boris-42 arcimboldo: as is
20:53 boris-42 arcimboldo: in your patch
20:53 arcimboldo ok. I'll amend the commit message then and submit a new review.
20:53 boris-42 arcimboldo: btw there is an issue
20:53 boris-42 arcimboldo: what about other services
20:53 arcimboldo shall I update the comment?
20:53 boris-42 arcimboldo: cinder and so on
20:53 boris-42 arcimboldo: ya you should...
20:53 arcimboldo I've tried cinder too, and it's working
20:53 boris-42 arcimboldo: it's quite strange=)
20:53 boris-42 arcimboldo: I mean cinder will work, cause we don't call this method for it
20:54 boris-42 arcimboldo: it's called only in one place in user context..
20:56 arcimboldo what about security groups or keypairs? I haven't checked if there are runners for testing those.
20:57 boris-42 arcimboldo:  sec groups and key pairs are used only in vm tasks
20:57 boris-42 arcimboldo: but we are talking now about this speciifc place
20:58 boris-42 arcimboldo: and this method is used only in one place as far as I remember in user context
20:58 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
21:00 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Fix issue with Pre-Grizzly deployment.  https://review.openstack.org/135419
21:00 arcimboldo commit message amended,
21:01 arcimboldo ah-ha! smart ircbot
21:05 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Fix issue with Pre-Grizzly deployment  https://review.openstack.org/135419
21:05 boris-42 arcimboldo: ya=)
21:05 boris-42 arcimboldo: btw I am getting emails=)
21:05 boris-42 arcimboldo: so I won't miss your patches=)
21:06 arcimboldo good :)
21:07 arcimboldo boris-42, I was planning to refactor a bit the install script and make it a bit more configurable, so that you can decide also the path of the virtualenv
21:07 arcimboldo is it fine?
21:12 boris-42 arcimboldo: sure that will be nice
21:13 boris-42 arcimboldo: probably I won't be able to review it today cause it's 00:13 =)
21:13 arcimboldo no problem, it's late here as well and my gf is complaining :)
21:13 arcimboldo good night
21:13 boris-42 arcimboldo: haha
21:14 boris-42 arcimboldo: ya that may happen =) when you have gf/wife=)
21:14 boris-42 arcimboldo: soo
21:14 boris-42 arcimboldo: we need to wait for gates (our CI) it will be message from Jenkins
21:14 boris-42 arcimboldo: and one more core reviewer
21:23 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/135250
21:44 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
21:46 oanufriev Да не свободы вы хотите, а безнаказанности.
21:47 oanufriev Sorry, thunderbird's lag
22:00 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
22:17 flwang boris-42: any luck you around?
23:39 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:40 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:42 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:46 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary