Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-01-19

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:34 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
02:47 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
02:47 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Develop#How_to_contribute   ☁ Rally weekly updates:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Updates
03:42 asrangne joined #openstack-rally
05:23 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
05:34 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:00 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:23 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
06:33 boris-42 vkmc: around?)
06:50 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
06:51 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
07:05 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
07:05 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Allow user to choose Tempest remote repo  https://review.openstack.org/147492
07:05 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds Tempest source repo support for "Tempest" context  https://review.openstack.org/147571
07:05 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds support for multiple tempest sources  https://review.openstack.org/148187
07:08 boris-42 yfried: hehe I made my first blogpost lol
07:10 psd boris-42, oh awesome!
07:10 psd boris-42, I have always wanted to start one! :P
07:10 boris-42 psd:  boris-42.me/rally-vs-tempest-what-to-use-for-openstack-testing/
07:12 psd boris-42, Nice :)
07:15 yfried boris-42: from the subject - unbiased at all :)
07:15 boris-42 yfried: ahaha
07:15 boris-42 yfried: I tried to be lol
07:15 boris-42 =)
07:19 yfried boris-42: tempest.conf and tempest/etc can be replaced by change env vars so you can use multiple confs for multiple clouds...
07:19 yfried boris-42: also, it's a little tempest-bashing
07:21 yfried boris-42: do you really want to publish such an anti-tempest doc?
07:21 yfried boris-42: I would have focused on how Rally allows you to overcome lot's of gaps in tempest
07:21 boris-42 yfried: there is another blogpost about thtat
07:22 boris-42 yfried: it's not yet ready=)
07:22 boris-42 yfried: but I finished all diagrams
07:22 boris-42 yfried: and most part of text
07:38 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
07:42 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
07:44 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
07:51 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
07:52 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
08:02 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:05 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:05 boris-42 yfried: btw
08:06 boris-42 yfried did you see this?
08:06 boris-42 Expand all Print all In new window
08:06 boris-42 [openstack-dev][openstack-operators][qa][Rally] Thoughts on removing half of Rally benchmark scenarios
08:11 * yfried looking
08:12 yfried boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148187/1 could you help me with the unittests on this patch
08:12 yfried ?
08:12 yfried please
08:17 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:22 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed stackforge/rally: Add a validator for neutron networks  https://review.openstack.org/141813
08:24 boris-42 yfried: in five minutes
08:31 neeti joined #openstack-rally
08:40 boris-42 yfried: oh
08:40 boris-42 yfried: a lot of failures
08:42 boris-42 yfried: so you should rebase your patches
08:42 boris-42 ah no sry
08:44 boris-42 yfried: no seems like it's not rebased well
08:44 boris-42 yfried: take a look at path to this file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148187/1/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py
08:44 boris-42 ah it exisit lol
08:49 clee joined #openstack-rally
08:49 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
08:52 boris-42 yfried|afk: hm really strange stuff
09:02 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
09:02 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
09:14 yfried boris-42: ?
09:27 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:29 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
09:43 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
09:44 fhubik boris-42: Hello, I was wondering about bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1409213. Should I do the entire refactoring of oslo.foo packages there as patchsets, or should I open new reviews for all of remaining oslo.foo packages?
09:45 pboros joined #openstack-rally
09:46 bkopilov tfreger, test
09:47 tfreger bkopilov: ?
09:47 bkopilov tfreger, ok ... just for test
10:02 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Several improvements in Rally info  https://review.openstack.org/148078
10:05 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added create_and_extend_volume scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/147489
10:06 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
10:06 andreykurilin yfried: hi!
10:07 andreykurilin yfried: please see my comment for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148187/
10:08 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed stackforge/rally: Add a validator for neutron networks  https://review.openstack.org/141813
10:13 nmagnezi_ joined #openstack-rally
10:14 obutenko joined #openstack-rally
10:24 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:29 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
10:35 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Several improvements in Rally info  https://review.openstack.org/148078
10:53 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:57 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from image  https://review.openstack.org/146820
10:57 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Add cinder scenario: create volume from volume(clone)  https://review.openstack.org/147449
10:57 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
11:02 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Add SLA to check for outliers  https://review.openstack.org/148079
11:03 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Add SLA to check for outliers  https://review.openstack.org/148079
11:04 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Add SLA to check for outliers  https://review.openstack.org/148079
11:05 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:06 psd joined #openstack-rally
11:07 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Improvements for scenario VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete  https://review.openstack.org/144337
11:09 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
11:09 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added extend_volume scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/147489
11:09 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed stackforge/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
11:13 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added extend_volume scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/147489
11:23 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:26 vkmc_ joined #openstack-rally
11:29 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
11:30 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
11:32 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Specify python version for pep8 env in tox.ini  https://review.openstack.org/148225
11:40 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed stackforge/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
11:42 openstackgerrit Filip Hubík proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor oslo.utils as oslo_utils  https://review.openstack.org/148065
12:08 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed stackforge/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
12:26 yfried joined #openstack-rally
12:28 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
12:31 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
12:34 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed stackforge/rally: Add EC2 API test scenario  https://review.openstack.org/147550
12:37 boris-42 fhubik_lunch: yep you should do
13:03 psd boris-42, Hey!!
13:04 psd boris-42, remember the task you gave me yesterday?
13:04 boris-42 psd: yep
13:04 boris-42 psd: about --uuid?
13:04 psd yeah!
13:05 psd so do you want me to fix that particular situation or in general
13:05 psd as in you pointed out to the error we get on, rally task start without creating deployment
13:06 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:07 psd boris-42, ^
13:14 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
13:19 yfried_ boris-42: I'm back
13:19 yfried_ boris-42: were you able to solve the nova issue from yesterday?
13:35 boris-42 yfried_: nope
13:37 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Removes duplicate for generate_random_name  https://review.openstack.org/148258
13:42 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added list_snapshots scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/146580
13:45 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:59 boris-42 yfried_: working with nova team on fixing
13:59 boris-42 yfried_: it will take some time to figure what caused it
13:59 boris-42 yfried_:  it started on 17 Jan https://github.com/openstack/nova/commits/master
13:59 boris-42 so few patches tho check
13:59 yfried_ boris-42: ack
14:00 boris-42 yfried_: btw nice cleanup in base.Scenario
14:00 boris-42 I will try to review it when I finished with this bug
14:04 yfried_ bkopilov: please explain your comment https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148258/1/rally/benchmark/scenarios/base.py,cm
14:04 yfried_ boris-42: tnx
14:06 bkopilov yfried_, we use prefix or cls.RESOURCE_NAME_PREFIX , in case prefix is None we choose the second
14:07 bkopilov yfried_, i think you set in the function  prefix=RESOURCE_NAME_PREFIX as default value
14:07 bkopilov yfried_, its the same as the first comment
14:08 bkopilov yfried_, i think you can skip this OR condition here , do you agree ?
14:09 bkopilov yfried_, you will never use this None value , always choose Not noe
14:10 bkopilov boris-42, Hi Boris
14:12 bkopilov boris-42, Can we run rally and generate jenkins report , keep the results in xunit xml , same as we are doing with testr or nose (tempest)
14:13 bkopilov boris-42, Assume we run all rally json tests from jenkins :  rally -v task start rally/samples/tasks/scenarios/nova/boot-and-delete.json...
14:15 boris-42 bkopilov: hi there
14:15 bkopilov boris-42, Hi
14:15 boris-42 bkopilov: so we don't support xml/xunit output for now
14:15 boris-42 bkopilov: you can get results in json if you type "rally task results"
14:15 boris-42 bkopilov: or HTML report if you type "rally task report"
14:16 bkopilov boris-42, i want to prepare json tests and use rally cli to run them , somehow jenkins should show output
14:17 boris-42 bkopilov: soo in OpenStack CI infra (we are just publishing output files of rally)
14:17 bkopilov boris-42, ok thanks
14:17 boris-42 bkopilov: like uploading results of "rally task report" to somewhere
14:18 boris-42 bkopilov: as well you can help with implmeneting xunit output type of results
14:18 boris-42 bkopilov: or wait some amount of time to get it impleted
14:18 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added list_snapshots scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/146580
14:19 bkopilov boris-42, How do you recommend to show the results from jenkins ?
14:20 boris-42 bkopilov: sooooo
14:20 boris-42 bkopilov:
14:20 boris-42 http://nose.readthedocs.org/en/latest/plugins/xunit.html
14:20 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Removes duplicate for generate_random_name  https://review.openstack.org/148258
14:20 boris-42 rally task detailed --xunit can show us detailed list of tests
14:21 boris-42 it shouldn't be too complicated to transfere
14:21 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added list_snapshots scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/146580
14:21 yfried_ boris-42: unrelated thing - rally executes tempest by executing "testr" command via Popen
14:23 yfried_ boris-42: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L210
14:24 yfried_ boris-42: why not use the actual "testr" python module?
14:24 yfried_ boris-42: testr is part of global requirments, isn't it?
14:25 boris-42 yfried_: not sure=)
14:25 boris-42 yfried_: haha
14:25 boris-42 yfried_: but actually good idea if it is
14:25 boris-42 yfried_: let me check
14:26 yfried_ boris-42: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L210
14:26 boris-42 yfried_: yep seems like it should be here https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L240-L240
14:26 yfried_ https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L240
14:26 boris-42 yfried_: yep seems reasonable
14:26 yfried_ boris-42: I'll start working on it
14:26 boris-42 yfried_: actually I didn't know about that it exist
14:26 boris-42 yfried_: don't forget to review=) to get core status=)
14:27 boris-42 yfried_: we need more cores=)
14:27 yfried_ boris-42: I'll start reviewing random stuff tomorrow
14:30 yfried_ boris-42: amaretskiy: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/test_base.py#L305-L309
14:30 yfried_ I'm trying to understand what is being tested by this assertion
14:30 boris-42 yfried_: great
14:31 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed stackforge/rally: Added list_snapshots scenario for Cinder test  https://review.openstack.org/146580
14:31 amaretskiy yfried_ hi
14:31 yfried_ amaretskiy: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148258/ is failing on it due to your suggestion
14:31 boris-42 yfried_: somebody was drunk=)
14:31 amaretskiy yfried_ let's call _generate_random_name("foo_prefix_", 10)
14:31 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
14:32 amaretskiy so the result is something like "foo_prefix_0123456789"
14:32 amaretskiy that is a string
14:32 amaretskiy with explicit length
14:32 amaretskiy of len("foo_preix_") + 10
14:32 amaretskiy that is explicitly tested
14:33 boris-42 bkopilov: so wanna work on subunit stuff?
14:33 boris-42 xunit*
14:34 amaretskiy yfried_ yes, I think we can roll back to your initial patch set, where we use default None values in method signature
14:35 amaretskiy because the problem is in inheritance
14:35 amaretskiy method signature is calculated in base class
14:35 amaretskiy so we have unexpected defaults
14:35 amaretskiy i will liave a comment in patch set
14:35 amaretskiy *leave
14:36 yfried_ amaretskiy: I still fail to understand this. it's overriding Scenario.RESOURCE_NAME_PREFIX but then calls base.Scenario.RESOURCE_NAME_PREFIX which holds the default
14:36 yfried_ amaretskiy: so back to original?
14:36 amaretskiy yes
14:36 amaretskiy back to original
14:36 yfried_ amaretskiy: why not fix the test?
14:36 amaretskiy my proposal works well if tehte is no child classes
14:37 amaretskiy we can not fix tests because the test is correct
14:37 yfried_ amaretskiy: it is? I fail to follow it
14:37 yfried_ amaretskiy: but ok
14:39 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Removes duplicate for generate_random_name  https://review.openstack.org/148258
14:42 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
14:49 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
14:54 nmagnezi_ joined #openstack-rally
14:55 boris-42 yfried_: heh we need to collect some stats
14:55 boris-42 yfried_: about failing benchmarks
14:55 boris-42 yfried_: so we will be able to track what is happening
14:56 bkopilov boris-42, I just started to work on rally , its my first day :)
14:57 yfried_ boris-42: sorry, I think I lost the track of the conversation. what are we talking about?
14:57 bkopilov boris-42, my scope is storage
14:57 boris-42 yfried_: so now as you see you need to "recheck" everything
14:57 boris-42 yfried_: we made unstable job
14:57 boris-42 yfried_: to put everything unstable to it (it's non voting so we don't need to recheck)
14:57 boris-42 yfried_: but now the question is what is failing
15:00 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds support for multiple tempest sources  https://review.openstack.org/148187
15:01 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
15:02 psd boris-42, the '--uuid' patch would just be a single line change in rally/cmd/envutils.py at default_from_global function
15:03 psd boris-42, oh my bad
15:03 boris-42 psd: it is common for task_uuid
15:04 boris-42 psd: so it won't be so simple
15:04 psd boris-42, it won't be a single line
15:06 psd boris-42, I did not understand what did you mean by 'task_uuid'
15:11 boris-42 psd: default_from_global is used not only for passing default deployment uuid but as well for passing default task uuid
15:11 baker joined #openstack-rally
15:24 psd boris-42, so should I make a new decorator for task uuid?
15:25 boris-42 psd: why?
15:25 boris-42 psd: it already works
15:25 boris-42 psd: just make it type proper messages
15:28 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Make Rally gates more stable by moving things to unstable job  https://review.openstack.org/148288
15:30 psd boris-42, Alright
15:30 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Make Rally gates more stable by moving things to unstable job  https://review.openstack.org/148288
15:31 boris-42 yfried_: ^
15:31 boris-42 andreykurilin: ^
15:31 boris-42 rediskin: ^
15:32 yfried_ boris-42: why is this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148288/2/rally-jobs/rally.yaml,cm required?
15:33 andreykurilin I have same question:)
15:34 boris-42 andreykurilin: yfried_ it is failing very very often
15:34 andreykurilin boris-42: so lets move it to unstable:)
15:34 boris-42 andreykurilin: yfried_ it's but that I am working in nova
15:34 boris-42 andreykurilin: it's related to nova-netowrk
15:34 boris-42 andreykurilin: unstalbe job is nova-neutron
15:35 yfried_ boris-42: also, where are you removing NovaServers.boot_and_delete_server
15:36 yfried_ boris-42: seems like you are just allowing it to fail instead of moving it to unstable
15:36 boris-42 yfried_: this is actually what you asked beofe ^
15:36 boris-42 yfried_: I removed sla check only
15:37 andreykurilin boris-42: from commit message: "2) Move 2 more cinder benchmarks to unstable"... hm.. I don't see any cinder scenarios:)
15:37 boris-42 wtf guys
15:38 boris-42 they are touching cinder
15:38 boris-42 and failing because of cinder
15:38 boris-42 andreykurilin: yfried_ ^  NovaServers.boot_server_from_volume_and_delete:
15:38 boris-42 you see word "volume"
15:38 andreykurilin :)
15:39 andreykurilin boris-42: no, I don't read full name of scenario:)
15:39 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
15:39 yfried_ boris-42: sorry, I tought this was supposed to move NovaServers.boot_and_delete_server to unstable as well
15:40 yfried_ boris-42: I think you should move it to unstable instead of removing SLA
15:40 boris-42 yfried_: let me copy paste message from above
15:41 boris-42 yfried_: ah actually it's simpler to repeat
15:41 boris-42 yfried_: unstable is nova+neutron
15:41 boris-42 this benchmark works in it well
15:41 boris-42 yfried_: and it is failing in nova+nova-network
15:41 yfried_ boris-42: oh - so the problem is in nnet?
15:42 yfried_ boris-42: you should rename the yaml to rally-novanetwork.yaml
15:43 boris-42 yfried_: it's veryhardtodo
15:43 boris-42 yfried_: yep problem is in nnet
15:44 yfried_ boris-42: should I recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147492/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147571/ ?
15:46 boris-42 yfried_: sooo
15:46 boris-42 yfried_: http://logs.openstack.org/92/147492/4/check/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally/3b70fe1/rally-plot/results.html.gz#/NovaServers.snapshot_server/failures
15:46 boris-42 yfried_: something wired is happening with nova these days...
15:46 yfried_ andreykurilin: boris-42: amaretskiy: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/rally+branch:master+topic:tempest_source,n,z
15:46 boris-42 yfried_: yep you can
15:47 andreykurilin yfried_: I'll review them tomorrow.
15:47 yfried_ the faster I get this merged, the faster I can start working on integrating our tempest conf
15:48 andreykurilin yfried_: Btw, can you implement "rally-manage tempest remove" and "rally-manage tempest reinstall" ?
15:48 yfried_ andreykurilin: I'll put it on my list
15:48 andreykurilin yfried_: ok, I'll try to review as quick as I can)
15:48 yfried_ andreykurilin: do you have a bp / gdoc for that?
15:48 boris-42 yfried_: I will try to help as well with reviews
15:49 boris-42 yfried_: really sorry but you see that something with nova is not OK
15:49 yfried_ we need that branch so we can convert all our CI to use rally
15:49 yfried_ boris-42: no pressure
15:49 andreykurilin yfried_: no. I have only google docs with several ideas related to improvements of verification. Do you interested in it?
15:50 yfried_ andreykurilin: sure
15:51 boris-42 yfried_: andreykurilin maybe we should work on rally roadmap
15:51 boris-42 yfried_: andreykurilin so I can put some points related to rally verify part
15:51 boris-42 yfried_: andreykurilin and links to documents with descriptions?
15:54 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
15:56 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:03 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the generic script-based benchmark for the VMs  https://review.openstack.org/141671
16:03 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the context benchmark_image  https://review.openstack.org/138466
16:05 paboldin review pls ^^
16:05 psd joined #openstack-rally
16:08 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
16:16 yfried_ andreykurilin: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L177
16:16 yfried_ andreykurilin: how is this working for "smoke"?
16:17 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
16:22 yfried_ andreykurilin: also - what's "dns"?
16:23 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed stackforge/rally: Add cold migrate scenario for Nova test  https://review.openstack.org/148307
16:24 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Improving error message  https://review.openstack.org/148308
16:24 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
16:24 baker joined #openstack-rally
16:25 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
16:28 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Publishing functional tests html reports  https://review.openstack.org/147098
16:33 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
16:35 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
16:37 boris-42 yfried_: maybe designate?
16:37 boris-42 yfried_: it's dns as a service
16:38 jaypipes_ joined #openstack-rally
16:59 yfried_ boris-42: no designate tests in tempest yet
17:01 boris-42 yfried_: then I don't know
17:01 yfried_ boris-42: how is this working for "smoke"  https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L177
17:04 boris-42 yfried_: it wont' be chosen
17:04 boris-42 yfried_: we will pass directly smoke to tempest
17:04 boris-42 yfried_: https://github.com/openstack/tempest/tree/master/tempest/api and there is no smoke here directory
17:04 boris-42 so everything should be fine
17:06 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Make Rally gates more stable by moving things to unstable job  https://review.openstack.org/148288
17:07 boris-42 e0ne: ^ okay now Rally gates will be more stable
17:07 e0ne boris-42: great!
17:07 boris-42 e0ne: not so actually
17:08 boris-42 e0ne: because it deosn't mean that OpenStack is stable more
17:10 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
17:24 meteorfox joined #openstack-rally
17:35 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
17:40 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
17:50 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
17:52 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Improvements for scenario VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete  https://review.openstack.org/144337
17:57 openstackgerrit Filip Hubík proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor oslo.foo as oslo_foo  https://review.openstack.org/148065
18:00 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Publishing functional tests html reports  https://review.openstack.org/147098
18:09 boris-42 psd_: I will help you to write that patch
18:10 boris-42 paboldin: gimme sec to put all ideas
18:10 paboldin boris-42: missed?
18:10 psd thanks boris-42 :)
18:17 boris-42 psd:  done https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148308/
18:18 psd boris-42, checking, thx
18:25 boris-42 psd: and don't forget about unit tests
18:28 psd joined #openstack-rally
18:37 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
19:01 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
19:12 fhubik_afk joined #openstack-rally
19:23 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Improvements for scenario VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete  https://review.openstack.org/144337
19:24 psd joined #openstack-rally
19:24 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds "scenario" to available verify sets  https://review.openstack.org/147581
19:26 pboros joined #openstack-rally
19:26 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
19:33 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
19:36 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
19:45 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:45 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
19:48 yfried_ boris-42: http://logs.openstack.org/71/147571/2/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/d902e3a/
19:48 yfried_ didn't you move the cinder tests to unstable?
20:03 prmtl joined #openstack-rally
20:10 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
20:50 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
20:53 psd joined #openstack-rally
20:54 jtaleric joined #openstack-rally
21:12 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
21:28 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Restructure Rally docs  https://review.openstack.org/120018
21:30 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
21:44 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
21:56 fhubik_afk joined #openstack-rally
22:14 nmagnezi_ joined #openstack-rally
22:23 jlk boris-42: today's work led me to run across this: https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/commit/98934d7bf1464afe0f7fe98efd2a591d95ac9c41
22:27 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Publishing functional tests html reports  https://review.openstack.org/147098
22:58 e0ne joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary