Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-03-10

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:06 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Try to found py27 interpreter for verification  https://review.openstack.org/158490
00:25 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:27 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
02:33 coolsvap joined #openstack-rally
02:47 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
02:47 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
03:25 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:26 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:02 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
04:21 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:34 zerda joined #openstack-rally
04:37 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
04:57 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:45 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:55 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:08 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:14 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
06:36 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:40 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
06:45 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
06:54 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:55 nmagnezi_ joined #openstack-rally
07:20 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
07:23 psd joined #openstack-rally
07:35 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
07:41 openstackgerrit Jens Rosenboom proposed stackforge/rally: Fix printing too much output for show secgroup  https://review.openstack.org/162900
07:57 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
07:57 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
08:01 psd joined #openstack-rally
08:48 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
08:52 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:53 openstackgerrit Jens Rosenboom proposed stackforge/rally: Fix printing too much output for show secgroup  https://review.openstack.org/162900
09:07 andreykurilin yfried_: hi! sorry, I was not online in IRC at weekends:(
09:09 yfried_ andreykurilin: understandable
09:12 andreykurilin yfried_: btw, I'm glad to see you in rally core team!;)
09:12 yfried_ andreykurilin: glad to be here :)
09:13 msdubov_ yfried_: Me too, congratulations! :)
09:13 yfried_ andreykurilin: As Murphy would have it, my review rate dropped the last two days. please don't take it as sign for anything other than bad time mgmt
09:13 yfried_ msdubov_: ^ tnx as well
09:15 andreykurilin yfried_: I don't look at review rate for period less than 1 month:)
09:15 yfried_ andreykurilin: how do I do that?
09:16 andreykurilin yfried_: http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/rally/N , where N is number of days
09:16 yfried_ andreykurilin: wow boris-42...
09:17 andreykurilin yfried_: yeah... sometimes I think that he doesn't sleep at all:)
09:18 yfried_ andreykurilin: I think he has a bot that does -1 with a generic comment :)
09:18 andreykurilin yfried_: heh, maybe)
09:19 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:20 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
09:22 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Add Python 3.4 as supported interpreters  https://review.openstack.org/158743
09:24 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
09:24 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Try to found py27 interpreter for verification  https://review.openstack.org/158490
09:28 neeti joined #openstack-rally
09:29 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/161596
09:33 boris-42 yfried_: huh only 133 reviews / 30 days=(
09:33 boris-42 yfried_: usually it's more=)
09:35 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Fix texts and images in docs  https://review.openstack.org/156093
09:39 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Try to found py27 interpreter for verification  https://review.openstack.org/158490
09:44 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
09:44 krishna13 hi
09:45 krishna13 I am getting following error while installing rally (./rally/install_rally.sh)
09:45 boris-42 krishna13:  ?
09:46 krishna13 which: no rally-manage in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin)
09:46 krishna13 Traceback (most recent call last):
09:46 krishna13 File "<string>", line 4, in <module>
09:46 krishna13 ImportError: No module named rally
09:46 krishna13 running install
09:46 krishna13 /usr/local/bin/python: No module named pip
09:46 krishna13 error: ['/usr/local/bin/python', u'-m', u'pip.__init__', u'install', u'Babel>=1.3', u'decorator>=3.4.0', u'fixtures>=0.3.14', u'iso8601>=0.1.9', u'Jinja2>=2.6  # BSD License3 clause', u'jsonschema>=2.0.0,<3.0.0', u'netaddr>=0.7.12', u'oslo.config>=1.6.0                      # Apache-2.0', u'oslo.db>=1.4.1                          # Apache-2.0', u'oslo.i18n>=1.3.0                        # Apache-2.0', u'oslo.log>=0.4.0  # Apache-2.0', u'oslo.ser
09:47 krishna13 [root@ip9-114-192-224 ~]#
09:47 boris-42 krishna13: please use next time paste.openstack.org
09:48 boris-42 krishna13: what linux are you using?
09:48 krishna13 http://paste.openstack.org/show/191229/
09:48 krishna13 this is rhel
09:48 krishna13 6.5
09:48 boris-42 krishna13: it's very strange it should work ...
09:50 boris-42 yfried_: ^ did you see such errors before?
09:52 boris-42 krishna13: are you installing in virtualenv?
09:52 boris-42 krishna13: couold you provide list of commands that you executed
09:52 afazekas joined #openstack-rally
09:52 krishna13 yeah sure
09:53 krishna13 git clone https://git.openstack.org/stackforge/rally
09:53 krishna13 1. git clone https://git.openstack.org/stackforge/rally
09:53 krishna13 first i executed this
09:53 krishna13 it worked fine
09:53 krishna13 and then ./rally/install_rally.sh
09:54 krishna13 as given on https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/install.html
09:54 krishna13 then we upgraded the pyton version form 2.6.6 to 2.7.6
09:55 krishna13 http://paste.openstack.org/show/191231/
09:56 krishna13 then we got this error after running second step
09:57 krishna13 so i ran python ez_setup.py
09:57 krishna13 so setuptools error got resolved
09:58 krishna13 but now following is coming
09:58 krishna13 http://paste.openstack.org/show/191232/
10:02 krisgan joined #openstack-rally
10:15 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:17 boris-42 krishna13: this  then we upgraded the pyton version form 2.6.6 to 2.7.6
10:17 boris-42
10:17 boris-42 krishna13: is the root of issue
10:17 boris-42 krishna13: seems like you need to install pip by hand
10:17 boris-42 andreykurilin: ^
10:18 krishna13 ok
10:18 krishna13 i did that too
10:18 boris-42 krishna13: until pip doesn't work install_rally.sh won't work
10:30 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Add classes for benchmark HTML report charts  https://review.openstack.org/159458
10:30 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Add chunks support and chart `Parallel iterations' to report  https://review.openstack.org/146814
10:36 neeti joined #openstack-rally
10:38 neeti joined #openstack-rally
10:39 yfried_ boris-42: just got back from lunch. what's with the error?
10:47 pboros joined #openstack-rally
10:51 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
10:56 zerda joined #openstack-rally
10:57 aix joined #openstack-rally
11:05 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
11:08 olkonami joined #openstack-rally
11:40 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Add chunks support and chart `Parallel iterations' to report  https://review.openstack.org/146814
11:43 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:44 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
11:46 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
11:47 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
11:49 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
11:50 krishna13 still we are getting the same error
11:52 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix printing too much output for show secgroup  https://review.openstack.org/162900
11:54 krishna13 http://paste.openstack.org/show/191232/
11:54 krishna13 while installing rally
12:08 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Fix texts and images in docs  https://review.openstack.org/156093
12:11 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
12:26 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:37 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
12:43 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Add Python 3.4 as supported interpreters  https://review.openstack.org/158743
12:44 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:54 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed stackforge/rally: [Sahara] Suppurt batch job execution  https://review.openstack.org/161188
12:54 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
13:14 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Try to found py27 interpreter for verification  https://review.openstack.org/158490
13:15 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
13:18 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
13:19 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
13:31 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: WIP: constant runner per tenant  https://review.openstack.org/162998
13:57 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
13:57 arcimboldo hi boris-42, have you played with the new install script?
14:09 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
14:11 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
14:11 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking:  https://review.openstack.org/137650
14:12 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
14:12 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
14:13 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
14:14 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
14:14 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking:  https://review.openstack.org/137650
14:14 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
14:15 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
14:15 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
14:15 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Add 'isolated_iterations' parameter to runners  https://review.openstack.org/162998
14:18 cdent joined #openstack-rally
14:22 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Adding Multiple Request Scenario  https://review.openstack.org/117705
14:29 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Implementation of 'rally task abort' command  https://review.openstack.org/161636
14:38 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
14:40 dspano joined #openstack-rally
14:45 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
14:46 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Add 'isolated_iterations' parameter to runners  https://review.openstack.org/162998
14:49 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
14:50 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
14:55 dspano Good morning everyone. I'm trying to create a test that uses multiple ephemeral drives, but I'm not sure if it's supported.
14:55 dspano I've tried stupid things like "ephemeral":[{"size": "1"}] and "block_device_mapping_v2":[{"source_type": "blank", "destination_type": "local", "boot_index": -1, "delete_on_termination": true, "volume_size": "1"}]
14:56 dspano Neither of which worked.
14:57 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
15:08 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Try to find py27 interpreter for verification  https://review.openstack.org/158490
15:12 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/161596
15:13 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
15:14 yfried joined #openstack-rally
15:17 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
15:22 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
15:24 imarnat joined #openstack-rally
15:35 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
15:40 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
15:41 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
16:04 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
16:04 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
16:04 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano client to osclient  https://review.openstack.org/163063
16:07 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:08 plieb joined #openstack-rally
16:09 albertom joined #openstack-rally
16:09 aix boris-42, andreykurilin Hi, I went through some bugs related to scenarios in launchpad, the problem is I was not able to reproduce some of them and I believe The bugs do not occur anymore, what's the police? should I just drop a comment? (I am reluctant to close them directly).
16:09 plieb left #openstack-rally
16:10 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano client to osclient  https://review.openstack.org/163063
16:10 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
16:10 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
16:11 boris-42 aix: hi there
16:12 boris-42 aix: drop the comment
16:12 boris-42 aix: if author won't reply we will make bug invalid
16:12 aix boris-42, ok
16:12 boris-42 aix: btw thanks for fixing that one bug=)
16:12 boris-42 aix: actually we have a lot of various tasks if you are looking for them
16:13 boris-42 exploreshaifali: hi there
16:13 exploreshaifali boris-42, hello
16:13 aix boris-42, the second easiest bug I found, there is one more from you with almost a patch provided.
16:14 boris-42 exploreshaifali: how are you?
16:14 aix boris-42, any pointers to such lsit of tasks?
16:14 exploreshaifali boris-42, all good :)
16:14 boris-42 aix: so we have roadmap
16:14 exploreshaifali boris-42, college exams were running
16:14 boris-42 aix: it's here https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/spreadsheets/d/16DXpfbqvlzMFaqaXAcJsBzzpowb_XpymaK2aFY2gA2g/edit?usp=drive_web
16:14 exploreshaifali boris-42, but they are done now
16:14 boris-42 exploreshaifali: gratz
16:15 exploreshaifali boris-42, how are you?
16:15 boris-42 aix: for example we have patch that we need to finish
16:15 boris-42 aix: this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140150/
16:16 boris-42 aix: jlk is unfortunatelly too busy to work on it in near feature, so we can finish it=)
16:16 boris-42 aix: jlk is ok with that
16:17 aix boris-42, I'll take a look, thnx
16:17 meteorfox boris-42: wasn't there a meeting today?
16:17 boris-42 aix: so when you finish it we can find other old patches or we can disucss work on some feature for roadmap
16:17 boris-42 meteorfox: it should be
16:18 boris-42 meteorfox: oh it should be already
16:18 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Allow installation as unprivileged user  https://review.openstack.org/162418
16:18 meteorfox boris-42: yeah, daylight saving :)
16:18 boris-42 meteorfox: let's make meeting
16:18 boris-42 aix: meeting time
16:18 boris-42 meteorfox: not in russia=)
16:19 meteorfox boris-42: daylight savings are not needed anymore, I don't know why we still have them
16:19 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
16:20 boris-42 meteorfox: it's 16:19 =)
16:20 boris-42 meteorfox: not 17:00
16:21 meteorfox boris-42: oh sorry about that.  see this daylight saving thing doesn't make any sense
16:22 boris-42 meteorfox: lol
16:22 boris-42 UTC doesn't care=)
16:22 meteorfox boris-42: back when there was no electricity, it was a good idea. Not so much anymore.
16:22 meteorfox boris-42: and even still, why not just wake up earlier, instead of moving the clock
16:23 boris-42 ьmeteorfox -)
16:24 meteorfox boris-42: anyway, so regarding my patch, do you think we should change the order of the metrics? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161037/
16:25 aix meteorfox, fixed opening hours? shifts for factory workers? etc. Not everybody is a coder:P But yes It makes much less sense now.
16:27 meteorfox aix: right :)
16:32 boris-42 aix: meteorfox actually I am not bind to timezone at all
16:32 boris-42 =)
16:33 meteorfox boris-42: is that only you, or is that how time is kept in Russia?
16:34 dpaterson Time is frozen in Russia this time of year :)
16:34 boris-42 dpaterson: meteorfox lol
16:36 meteorfox boris-42: yeah, UTC everywhere would simplify so many things. It'd definitely take sometime to get used to it.
16:40 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Allow installation as unprivileged user  https://review.openstack.org/162418
16:40 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
16:42 arcimboldo hi @all, I would like to know the status of the "support-existing-users" item in the roadmap...
16:47 morgan_orange joined #openstack-rally
16:47 morgan_orange hi
16:50 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
16:50 morgan_orange I am currently installing a Rally instance for OPNFV. I can run some scenarios. When I want to run tempest, I got a problem. Installation looks fine but when I look into a scenario, there is a reference to /etc/tempest/tempest.conf, this file does not exist. Did I miss some steps?
16:54 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: WIP Always install rally in virtualenv  https://review.openstack.org/160738
16:55 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
16:57 andreykurilin_ morgan_orange: hi! your issue looks a little bit strange(maybe like a bug):) what version of rally do you use?
16:58 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano client to osclient  https://review.openstack.org/163063
16:58 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
16:58 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
17:00 morgan_orange andreykurilin  rally version tells me 0.0.1 ...
17:00 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
17:00 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
17:01 meteorfox boris-42: now is definitely 17:00 UTC
17:01 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
17:02 boris-42 meteorfox: yep
17:04 boris-42 aix: dpaterson  albertom  arcimboldo  avico-  cdent coolsvap|afk  davidlenwell dpaterson  dspano exploreshaifali exploreshaifali  exploreshaifali  frickler frobware  ibiris  jlk  kambiz kevinbenton  kun_huang  logan2 olkonami oanufriev  panbalag panbalag  pboros  peng_li_ psd  rvasilets  rvasilets svasheka  tnurlygayanov  vkmc  vaidy_ril  verdurin zhiyan
17:04 boris-42 Rally meetin in #openstack-meeting chat
17:05 rvasilets hi
17:06 rvasilets join #openstack-meeting
17:07 rvasilets mis click
17:07 andreykurilin_ morgan_orange: ok. Can you share a command and scenario, which is used ?
17:10 morgan_orange andreykurilin I successfully played the rally/samples/tasks/scenarios/nova/boot-and-delete.json,
17:12 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
17:13 boris-42 morgan_orange: it's meeting time=)
17:13 morgan_orange boris-42: sorry, I will comme back later. have a good meeting
17:13 boris-42 morgan_orange: you can ask now
17:14 boris-42 morgan_orange: just there will be some bigger latency =)
17:14 boris-42 morgan_orange: if you have some ideas/issue you can discuss them #openstack-meeting
17:16 morgan_orange boris-42: I have to leave anyway, I will continue tomorrow
17:19 boris-42 morgan_orange: if you have any questions be free to ping at any moment
17:19 boris-42 morgan_orange: see you
17:19 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
17:21 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
17:22 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
17:41 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Adding Multiple Request Scenario  https://review.openstack.org/117705
17:53 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Adding Multiple Request Scenario  https://review.openstack.org/117705
17:58 jlk boris-42: just now telling a room full of people interested in testing and interop about Rally
17:59 jlk but some of the tempest devs are here as well. it's a fun conversation :)
17:59 boris-42 jlk: haha=)
17:59 boris-42 jlk: thank you for support=)
18:00 jlk yup, happy to help
18:04 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
18:09 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
18:11 imarnat joined #openstack-rally
18:12 arcimboldo What's the status of rally "support-existing-users" feature? Our new deployment will have LDAP and we cannot create users from openstack
18:12 arcimboldo which is a pity because it means I can't use rally...
18:12 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
18:15 boris-42 arcimboldo: I am hard working on this feature
18:16 boris-42 arcimboldo: it requires a lot of refactoring
18:16 arcimboldo boris-42, can I help? I'm really interested
18:17 boris-42 arcimboldo: you can help with code reviews
18:17 boris-42 arcimboldo: this chain https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160142/
18:17 boris-42 arcimboldo: so we need to switch to plugin base all our plugins
18:18 boris-42 arcimboldo: after that I will move validation mechaism to plugin base
18:18 boris-42 arcimboldo: refactor a bit validation mechanism
18:18 boris-42 arcimboldo: after that all plugins will be able to use @validator.sutff like scenarios
18:19 boris-42 arcimboldo: this is first part, second part is ready but even not published
18:19 boris-42 arcimboldo: it allows to make admin validators and user validators
18:19 boris-42 arcimboldo: and static
18:20 boris-42 This will allow to write benchmarks that can be run without OpenStack cloud, against OpenStack with existing users, or against OpenStack with admin access
18:21 arcimboldo boris-42, I'll take a look and see if I can have meaningful comment to add :)
18:21 arcimboldo I think being able to run against openstack with existing users is a very important feature
18:21 boris-42 arcimboldo: it's has essential priority
18:21 boris-42 it*
18:22 boris-42 be back in 1 hr
18:23 arcimboldo I'm done for today, see you all
18:37 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:43 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
18:44 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
18:45 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
19:30 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
19:38 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
19:57 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Add Python 3.4 as supported interpreters  https://review.openstack.org/158743
19:58 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/161596
20:04 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
20:04 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
20:13 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Allow installation as unprivileged user  https://review.openstack.org/162418
20:32 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
20:49 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
21:13 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
21:13 echoingumesh Hello
21:13 echoingumesh Is it possible to run Tempest scenarios using Rally ?
21:19 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed stackforge/rally: Use get_client when creating ceilometer client instance  https://review.openstack.org/163192
21:23 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
21:34 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
22:06 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
22:16 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
22:18 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed stackforge/rally: Use get_client when creating ceilometer client instance  https://review.openstack.org/163192
22:18 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
22:21 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
22:23 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
22:25 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
22:27 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
22:28 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
22:38 meteorfox boris-42: hey, what do you think of collecting timings of the actual HTTP calls, and provide that as more detailed results? Nova already has a --timings call that can give you this https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/blob/ac6636a54d72ba76d0adca76e07d1d26d9ea35c3/novaclient/v2/client.py#L212
22:46 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Always install rally in virtualenv  https://review.openstack.org/160738
23:16 boris-42 meteorfox: we were thinking about that
23:16 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:16 boris-42 meteorfox: like patching request lib
23:17 boris-42 meteorfox: to collect all data
23:18 boris-42 meteorfox: so I would prefer to monkey patch request lib request method
23:18 boris-42 meteorfox: do this
23:22 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
23:26 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
23:28 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:31 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:31 boris-42 so it's sad that not all clients has timings
23:32 boris-42 patching them will be quite hard task
23:33 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:34 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
23:35 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:38 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:42 boris-42 jlk: btw did you expalin to everybody that Rally is not just tool on top of Tempest?)
23:43 boris-42 jlk: and that it has own framework?)
23:43 jlk yes
23:43 jlk that point came through
23:43 boris-42 jlk: great thank you=)
23:46 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
23:49 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
23:56 dmorita joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary