Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-01-15

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:26 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Publishing functional tests html reports  https://review.openstack.org/147098
00:29 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Input task templates and task cmd cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/137716
00:33 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:33 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:38 rook joined #openstack-rally
00:39 rook boris reading through :http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally/2014-12-05 , it seem that people think cbtool is limiting, however I think it is just due to lack of understanding of how cbtool works.
00:39 rook boris-42** ^
00:40 rook paboldin I see you are referenced in this discussion
00:40 boris-42 rook: hm?
00:41 boris-42 rook: I mean I am ok with integrating cbtool and simplifing it usage with OpenStack
00:41 boris-42 rook: cause as far as I know you have to create OpenStack users for it and so on
00:41 rook ok, just didn't want to be spinning my wheels on something
00:41 boris-42 rook: but in rally we are as well working on generic framework
00:42 boris-42 rook: that allows us to port anything to cloud=)
00:42 boris-42 rook: like iperf and so on
00:42 rook right, we would use rally to do most of the control plane standup and pass credentials to cbtool to run a VM workload.
00:42 rook roger.
00:42 boris-42 rook: exactly
00:42 rook makes sense.
00:42 boris-42 rook: so in rally we don't want to reinvent iperf cbtool
00:42 rook ha, maybe by the time i get a moment to do anything, this will be done
00:43 boris-42 rook: just to make it usable in 1 click
00:43 rook :)
00:43 rook press button
00:43 boris-42 rook: and with unification of ouptup results
00:43 rook boris-42 also, I am looking at the scope to have Rally allow for networks to be IPv6
00:43 rook instead of locking people into ipv4
00:44 rook sorry I have been missing so many meetings... partner stuff popping up like crazy
00:44 rook is there work to do this already?
00:45 boris-42 rook: sooo
00:45 boris-42 rook: there was small patch
00:45 boris-42 rook: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/commit/9c8b62380d6847f011f1e2ff03875bca7ef9c316
00:49 rook boris-42: sure, if I provide a network already created with ipv6
00:49 rook however, if i wanted to test create_subnet -> then ping, I am sol :/
00:50 rook so need to scope what it would take to allow rally to create networks with ipv6 enabled.
00:50 rook also, i have netperf working in Rally today
00:50 rook i need to push this patch.
00:50 rook I do not prepare the guest, I assume the guest already has netperf installed.
00:51 boris-42 rook: btw paboldin is working on patch for prapering guests
00:51 rook i saw that.
00:51 rook my only fear is, people using Rally in a offline method
00:51 boris-42 rook: so as well huge work..
00:51 boris-42 rook: ?)
00:51 rook so I hope the work he is doing with benchmarking vms, will not require the guest to be prepared via this work.
00:51 boris-42 rook: they can specify "name" of already exisitng image
00:51 rook good.
00:52 boris-42 rook: so I think that there will be 2 modes
00:52 boris-42 rook: one with prepared image
00:52 boris-42 rook: another full stack
00:52 boris-42 rook: as well we are going to create rally-agent
00:52 boris-42 rook: that will help to trigger benchmarks and unify that process
00:53 rook I heard there was a patch push for a starting gun functionality?
00:53 rook I added something like this to CBtool
00:58 boris-42 rook: gun functionality?
00:58 boris-42 rook: ah you mean triggering benchmark in vms?
00:58 rook haha
00:58 rook yeah
00:59 boris-42 rook: yep
00:59 boris-42 rook: paboldin is writing proposal for that
00:59 boris-42 rook: like analyze of what we can use and how
00:59 rook is paboldin at Cisco?
00:59 boris-42 rook: nope
00:59 boris-42 rook: mirantis=)
00:59 rook Mirantis
00:59 rook ok
00:59 boris-42 rook: but not in my team=)
00:59 rook ah
01:01 rook__ joined #openstack-rally
01:11 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Optional parameter "endpoint" is added to deployment configuration  https://review.openstack.org/146490
01:17 boris-42 rook: ok sems like I need to sleep
01:17 boris-42 rook: see you
01:26 rook later!
01:52 yaguang joined #openstack-rally
02:34 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/146713
02:37 vDruids joined #openstack-rally
02:50 rook__ joined #openstack-rally
02:54 vDruids joined #openstack-rally
04:11 rook joined #openstack-rally
04:39 rook joined #openstack-rally
05:28 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:29 psd joined #openstack-rally
05:49 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
06:01 psd Hey boris-42
06:03 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
06:05 boris-42 psd: hey
06:05 boris-42 psd: thank you for patch
06:05 boris-42 psd: so as far as I know you need some new task?)
06:05 psd boris-42, I have one!
06:06 psd remember the adding duration...
06:07 psd I got the code and it is also functioning correctly on my local repo. I am facing issues making changes to the test file such that tox returns no error
06:11 boris-42 psd: adding duration?)
06:12 boris-42 psd: could you help me to remember?)
06:12 boris-42 psd: few more words?)
06:12 psd adding task duration by adding header to the task.py file in rally/cmd/commands
06:13 boris-42 psd: ahhh
06:13 boris-42 psd: yep that one is good
06:13 boris-42 psd: and there were few more related to refactoring task command
06:13 boris-42 psd: ah yep now I remember everything=)
06:13 boris-42 psd: so could you push change on review and I will help you
06:14 exploreshaifali gooood morning boris-42, psd :)
06:14 boris-42 exploreshaifali: hey hey
06:14 boris-42 exploreshaifali: morning party hard..
06:14 boris-42 =)
06:15 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
06:15 exploreshaifali boris-42, party hard? :D
06:21 psd exploreshaifali, Morning, How are you doing?
06:21 exploreshaifali psd, \o
06:21 psd boris-42, Alrighty will do that :)
06:21 exploreshaifali atm I am working on hard patch
06:22 exploreshaifali its taking time  to grab things.... but its fun ;)
06:22 exploreshaifali psd, how you doing?
06:22 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Adding duration header  https://review.openstack.org/147394
06:23 psd pretty well. back from a small vacation.. Fun :D
06:23 exploreshaifali hey psd  you are from India?
06:23 psd Yeah!
06:23 psd You too, I believe
06:23 exploreshaifali mee too :)
06:23 exploreshaifali yea :D
06:23 psd Student?
06:23 exploreshaifali yup, you too?
06:24 psd Yups
06:24 exploreshaifali ah... so both of us are aspiring for GSoC! :P
06:25 psd Yeah!
06:26 psd Opw's over?
06:27 rook joined #openstack-rally
06:28 exploreshaifali psd, nup.... it will be in March starting
06:29 boris-42 exploreshaifali: psd guys do you have already proposals?)
06:30 boris-42 exploreshaifali: psd in 2014 OpenStack got 10 GSoC positions
06:32 exploreshaifali boris-42, once we had a discussion and you mentioned about *generating trends of N tasks*
06:32 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
06:32 psd exploreshaifali, oh Okay
06:32 exploreshaifali I wanted to work on data science or data visualization
06:32 psd boris-42, Not yet!
06:33 boris-42 exploreshaifali: yep
06:33 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that is very large task=)
06:33 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and sounds good=)
06:33 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and can be implemented partially during GSoC=)
06:34 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay, please can you suggest how to start
06:34 exploreshaifali after playing with Rally
06:35 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so you run it successfully?)
06:35 boris-42 exploreshaifali: what benchmarks did you try?
06:35 exploreshaifali boris-42, I haven't played much.... I need to explore it more
06:36 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so it's quite easy to play with it
06:36 boris-42 exploreshaifali: you should get VM
06:36 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and install on it DevStack and Rally
06:37 exploreshaifali yes, I have installed Rally successfully
06:37 exploreshaifali then followed https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/HowTo
06:37 exploreshaifali not tried all the commands
06:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: did you try main one?
06:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: rally task start?)
06:37 boris-42 and rally task report
06:37 boris-42 ?
06:39 exploreshaifali I think not, I used rally list flavor and image
06:40 exploreshaifali boris-42, benchmark are bunch of tasks.... right?
06:44 boris-42 exploreshaifali: vise versa
06:44 boris-42 exploreshaifali: 1 task (json|yaml) is set of benchmarks that you are running
06:47 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay, what kind of tasks are considered here?
06:47 exploreshaifali I mean, task here represents what?
06:47 boris-42 exploreshaifali: task is File with YAML|JSON
06:47 boris-42 exploreshaifali:  it's dict
06:48 boris-42 exploreshaifali: "key": <list>
06:48 boris-42 "key" -> name of benchmark it consists of two parts ClassName.MethodName
06:48 exploreshaifali boris-42, and such file contain data related preformace?
06:48 boris-42 exploreshaifali: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/authenticate/authenticate.py#L19-L31
06:48 boris-42 exploreshaifali: nope
06:49 boris-42 exploreshaifali: they contain information about what to RUN against Cloud
06:49 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so key is name of benchmark
06:49 boris-42 exploreshaifali: in list every element is full configration for single benchmark
06:49 boris-42 exploreshaifali: args are used to call ClassName.MethodName
06:50 boris-42 exploreshaifali: runner section -> what load to generate
06:50 boris-42 exploreshaifali: context -> what env to create (like amount of tenants/users set quotas / upload images)
06:51 boris-42 exploreshaifali: here is the sample of large task https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/rally.yaml
06:51 exploreshaifali boris-42, thanks! got to know new things :)
06:53 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so you should play with various configuration of tasks
06:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so you will understand how thye work better
06:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali: as well you can run "rally task results" and you'll see the results in JSON
06:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali: if you run rally task plot you will see graphs
06:54 psd boris-42, Is there someplace I could look for rally project ideas, When do you expect the 2015 GSoC wiki to be present?
06:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali:  http://logs.openstack.org/35/144835/6/gate/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/8c1d7a4/rally-plot/results.html.gz
06:57 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:57 boris-42 psd: heh good question
06:57 boris-42 psd: acutally we can just discuss
06:57 boris-42 psd: what you would like to do
06:58 boris-42 psd: there is interesting task in Rally Road Map that you can take
06:58 boris-42 psd: this is Rally ROadMap https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/spreadsheets/d/16DXpfbqvlzMFaqaXAcJsBzzpowb_XpymaK2aFY2gA2g/edit#gid=0
06:58 boris-42 psd: so you can take for example add-cloud-info-to-report
06:59 boris-42 psd So you should extend this report http://logs.openstack.org/35/144835/6/gate/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/8c1d7a4/rally-plot/results.html.gz
06:59 boris-42 psd: with information about cloud that can be riched via OpenStack API
06:59 boris-42 psd: like what projects we are running, which services, amount of computes, which hyporvisors bablabalb
07:00 boris-42 psd: plus add possibility to specify extra information via rally task start (or rally task report)
07:00 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
07:01 psd boris-42,looking into it!
07:02 psd yo yo interesting!
07:02 boris-42 psd: that is actually very important for end users
07:02 boris-42 psd: cause without it it is not clear what cloud did we benchamrk at all=)
07:03 psd yeah, gives them all the info about the current cloud..
07:04 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/146713
07:10 psd boris-42, How would you suggest I get started?
07:18 boris-42 psd: so just keep going with those simple tasks
07:18 boris-42 psd: to get familiar with rally parts
07:18 boris-42 psd: and I will make step-by-step road map for you
07:19 boris-42 exploreshaifali: btw
07:19 boris-42 exploreshaifali: I have some really simple tasks for begging
07:19 boris-42 exploreshaifali: if you would like to contribute to rally=)
07:26 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
07:38 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
07:41 exploreshaifali boris-42, yes yes.... sure
07:41 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
07:41 exploreshaifali I would love to do them
07:42 boris-42 exploreshaifali: recently we were asked to do this https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1409836
07:42 * exploreshaifali clicks
07:42 psd boris-42, Awesome :)
07:43 exploreshaifali boris-42, will do it :D
07:46 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Adding documentation  https://review.openstack.org/144835
07:47 psd boris-42, Currently I am on that duration task,,Yayyaa ^
07:51 openstackgerrit Shaifali Agrawal proposed stackforge/rally: Moving rally/doc/samples to rally/samples  https://review.openstack.org/147412
07:55 boris-42 exploreshaifali: you should run locally test
07:56 boris-42 exploreshaifali: before pushing changes*
07:56 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it's good practice=)
07:56 boris-42 exploreshaifali: try running locally "tox
07:56 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay, I thoght it has nothing to do with code so just push it
07:57 exploreshaifali okay, will run tests too :)
07:57 boris-42 exploreshaifali: nothing with code
07:57 boris-42 exploreshaifali: but something with tests=)
07:57 exploreshaifali boris-42, yes yes!!
08:00 boris-42 psd: lemme take a look
08:02 psd boris-42, :)
08:16 rook joined #openstack-rally
08:17 boris-42 psd|lunch: ok https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147394/
08:17 boris-42 psd|lunch: take it
08:32 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:33 boris-42 arxcruz: hey there
08:34 boris-42 arxcruz: could you please add one more SLA check
08:34 boris-42 arxcruz: like specific exception was raised
08:34 arxcruz boris-42, assertRaises ?
08:34 boris-42 arxcruz: ?
08:35 boris-42 arxcruz: you mean name?
08:35 arxcruz boris-42, sorry, just wake up, what you mean ?
08:35 boris-42 arxcruz: like we have here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/sla/base.py#L141-L158
08:36 boris-42 arxcruz: we need new one
08:36 boris-42 arxcruz: that will check that exception occurred
08:36 boris-42 arxcruz: so we will be able to make functional tests for your patch
08:37 arxcruz boris-42, ok
08:42 boris-42 arxcruz: this will be as well very useful for negative texting
08:42 boris-42 testing*
08:45 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Pulls up _test_atomic_action_timer to TestCase  https://review.openstack.org/147423
08:51 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
08:54 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:55 yfried_ boris-42: I'm trying to run the py27 tests on my patch, but I'm getting "error: rally.egg-info/pbr.json: Permission denied"
08:55 yfried_ boris-42: any ideas?
08:57 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
08:58 yfried_ boris-42: how do I uninstall rally?
09:21 amaretskiy yfried_: to fix "error: rally.egg-info/pbr.json: Permission denied", run `sudo chown -R <path/to/rally/virtualenv/dir>'
09:23 amaretskiy sudo chown -R <username> <path/to/rally/virtualenv/dir>
09:24 yfried_ amaretskiy: tnx. I'm now seeing other issues...
09:24 amaretskiy yfried_: what another issues?
09:26 yfried_ amaretskiy: http://paste.openstack.org/show/158083/
09:29 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
09:30 amaretskiy try standard workflow to reset the environment:
09:30 amaretskiy 1) git checkout . && git checkout master && git pull origin master
09:30 amaretskiy 2) pip install -r requirements.txt (if there are some updates in this file)
09:30 amaretskiy 3) rm -rf .tox
09:30 amaretskiy there should not be any issues with running `tox -e py27'
09:37 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from image  https://review.openstack.org/146820
09:46 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added list_snapshots scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/146580
09:47 Miouge_ joined #openstack-rally
09:48 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
10:05 rook joined #openstack-rally
10:11 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
10:29 yfried_ amaretskiy: tnx. now it works.
10:29 yfried_ amaretskiy: could you please take a look? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147423/
10:29 amaretskiy yfried_: of course
10:31 yfried_ amaretskiy: It's a pretty trivial change. I wonder how things got to this state were every new test class is copy-pasting code
10:32 amaretskiy code duplication is evil :)
10:32 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from volume(clone)  https://review.openstack.org/147449
10:43 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Adding duration header  https://review.openstack.org/147394
11:03 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:05 rook joined #openstack-rally
11:05 yfried_ andreykurilin1: amaretskiy: boris-42: in verifaction (tempest) tree
11:06 yfried_ I'm looking to understand the relationship between
11:06 yfried_ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L53
11:07 yfried_ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L53
11:07 yfried_ and https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L53
11:13 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
11:35 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed stackforge/rally: Adding dict.items() concatenate validation  https://review.openstack.org/145458
11:36 boris-42 yfried_: you send 3 times
11:36 boris-42 yfried_: 3 same links..
11:36 yfried_ boris-42: sorry
11:37 yfried_ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L80
11:37 yfried_ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L80
11:37 yfried_ https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L57
11:37 yfried_ boris-42: now I've sent the 2nd 3 times and the 3rd once
11:42 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
11:53 boris-42 psd|lunch: are you around?
11:54 boris-42 yfried_: so
11:54 boris-42 yfried_: the idea was to be able to specify explicit where "tempest.config" is
11:54 boris-42 yfried_: or to use default one (that was generate by rally for active/specified rally deployment)
11:59 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
12:19 psd boris-42, Hey
12:27 boris-42 psd: could I ask you 2 things)
12:27 boris-42 psd: one is absolutelly nerdy
12:27 psd boris-42, yeah
12:28 boris-42 psd: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147394/ I even don't want to put -1
12:28 boris-42 psd: it's on you
12:28 boris-42 psd: the second is could you make the same change for rally verify command
12:31 andreykurilin1 yfried_: hi! I'm here. Can I help you?
12:31 psd boris-42, Oh! no worries, I will upload a new patch :)
12:32 psd boris-42, Sure! I'll make the change :)
12:33 boris-42 psd: great
12:33 psd boris-42, =)
12:35 Miouge Can one use context definition with VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete to provision the fixed_network and floating_network or should this be pre provisioned in the cloud ?
12:35 boris-42 Miouge: hi there
12:35 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ^ trying to understand the differences between the various tempest paths
12:36 yfried_ andreykurilin1: and the cloning process
12:36 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added extend_volume scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/147489
12:36 andreykurilin1 yfried_: ok. I'll try to tell you about it:)
12:36 rook joined #openstack-rally
12:37 Miouge hello everyone :)
12:37 andreykurilin1 Miouge: hi
12:38 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Adding duration header  https://review.openstack.org/147394
12:38 yfried_ andreykurilin1: yes?
12:39 andreykurilin1 yfried_: the main idea is based on "tempest repository is too big and cloning it for every deployment takes long time".
12:39 yfried_ andreykurilin1: seems valid.
12:39 andreykurilin1 yfried_: so rally cloning tempest one time to  ~/.rally/tempest/base dir - https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L53
12:40 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Allow user to choose Tempest remote repo  https://review.openstack.org/147492
12:41 andreykurilin1 yfried_: when rally launches tempest for specific deployment, ~/.rally/tempest/base is copied to ~/.rally/tempest/for-deployment-<deployment_uuid> dir - https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L57
12:44 andreykurilin1 yfried_: since we have a lot of files inside /.rally/tempest/for-deployment-<deployment_uuid> dir, function "path" was designed to replace such big construction like "os.path.join(self._path, some_another_path)"
12:45 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ok, I think I understand
12:45 yfried_ andreykurilin1: tnx
12:45 andreykurilin1 yfried_: rally stores virtual environment, log files, config files and some testr related stuff in ~/.rally/tempest/for-deployment-<deployment_uuid>
12:45 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
12:45 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed stackforge/rally: Neutron network context support  https://review.openstack.org/143671
12:46 yfried_ so it's git clone to RALLY/base
12:46 yfried_ and then "cp RALLY/base RALLY/for-deployment-<deployment_uuid>"
12:46 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ^?
12:46 andreykurilin1 yes
12:46 andreykurilin1 )
12:47 yfried_ andreykurilin1: so you have multiple git repos but they are all copied from a single clone
12:47 yfried_ andreykurilin1: is there a "git pull" to make sure the RALLY/for-deployment-<deployment_uuid> repo is up to date?
12:47 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed stackforge/rally: Neutron network context support  https://review.openstack.org/143671
12:48 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed stackforge/rally: [Sahara] Add Cloudera plugin support  https://review.openstack.org/146400
12:48 andreykurilin1 yfried_: oh, I forgot to tell you about it) yes, "git pull" is called at copied version  - https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L147-L150
12:49 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Allow user to choose Tempest remote repo  https://review.openstack.org/147492
12:50 yfried_ andreykurilin1: and what about working on a specific branch/commit?
12:50 yfried_ andreykurilin1: /patchset
12:50 andreykurilin1 yfried_: rally does work with specific branch/commit
12:50 pboros joined #openstack-rally
12:51 yfried_ andreykurilin1: but you're doing "git pull" on master anyway?
12:51 andreykurilin1 yfried_: so if you interested in "rally verify", I have several ideas hot to improve it
12:51 andreykurilin1 yfried_: yes
12:52 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ^ just pushed one
12:52 yfried_ andreykurilin1: question
12:52 yfried_ andreykurilin1: instead of "shutil.copytree"
12:52 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [WIP] Restructure Rally docs  https://review.openstack.org/120018
12:52 yfried_ andreykurilin1: you could clone from local repo. is that an option?
12:53 andreykurilin1 yfried_: no this is not an option, but you can do it:)
12:53 yfried_ andreykurilin1: I meant - did you consider it and drop it or did you go with "cp" as default?
12:53 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
12:55 andreykurilin1 yfried_: "cp" and "git pull" is called for every deployment
13:00 andreykurilin1 yfried_: so I prefer to extend "rally-manage tempest" command
13:00 yfried_ andreykurilin1: what do you mean?
13:00 yfried_ andreykurilin1: https://review.openstack.org/147492
13:00 andreykurilin1 yfried_: I already left a comment)
13:00 andreykurilin1 to this patch
13:01 andreykurilin1 yfried_: rally has group of command "rally-manage tempest" - https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/manage.py#L37
13:01 yfried_ andreykurilin1: hang on a sec
13:02 andreykurilin1 yfried_: which include only one command "rally-manage tempest install"
13:02 yfried_ andreykurilin1: about  https://review.openstack.org/147492
13:03 yfried_ andreykurilin1: if we choose to use git-clone </path/to/local/repo> instead of "cp" we would need the "source" argument for "_clone()"
13:03 yfried_ andreykurilin1: so why not keep the option?
13:06 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ?
13:06 andreykurilin1 yfried_: one moment
13:07 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
13:12 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Restructure Rally docs  https://review.openstack.org/120018
13:13 andreykurilin1 yfried_: okey, based on your patch, local repo is not used any more. TEMPEST_SOURCE or custom source is used each time.
13:13 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Restructure Rally docs  https://review.openstack.org/120018
13:14 yfried_ andreykurilin1: what do you mean?
13:15 andreykurilin1 yfried_: you should set default value of source to "None" in init method of Tempest
13:15 andreykurilin1 yfried_: one moment
13:15 andreykurilin1 yfried_: looking at TempestCommands
13:17 andreykurilin1 yfried_: ok. "rally verify" cmd will work. But we have tempest based benchmark scenarios -  https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/tempest/tempest.py  and TempestContext - https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/context/tempest.py , which uses Tempest.clone too
13:20 yfried_ andreykurilin1: yeah, I was going to ask about those as well
13:20 andreykurilin1 yfried_: hm... seems like "rally verify" cmd will not copy local repository, if it not specified in source
13:20 yfried_ what do they do?
13:21 yfried_ andreykurilin1: really? I just managed to clone my own tempest repo to the RALLY_BASE/for-deployment dir
13:21 yfried_ andreykurilin1: using rally-manage tempest install --source $PROJECT_HOME/tempest
13:23 andreykurilin1 yfried_: rally-manage tempest install --source ~/.rally/tempest/base will work, but "~/.rally/tempest/base" should be default repo
13:23 yfried_ andreykurilin1: I'm sorry. I don't follow
13:24 yfried_ andreykurilin1: using rally-manage tempest install --source /home/yfried/workspace/git/tempest
13:24 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ^ that's my command that's working
13:26 andreykurilin1 yfried_: yes, this command should work. but if I launch  "rally-manage tempest install" without "--source" attr, source will be equal to TEMPEST_SOURCE and local repository will not used
13:26 yfried_ andreykurilin1: that's how we want it to work, isn't it?
13:27 yfried_ andreykurilin1: by default you clone from github
13:27 yfried_ andreykurilin1: unless you want to use your own up/down stream repo and then you use "--source PATH_OR_URL"
13:28 yfried_ andreykurilin1: what am I missing
13:28 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
13:29 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Input task templates and task cmd cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/137716
13:30 andreykurilin1 yfried_: yes, we want to use github.com when "source" attr is not specified. But current mechanism is designed to decrease time(when we talk about using one instance of rally with several deployment) of cloning from github by using local repository cloned from github.
13:30 andreykurilin1 yfried_: I'll draw a diagram to explain what I mean)
13:32 yfried_ andreykurilin1: I'm waiting :) tnx
13:38 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Restructure Rally docs  https://review.openstack.org/120018
13:38 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
13:39 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Allow user to choose Tempest remote repo  https://review.openstack.org/147492
13:41 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Restructure Rally docs  https://review.openstack.org/120018
13:41 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added extend_volume scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/147489
13:44 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Adding dict.items() concatenate validation  https://review.openstack.org/145458
13:52 rook joined #openstack-rally
13:56 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
13:57 yfried_ andreykurilin1: about test execution - I see that the test-set is pretty hard-coded
13:58 yfried_ andreykurilin1: can I execute from test-list file or a single test?
13:59 andreykurilin1 yfried_: ok. I finished diagrams) that is how it should work https://www.dropbox.com/s/7gw8isuccbmg507/rally_verify.png?dl=0
13:59 andreykurilin1 yfried_: and that is example: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1eykgmjwath1qso/rally_verify_2.png?dl=0
14:00 andreykurilin1 yfried_: in you implementation, rally-manage for second deployment will not clone from ~/.rally/tempest/base. TEMPEST_SOURCE will be used as source
14:07 andreykurilin1 yfried_: about test-sets. they are hard-coded to speed up validation of it
14:08 andreykurilin1 yfried_: yes, we can discover it, but such process takes a time. Do you know situations, where test-set can differs with our hardcoded?
14:11 yfried_ andreykurilin1: I want to run only scenario tests
14:11 yfried_ andreykurilin1: or more specifically only network scenarios
14:12 yfried_ andreykurilin1: or just the tests in "tempest/scenarios/test_network_basic_ops.py"
14:12 andreykurilin1 yfried_: you can use regex for it
14:12 yfried_ andreykurilin1: rally -v verify start "regex" ?
14:13 andreykurilin1 yfried_: it seem like "rally verify start --regex 'tempest.scenarios.test_network_base_ops'"
14:13 andreykurilin1 should work
14:14 andreykurilin1 yfried_: oh...
14:14 andreykurilin1 yfried_: we have a bug:(
14:14 andreykurilin1 yfried_: regex is not working in "rally verify"
14:14 yfried_ andreykurilin1: I don't think "--regex" is a valid switch
14:14 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ok
14:15 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ok, so I know what's verify and what's tempest benchmark is
14:15 yfried_ andreykurilin1: but what's tempest context?
14:16 andreykurilin1 yfried_: one moment and we will talk about bechmarking via tempest :)
14:17 andreykurilin1 yfried_: can you fix issue with regex in "rally verify" ? fix is quire simple
14:17 andreykurilin1 *quite
14:17 yfried_ andreykurilin1: I could try. where should it go?
14:18 andreykurilin1 yfried_: nice. this lines should be modified - https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/verify.py#L71-L73
14:18 andreykurilin1 yfried_: first of all, if regex in specified (L71), set_name should not be set to "full". so L71-72, should be removed)
14:20 andreykurilin1 yfried_: L73: check of correct set name should be executed only when set_name is presented
14:21 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
14:21 andreykurilin1 yfried_: oh. check on L71-72 should be corrected, not removed. set_name should be set to "full", when both set_name and regex are not specified
14:21 andreykurilin1 yfried_: that is all
14:22 andreykurilin1 :)
14:22 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
14:23 yfried_ andreykurilin1: not working
14:23 andreykurilin1 yfried_: hm... errors or nothing is executed?
14:24 yfried_ it's executing full without regex
14:26 svasheka joined #openstack-rally
14:27 svasheka hi guys
14:27 svasheka can you advise me with best way of running rally against H/A cluster
14:27 andreykurilin1 yfried_: please send my fix for review and i'll check it a little bit later(now I don't have env for it)
14:27 svasheka where to install?
14:27 andreykurilin1 svasheka: hi!
14:28 andreykurilin1 boris-42 ^
14:29 boris-42 svasheka: hi
14:29 boris-42 svasheka: it's the same as in case of non HA
14:29 boris-42 svasheka: as far as I know you are talking about MOS?
14:29 svasheka yes, you are right
14:32 svasheka boris-42: Last time I've tried it was with docker container, but right now I'm not sure it's the best way
14:32 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: (WIP) Fixs "regex" switch for verify  https://review.openstack.org/147531
14:32 yfried_ andreykurilin1: ^
14:32 andreykurilin1 yfried_: thx
14:32 andreykurilin1 yfried_: about benchmarking via tempest. TempestContext takes care about installing tempest, install venv, initialize testr and etc. So you don't need to launch rally-manage, before benchmarking via tempest.
14:33 andreykurilin1 yfried_: it would be nice, if you add source option to TempestContext too
14:33 yfried_ andreykurilin1: and it's implicit?
14:33 yfried_ andreykurilin1: will do
14:33 boris-42 svasheka: you can do it from master node
14:33 boris-42 svasheka: or OpenStack VM
14:33 andreykurilin1 yfried_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147531/1/rally/cmd/commands/verify.py you should change L71 to "if not regex and not set_name"
14:34 boris-42 svasheka: we have some changes for MOS
14:34 boris-42 svasheka: you should use this one https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/doc/samples/deployments/existing-with-given-endpoint.json
14:34 obutenko joined #openstack-rally
14:34 boris-42 svasheka: and in field endpoint you should specify keystone PUBLIC IP with that 35357 port
14:35 boris-42 svasheka: then it will work
14:35 svasheka boris-42: thanks, I'll try that
14:36 yfried_ andreykurilin1: nope. still launching full test
14:40 andreykurilin1 yfried_: hm...will look a little bit later
14:44 yfried_ andreykurilin1: set_name is "smoke" by default, so there's no use in "if not set_name"...
14:45 andreykurilin1 yfried_: oh... so we should change default value of set_name to None and add some more check like "if not regex and not set_name: set_name = 'smoke'"
14:46 andreykurilin1 yfried_: why 'smoke' is used by default? I don't know))))
14:46 yfried_ andreykurilin1: also, regex are ignored for full/smoke is this ok?
14:46 yfried_ andreykurilin1: or for any other set name...
14:47 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Changes Timestamp to hold float instead of datetime  https://review.openstack.org/146813
14:49 andreykurilin1 yfried_: I don't think that this is ok, but I don't know how testr will work if set_name and regex will be set together
14:49 yfried_ andreykurilin1: same here
14:49 yfried_ andreykurilin1: adding a comment for that
14:51 yfried_ andreykurilin1: what's the proper exception for too arguments that shouldn't be defined togather
14:51 yfried_ ?
14:59 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Fix "regex" switch for verify  https://review.openstack.org/147531
15:02 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Fix "regex" switch for verify  https://review.openstack.org/147531
15:03 yfried_ andreykurilin1: amaretskiy: boris-42: why isn't this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1411268 being updated by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147531/ ?
15:04 yfried_ this happend for me last time I pushed a rally bugfix
15:04 yfried_ am I doing something wrong here?
15:04 boris-42 yfried_: that is bug in launchpad
15:04 boris-42 yfried_: you should join rally bug group or something like that
15:04 yfried_ boris-42: for all of rally?
15:05 boris-42 yfried_: for all
15:05 yfried_ boris-42: how do I do that?
15:09 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed stackforge/rally: Add EC2 API test scenario  https://review.openstack.org/147550
15:10 boris-42 yfried_: let me check
15:11 yfried_ andreykurilin1: amaretskiy: boris-42: anyway - please check out this bugfix
15:11 yfried_ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147531/
15:11 andreykurilin1 yfried_: this bug will be updated, when fix will be merged
15:12 yfried_ andreykurilin1: it should also update a "fix suggested" and assign me to it
15:12 boris-42 yfried_: add you to bug team
15:12 boris-42 yfried_: now you can set priority of bugs lol
15:12 boris-42 andreykurilin1: I think he is asking about IN progress
15:12 boris-42 yfried_: ^
15:13 yfried_ boris-42: gerrit/LP should do that automatically upon push
15:13 yfried_ boris-42: but tnx :)
15:13 yfried_ boris-42: I feel very important
15:13 boris-42 yfried_: yep+)
15:13 boris-42 yfried_: so actually in-progress stuff is broken as far as I know
15:14 boris-42 yfried_: I didn't dive deep in that issue but it's not related to rally
15:14 yfried_ boris-42: it's working for Tempest and Neutron AFAIK
15:16 boris-42 yfried_: heh
15:16 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
15:17 yfried_ andreykurilin1: are you too busy? question about your diagram https://www.dropbox.com/s/7gw8isuccbmg507/rally_verify.png?dl=0
15:17 yfried_ andreykurilin1: so until now you have github or local-base as source
15:18 yfried_ andreykurilin1: if we had MYSOURCE as an option
15:18 yfried_ andreykurilin1: and the 2nd installation is not specifing "--source"
15:19 yfried_ andreykurilin1: should we pull from github, or from local-base (that's now hosting "MYSOURCE" repo
15:19 yfried_ andreykurilin1: the 2nd user doesn't neccerily know/remember that local-base is holding a non-standrad tempest repo
15:21 andreykurilin1 yfried_: imo, we should 1) add a good documentation for this process:) , 2) add a option that select does MYSOURCE repo will go to for-deployment-... dir or to local-base folder
15:23 andreykurilin1 yfried_: I prefer to store somewhere a source repo. maybe in db or in some file ~/.rally/tempest/for-deployment-.../source_repo . This helps to implement such command as "rally-manage tempest reinstall" or "rally-manage tempest reclone"
15:24 yfried_ andreykurilin1: how do I write to DB? I've never touched that before
15:26 andreykurilin1 yfried_: please, look at https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/objects/verification.py and here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/db/api.py
15:26 andreykurilin1 yfried_: need to go, will be online later. feel free to left comments/questions and I'll answer you, when return
15:27 yfried_ andreykurilin1: can you send me a raw file for your diagram, I'd like to edit it
15:27 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
15:30 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Neutron network context support  https://review.openstack.org/143671
15:31 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Input task templates and task cmd cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/137716
15:35 boris-42 jlk: ^
15:35 boris-42 rmk: this can be interesting for you ^
15:35 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
15:41 rook_ joined #openstack-rally
15:44 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
15:50 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
15:57 boris-42 psd: oh could you please rebase https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147394/
15:58 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
16:05 baker joined #openstack-rally
16:06 andreykurilin1 yfried_: https://www.dropbox.com/s/k9ajux296tle1fi/rally_verify.xml?dl=0
16:07 yfried_ andreykurilin1: how do I edit the xml? what tool should I DL?
16:08 andreykurilin1 yfried_: http://draw.io :)
16:09 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
16:10 meteorfox joined #openstack-rally
16:10 yfried_ andreykurilin1: tnx. didn't know this one
16:14 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Publishing functional tests html reports  https://review.openstack.org/147098
16:18 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds Tempest source repo support for "Tempest" context  https://review.openstack.org/147571
16:19 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
16:22 yfried_ andreykurilin1: tempest context https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147571/ as we discussed
16:26 msdubov_ andreykurilin1: What do you think about my comment to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147531/ ?
16:26 msdubov_ andreykurilin1: yfried_: Seems like smoke tests will take less time
16:26 msdubov_ So this seems to be a reasonable default setting
16:27 yfried_ msdubov_: andreykurilin1: if you are concerned with timing, IMO you need to specifiy what you want
16:27 andreykurilin1 yfried_, msdubov: I remembered why I set smoke set as default!:)
16:27 yfried_ msdubov_: andreykurilin1: "full" suit seems like the most reasonable default
16:27 yfried_ msdubov_: andreykurilin1: also, I'm not sure "smoke" is still recognized by tempest.
16:28 andreykurilin1 yfried_, msdubov: the reason was - original tempest script, which launch tempest tests, uses "smoke" by default
16:29 andreykurilin1 yfried_, msdubov: There was some problems with smoke tests in tempest. But looks like it already fixed
16:29 yfried_ andreykurilin1: please break the tie - "smoke" or "full" as default?
16:30 yfried_ msdubov_: anyone who's concerned with speed, isn't running default, so one more switch isn't gonna break anything
16:31 yfried_ msdubov_: if you want speed, you should specify it
16:31 msdubov_ yfried_: Agree
16:32 andreykurilin1 yfried_, msdubov:  I prefer to use "full", because of "smoke" tests can be broken with some version of required tempest packages
16:32 msdubov_ yfried_: Ok then could you please just update the commit message with the information about this change? And I'll five this +2
16:32 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
16:32 yfried_ msdubov_: tnx
16:34 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Fix "regex" switch for verify  https://review.openstack.org/147531
16:34 yfried_ msdubov_: done
16:41 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds "scenario" to available verify sets  https://review.openstack.org/147581
16:41 rook_ joined #openstack-rally
16:50 obutenko_ joined #openstack-rally
16:53 leeantho joined #openstack-rally
17:21 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
17:27 andreykurilin1 yfried_: here?
17:27 andreykurilin1 yfried_: I know what you need change to make https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147581/1 work:)
17:43 rook_ joined #openstack-rally
17:53 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from image  https://review.openstack.org/146820
17:53 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from volume(clone)  https://review.openstack.org/147449
17:57 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from image  https://review.openstack.org/146820
17:57 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from volume(clone)  https://review.openstack.org/147449
17:59 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
17:59 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:59 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix "regex" switch for verify  https://review.openstack.org/147531
18:00 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
18:02 openstackgerrit Joe Talerico proposed stackforge/rally: Created new single vm workload sample script using linpack  https://review.openstack.org/115439
18:04 hemna joined #openstack-rally
18:11 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Pulls up _test_atomic_action_timer to TestCase  https://review.openstack.org/147423
18:12 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
18:54 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:58 rook_ joined #openstack-rally
19:00 psd boris-42, Hey! yeah will just do the re-basing... git is troubling me :/
19:00 boris-42 psd: heh
19:00 boris-42 psd: use my workflow
19:00 boris-42 git checkout master
19:00 boris-42 git remote update
19:00 boris-42 git pull
19:00 boris-42 git checkout <your_branch_with_patch>
19:01 boris-42 git rebase master
19:01 boris-42 (then it will say to you to fix merge conflicts)
19:01 boris-42 you are fixing them
19:01 boris-42 git add <all changed files>
19:01 boris-42 git rebase --continue
19:01 boris-42 ^psd thats' all
19:03 psd boris-42, Oh This is awesome! Thanks a lot
19:11 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Adding duration header  https://review.openstack.org/147394
19:11 baker joined #openstack-rally
19:13 boris-42 psd: you forgot
19:13 boris-42 psd: to resolve merge conflicts
19:13 boris-42 psd: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147394/4/rally/cmd/commands/task.py
19:14 boris-42 psd: step after "git rebase master"
19:16 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:16 afazekas joined #openstack-rally
19:22 psd boris-42, I'll just do it again,
19:22 boris-42 psd: no
19:22 boris-42 psd: just fix it
19:22 boris-42 psd: run git add ...
19:22 boris-42 psd: git commit --amend
19:23 psd Alrighty
19:23 boris-42 psd: so basically when you finish those first few tasks related to rally cli
19:24 boris-42 psd: we can go and try to work on starting collecting as much as possible info from cloud
19:24 boris-42 psd: actually create a google doc before starting)
19:25 psd Yeah! Okay
19:25 boris-42 vkmc: btw
19:25 boris-42 vkmc: do you know where is OpenStack GSoC 2015 page?)
19:25 vkmc boris-42, probably not created
19:25 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added create_and_extend_volume scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/147489
19:25 boris-42 vkmc: hehe
19:26 vkmc boris-42, :D
19:26 vkmc boris-42, we should start pinging people to mentor and set up everything
19:28 boris-42 vkmc: yep
19:28 vkmc boris-42, the application process for organizations start in Feb 9
19:28 boris-42 vkmc: lol we have too much time
19:28 boris-42 =)
19:28 vkmc we should have something by that time... at least two or three projects
19:28 vkmc mentors
19:28 vkmc coordinators
19:29 vkmc and cross fingers to get some spots
19:29 boris-42 vkmc: Openstack so popular
19:29 boris-42 that we will get something)
19:29 vkmc boris-42, heh, remember that we tried 3 years in a row... we made it last year :P
19:29 vkmc boris-42, now that we have "experience" it will be easier
19:35 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Adding duration header  https://review.openstack.org/147394
19:38 psd Hey vkmc Whatsup
19:38 vkmc psd, wasaaaaaaap
19:38 vkmc psd, good and you?
19:38 psd Good Good !
19:39 psd College jst  started
19:41 vkmc great!
19:41 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
19:41 vkmc psd, which courses are you taking?
19:41 vkmc shh... exploreshaifali just joined
19:41 psd haha!
19:42 exploreshaifali vkmc, ssshhhhh no one knows that ;)
19:42 exploreshaifali :D
19:42 vkmc lol
19:42 exploreshaifali btw I  got a bug to work for Rally
19:43 exploreshaifali but my fix's test cases failed :P
19:43 psd Thinking of taking Image processing this semester!! or Cryptography maybe
19:44 exploreshaifali psd for image processing, you can take a glance for Udacity's intoduction to parallel programming
19:44 exploreshaifali they teach image processing stuff with parallel computing
19:44 exploreshaifali Nvidia's Cuda
19:44 psd exploreshaifali, oh Thanks!! seems pretty interesting
19:44 exploreshaifali but that course is in C
19:44 exploreshaifali so you need to be famailiar with it
19:45 exploreshaifali psd, np :)
19:45 psd done a bit of C,,
19:46 exploreshaifali better to explore on course requirements for level of C they want
19:58 psd Yeah will do that!
19:58 psd gotta go, see ya vkmc exploreshaifali  :)
19:58 vkmc psd, see ya! :)
19:58 exploreshaifali psd, Night!
19:59 rmk boris-42: Thanks
20:00 rmk Things have come quite a way over the past few months.
20:03 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
20:04 boris-42 exploreshaifali: hey there=)
20:04 boris-42 rmk: hey there=)
20:05 exploreshaifali boris-42, hello :)
20:05 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so how is your patch?)
20:05 exploreshaifali boris-42, all test cases failed, you was right
20:05 exploreshaifali I need to look at tests
20:05 exploreshaifali :)
20:06 exploreshaifali in Rally wiki for testing only *tox* is mentioned
20:07 exploreshaifali boris-42, but I need to check tests cases explicitly for `tox -epep8`, `tox -epy27
20:07 exploreshaifali right?
20:08 psd|away exploreshaifali, even if you just run tox it will run tox -epep8 -epy27 and others
20:08 psd|away as in just |tox|
20:08 exploreshaifali psd|away, cool... thanks :)
20:08 exploreshaifali psd|away, -- is not away :P
20:09 psd|away Hehe... leaving leaving :P
20:09 exploreshaifali no no.... your choice :D
20:09 psd|away Haha :D
20:09 boris-42 exploreshaifali: just run "tox"
20:10 boris-42 rmk: so how are you man?
20:10 exploreshaifali boris-42, yes, thanks!!
20:14 boris-42 rmk: so there are 2 left stuffs to make operators happy
20:15 boris-42 rmk: create a huge huge task template with few arguments (that specify main resources + size of cloud)
20:15 boris-42 rmk: and add support of exisitng users=)
20:29 rook_ joined #openstack-rally
20:31 baker left #openstack-rally
20:45 baker joined #openstack-rally
20:54 boris-42 psd|away: fuuu seems like some project broke our gates
20:54 boris-42 again
20:54 boris-42 hard week..
21:29 rook_ joined #openstack-rally
21:39 rmk boris-42: Good, been super busy.  Sorry we missed each other in Paris.
21:39 rmk I ended up getting pulled away constantly.
21:45 boris-42 rmk: no worries=)
21:45 boris-42 rmk: we will have a chance on next summit
22:48 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:49 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
22:50 jseutter_ joined #openstack-rally
22:52 mitz_ joined #openstack-rally
22:53 clee joined #openstack-rally
22:53 NikitaKonovalov2 joined #openstack-rally
22:53 davidlenwell joined #openstack-rally
22:53 rmk joined #openstack-rally
22:54 gema joined #openstack-rally
22:54 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
22:54 baker joined #openstack-rally
22:54 psd|away joined #openstack-rally
23:04 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
23:04 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  Ã¢ËœÂ To publish changes to Rally:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Develop#How_to_contribute   ☁ Rally weekly updates:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Updates
23:04 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
23:04 omnibus7 joined #openstack-rally
23:05 rvasilets_ joined #openstack-rally
23:05 rediskin joined #openstack-rally
23:05 obutenko_ joined #openstack-rally
23:05 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
23:05 zhiyan joined #openstack-rally
23:05 vaidy_ril joined #openstack-rally
23:05 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:08 vDruids joined #openstack-rally
23:09 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
23:12 psd|away joined #openstack-rally
23:12 baker joined #openstack-rally
23:12 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
23:12 _dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
23:12 NikitaKonovalov joined #openstack-rally
23:12 yfried joined #openstack-rally
23:12 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
23:12 svasheka joined #openstack-rally
23:12 mkoderer joined #openstack-rally
23:13 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
23:13 flwang joined #openstack-rally
23:14 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
23:14 rmk joined #openstack-rally
23:14 rmk joined #openstack-rally
23:15 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
23:18 rook__ joined #openstack-rally
23:28 vDruids joined #openstack-rally
23:30 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
23:31 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
23:39 rook__ joined #openstack-rally
23:56 frobware joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary