Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-02-06

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:12 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
00:45 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
02:52 clfh joined #openstack-rally
03:14 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Don't create task db record during validation  https://review.openstack.org/153037
03:58 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Publishing functional tests html reports  https://review.openstack.org/147098
04:04 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Publishing functional tests reports  https://review.openstack.org/147098
04:12 jseutter joined #openstack-rally
04:24 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
04:53 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
05:55 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
06:06 psd joined #openstack-rally
06:22 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
06:31 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
06:35 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
06:40 boris-42 vkmc: - Adding Victoria Martinez De La Cruz (vkmc) to trove-core
06:40 boris-42
06:41 boris-42 vkmc: oh nice=)
06:43 psd boris-42 vkmc  Hey!
07:16 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
07:22 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
07:34 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:59 openstackgerrit Shaifali Agrawal proposed stackforge/rally: Shifting ._generate_random_name() call  https://review.openstack.org/149832
08:03 boris-42 psd: hey hey
08:03 boris-42 psd: sorry for inactivity regarding to your patch
08:03 boris-42 psd: I have a bit more then usually work
08:03 psd no problem :)
08:03 boris-42 psd: btw do you want to write some benchmarks?
08:03 boris-42 psd: to try framework ?
08:03 boris-42 psd: we have one patch on review that will be nice to finish
08:04 psd boris-42, Okay, I can try
08:04 boris-42 psd: let me find the link
08:04 boris-42 psd: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113177/
08:04 boris-42 psd: it will be nice to change commit to at least create and delete routers
08:06 psd alright. I have not written benchmarks before, i'll try and get back to you in case of any doubts :)
08:07 boris-42 psd: sure
08:07 boris-42 psd: it is actually good for practice
08:07 psd cool :)
08:07 boris-42 psd: so you'll get familiar with Rally framework=)
08:09 psd yeah
08:24 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
08:29 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
09:04 yfried joined #openstack-rally
09:07 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
09:22 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:23 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
09:41 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:50 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:54 neeti joined #openstack-rally
09:59 psd joined #openstack-rally
10:02 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Don't create task db record during validation  https://review.openstack.org/153037
10:07 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
10:19 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
10:44 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Don't create task db record during validation  https://review.openstack.org/153037
10:52 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:00 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:04 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:13 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add create-update-delete stack scenario  https://review.openstack.org/152557
11:13 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add update + add/delete resource cases  https://review.openstack.org/152886
11:13 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add "update-inplace/replace resource" cases  https://review.openstack.org/152885
11:26 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:28 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:35 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:42 cdent_ joined #openstack-rally
11:51 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Shifting ._generate_random_name() call  https://review.openstack.org/149832
11:57 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
11:58 clfh joined #openstack-rally
12:00 cdent joined #openstack-rally
12:01 psd_mo joined #openstack-rally
12:02 openstackgerrit Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed stackforge/rally: Implement create_and_upload_volume_to_image scenario for Cinder  https://review.openstack.org/152670
12:06 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [WIP] Stop scenario execution on SLA failure  https://review.openstack.org/152459
12:06 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [WIP] Implement abort in scenario runners  https://review.openstack.org/151678
12:08 fhubik_afk joined #openstack-rally
12:09 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Switch to plugin base deployengines and serverproviders  https://review.openstack.org/152612
12:19 fhubik_afk joined #openstack-rally
12:20 psd_mo joined #openstack-rally
12:20 psd joined #openstack-rally
12:20 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
12:21 psd left #openstack-rally
12:22 psd joined #openstack-rally
12:23 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
12:31 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
12:36 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
12:37 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
12:44 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Switch to plugin base deployengines and serverproviders  https://review.openstack.org/152612
12:50 psd joined #openstack-rally
13:12 pboros joined #openstack-rally
13:14 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add create-update-delete stack scenario  https://review.openstack.org/152557
13:14 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add update + add/delete resource cases  https://review.openstack.org/152886
13:15 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed stackforge/rally: Add "update-inplace/replace resource" cases  https://review.openstack.org/152885
13:15 openstackgerrit Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed stackforge/rally: Implement create_and_upload_volume_to_image scenario for Cinder  https://review.openstack.org/152670
13:22 boris-42 e0ne: hey
13:22 e0ne boris-42: hi
13:23 boris-42 e0ne: recently we started getting some strange errors
13:23 e0ne :(
13:23 boris-42 e0ne: all cinder benchmark doesn't work=)
13:23 boris-42 e0ne: like this http://logs.openstack.org/37/153037/5/check/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally/2241bc3/rally-plot/results.html.gz
13:23 e0ne so, there are no failures:)
13:23 boris-42 e0ne: hm?
13:24 boris-42 e0ne: TimeoutException: Rally tired waiting for Volume <Volume: b5ff9bd1-e7f2-4ef1-9c27-e7db1d6f20d5>:b5ff9bd1-e7f2-4ef1-9c27-e7db1d6f20d5 to become available current status CREATING
13:24 boris-42 e0ne: on scheduler logs I saw no valid host
13:24 boris-42 e0ne: but it seems very strange..
13:25 e0ne boris-42: after what changed did you start recieve these errors?
13:25 boris-42 e0ne: hm not sure that this is related to rally
13:25 boris-42 e0ne: it's not on every patch
13:25 boris-42 e0ne: just sometimes
13:27 e0ne http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJkNzIyNTI0Yi00OGJjLTQ4ZmEtOTljOS1kNWMwYzA3ZTNkYzEiLCJmaWVsZHMiOltdLCJvZmZzZXQiOjAsInRpbWVmcmFtZSI6IjkwMCIsImdyYXBobW9kZSI6ImNvdW50IiwidGltZSI6eyJ1c2VyX2ludGVydmFsIjowfSwic3RhbXAiOjE0MjMyMjkxNzYwMTh9
13:27 e0ne "[req-65fecd1f-9b6a-48fa-b538-21756f4b45ba ctx_rally_7681ee655d6748bcb46f41ab7567fff0_user_0 ctx_rally_617a399a-b6ba-4137-8372-a1f2b87d7b30_tenant_1] Can not find policy directory: policy.d"
13:27 boris-42 e0ne: ?
13:28 e0ne i'm sorry, wrong url
13:57 openstackgerrit Anastasia Kuznetsova proposed stackforge/rally: Add Mistral benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/144320
14:01 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
14:01 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
14:02 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed stackforge/rally: [Sahara] move cluster timeout from config to param  https://review.openstack.org/153567
14:06 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
14:07 plieb joined #openstack-rally
14:08 plieb boris-42: Am I good to close 1405884?
14:09 boris-42 plieb: marked it as Fix Commited
14:09 plieb yay!
14:09 boris-42 plieb: thank you!=)
14:10 plieb my pleasure, can I change status to closed on launchpad?
14:10 boris-42 plieb: so I changed to "Fix Commited"
14:10 boris-42 plieb: it should stay Fix Commited until I cut new release
14:10 plieb okay
14:10 boris-42 plieb: then it will be Fix Released
14:11 plieb boris-42 thanks for your help im going to look around for another bug unless you have a suggestions
14:12 boris-42 plieb: so actually it will be interesting to create new scenario (benchmark) for rally
14:12 boris-42 plieb: for creating-deleting floating ip and for creating-listing it
14:13 boris-42 plieb: so you should create here new module floating_ip.py https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/neutron
14:13 boris-42 plieb: and make something similar to network.py but related to floating_ip functionallity
14:13 plieb boris-42: sounds fun, but i will probably have a lot of questions at first
14:13 boris-42 plieb: it's okay
14:14 plieb okay great that sounds perfect
14:14 plieb i can also take on another low priority/clean up type bug
14:14 plieb i'll poke around for something
14:14 boris-42 plieb: sure if you wish
14:14 plieb i like doing that kind of work, it makes me feel very productive
14:15 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [WIP] Stop scenario execution on SLA failure  https://review.openstack.org/152459
14:17 boris-42 plieb: it's actually as well important
14:17 boris-42 plieb: keeping code clean is quite hard task
14:18 plieb i noticed everytime i updated a file, someone would recommit it with the single quotes back in
14:18 plieb its like hercules fighting the hydra
14:19 plieb it would be useful to have a python lexer (like youd use for a compiler) to find the outside ' and automatically rewrite the syntax
14:25 obutenko joined #openstack-rally
14:32 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
14:45 boris-42 plieb: =)
14:45 boris-42 plieb: actually we have a job
14:45 boris-42 plieb: Mirantis Rally CI pep8
14:45 boris-42 plieb: that will be now voting*
14:46 boris-42 plieb: so CI will reject patches that tries to add '
14:46 boris-42 =)
14:46 boris-42 plieb: so no worries=)
15:06 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
15:18 psd joined #openstack-rally
15:21 openstackgerrit Koert van der Veer proposed stackforge/rally: Add a (configurable) set of roles to users  https://review.openstack.org/153595
15:37 lordd joined #openstack-rally
15:40 openstackgerrit Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed stackforge/rally: Implement create_and_upload_volume_to_image scenario for Cinder  https://review.openstack.org/152670
15:57 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
15:59 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
15:59 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano base for murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137650
16:22 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
16:29 RaginBajin joined #openstack-rally
16:31 RaginBaj_ joined #openstack-rally
16:40 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
16:48 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
17:24 kairat_kushaev joined #openstack-rally
17:25 olkonami joined #openstack-rally
17:48 psd joined #openstack-rally
17:50 plieb joined #openstack-rally
17:53 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
17:53 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
18:00 plieb joined #openstack-rally
18:09 masa_ joined #openstack-rally
18:14 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
18:15 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
18:17 plieb1 joined #openstack-rally
18:17 plieb1 boris-42: do I open a bug in launchpad for that new feature request? if not, where do I record and track the work? thanks
18:23 boris-42 plieb1: hm just work ..
18:24 boris-42 plieb1:  you don't need to add bugs to launchpad if thye are bugs..
18:24 boris-42 plieb1: btw what new feature?
18:24 boris-42 plieb1: you mean benchmark scenario for floating ips?
18:25 plieb1 yes
18:25 plieb1 i can just start writing it up and add it if thats the normal workflow
18:25 plieb1 i didnt know if you used something to track new feature requests (we create bugs for new feature requests internally to track)
18:26 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:27 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: (WIP) Add chunks support and chart `Parallel iterations' to report  https://review.openstack.org/146814
18:29 rook joined #openstack-rally
18:30 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
18:50 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
18:51 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
19:09 exploreshaifali boris-42, I am trying to understand code for 'generating html report for a specified task'
19:10 exploreshaifali boris-42, need a bit help in understanding it
19:10 exploreshaifali boris-42, can we discuss now, if you are not much busy ?
19:16 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
19:30 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Add Mistral benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/144320
19:31 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
19:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: okay
19:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so?
19:38 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
19:38 boris-42 plieb1: btw
19:39 boris-42 plieb1: on stackalytics you are not contributing from RH
19:39 boris-42 plieb1: wanna change that?
19:39 plieb1 i will if im supposed to
19:39 plieb1 it doesnt matter to me
19:40 boris-42 plieb1: nope you are not forced to that =)
19:40 plieb1 okay
19:40 plieb1 maybe i will change it later
19:40 boris-42 plieb1: btw do you know about stackalytics?)
19:40 plieb1 does that just show data for contributors and changes to the code base?
19:40 boris-42 plieb1: http://stackalytics.com/?release=kilo&amp;metric=commits&amp;project_type=All&amp;module=rally&amp;company=&amp;user_id= + reviewes blueprints emails and so on
19:41 plieb1 maybe i will change it
19:41 plieb1 i think ive touched 90% of the files in rally now on that last bug
19:44 boris-42 plieb1: loll
19:46 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
19:50 exploreshaifali boris-42, sorry I was out for a while
19:50 exploreshaifali boris-42, so very first from where task_id comes http://irclog.perlgeek.de/
19:51 exploreshaifali boris-42, sorry wrong link https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L502
19:51 boris-42 exploreshaifali: user specify it
19:51 boris-42 exploreshaifali: when it types in CLI rally task report
19:52 exploreshaifali boris-42, but where method catch it ?
19:52 boris-42 exploreshaifali: if it doesn't specify anything rally will use default task uuid (that is usually the uuid of last task)
19:52 boris-42 exploreshaifali: ?
19:52 exploreshaifali boris-42, in method signature https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L499
19:52 exploreshaifali no argument is task_id
19:52 exploreshaifali method is accepting 3 args
19:53 exploreshaifali task_id is not there
19:53 exploreshaifali boris-42, is it coming from decorator ?
19:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali: there is a lot of code
19:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that use that class
19:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali: this is start
19:54 boris-42 exploreshaifali: this is run https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/cliutils.py#L238
19:55 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it parses input command, find required class, setups CONF and Logging and execute that method
19:56 boris-42 exploreshaifali: in case of NO task uuid this decorator is used https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/envutils.py#L80
19:56 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it looks on speciial file in ~/.rally/
19:56 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay. I think I need to look deeply on the link you gave me above
19:57 exploreshaifali boris-42, but we can jump on my next query
19:57 exploreshaifali boris-42, if our data is valid https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L519
19:58 exploreshaifali this for loop starts https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L519
19:58 exploreshaifali boris-42, but what exactly this for loop is doing ?
19:58 exploreshaifali boris-42, I mean incrementing some value
19:58 exploreshaifali but for what
20:00 exploreshaifali boris-42, and before that, our task file that is .json or .yaml file is considered as a single "task in tasks" right ?
20:05 boris-42 exploreshaifali: hm
20:05 boris-42 exploreshaifali: when you run "rally task start"
20:05 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it creates DB record related to that task in rally DB
20:06 boris-42 exploreshaifali: this record has UUID
20:06 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so you can use this UUID to get results, generate report or delete results from DB
20:07 exploreshaifali boris-42, DB schema is this https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/objects/task.py#L22
20:07 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so almost all commands in rally/cmd/commands/task accept this argument
20:07 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it's not db schema
20:07 boris-42 exploreshaifali: here is DB scheme https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L135
20:07 boris-42 exploreshaifali: on top of this scheme you have DB API layer
20:08 boris-42 exploreshaifali: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/db/sqlalchemy/api.py
20:08 boris-42 exploreshaifali: on top of this API you has a rally.objects.task stuff
20:08 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that is used in code
20:08 exploreshaifali okay o.O
20:09 boris-42 exploreshaifali: yaya
20:10 exploreshaifali boris-42, but still the schema link that you send me does not represent fields like - runner, sla, context that we specify in .json file
20:10 exploreshaifali boris-42, so I am thinking how they get mapped here ?
20:35 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that is input file
20:35 boris-42 exploreshaifali: for rally....
20:35 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it is not connected with DB at all
20:35 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it just says to rally what to run and how
20:37 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay, so I think first I should look at database schema more closely
20:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: nope
20:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: you shouldn't
20:37 boris-42 it's wrong direction
20:37 boris-42 exploreshaifali: you should take a look how rally task report works
20:38 exploreshaifali boris-42, and starting point for that is the 'report' method ?
20:38 boris-42 exploreshaifali: yep
20:39 boris-42 exploreshaifali: you need to do the similar stuff
20:39 boris-42 exploreshaifali: get results of two task from DB (like it did more or less)
20:39 exploreshaifali boris-42, so what this for loop is doing https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/cmd/commands/task.py#L545 ?
20:52 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so we are supporting generating rally task report (by merging few tasks)
20:53 boris-42 exploreshaifali: like you can specify N task UUIDS and files with raw results (that are returned by rally task results command)
20:53 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and it will generate single report like it was single task
20:53 boris-42 exploreshaifali: in your case you don't need that loop*
20:54 exploreshaifali boris-42, above that for loop all we are doing is checking weather the task file is proper or not
20:54 exploreshaifali boris-42, like if it has valid schema
20:55 exploreshaifali boris-42, or proper path ect
20:55 exploreshaifali etc*
20:56 exploreshaifali boris-42, and after that this loop, so basically what this loop is doing - incrementing "pos" value
20:56 exploreshaifali boris-42, I am thinking for what it is there ?
20:57 exploreshaifali I have no clue of this "pos" and incrementing "name" of all tasks
20:58 exploreshaifali boris-42, even if I don't need this loop, I am curious to know why and for what it is there ?
20:58 exploreshaifali boris-42, I mean what stuff is happening inside it ?
21:01 boris-42 exploreshaifali: I already said
21:01 boris-42 exploreshaifali: read a bit above
21:05 exploreshaifali boris-42, sorry, but I am still not getting it
21:05 exploreshaifali boris-42, that is okay that in for loop we are iterating over each task
21:05 exploreshaifali boris-42, if we have more than one
21:06 boris-42 exploreshaifali: one more time
21:06 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that LOOP is required to merge N rally tasks into single
21:07 exploreshaifali boris-42, but inside it, we are doing something with *processed_names[task_result["key"]["name"]] *
21:07 boris-42 exploreshaifali: yep that magic is required to merge N rally tasks results
21:07 exploreshaifali boris-42, hahaha, yes it is magic for me ;)
21:07 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it can stay magic for you=)
21:07 exploreshaifali and I am seeking for this magic trick
21:07 boris-42 exploreshaifali: because you don't need it =)
21:07 exploreshaifali boris-42, ah, ok fine
21:08 exploreshaifali boris-42, cool for now, later on I will surely get its trick ;)
21:08 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it is just for mergin N tasks
21:08 boris-42 exploreshaifali: what you need is to get using UUID task from DB
21:08 boris-42 exploreshaifali: via rally.objects.task stuff
21:08 boris-42 exploreshaifali: actually N tasks
21:09 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and then create trends
21:09 boris-42 exploreshaifali: like fetch for every benchmark avg duration
21:09 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and use it like single point
21:11 exploreshaifali boris-42, so here in report method where we are creating trend ?
21:12 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so you should create method called "trend"
21:12 exploreshaifali boris-42, plot.plot(result)
21:12 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it is not trend
21:12 boris-42 exploreshaifali: it's overview of one task
21:13 exploreshaifali boris-42, overview of one task in the form of graphs ?
21:14 boris-42 exploreshaifali: this HTML http://logs.openstack.org/14/146814/12/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/2a61837/rally-plot/results.html.gz
21:14 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay!
21:14 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so you need to generate another one=)
21:15 boris-42 exploreshaifali: that will show trends between N tasks
21:15 exploreshaifali boris-42, by trends what you mean, specifically ?
21:15 exploreshaifali boris-42, their general properties ?
21:15 boris-42 exploreshaifali: for the begging you can show for every benchmark
21:16 boris-42 exploreshaifali: how load duration was changed
21:16 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and whole duration
21:16 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so graph with 2 lines
21:16 boris-42 exploreshaifali: every point is load or whole duration (from one task that was specified)
21:16 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and you can assume that all tasks are running the same input task file
21:17 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay, so should I create a BP for it first ?
21:19 exploreshaifali boris-42, and I should put the new methods inside the same class.... right ?
21:20 boris-42 exploreshaifali: you don't need to create BP
21:20 boris-42 exploreshaifali: I don't care about BP =) I dislike them =)
21:20 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and yep you should add there method=)
21:20 exploreshaifali boris-42, can I ask, why you don't like BPs ?
21:21 exploreshaifali :P
21:21 boris-42 exploreshaifali: I dilike useless bureaucracy =)
21:21 boris-42 I am developer not poet=)
21:22 exploreshaifali boris-42, lol
21:22 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay!!
21:22 exploreshaifali boris-42, so you think I should coding for it, or wait a bit as we are considering it as GSoC project
21:23 exploreshaifali boris-42, I am suppose to write a proposal first
21:24 exploreshaifali boris-42, or we can plan more for it ?
21:24 exploreshaifali whatever you say.
21:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: so you can try to analyze format of "rally task results"
21:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: then think about what values can be used for trends
21:26 boris-42 exploreshaifali: and write about that
21:27 exploreshaifali boris-42, yes and also I need to learn about D3.js
21:27 exploreshaifali boris-42, so it will also take some time
21:35 plieb joined #openstack-rally
21:35 exploreshaifali boris-42, okay, I will come back to you tomorrow  :)
21:38 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
21:39 boris-42 ekarlso: no dont' touch that part=)
21:39 boris-42 ekarlso: oh sry
21:39 boris-42 ekarlso: =)
22:22 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
22:47 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Support scenarios for updating neutron quotas  https://review.openstack.org/92794
23:05 jjmb joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary