Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-03-11

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:10 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
00:18 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
00:21 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
00:25 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
00:31 igormarnat joined #openstack-rally
01:12 rook joined #openstack-rally
01:25 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
01:59 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Always install rally in virtualenv  https://review.openstack.org/160738
02:22 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed stackforge/rally: Use get_client when creating ceilometer client instance  https://review.openstack.org/163192
02:29 coolsvap joined #openstack-rally
02:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
02:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
03:11 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
03:20 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
03:30 openstackgerrit John Wu proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for Swift API Benchmarks - Patch-2  https://review.openstack.org/159258
03:46 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
03:48 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
04:53 zerda joined #openstack-rally
04:54 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
05:03 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
05:31 psd joined #openstack-rally
05:45 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
06:00 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
06:06 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
06:19 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
06:20 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
06:28 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
06:37 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:52 nmagnezi_ joined #openstack-rally
07:25 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
07:40 neeti joined #openstack-rally
08:11 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:17 brut joined #openstack-rally
08:30 boris-42 yfried_: andreykurilin ping
08:30 andreykurilin boris-42: ping
08:30 andreykurilin pong
08:32 boris-42 andreykurilin: could you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156093/
08:32 boris-42 kun_huang: are you here?
08:32 andreykurilin boris-42: sure
08:32 boris-42 andreykurilin: It is blocking release
08:32 boris-42 andreykurilin: and seems like it's ready for merge
08:38 boris-42 andreykurilin by the way what do you think if I create some kind of list
08:38 boris-42 andreykurilin: with patches that are blocking release and priorities
08:38 andreykurilin boris-42: yeah, it would be nice to have such list
08:39 boris-42 andreykurilin: so google excel?)
08:39 andreykurilin boris-42: can we put it somewhere in roadmap doc?
08:39 andreykurilin boris-42: I have found small nits - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156093/11/doc/source/tutorial/step_7_deploying_openstack.rst
08:40 andreykurilin boris-42: I don't think that these comments are blocking. What do you thing about them?
08:42 andreykurilin morgan_orange: hi!
08:42 andreykurilin morgan_orange: are you here?
08:42 morgan_orange andreykurilin: yep
08:43 andreykurilin morgan_orange: do you have any issues related to rally since yesterday?
08:43 morgan_orange andreykurilin: I followed the Mirantis tuto https://www.mirantis.com/blog/rally-openstack-tempest-testing-made-simpler/
08:43 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:43 morgan_orange everything is fine .. until Tempest
08:43 andreykurilin morgan_orange: this is my article:)
08:44 morgan_orange very nice article.. :)
08:44 morgan_orange the rally-manage tempest install is OK
08:44 andreykurilin morgan_orange: thanks. what step is not working?
08:44 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:44 morgan_orange rally verify start
08:44 morgan_orange Reason:
08:44 morgan_orange Invalid scenario argument: 'HTTPConnectionPool(host='keystone.stack.opensteak.fr', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by <class 'socket.error'>: [Errno 111] Connection refused)'
08:46 morgan_orange when I look into the json description file, it mentioned a tempest config file /etc/tempest/tempest.conf
08:46 morgan_orange but I do no have this file on the server
08:47 andreykurilin as far as I understand, you are trying to use not `rally verify` command, but `rally task` with tempest scenario. right?
08:48 morgan_orange I tried both
08:48 morgan_orange just retry rally verifiy start
08:48 andreykurilin and both aren't work?
08:48 morgan_orange root@rally:~# rally verify start
08:48 morgan_orange HTTPConnectionPool(host='keystone.stack.opensteak.fr', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by <class 'socket.error'>: [Errno 111] Connection refused)
08:48 morgan_orange rally task start with a nova scenario is working fine
08:49 morgan_orange but rally task start with a scenario in tempest folder lead to kesystone error
08:49 andreykurilin about `rally task`: you should remove 'tempest_conf' from json/yaml scenario.
08:49 boris-42 andreykurilin: le'ts merge
08:49 boris-42 andreykurilin: there are bigger issues without this patch
08:50 andreykurilin boris-42: ok, np
08:50 boris-42 andreykurilin: so I will cut release and in some new versions of read the docs they will be fixed
08:52 kun_huang boris-42: nice to meet you again :)
08:53 andreykurilin morgan_orange: rally scenarios(which are based on tempest) can use external tempest config file(if you have one) or Rally can try to auto-generate it for you. If "tempest_conf" argument is defined, Rally will use config which is specified in this variable.
08:54 morgan_orange Ok I removed tempest_conf argument in single_test.json/yaml from tempest folder
08:54 morgan_orange i relaunch the rally task start single_test.json
08:54 andreykurilin morgan_orange: btw, try to use "--rally-debug" argument. It prints debug messages only from Rally and it can help to define step, which is failed.
08:55 andreykurilin `rally --rally-debug task start ...`
08:57 dmellado one quick workaround would be to have a soft link from your tempest.conf file (or a copy) inside the .rally/.../for_dployment_blah
08:58 boris-42 kun_huang: oooo=)
08:58 boris-42 kun_huang: you alive=)
08:58 boris-42 kun_huang: how are you man?)
08:59 boris-42 dmellado: actually you can pass own tempest conf if you need that as far as I know?
08:59 dmellado yep, it's true, there was also an option for that
09:01 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
09:01 morgan_orange andreykurilin:  http://pastebin.com/RkzieZhB
09:02 kun_huang boris-42: just join to an IT company, Huawei, to support OpenStack
09:02 kun_huang boris-42:  it takes me some months
09:02 boris-42 kun_huang: tired from previous one?)
09:02 boris-42 kun_huang: I hope now you will have more time for OpenSource?
09:03 kun_huang boris-42:  a little disappointed but no complain, Intel is not good at software, that's common sense
09:03 dmellado I hope to have more time too xD, I've been trying to allocate some time for working in rally for a while..., so congrats kun_huang :)
09:04 kun_huang boris-42:  I'm sure now and my manager tell me I have 70% time on community,
09:04 andreykurilin morgan_orange: looks like a bug in rally. please take a moment, I'll try to do some quick fix;)
09:05 kun_huang boris-42:  dmellado  next step in Huawei, we would build some system to verify openstack api performance spec
09:05 dmellado that looks quite nice
09:05 kun_huang boris-42: dmellado  and many openstacker here are interested in rally, so Huawei would be a super user of rally
09:06 boris-42 kun_huang: dmellado so guys I have a great idea
09:06 boris-42 kun_huang: dmellado regarding to certification of cloud
09:06 boris-42 kun_huang: dmellado recently we merged patch that makes templated tasks
09:06 boris-42 (parametrized)
09:07 boris-42 kun_huang: dmellado https://github.com/stackforge/rally/commit/a2d28d1f9f469b1699d31814a957505935803a17
09:07 boris-42 kun_huang: dmellado no we can make tasks with if/for/variables/calculations
09:08 boris-42 and create single task that accepts such parameters like amount of users/tenants/controllers/... what projects are used and what images/flavors/netowrks to use
09:08 boris-42 and it will generate proper task for specific cloud
09:08 dmellado ohh jinja templates, nice!
09:08 boris-42 dmellado: yep yep
09:08 boris-42 dmellado: so no more hardcoded values in tasks
09:09 boris-42 dmellado: --taks-args or --task-args-file can be used to pass variables
09:10 boris-42 dmellado: kun_huang so guys if you would like to join this big effort I will be more then happy=)
09:10 dmellado ;)
09:11 boris-42 dmellado: kun_huang as well guys take a look please at proposal for new input task: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159065/
09:11 kun_huang np, you could assign some job now boris-42
09:11 dmellado let's take a look
09:12 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Handle ConnectionError in ConfigGen  https://review.openstack.org/163330
09:13 andreykurilin morgan_orange: This patch should help you https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163330/
09:13 krishna13 left #openstack-rally
09:15 andreykurilin morgan_orange: Do you know how to apply this patch?
09:16 boris-42 kun_huang: so we have a lot of stuff to do
09:16 boris-42 kun_huang: what you would like to work on?)
09:17 kun_huang boris-42:  do you have to-do list?
09:17 boris-42 kun_huang: so I am better manager now=)
09:18 dmellado lol
09:18 dmellado ;)
09:18 boris-42 dmellado: =)
09:18 morgan_orange yep
09:18 boris-42 kun_huang: https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/spreadsheets/d/16DXpfbqvlzMFaqaXAcJsBzzpowb_XpymaK2aFY2gA2g/edit#gid=0
09:18 morgan_orange andreykurilin: just did it
09:18 boris-42 this is our roadmap ^
09:18 morgan_orange I relaunch the test
09:19 boris-42 boris-42: dmellado so one of point that you can work is generalization of rally verify command
09:19 kun_huang boris-42:  I need check that doc this nignt. docs.google.com is blocked in my office
09:20 boris-42 kun_huang: this is the idea of rally verify improvements http://boris-42.me/rally-verfiy-as-the-control-plane-for-gabbi-tempest-in-tree-functional-tests/
09:20 boris-42 kun_huang: dmellado if you are going to run in-tree functional tests / tempest tests and other stuff against your clouds
09:21 morgan_orange andreykurilin: same result ..but maybe I believe I knew how to apply the patch I just run git fetch https://review.openstack.org/stackforge/rally refs/changes/30/163330/1 && git checkout FETCH_HEAD
09:22 dmellado boris-42: I'll take a look, also wanted to improve how the crt for ssl endpoints is being used as of now and add it to the yaml/json template
09:23 boris-42 dmellado: btw I think we have bug related to that
09:23 boris-42 dmellado: gimme second
09:23 kun_huang boris-42:  just about the topic several seconds ago, I said Huawei need a system to verify performance spec. I thought that system should be a system built on rally, but now rally would become that
09:24 kun_huang boris-42:  an engine to run tempest and other test platform
09:25 kun_huang boris-42: s/engine/control plane
09:25 boris-42 dmellado: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1430695
09:25 boris-42 dmellado: take it if you would like
09:26 boris-42 kun_huang: so it's just 2 different parts of rally
09:26 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
09:26 boris-42 kun_huang: one is unified way to run verification stuff from tools that we have
09:26 boris-42 kun_huang: another is "rally task" that has own framework for generating load and doing performance stuff
09:26 andreykurilin morgan_orange: I suppose that Rally is installed in python libs path and changing rally local repository doesn't affect anything. Can you check it? Also, "pip uninstall rally && cd ./rally && python setup.py install" should help
09:27 boris-42 kun_huang: btw do you know about "sla" stuff?
09:27 kevinbenton joined #openstack-rally
09:27 kun_huang boris-42:  I know what sla is, but don't know how rally verify that
09:28 kun_huang boris-42: haven't read codes yet
09:28 boris-42 kun_huang: so it's not new feature in rally
09:28 boris-42 kun_huang: but it allows you to transform result of each benchmark to True/False
09:28 boris-42 kun_huang: and then task is successful if all benchmarks passed
09:28 boris-42 kun_huang: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/rally.yaml#L11-L13
09:29 boris-42 kun_huang: sla checkers are plugable
09:29 boris-42 kun_huang: so you can put any combination of them
09:29 boris-42 kun_huang: duration/exceptions/any_other_stuff_based_on_results
09:30 kun_huang boris-42: got it, a good component :)
09:30 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Allow installation as unprivileged user  https://review.openstack.org/162418
09:30 morgan_orange andreykurilin: looks better
09:31 andreykurilin :)
09:31 boris-42 kun_huang: so that + templates can allow to make performance verification stuff
09:31 kun_huang boris-42: sure
09:32 morgan_orange andreykurilin: thanks, I will continue my rally tour..
09:32 dmellado brb
09:33 andreykurilin morgan_orange: np. feel free to ping me for any questions
09:33 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix texts and images in docs  https://review.openstack.org/156093
09:33 andreykurilin boris-42, rediskin: can we merge this simple fix - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163330/1
09:37 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Handle HTTPError in ConfigGen  https://review.openstack.org/163330
09:40 boris-42 andreykurilin: you forgot to put closes bug
09:40 andreykurilin boris-42: there is no filed bug:)
09:40 andreykurilin as I know
09:41 boris-42 andreykurilin: yep there is no
09:41 boris-42 andreykurilin: but you are fixing bug
09:41 boris-42 =)
09:42 andreykurilin boris-42: you nerd! I'll file a bug for you and put it to commit message:)
09:43 boris-42 andreykurilin: it's important because somebody can use older rally version
09:43 boris-42 andreykurilin: so he will try to google and he will find that this is fixed
09:45 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Handle HTTPError in ConfigGen  https://review.openstack.org/163330
09:45 andreykurilin boris-42: done:)
09:45 boris-42 andreykurilin: u forgot to do something
09:45 andreykurilin boris-42: put in-progress and assign bug to my-self?)
09:46 boris-42 andreykurilin: your patch got -1)
09:46 andreykurilin and set priority to High:)
09:50 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Try to find py27 interpreter  https://review.openstack.org/158490
09:54 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Try to find py27 interpreter  https://review.openstack.org/158490
09:56 psd joined #openstack-rally
09:57 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/161802
10:05 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
10:16 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:20 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Handle errors from `requests` in ConfigGen  https://review.openstack.org/163330
10:29 amaretskiy hi all
10:30 amaretskiy let's discuss an email [openstack-dev] [all][qa][gabbi][rally][tempest] Extend "rally verfiy" to unify work with Gabbi, Tempest and all in-tree functional tests
10:30 amaretskiy i have a question
10:30 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Always install rally in virtualenv  https://review.openstack.org/160738
10:30 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Handle errors from `requests` in ConfigGen  https://review.openstack.org/163330
10:31 amaretskiy let's imagine we have command `rally verify nova start'
10:31 amaretskiy and we do have pure rally installation with deployment to existing cloud
10:31 amaretskiy what should this command do? (install novaclient and run its fnctional tests? ...)
10:32 amaretskiy can someone give a detailed explanation?
10:34 andreykurilin amaretskiy: imo, it should download https://github.com/openstack/nova/tree/master/nova/tests/functional and run it
10:36 boris-42 andreykurilin: you didn't get the point
10:36 boris-42 amaretskiy: ^
10:36 boris-42 andreykurilin: sorry
10:36 amaretskiy download only tests? not a whole project repository, right^
10:36 amaretskiy ?
10:36 boris-42 amaretskiy: the thing is that now functional tests are in projects
10:36 boris-42 amaretskiy: you can't download the part of projects
10:37 boris-42 amaretskiy: you can but it will be quite dirty
10:37 boris-42 amaretskiy: as well you need to install test-requirments and whatever
10:37 boris-42 to run tests
10:37 boris-42 so the approach is similar to tempest
10:37 boris-42 download whole project
10:37 amaretskiy okay, download project repository, locate tests
10:37 boris-42 install everything that is needed for tests
10:37 boris-42 run them
10:37 boris-42 parse results/store to db
10:38 boris-42 difference is only that project is not tempest but heat/orelse
10:38 amaretskiy so we need project-specific rally plugin for that
10:38 boris-42 amaretskiy: yep
10:38 amaretskiy okay
10:38 amaretskiy got it
10:47 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
11:09 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
11:09 anshul joined #openstack-rally
11:10 bkopilov boris-42, Hi
11:10 boris-42 bkopilov: hi there
11:10 bkopilov a quick question for you
11:11 boris-42 bkopilov: sure
11:11 bkopilov boris-42, we can export json test into html file , is it possible to append all tests into a single html ?
11:12 bkopilov boris-42, i mean to rally task report ec15dbe2-c95e-4556-955b-c0bc64c9248c --out output.html
11:12 bkopilov boris-42, i need that all reports will be in the same output.html file ?
11:12 boris-42 bkopilov: so there are two ways to do this
11:13 boris-42 bkopilov: first is to run all benchmarks in single task (it's preferred)
11:13 bkopilov boris-42, sounds good to me
11:13 boris-42 bkopilov: the another if you already run everything
11:14 boris-42 bkopilov: and need to combine
11:14 boris-42 bkopilov: you can pass to "rally task report" any amount of UUIDS
11:14 boris-42 bkopilov: and it will generate single page
11:14 bkopilov boris-42, wow its great !!!!
11:15 bkopilov boris-42, another question please .
11:15 boris-42 bkopilov: sure
11:15 boris-42 bkopilov: btw it accepts as well files (results of command rally task results)
11:16 bkopilov boris-42, How can i change the defaults in json files ? assume we have flavor name .Is it possible to create global names somewhere
11:16 bkopilov boris-42, json file will point to variables names
11:16 boris-42 bkopilov: so we don't have tutotiral for it
11:17 boris-42 bkopilov: but let me show you one patch
11:17 boris-42 https://github.com/stackforge/rally/commit/a2d28d1f9f469b1699d31814a957505935803a17
11:17 boris-42 bkopilov: ^ so input rally task are jinja2 templates
11:18 bkopilov boris-42, ok , its new for me . i will read about - THANKS !!
11:18 boris-42 bkopilov: so it allows you to put "IF/FOR/Variables/Caluclations" in tasks
11:20 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add benchmarks for keystone  https://review.openstack.org/163379
11:22 bkopilov boris-42, how can i run all json tests under cinder to generate a single report ? can you send the exact command
11:22 dmellado you can create a task for it with the desired regex
11:23 dmellado but that was before the jinja templates
11:26 boris-42 bkopilov: dmellado samples were not created for such kind of usage
11:27 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
11:27 boris-42 We should have single task file with few arguments
11:27 boris-42 at least that is my goal
11:27 bkopilov boris-42, so how can i run all cinder directory and create a single report ?
11:27 dmellado mmm I see, but for example I was selecting a subset of tempest tests
11:27 boris-42 bkopilov: I aleady replied
11:27 dmellado using the specific_regex as a base
11:27 boris-42 bkopilov: it's not how samples should be used
11:28 bkopilov boris-42, ok
11:28 boris-42 bkopilov: you should combine them in single task
11:28 boris-42 bkopilov: by hands
11:28 boris-42 bkopilov: the goal is to create single task
11:28 boris-42 dmellado: that's why we are going to use jinja2 templates
11:28 dmellado regex generation is not simple at all, though
11:29 dmellado so that'd be a great improvement
11:29 bkopilov boris-42, i think directory path should be supported ... what do you think ?
11:39 boris-42 bkopilov: I am not sure that it makes any sense..
11:39 boris-42 bkopilov: I mean what is the goal of running samples?
11:40 boris-42 bkopilov: I believe it's better to spend time for making single task that is parametrized and runs everything
11:40 dmellado I think the jinja templating support fully covers any CI intention
11:40 bkopilov boris-42, ok .
11:40 boris-42 bkopilov: so you will put paramters and it will generate exactly for you cloud task with sucess criterias for you task
11:41 bkopilov boris-42, Can you please share a simple example
11:41 bkopilov boris-42, from rally cli
11:41 boris-42 bkopilov: jinja template?
11:41 bkopilov boris-42, ok , will read it later -thanks
11:42 boris-42 bkopilov: I mean for example
11:42 anshul joined #openstack-rally
11:42 boris-42 bkopilov: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/rally.yaml
11:42 boris-42 bkopilov: this is what we are running in gates
11:46 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/161802
11:47 boris-42 bkopilov: or I can show shorter
11:47 boris-42 bkopilov: https://gist.github.com/boris-42/b2a457b4f781357bd07f
11:47 boris-42 bkopilov: so you need to specify to arguments
11:48 bkopilov boris-42, ok
11:51 boris-42 rally task start --file filename --task-args '{"flavors": ["img_a", "img_b"], "images": ["img_a", "img_b"]}'
12:05 anshul joined #openstack-rally
12:18 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
12:24 rook joined #openstack-rally
12:28 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
13:06 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
13:06 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add benchmarks for keystone  https://review.openstack.org/163379
13:12 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
13:13 aix joined #openstack-rally
13:21 pboros joined #openstack-rally
13:22 cdent joined #openstack-rally
13:34 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add benchmarks for keystone  https://review.openstack.org/163379
13:57 openstackgerrit Alexander Gubanov proposed stackforge/rally: Fix texts in docs  https://review.openstack.org/163441
13:57 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
14:12 openstackgerrit Alexander Gubanov proposed stackforge/rally: Fix texts in docs  https://review.openstack.org/163441
14:16 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: hi there
14:35 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add benchmarks for keystone  https://review.openstack.org/163379
14:43 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Try to find py27 interpreter  https://review.openstack.org/158490
14:44 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Try to find py27 interpreter  https://review.openstack.org/158490
15:04 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Add create-suspend-resume-delete stack scenario  https://review.openstack.org/155346
15:09 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Add create-check-delete stack scenario  https://review.openstack.org/155685
15:23 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
15:34 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
15:37 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Allow installation as unprivileged user  https://review.openstack.org/162418
15:45 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: [keystone] Add number of benchmarks for keystone:  https://review.openstack.org/163379
15:47 zerda joined #openstack-rally
15:56 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
16:15 jlk joined #openstack-rally
16:15 jlk joined #openstack-rally
16:16 vaidy_ril joined #openstack-rally
16:44 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:51 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
16:56 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Handle errors from `requests` in ConfigGen  https://review.openstack.org/163330
17:09 morgan_orange left #openstack-rally
17:14 openstackgerrit Carlos L. Torres proposed stackforge/rally: Adds median metric to summary report of task  https://review.openstack.org/161037
17:16 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix texts in docs  https://review.openstack.org/163441
17:30 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:39 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
17:40 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
17:48 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Add murano client to osclient  https://review.openstack.org/163063
17:48 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
17:57 bkopilov joined #openstack-rally
18:01 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
18:08 openstackgerrit Antonio Messina proposed stackforge/rally: Allow installation as unprivileged user  https://review.openstack.org/162418
18:10 Guest2876 boris-42 is this a tuneable : Rally tired waiting for Server rally_volume_gzrlkcbsob:5ef217e7-f56f-4596-abb6-6bea9eacf9a0 to become ACTIVE current status BUILD  ?
18:10 Guest2876 the timeout/
18:10 boris-42 rook: hi there
18:10 rook hey!
18:10 boris-42 rook: yep something went wrong with your nova
18:10 Guest38800 exactly
18:10 boris-42 rook: now message is clear=)
18:11 rook-tmp that message is clear :)
18:12 rook-tmp boris-42: this is under load.
18:13 rook-tmp so, is there a param I can pass to increase timeout
18:14 boris-42 rook-tmp: it won't help usually
18:14 boris-42 rook-tmp: timeout is 10 minutes
18:14 boris-42 rook-tmp: you can set times via rally.conf that is in /etc/rally/rally.conf
18:14 boris-42 timeouts*
18:14 rook-tmp thanks boris-42!
18:17 krisgan joined #openstack-rally
18:19 boris-42 rook-tmp: np
18:19 boris-42 rook-tmp: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161699/
18:19 boris-42 rook-tmp: ^ restoring abbility to use fixed ips
18:23 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
18:24 rook-tmp boris-42: I do need to open a BZ against the sshutils for rally
18:24 rook-tmp we need to add the Timeout to the rally.conf
18:24 rook-tmp ssh_timeout
18:24 rook-tmp it is hard set to 120
18:25 boris-42 rook-tmp: heh
18:25 rook-tmp :)
18:29 boris-42 rook-tmp: me need to finish release notes
18:29 boris-42 rook-tmp: going to cut release when I finish them lol
18:29 boris-42 rook-tmp: rally version 0.0.2 almost entriprise=)
18:29 rook-tmp lol
18:30 rook-tmp is that in the notes
18:30 rook-tmp "Almost Enterprise"
18:30 rook-tmp lD
18:30 rook-tmp :D
18:30 albertom joined #openstack-rally
18:31 boris-42 rook-tmp: +))
18:33 boris-42 rook-tmp: btw bench 85kg x8x4
18:33 boris-42 rook-tmp: going to try on next Tuesday 90kg x8x4=)
18:34 rook-tmp Nice!
18:34 rook-tmp crazy volume.
18:34 rook-tmp getting the chest swole
18:37 boris-42 rook-tmp: =)
18:40 boris-42 rook-tmp: btw did you try --stop-on-sla-failure
18:41 * boris-42 rook-tmp: --abort-on-sla-failure
18:41 rook-tmp nope but I can :D
18:41 boris-42 rook-tmp: I mean antikillyourcloud system
18:41 boris-42 "antikillyourcloud 3000"
18:42 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
18:54 echoingumesh joined #openstack-rally
18:57 krishna13 joined #openstack-rally
18:58 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:02 krishna131 joined #openstack-rally
19:31 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed stackforge/rally: Use get_client when creating ceilometer client instance  https://review.openstack.org/163192
19:52 dpaterson Is there are way to alias a cli entry point with a name that points to function different name, doesn't seem so in cliutils but not sure.  Example "rally verify import"  points to method "rally.cmd.commands.verify.import_verification"
19:52 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
19:53 dpaterson as import is reserved word so def import(...): is bad
19:54 echoingumesh boris-42: Can rally be used to benchmark -inside vm- ? Something like iPerf
19:57 kevinbenton joined #openstack-rally
20:00 meteorfox echoingumesh: yes, take a look at the VMTask scenarios here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand-delete.json and the scripts here https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/samples/tasks/support
20:01 meteorfox echoingumesh: I think better support for VM benchmarks is in the works
20:03 echoingumesh meteorfox: awesome. This shall work. The "force_delete": false, key-pair, does it wait for the script to complete before compliting the rally job?
20:03 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
20:06 meteorfox echoingumesh: I haven't used it myself, but I believe it blocks on the scripts util it returns.
20:07 meteorfox echoingumesh: here's one of the scenario: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/vm/vmtasks.py#L46
20:08 meteorfox echoingumesh: it seems this one expects that the output return is in JSON format
20:24 meteorfox boris-42: so like or no like? The summary results here: http://logs.openstack.org/37/161037/4/check/gate-rally-dsvm-cli/c9febd8/rally-cli-output-files/TaskTestCase/test_report_bunch_files.txt
20:24 meteorfox boris-42: also the html report here: http://logs.openstack.org/37/161037/4/check/gate-rally-dsvm-cli/c9febd8/rally-cli-output-files/TaskTestCase/test_report_bunch_files.html#/Dummy.dummy_random_fail_in_atomic
20:34 openstackgerrit Srinivas Sakhamuri proposed stackforge/rally: Use get_client when creating ceilometer client instance  https://review.openstack.org/163192
21:14 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
21:14 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
21:15 paboldin joined #openstack-rally
21:16 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
22:31 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
23:49 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Use get_client when creating ceilometer client instance  https://review.openstack.org/163192

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary