Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2014-12-02

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:33 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:36 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
01:10 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:20 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:25 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
01:44 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:53 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
01:55 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:04 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
02:25 erkules_ joined #openstack-rally
03:29 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
04:43 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:44 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
04:50 openstackgerrit Deliang Fan proposed stackforge/rally: Fix rally deployment check fails with https auth_url  https://review.openstack.org/137739
04:53 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:54 Poornima_ joined #openstack-rally
05:19 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
05:31 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
05:55 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
06:12 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
06:12 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
06:12 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
06:23 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
06:24 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
06:32 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:32 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
06:44 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
06:47 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
06:48 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:55 ehaselwanter joined #openstack-rally
07:21 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
07:25 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
07:27 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
07:49 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:07 flwang1 joined #openstack-rally
08:21 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
08:28 stannie joined #openstack-rally
08:45 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
08:47 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
08:49 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: Add new scenario for nova security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282
08:53 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
09:11 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:27 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: Add new scenario for nova security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282
09:29 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix rally deployment check fails with https auth_url  https://review.openstack.org/137739
09:33 Dmitry_Savenkov joined #openstack-rally
09:36 paboldin joined #openstack-rally
09:40 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
09:41 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
09:54 rvasilets__ joined #openstack-rally
10:01 Dmitry_Savenkov joined #openstack-rally
10:01 svasheka joined #openstack-rally
10:01 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
10:02 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
10:03 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
10:04 paboldin joined #openstack-rally
10:07 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
10:30 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: Add new scenario for nova security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282
10:30 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
10:33 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: add 'rally task list' filters  https://review.openstack.org/131005
10:37 msdubov_ jlk hi there!
10:37 msdubov_ jlk I was told you have a question regarding the way Rally launches benchmarks?
10:41 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
10:57 redixin joined #openstack-rally
10:59 redixin joined #openstack-rally
11:08 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
11:17 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: add 'rally task list' filters  https://review.openstack.org/131005
11:17 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
11:22 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
11:26 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: Add new scenario for nova security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282
11:28 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
11:36 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
11:40 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: Add new scenario for nova security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282
11:41 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
12:18 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
13:20 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
13:30 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: add 'rally task list' filters  https://review.openstack.org/131005
13:31 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
13:37 pboros joined #openstack-rally
13:38 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Add scenario for booting vm with security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282
13:44 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Add scenario for booting vm with security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282
14:22 debu_ joined #openstack-rally
14:26 debu_ Hi...i want to run boot.json scenario without cleaning up. I mean instances should not be deleted at the end. Is it possible to do so?
14:29 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
14:32 amaretskiy debu_ hi
14:33 amaretskiy debu_ that is not currently possible from-the-box
14:33 amaretskiy rally should clean up all the stuff that created during the benchmarking
14:38 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
14:43 debu_ amaretskiy thankq
15:12 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
15:21 openstackgerrit Victoria Martínez de la Cruz proposed stackforge/rally: Adds Zaqar consumer-producer scenario  https://review.openstack.org/136922
15:32 chandankumar joined #openstack-rally
15:42 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
15:50 jlk msdubov_: yes. I've added multiple benchmarks to a run, http://geek.j2solutions.net/stuff/output.html  and in this run ( http://geek.j2solutions.net/stuff/output.html#/source ) it seemed to launch all the tests at once. I was curious if there is a way to serialize them instead of doing them all at once.
16:02 msdubov_ jlk I'm currently taking a look at http://geek.j2solutions.net/stuff/output.html#/source
16:03 msdubov_ jlk Well, "GlanceImages.create_and_delete_image" and "KeystoneBasic.create_delete_user" shouldn't work in parallel, because the Rally benchmark engine iterates over scenario keys and doesn't process the next key until the first hasn't been finished
16:03 msdubov_ jlk But inside each scenario, you indeed will have concurrency because of that "concurrency": 2 parameter in the "runner" section
16:04 jlk okay, I didn't look too closely at the debug, I just saw what appeared to be multiple types of tests running concurrently.
16:04 jlk eg I saw instances booting at the same time as glance or keystone tests.
16:04 jlk might have even seen the neutron test going too
16:05 msdubov_ jlk That's strange... It could be the case that horison is updating its information a bit too slow (if you're using it)
16:06 jlk does the database keep timestamps of when things happened?
16:07 fandi joined #openstack-rally
16:08 jlk really could be that I'm reading this wrong
16:09 msdubov_ jlk As for the database, we don't keep timestamps
16:09 msdubov_ jlk So but where are you reading that? :)
16:10 jlk Okay, so to flip the question, is the only way to get concurrent benchmarks to happen is to run multiple invocations of rally task?
16:10 jlk msdubov_: I was trying to read the debug output scrolling by :)  I need to capture it for a more real perusal
16:27 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
16:44 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
16:51 olkonami joined #openstack-rally
16:56 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
17:00 msdubov_ rvasilets__, it's meeting time, please join #openstack-meeting
17:01 msdubov_ andreykurilin, meeting time!
17:04 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: 100% coverage in functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/138134
17:06 msdubov_ jlk by the way we have a meeting right now at #openstack-meeting, you can join if you wish
17:08 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
17:10 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: 100% coverage in functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/138134
17:17 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
17:40 jlk msdubov_: thanks, I idled for the last bit of it.
17:40 jlk msdubov_: I still owe y'all a bug report on the admin_port issue. I'm working today on an ansible role to install rally in our stacks so hopefully I'll spend some cycles to get you a useful report.
17:43 AlexF joined #openstack-rally
17:51 jlk If I'm going to use syslog, do I still need to define a log_file and log_dir ?
17:52 jlk or does syslog itself decide where to log things?
17:52 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
18:00 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
18:03 leeantho joined #openstack-rally
18:08 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the base method for the benchmarking of VMs  https://review.openstack.org/98172
18:08 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the benchmark Blogbench for the Virtual Machines  https://review.openstack.org/97030
18:08 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the context benchmark_image  https://review.openstack.org/138466
18:08 boris-42 jlk: around?
18:09 jlk yup
18:09 paboldin boris-42: oh, you are here. so, is it ok to push patches started by someone else?
18:10 boris-42 paboldin: yep it is okay
18:10 boris-42 paboldin: in case of those patches
18:10 boris-42 paboldin:  we have agreement with that guy=)
18:10 paboldin :)
18:10 paboldin I think i should reference him in history at least
18:10 paboldin (will do that)
18:11 boris-42 paboldin: yep you should Co-authored-by: ...
18:11 paboldin ok
18:12 boris-42 jlk: my guys said that you have some questions about running tasks
18:12 boris-42 jlk:  could you please repeat it (I am bit in vacation so missed it)
18:15 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the base method for the benchmarking of VMs  https://review.openstack.org/98172
18:15 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the benchmark Blogbench for the Virtual Machines  https://review.openstack.org/97030
18:15 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the context benchmark_image  https://review.openstack.org/138466
18:15 jlk boris-42: so I thought I was seeing multiple benchmarks running in parallel when multiple are defined in an input file, but I think I was wrong. I would be curious if there is a way to control whether they run in parallel or not. I see value in testing max performance of an isolated service, but also testing a "real life" load example of multiple benches running at once.
18:16 paboldin err
18:18 boris-42 jlk: so for now we are running them serial
18:18 boris-42 jlk:  but we have feature_request for running in parallel (different scenarios)
18:18 boris-42 jlk:  https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/doc/feature_request/multi_scenarios_load_gen.rst
18:19 jlk boris-42: neat, okay.
18:20 boris-42 jlk:  the blocker here is "format of input task"
18:20 boris-42 jlk: so if you have some ideas about how to "format" multiscenarios
18:20 boris-42 jlk: it will be nice
18:20 jlk hrm.
18:21 boris-42 jlk: I mean it will be nice to put in input task everything (serial, parallel) scenarios and it will work well
18:21 boris-42 jlk: and not to have it too complicated
18:22 jlk yeah, either that or a run-time switch to define X number of scenarios to run in parallel.
18:22 jlk with a default of 1
18:46 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the base method for the benchmarking of VMs  https://review.openstack.org/98172
18:46 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the benchmark Blogbench for the Virtual Machines  https://review.openstack.org/97030
18:46 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the context benchmark_image  https://review.openstack.org/138466
18:46 * paboldin spamer
18:50 jlk joined #openstack-rally
18:54 boris-42 jlk: I think about having in config special keys
18:54 jlk joined #openstack-rally
19:02 boris-42 paboldin: btw you can run locally
19:03 boris-42 paboldin: tests=)
19:03 paboldin boris-42: yeah :) I did that time
19:03 paboldin boris-42: not the gates though
19:06 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Add decorator 'deprecated' to mark deprecated scenario, runner, context or sla  https://review.openstack.org/138489
19:09 boris-42 paboldin: ok I am going to continue my vacation
19:09 boris-42 paboldin: see you
19:09 paboldin boris-42: enjoy it
19:09 paboldin see you
19:25 paboldin guys, can someone say me if this is caused by my code or some kind of temporarily glitch? http://185.8.56.87/logs/jGZdDoRqXsWlxPKe/mos51-ice/ecli.txt.gz
19:37 boris-42 paboldin: that job doesn't work
19:37 boris-42 paboldin: Rally CI is underconstruction =)
19:37 paboldin http://logs.openstack.org/30/97030/32/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/b36273d/ how about this one?
19:38 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
19:46 paboldin boris-42: can you please restart this one or what?
20:02 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
20:06 flwang boris-42: ping
21:34 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
22:55 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
22:57 olkonami joined #openstack-rally
22:58 marcoemorais1 joined #openstack-rally
23:06 marcoemorais joined #openstack-rally
23:30 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Add scenario for booting vm with security groups  https://review.openstack.org/129282

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary