Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-01-26

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:38 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:47 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
01:26 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:13 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:20 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:32 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
02:47 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
02:47 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Develop#How_to_contribute   ☁ Rally weekly updates:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/Updates
04:10 mitz joined #openstack-rally
05:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:55 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:15 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
06:24 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
06:36 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
06:38 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
06:38 yfried joined #openstack-rally
07:13 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
07:21 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:25 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
07:44 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
07:46 yfried msdubov_: question about rally-verify gate
07:46 yfried msdubov_: http://logs.openstack.org/87/148187/4/check/gate-rally-dsvm-verify/b1537b8/rally-verify/1_verify_results.html.gz
07:47 yfried msdubov_: how come this passes when most are failures?
07:48 msdubov_ yfried: Well it passes just because Rally worked fine
07:48 msdubov_ And those failures were just produced as an output of Tempest
07:49 yfried msdubov_: really? but seems like Rally didn't configure tempest properly?
07:50 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
07:52 msdubov_ yfried: Let's see what will be there after your recheck
07:52 msdubov_ yfried: But anyway, seems like now the gate script doesn't check for that
07:52 yfried msdubov_: oh. it's not just this specific patch. it's almost any verify run
07:52 msdubov_ http://logs.openstack.org/87/148187/4/check/gate-rally-dsvm-verify/b1537b8/console.html
07:53 yfried msdubov_: what am I looking for?
08:00 tkammer joined #openstack-rally
08:00 msdubov_ yfried: That's just to illustrate how our gate job script works
08:05 psd msdubov_, I was trying to find ways to call nova functions through python code, is there some wiki that I could use?
08:06 psd msdubov_, for example if I need to list hosts, then what call would return the required result?, could you help?
08:09 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:11 boris-42 yfried: yep
08:11 boris-42 yfried: we have issues with tempest conf generation
08:11 boris-42 yfried|afk: so we don't are checking that rally commands works properly, not tempest.conf=)
08:12 boris-42 yfried|afk: that's why it will be nice to have dkranz scirpt
08:15 yfried boris-42: I'll start working on it shortly
08:18 msdubov_ psd, Hi, we use python-novaclient (https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient) and the basic Nova actions are implemented here: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/nova/utils.py
08:19 msdubov_ psd, So seems like the "list hosts" action is not implemented yet, then this should be added there
08:21 psd msdubov_, Thanks!!
08:28 psd boris-42, Hey!
08:29 psd boris-42, for api calls that aren't defined yet, I am leaving the column blank, and would fill it when we implement it. Is that Okay?
08:32 pboros joined #openstack-rally
08:37 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
08:41 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
08:48 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
08:56 exploreshaifali msdubov_, hello, I am working for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149832/
08:57 exploreshaifali msdubov_, by making changes you mentioned, I got errors like http://dpaste.com/285PK1A
08:58 msdubov_ exploreshaifali:AssertionError: Expected call: mock('img', 0, auto_assign_nic=False, fakearg='f')
08:58 msdubov_ Actual call: mock('img', 0, False, fakearg='f')
08:59 msdubov_ exploreshaifali: I think the error message is quite clear
08:59 msdubov_ exploreshaifali:
08:59 msdubov_ You can just remove "auto_assign_nic=" and it will work
09:00 exploreshaifali msdubov_, I think I need to "add auto_assign_nic=" because this is expected
09:02 ilyashakhat joined #openstack-rally
09:04 exploreshaifali msdubov_, error states to make method call like `Expected call: mock('img', 0, auto_assign_nic=False, fakearg='f')` for line 271 and 276
09:04 msdubov_ exploreshaifali: What is marked as "Expected" and what as "Actual" depends ONLY  on the order in which things are passed to the assert_called_with() method. So you can safely remove "auto_assign_nic" from the tests
09:06 exploreshaifali msdubov_, but it is not present in the call, look https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149832/2/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/nova/test_servers.py at line 271
09:07 openstackgerrit Filip Hubík proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor oslo.foo as oslo_foo  https://review.openstack.org/148065
09:07 exploreshaifali msdubov_, and if I will add 'auto_assign_nic' to it, will give error like "TypeError: _verify_boot_server() got an unexpected keyword argument 'auto_assign_nic'"
09:14 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
09:18 pboros joined #openstack-rally
09:24 tkammer joined #openstack-rally
09:25 msdubov_ exploreshaifali:But the error message is about line 262, isn't it?
09:25 msdubov_ exploreshaifali:What if you try http://paste.openstack.org/show/162160/ there?
09:29 exploreshaifali msdubov_, yes, after modifying line 262, tests passed, Thanks!!
09:30 exploreshaifali msdubov_, but I was wondering why was so? It should not matter for optional args if I use their name of not
09:31 exploreshaifali msdubov_, is it because how the test cases works?
09:34 msdubov_ exploreshaifali: This is how mocks work
09:34 msdubov_ exploreshaifali: (We use mocks to check that specific methods were called in a specific way)
09:35 exploreshaifali msdubov_, okay, Thanks!!  also I have one more question, why we have two level tests one in rally/tests and another in rally/rally/tests
09:36 exploreshaifali msdubov_, I believe they both have their own purposes, it is so?
09:37 yfried boris-42: could you please comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147581/ ?
09:41 openstackgerrit Shaifali Agrawal proposed stackforge/rally: Shifting ._generate_random_name() call  https://review.openstack.org/149832
09:42 boris-42 exploreshaifali: we don't have 2 levels
09:42 boris-42 yfried: I will
09:43 exploreshaifali boris-42, oh, yes sorry, my mistake.
09:44 exploreshaifali another openstack component have so, I am suppose to ask it there not here :P
10:03 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:07 tkammer joined #openstack-rally
10:10 boris-42 e0ne: hi there
10:11 e0ne boris-42: morning
10:12 boris-42 e0ne: so is is possible to get fixes for nested volumes benchmarks today?
10:12 e0ne boris-42: i hope, aarefiev is working on it
10:13 boris-42 e0ne: okay let's try to do it before cutting release
10:14 aarefiev boris-42: hi! I'm working on nested snapshots
10:14 openstackgerrit Filip Hubík proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor oslo.foo as oslo_foo  https://review.openstack.org/148065
10:21 openstackgerrit Filip Hubík proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor oslo.foo as oslo_foo  https://review.openstack.org/148065
10:40 boris-42 yfried: hey
10:40 boris-42 yfried: around?
10:41 yfried boris-42: here for the next ~5hrs
10:43 boris-42 yfried: so
10:44 boris-42 yfried: what I was saying is to have 2 classes
10:44 boris-42 yfried: not one with 2 lists
10:44 boris-42 yfried: like other consts in that file
10:46 yfried boris-42: ok, though I like my current mode
10:46 yfried boris-42: could you please help with naming the second class? ("not API")?
10:50 boris-42 yfried: could you take a look at my comment
10:50 boris-42 yfried: I left it on review
10:51 openstackgerrit Filip Hubík proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor oslo.foo as oslo_foo  https://review.openstack.org/148065
10:55 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Add chart `Parallel iterations' to HTML report  https://review.openstack.org/146814
10:57 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
11:09 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:20 tkammer joined #openstack-rally
11:21 psd boris-42, I have made some changes, please check when you find time :)
11:22 psd boris-42, http://goo.gl/y1145t
11:25 msdubov_ psd, By the way, have you started your patch on fixind typos in docs?
11:30 psd msdubov_, I realised that I had found just one.I tried looking for more typos but did not find any. Today I found another one in the comments of file that you send the link to.
11:31 msdubov_ psd Making a patch with fixing just a couple of typos will be OK as well, then I'm going to continue the work on docs towards the end of this week :)
11:33 psd msdubov_, Okay I'll make the changes right away :)
11:39 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
11:52 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
12:13 yfried tfreger: for t in `neutron net-list | awk '/test|private|rally/ {print $2}'`; do neutron net-delete $t; done
12:13 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
12:13 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/149988
12:16 tfreger yfried: Thank you!
12:19 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
12:26 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Correcting minor typos  https://review.openstack.org/150017
12:27 psd msdubov_, ^
12:28 msdubov_ psd, thanks!
12:29 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Fix all py3 related issues  https://review.openstack.org/148763
12:33 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Refactor oslo.foo as oslo_foo  https://review.openstack.org/148065
12:38 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
12:41 cdent joined #openstack-rally
12:52 paboldin joined #openstack-rally
12:52 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
12:53 NikitaKonovalov joined #openstack-rally
12:58 tkammer joined #openstack-rally
13:02 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
13:25 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Refactor rally.api  https://review.openstack.org/149597
13:30 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
13:39 boris-42 e0ne: boot server from volume bug http://logs.openstack.org/63/148763/12/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/6d2df86/rally-plot/results.html.gz
13:39 boris-42 e0ne: race in gates
13:40 e0ne boris-42: thanks! i'll take a look on it
13:41 yfried redixin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148187/4/tests/unit/verification/test_tempest.py,cm
13:41 yfried redixin: could you please show me how?
13:46 openstackgerrit Anastasia Kuznetsova proposed stackforge/rally: Add Mistral benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/144320
14:00 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Correcting minor typos  https://review.openstack.org/150017
14:01 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:06 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
14:14 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:22 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:24 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
14:45 baker joined #openstack-rally
14:48 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
14:48 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
14:50 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
14:51 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
14:51 jell joined #openstack-rally
15:04 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
15:09 openstackgerrit Anton Arefiev proposed stackforge/rally: Fix cinder scenario: create nested snapshots  https://review.openstack.org/150053
15:15 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
15:15 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
15:18 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Fix all py3 related issues  https://review.openstack.org/148763
15:20 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
15:57 rook boris-42: ping
15:58 rook with vmtask - i see the scenario changed, and is strictly using the floating ip, was there a reason for this?
16:32 andreykurilin rook: hi!
16:32 rook hey!
16:32 rook hey!
16:32 andreykurilin rook: you should ask amaretskiy about vmtask
16:32 rook yeah, i saw that is who had the latest commits.
16:32 andreykurilin rook: he should know the answer)
16:33 fhubik hey, is this bug still valid? https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1378960, I am just asking to be sure. Thx.
16:33 amaretskiy rook hi
16:33 andreykurilin fhubik: hi, yes!
16:34 andreykurilin fhubik: feel free to assign it to yourself:)
16:34 fhubik andreykurilin: ok, thanks, I will try look into it ;)
16:34 rook amaretskiy: hey
16:34 andreykurilin fhubik: nice
16:34 amaretskiy rook look at commit message about changes in vmtask https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144337/
16:36 rook amaretskiy so a cloud w/o floating IPs can no longer run VMTask scenarios
16:36 rook ie, provider network
16:37 amaretskiy rook - yes, that is so! but this kind of cloud can be only on devstack
16:37 rook I am in the middle of pushing a new scenario for VMTask, however, I am following the old method, of allowing floating and non-floating
16:38 amaretskiy rook new scenario is simplified
16:38 amaretskiy rook I do not see any problems
16:38 rook while I understand the concept of "simplifying".
16:38 rook lol i do
16:38 rook I do not use Floating IPs
16:38 amaretskiy floating_ip works perfect on devstack
16:38 rook yeah, I am not running on dev stack
16:38 rook I am running against real deployments
16:38 amaretskiy root why you do not use FIPs ?
16:38 rook where Floating IPs do not scale
16:38 rook ^
16:39 rook Find a provider where you can get a /16 for a Floating IP pool
16:39 rook :)
16:39 rook I highly suggest we default to Floating IP - for your devstack case, but we allow for non-floating ip
16:39 rook do not restrict users.
16:40 rook I might see if kambiz can help push a patch to this.
16:40 baker left #openstack-rally
16:40 amaretskiy i do not understand how you can get ssh to VM without FIP? does this mean that you have routes to fixed networks?
16:41 rook amaretskiy VLAN provider networks - create a "rally
16:41 rook " network, attach guests to the Rally network
16:41 rook then rally can inject the key, and get access to the guest.
16:41 rook w/ VXLAN/GRE tenant networks, we can put rally in the cloud
16:41 rook or, I have a veth hack, to get Rally in to the tenant network.
16:42 rook However, restricting users to only floating ips is not a good idea, imho. i wish I caught this commit.
16:42 rook my appologies.
16:51 amaretskiy rook floating_network is not mandatory to be available from the internet
16:52 amaretskiy the only thing is it must be available for rally
16:52 rook understood
16:52 rook yes, however, there are some companies that have zero concept of floating ips
16:52 rook or l3
16:53 rook so, their deployments, do not even utilize neutron's L3
16:53 amaretskiy openstack networking assumes that tenant networks are not available outside of cloud
16:53 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
16:56 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
16:56 amaretskiy rook http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/tenant-provider-networks.html
16:57 rook amaretskiy understood, this isn't my first rodeo
16:57 amaretskiy ok
16:57 rook amaretskiy there are deployments with L3 completely disabled.
16:57 amaretskiy rook we can digg this deeper and, if required, add a patch
16:57 amaretskiy but this looks fine for me
16:58 rook might fine for you, but deployments we are using rally for stress testing for, will quickly run out of floating Ips
16:58 rook since typically, people only have a /24 or /22 for floating ip pool
16:58 rook And we are using Rally to deploy 20k+ guests
16:58 amaretskiy 20k - in parallel?
16:59 rook 20k over time, 20-40 at a time.
16:59 amaretskiy because FIP should be released after VM is deleted
16:59 rook right, we won't delete until Rally runs through the cleanup
16:59 rook we have patches we need to push upstream, but this patch sort of breaks some of the logic.
16:59 rook kambiz and I will have to look through things
17:00 amaretskiy scenario boot-runcommand-delete runs a VM, adds FIP, runs script, then releases FIP and deletes VM - that is an iteration
17:01 amaretskiy so I do not see problems
17:21 boris-42 rook: hey hey
17:21 boris-42 rook: I think we should return that abbility back
17:21 rook hey boris-42 - off topic.. i am just now getting back into the swing of things (oly lifting) -- one sec posting a vid
17:22 boris-42 rook: hehe
17:22 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed stackforge/rally: Add new script for gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/144633
17:22 boris-42 rook: how that's go?
17:22 leeantho joined #openstack-rally
17:22 rook boris-42: hurt my back - no sleep == injury.
17:23 rook boris-42 other than that, going well.
17:23 boris-42 rook: =((
17:23 boris-42 rook: something serious with back?
17:24 rook i am too stubborn to get it looked at by a doc
17:25 boris-42 rook: heh
17:34 rook boris-42 does this link work for ya? https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/share/2Nko-rOSHKK1XkAK2f9DQhzM3FHYdIr8dIUsErOaxgM
17:36 boris-42 rook: yep
17:36 boris-42 rook: heh nice set
17:37 rook yeah, lil lockout
17:37 boris-42 rook: so can you do workouts now?
17:37 rook but, last week, i could barely lift my 5kg son.
17:37 rook yeah
17:37 rook that was Sunday
17:37 rook I snatched 80kg today with ease, from power position
17:38 boris-42 rook: heh good one
17:38 boris-42 rook: I was a bit fu*** by dead lift on sanday=)
17:38 boris-42 sunday*
17:38 boris-42 rook: 120kg 4x3
17:38 rook yeah... screw a dead lift.
17:39 rook i hate deads... i have been using pulls as my dl work.
17:39 rook snatch/clean pulls
17:39 boris-42 rook: they pick right name for that exercise =)
17:40 rook lol
17:40 rook so true.
17:47 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
17:55 openstackgerrit Joe Talerico proposed stackforge/rally: Add boot_client_server_delete scenario.  https://review.openstack.org/150103
18:03 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
18:09 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
18:15 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
18:16 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
18:17 openstackgerrit Joe Talerico proposed stackforge/rally: Add boot_client_server_delete scenario.  https://review.openstack.org/150103
18:40 zhiyan joined #openstack-rally
18:44 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
18:47 pboros joined #openstack-rally
18:55 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
18:58 psd joined #openstack-rally
18:59 RaginBaj_ joined #openstack-rally
19:01 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
19:03 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
19:22 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
19:28 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix cinder scenario: create nested snapshots  https://review.openstack.org/150053
19:40 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
19:51 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
20:10 jlk Is there a shared tool out there for cleaning up after rally takes a cluster down hard, and leaves running instances and users and volumes and whatever?
20:12 psd joined #openstack-rally
20:13 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
20:29 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
20:41 boris-42 jlk: I am working on that..
20:41 boris-42 jlk: rally disaster cleanu
20:44 boris-42 jlk: so the first that that I am going to implement is exisitng users supoot + disaster cleanup
20:44 boris-42 jlk: for such case
20:47 boris-42 jlk: btw
20:47 boris-42 jlk: I am starting cutting releases
20:47 boris-42 for rally
20:49 jlk nice
20:49 openstackgerrit Jacob Liberman proposed stackforge/rally: Replacing ' with " in rally/cmd  https://review.openstack.org/149574
20:51 jlk I think it might be time to just truncate nova and start over
20:54 boris-42 jlk: lol
20:57 boris-42 jlk: btw could you update your patch?
20:57 boris-42 jlk: that fixes doc?
20:57 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
20:57 jlk sure
20:59 openstackgerrit Shaifali Agrawal proposed stackforge/rally: Shifting ._generate_random_name() call  https://review.openstack.org/149832
21:00 boris-42 jlk: thank you
21:03 openstackgerrit Jesse Keating proposed stackforge/rally: Replace deprecated max_failure_precent sla  https://review.openstack.org/149039
21:11 jlk boris-42: ^^ is pep8 expected to fail so badly?
21:11 jlk and does that block?
21:14 openstackgerrit Jacob Liberman proposed stackforge/rally: Replacing ' with " in rally/cmd  https://review.openstack.org/149574
21:14 jlk boris-42: is the task arguments syntax available now, where I can define repeating things somewhere once, like nic network ID? and reference over and over?
21:18 boris-42 jlk: yep
21:18 boris-42 jlk: you can use it
21:18 boris-42 jlk: take a look at jinja2 templates
21:19 boris-42 jlk: or this https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/rally-neutron.yaml#L1
21:19 jlk oh I know all about jinja...
21:19 boris-42 jlk: I will make soon tutorial in rally docs
21:19 boris-42 jlk: they are all similiar
21:19 boris-42 jlk: jinja mako jinja2=)
21:19 jlk thanks, this will help. Coming soon is doing this with an external file for the definitions right?
21:20 boris-42 jlk: Comming soon?)
21:20 boris-42 jlk: it's already merged...
21:20 boris-42 jlk: you have now 2 extra arguments in "rally task start" coomand
21:20 boris-42 jlk: --task-args and --task-args-file
21:20 boris-42 jlk: so you can specify directly from cli or from file
21:21 jlk ooooh!
21:21 jlk is that documented ?  :)
21:23 boris-42 jlk: will be!
21:24 boris-42 jlk: actually community message was nice
21:24 boris-42 jlk: let me find it
21:24 boris-42 jlk: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/commit/a2d28d1f9f469b1699d31814a957505935803a17
21:25 jlk thanks
21:26 boris-42 jlk: heh http://boris-42.me/thoughts-on-making-openstack-community-more-user-friendly/
21:28 boris-42 jlk: anti-nova approach
21:28 boris-42 -)
21:28 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:41 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
21:41 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: DO NOT MERGE: test our gates  https://review.openstack.org/150157
21:52 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:57 boris-42 jlk: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/rally/0.0.1
21:57 boris-42 jlk: first release
21:57 jlk neat
21:59 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:46 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
23:18 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: WIP Don't create task db record during validation  https://review.openstack.org/150181
23:23 vkmc boris-42, heeeeeeeeeeeey
23:23 vkmc boris-42, nice blog post! :D
23:24 boris-42 vkmc: thanks=)
23:25 boris-42 vkmc: how do you do?
23:37 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: WIP Don't create task db record during validation  https://review.openstack.org/150181
23:39 vkmc boris-42, fine! I got distracted
23:40 boris-42 vkmc: ?)
23:40 vkmc boris-42, (for delayed reply)
23:40 vkmc boris-42, and you?
23:41 boris-42 vkmc: good good=)
23:41 boris-42 vkmc: heavy working)
23:41 boris-42 vkmc: billions of meetings lol
23:41 vkmc boo
23:42 boris-42 vkmc: +2 approved
23:42 boris-42 vkmc: lol
23:42 vkmc boris-42, lol
23:43 vkmc boris-42, well, you found time to write some posts
23:43 vkmc boris-42, I was looking forward for them
23:54 boris-42 vkmc: actualy this one is second=)
23:54 vkmc boris-42, yeah, I noticed that :)

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary