Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-02-04

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:38 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:48 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:22 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:48 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
01:49 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
01:51 pboldin1 joined #openstack-rally
01:51 pboldin1 joined #openstack-rally
02:32 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:45 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
03:43 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:54 rdas joined #openstack-rally
03:56 mitz joined #openstack-rally
04:02 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add FIO disk benchmark for VMs  https://review.openstack.org/152388
04:02 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the generic script-based benchmark for the VMs  https://review.openstack.org/141671
04:02 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add network-aware VM boot/delete utils  https://review.openstack.org/151384
04:02 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the context benchmark_image  https://review.openstack.org/138466
04:02 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Boot server w/ predefined internal network  https://review.openstack.org/152387
04:02 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Fix get_floating_ip lookup for {"id": net_id"}  https://review.openstack.org/152766
04:06 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
04:34 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:59 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
06:15 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:58 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
07:05 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
07:10 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
07:15 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:35 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
07:45 psd joined #openstack-rally
07:52 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:07 psd joined #openstack-rally
08:09 Miouge_ joined #openstack-rally
08:21 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:27 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
08:39 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:57 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
09:10 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:17 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:25 psd joined #openstack-rally
09:32 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
09:39 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
09:42 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
09:50 psd joined #openstack-rally
09:52 boris-42 yfried__: ping
09:52 yfried__ boris-42: pong
09:53 boris-42 yfried__: how are you?
09:55 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Fix template paths in heat samples  https://review.openstack.org/152564
09:56 yfried__ boris-42: fine. tnx. you?
09:57 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:58 boris-42 yfried__: ah a bit tired
09:58 boris-42 yfried__: but I have few news for you
09:58 boris-42 yfried__: first I started cutting releases
09:58 boris-42 yfried__: the second thing is we are working a bit on refactoring rally.api (I mean lib api)
09:59 boris-42 yfried__: ah you already saw https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150468/ =)
09:59 yfried__ boris-42: what's "cutting releases"?
09:59 boris-42 yfried__: so https://pypi.python.org/pypi/rally/0.0.1
10:00 boris-42 yfried__: you can run pip install rally =)
10:00 yfried__ boris-42: what about the "install_rally.sh" sudo requirement
10:01 boris-42 yfried__: bug still exist
10:01 boris-42 yfried__: we will need to refactor that
10:03 yfried__ boris-42: so how can you "pip install" rally?
10:04 boris-42 yfried__: not sure that I get the question
10:04 boris-42 yfried__: like all other pip stuff
10:05 boris-42 yfried__: sudo pip install rally
10:05 boris-42 yfried__: if you have all packages in system that are required it will be successfully
10:05 yfried__ what's the proper installation sequence now?
10:06 yfried__ boris-42: "pip install rally" vs "git clone rally && ./install_rally.sh"
10:07 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
10:07 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Replace ' with " in tests/unit/[common,deploy,doc,fixtures]  https://review.openstack.org/152613
10:08 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
10:11 amaretskiy1 joined #openstack-rally
10:14 rdas joined #openstack-rally
10:23 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: WIP: some cleanup around oslo  https://review.openstack.org/152847
10:24 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add create-update-delete scenario  https://review.openstack.org/152557
10:51 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
11:06 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:06 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Switch to the new Rally API  https://review.openstack.org/150468
11:27 tnurlygayanov joined #openstack-rally
11:36 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
11:49 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix template paths in heat samples  https://review.openstack.org/152564
11:51 exploreshaifali_ joined #openstack-rally
12:07 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
12:11 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
12:17 ilyashakhat_ joined #openstack-rally
12:17 kevinbenton_ joined #openstack-rally
12:24 svasheka joined #openstack-rally
12:25 jseutter joined #openstack-rally
12:27 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:31 tellesnobrega joined #openstack-rally
12:31 tellesnobrega boris-42, ping
12:31 boris-42 tellesnobrega: pong
12:31 olkonami joined #openstack-rally
12:32 tellesnobrega boris-42,rally statistics (min, max, average) are related to a single request?
12:32 psd__ joined #openstack-rally
12:32 boris-42 tellesnobrega: nope
12:32 boris-42 tellesnobrega: it's related to whole scenario and part of scenarios (called atomic actions)
12:34 tellesnobrega boris-42, I'm running 100 times, 50 concurrent requests. The results are for the 50 requests?
12:35 boris-42 tellesnobrega nope you are running 100 times
12:35 boris-42 tellesnobrega: so results are based on 100 times iteration
12:36 tellesnobrega yeah, but the min value, is the min value of one request of the 100 times? of 50 concurrent of the 100?
12:37 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Adds Designate server tests  https://review.openstack.org/150318
12:38 psd Hey Hey boris-42! How are you?
12:52 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:06 pboros joined #openstack-rally
13:09 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add create-update-delete scenario  https://review.openstack.org/152557
13:09 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add-delete resource templates for heat  https://review.openstack.org/152884
13:09 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add update inplace, replace cases  https://review.openstack.org/152885
13:09 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add inplace update + add/delete scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/152886
13:25 boris-42 tellesnobrega: sorry was in the meetings
13:25 tellesnobrega boris-42, no problem
13:25 boris-42 tellesnobrega: 50 concurent means load
13:26 boris-42 tellesnobrega: it doesn't have any impact on results processing
13:26 boris-42 tellesnobrega: min, avg, max is related to min, max, avg based on all iterations (and the amount of iterations is equal to times)
13:26 boris-42 psd: hey hey
13:27 boris-42 psd: better this week
13:27 psd boris-42, oh good :)
13:29 tellesnobrega ok, got it. Thanks
13:30 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
13:43 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
14:01 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add create-update-delete stack scenario.  https://review.openstack.org/152557
14:01 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add update + add/delete resource cases.  https://review.openstack.org/152886
14:01 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add "add-delete stack resources" test cases.  https://review.openstack.org/152884
14:01 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add "update-inplace/replace resource" cases.  https://review.openstack.org/152885
14:12 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [WIP] Implement abort in scenario runners  https://review.openstack.org/151678
14:15 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
14:15 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano base for murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137650
14:17 openstackgerrit Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed stackforge/rally: Implement create_and_upload_volume_to_image scenario for Cinder  https://review.openstack.org/152670
14:18 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [WIP] Implement abort in scenario runners  https://review.openstack.org/151678
15:14 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
15:36 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
15:57 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
15:59 exploreshaifali boris-42, ping :)
16:03 neeti joined #openstack-rally
16:11 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add create-update-delete stack scenario  https://review.openstack.org/152557
16:11 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add update + add/delete resource cases  https://review.openstack.org/152886
16:11 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add "update-inplace/replace resource" cases  https://review.openstack.org/152885
16:13 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [WIP] Implement abort in scenario runners  https://review.openstack.org/151678
16:32 boris-42 exploreshaifali: pong
16:33 exploreshaifali boris-42, so we need to discuss about generating trends of N tasks
16:33 exploreshaifali boris-42, I have played with rally a bit
16:34 exploreshaifali boris-42, many things are clear to me now
16:34 exploreshaifali boris-42,  in this task we need to generate graphs from N different trends
16:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: yep we are running N times "rally task start ..."
16:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: then we are running "rally task trend <uuid1> <uuid2> ... <uuidN>"
16:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and that thing generates single document (HTML) like "rally task report"
16:38 boris-42 exploreshaifali: but showing how some avarage values are changed (like amount of errors, avarage, max, min durations)
16:38 boris-42 and so on
16:38 exploreshaifali boris-42, so here these uuids represent different openStack environment ?
16:39 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay got that
16:39 exploreshaifali boris-42, so in general what do you expect to result if we run "rally task trend <uuid1> <uuid2> ... <uuidN>"
16:40 exploreshaifali boris-42, like if I will think to do so, it could be vary as per the specifications in different uuids
16:40 exploreshaifali boris-42, will there be one graph for each uuid ?
16:41 boris-42 exploreshaifali: no
16:41 boris-42 uuids are task uuids
16:41 openstackgerrit Jacob Liberman proposed stackforge/rally: Replace ' with " in tests/unit/[aas,cmd]  https://review.openstack.org/152202
16:42 exploreshaifali boris-42, so there will be a separate json or yaml file for each task ?
16:43 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it doesn't matter
16:44 boris-42 exploreshaifali: when you are running task
16:44 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it stores all data to DB related to this task
16:44 boris-42 exploreshaifali: take a look at how rally task report works
16:47 exploreshaifali boris-42, from where I can find "how rally task report works"
16:48 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
16:48 exploreshaifali I am searching it on github
17:05 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
17:06 openstackgerrit Jacob Liberman proposed stackforge/rally: Replace ' with " in tests/unit/verification  https://review.openstack.org/152624
17:12 exploreshaifali boris-42, please can you help me why test are failing here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149832/
17:13 exploreshaifali boris-42, I think we need "gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-unstable" get passed..... right ?
17:14 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add network-aware VM boot/delete utils  https://review.openstack.org/151384
17:14 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the context benchmark_image  https://review.openstack.org/138466
17:14 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Boot server w/ predefined internal network  https://review.openstack.org/152387
17:14 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Fix get_floating_ip lookup for {"id": net_id"}  https://review.openstack.org/152766
17:14 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed stackforge/rally: Store keypair and secgroup names in user's data  https://review.openstack.org/149771
17:20 boris-42 exploreshaifali: nope
17:20 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it's called unstable cause it can fail
17:20 boris-42 exploreshaifali: cause OpenStack is quite unstable on those patches
17:21 exploreshaifali boris-42, sorry but do you mean there is no problem in changes I did, and I need to recheck ?
17:22 exploreshaifali boris-42, and since Jenkins gave +1 so it mean there in no problem in code modifications, I need to work for those parts where the reviewer has commented ?
17:23 exploreshaifali boris-42, I don't understand here in Rally, even though many tests fails like pep8, tox-ecli, mos etc than too Jennkins give +1
17:24 boris-42 exploreshaifali: if jenkins is +1 no need to recheck
17:24 exploreshaifali boris-42, which tests I always need to be passed and which one if not pass does not matter to Jenkind
17:25 boris-42 exploreshaifali: ?
17:25 boris-42 exploreshaifali: if Jenkins says +1 it means OK
17:25 exploreshaifali boris-42, so question is why Jenkins giving +1 even few tests are failed
17:25 boris-42 exploreshaifali: there are non voting jobs
17:25 boris-42 exploreshaifali: those tests CAN fail
17:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: I specially made special job
17:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that is NON VOTING
17:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: to check those and track them over time
17:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so if you see (non-voting) it's okay that it can fail
17:26 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay they can be considered as in progress work
17:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that is the reason why it is (non-voting)
17:27 exploreshaifali boris-42, cool, thanks!!
17:27 exploreshaifali boris-42, and from where I can see "how rally tasks report works" ?
17:27 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
17:34 boris-42 exploreshaifali: start here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L499
17:35 boris-42 exploreshaifali: result of this function is that pretty HTML report
17:35 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay, Thanks!!.... and yes result is actually pretty :)
18:11 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
18:19 psd joined #openstack-rally
18:22 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
18:42 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
19:10 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Add option to keep db settings in functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/151606
19:11 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Replace ' with " in tests/unit/verification  https://review.openstack.org/152624
19:16 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
19:24 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:31 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
20:05 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Replace ' with " in tests/unit/[aas,cmd]  https://review.openstack.org/152202
20:08 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: WIP Don't create task db record during validation  https://review.openstack.org/153037
20:10 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
20:16 plieb joined #openstack-rally
20:17 plieb boris-42: is there an easy to tell whether 1405885 is ready to close? (replace ' with ")
20:17 boris-42 plieb: ?
20:17 boris-42 plieb: is it?
20:18 plieb boris-42: i'm not sure
20:18 plieb i *think* i got through everything
20:18 plieb is there a way to tell from the pep8 test logs?
20:18 boris-42 plieb: yep as I said you before
20:19 boris-42 plieb: look at results of Mirantis Rally CI
20:19 plieb okay looking
20:19 boris-42 plieb: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153037/ this is new patch let's wait for it
20:19 boris-42 plieb: the job is called pep8
20:20 plieb yup looking thx
20:21 psd_ boris-42, Please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151373/ when you find time :)
20:21 boris-42 plieb: actually you can run this locally as well
20:22 plieb that would be great
20:22 boris-42 plieb: you need to change test-requirements.txt in root of project
20:23 boris-42 psd_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144118/1/test-requirements.txt
20:23 boris-42 plieb: ^
20:23 boris-42 psd_: sorry
20:23 boris-42 psd_: yep I will
20:23 psd_ boris-42, awesome :)
20:23 boris-42 plieb: after that you can run "tox -r -e pep8"
20:24 boris-42 plieb: and you'll get all errors
20:25 plieb okay trying now
20:44 plieb Boris-42: there are a bunch left, but not so many as before
20:44 plieb i'll circle back when theyre gone
20:49 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
22:08 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
22:55 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary