Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-03-19

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:09 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
00:26 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
00:37 Vishal_ joined #openstack-rally
00:54 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:22 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
01:22 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
01:34 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:40 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
02:10 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
02:11 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
02:33 karimb joined #openstack-rally
02:39 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:45 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
02:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
02:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Rally IRC chat logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  Ã¢ËœÂ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
03:38 asalkeld joined #openstack-rally
03:39 Kennan joined #openstack-rally
03:39 Kennan :boris-42  there?
03:40 asalkeld Kennan: just ask, there might be others around
03:40 Kennan OK. Thanks
03:41 Kennan Hi heat-dev guys, could you give some help ?
03:41 Kennan I followed heat dev guide and configured to use osprofiler
03:41 Kennan I could execute
03:41 Kennan ubuntu@test-alarm:~$ heat --profile SECRET_KEY stack-list
03:41 Kennan and it said
03:42 Kennan To display trace use next command:
03:42 Kennan osprofiler trace show --html 8a410e34-550f-4ac0-aabc-175c2e0a9384
03:42 Kennan when run I following it said
03:42 Kennan Trace with UUID 8a410e34-550f-4ac0-aabc-175c2e0a9384 not found. There are 2 possible reasons:   1) You are using not admin credentials  2) You specified wrong trace id
03:42 Kennan does dev guys know that ?
03:43 Kennan is it osprofiler issue ?
03:46 asalkeld Kennan: what's the link to the guide  you used
03:47 Kennan :asalkeld http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/getting_started/on_devstack.html
03:47 asalkeld http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/getting_started/on_devstack.html#configure-devstack-to-enable-osprofiler
03:51 Kennan I did config that
03:51 Kennan notification_topics = notifications,profiler
03:51 Kennan I just folloed that guide :)
03:51 Kennan do I need to restart those service after such config ?
03:53 Kennan I restated heat serice, seems still not work
03:55 asalkeld Kennan: yeah restart ceilometer
03:58 Kennan still not work. I am thinking I config heat
03:58 Kennan seems heat not work well with osprofiler
04:00 asalkeld Kennan: it should work
04:00 asalkeld i know some people are using it
04:00 asalkeld just been a while, can't remember all the bit's n pieces to get right
04:01 Kennan :) hope can find someone give hits
04:02 Kennan maybe not same as dev guide write
04:02 asalkeld yeah, let me look around
04:03 asalkeld Kennan: this is old, but... https://ahsalkeld.wordpress.com/2014/09/04/how-to-profile-heat-using-osprofile/
04:21 Kennan yes, Thanks :asalkeld, but it uses a lot of review git clone, I am thinking, I followed heat dev guide, I assume it would be right
04:21 Kennan if not such case, it means something wrong, and maybe a issue/bug
04:21 asalkeld maybe
04:25 psd joined #openstack-rally
04:50 Vishal_ joined #openstack-rally
04:53 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
04:58 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:38 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
05:42 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
05:52 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:01 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
06:01 rvcehimanshu boris-42: hello boris
06:02 rvcehimanshu I have created tenant with "Non-Admin" credentials... is it possible to rub rally test using non admin tenant ??
06:38 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
07:14 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:25 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
07:30 yfried joined #openstack-rally
07:39 yfried boris-42: around?
07:48 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
07:58 abehl joined #openstack-rally
08:14 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:17 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:18 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
08:20 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:21 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
08:58 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
09:07 yfried rvcehimanshu: I know that rally still doesn't support using precreated accounts (it's on the road map) but I think some ppl have already managed to do what you are asking
09:07 yfried rvcehimanshu: I think rook might know how, but he's still asleep
09:08 yfried rvcehimanshu: could you please repost your question?
09:08 rvcehimanshu I have created tenant with "Non-Admin" credentials... is it possible to rub rally test using non admin tenant ??
09:13 yfried rook: boris-42: amaretskiy: andreykurilin ^ do you guys know how?
09:19 kairat_kushaev joined #openstack-rally
09:19 yfried rvcehimanshu: sorry. seems like ppl are not here ATM. I suggest checking again in ~4hrs
09:20 rvcehimanshu sure.. no worries
09:22 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
09:28 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
09:32 tfreger left #openstack-rally
09:32 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
09:52 yfried boris-42: are you around?
10:03 andreykurilin yfried, rook: as far as I understad, you cann't do it, because UserContext will try to create at least one user. I don't think that it is possible from non-admin tenant
10:03 yfried rvcehimanshu: ^
10:03 rvcehimanshu yfried: got it
10:03 yfried andreykurilin: can't you disable user context to work with existing user/tenant?
10:04 andreykurilin yfried: if usercontext is not specified in scenario, rally will raise an exception
10:05 andreykurilin yfried: ^ this statement is true for most scenarios(scenarios which have required_openstack decorator)
10:06 yfried andreykurilin: so seems like it should be easy to extend users context to support an existing account. but I know it's not...
10:07 yfried andreykurilin: could you please check this issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1433985
10:07 yfried ?
10:09 boris-42 yfried: hi
10:09 boris-42 yfried: I already replied to rvcehimanshu that there is cenr hack
10:10 boris-42 Cern hack*
10:10 boris-42 yfried: that hacks user context
10:10 rvcehimanshu thanks boris-42 and yfried
10:10 yfried boris-42: is it available somewhere?
10:11 yfried boris-42: I have a series of rally questions, do you have time for me now?
10:11 boris-42 yfried: I have always time for you=)
10:11 boris-42 yfried: take a look here https://github.com/cernops/rally/commits/150226
10:11 yfried boris-42: tnx. I'll post them here, so other ppl might join/learn
10:12 yfried boris-42: re the link, do we have a rally doc with interesting stuff like this?
10:15 andreykurilin yfried: ok, I'll check it
10:15 yfried andreykurilin: tnx. Maybe I'm doing something wrong
10:16 Vishal_ Hi
10:17 Vishal_ Is there any way we can generate overlapping IP's in the neutron scenario's for different tenanats
10:17 andreykurilin yfried: we have a issue in docvs
10:17 andreykurilin yfried: the correct command is `rally info BenchmarkScenarios`
10:18 boris-42 amaretskiy: ^
10:18 boris-42 amaretskiy: could you help Vishal_ ?
10:18 amaretskiy hi
10:18 amaretskiy sure
10:19 amaretskiy Vishal_ hi
10:19 Vishal_ Thanks Boris and Amaretskiy
10:19 Vishal_ Rally auto increments the starting_cidr parameter for different tenants
10:20 amaretskiy Vishal_: please clarify your question - do you want to generate *overlapping* CIDRS for tenants networks?
10:20 Vishal_ in neutron scenarios
10:20 amaretskiy yes
10:20 Vishal_ yes
10:20 amaretskiy Vishal_ I do not understand what is needed
10:20 Vishal_ I want to stop this auto increment and generate overlapping ips
10:21 amaretskiy CIDRs must *not( overlap
10:21 amaretskiy if there is overlapping, then the error will take place
10:21 yfried andreykurilin: yeah. I just posted in in bug
10:21 amaretskiy and there will be a failure of network creation
10:21 yfried andreykurilin: tnx
10:21 amaretskiy cidrs must not overlap
10:22 Vishal_ In neutron it is possible to give same cidr ranges in different networks
10:22 yfried andreykurilin: another doc question
10:22 Vishal_ so if lets say net1 has cidr 10.10.10.0/24
10:22 amaretskiy sorry, there is an update for that - for neutron (not nova-network) we generate CIDRs only for subnets
10:22 yfried andreykurilin: is it possible to have a web page (in readthedocs) with all the info, so you can read instead of query CLI?
10:22 amaretskiy not networks
10:23 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:23 yfried andreykurilin: the data is available. it's just a matter of auto-generating it
10:23 amaretskiy currently all subnets (even in defferent networks) get different CIDRS
10:23 amaretskiy I think I've finally caught your question :)
10:23 boris-42 Kennan: hi there
10:23 Vishal_ yes...sorry for not putting it clearly :)
10:24 amaretskiy so if we have net1+subnet1 and net2+subnet2
10:24 amaretskiy then we have cidr1 and cidr2
10:24 Vishal_ so there is no way to make overlapping subnets (in different networks) through rally
10:24 amaretskiy but this is possible for neutron to have cidr1 both for subnet1 and subnet2
10:24 amaretskiy and this will work
10:24 amaretskiy yes
10:24 Vishal_ yes
10:25 amaretskiy for now cidrs are creating serially
10:25 amaretskiy for all subnets
10:25 amaretskiy and making these cidrs generation serial per-network only is a topic of future work
10:25 andreykurilin yfried: looks like it is posible
10:25 amaretskiy so current answer is "no, not possible"
10:26 Vishal_ Thanks for the clarification :)
10:26 amaretskiy :)
10:27 boris-42 Kennan: you should check api-paste.ini of heat (and ensure that you are using proper secret_key)
10:27 Kennan :boris-42 I followed heat dev guide
10:27 Kennan it used same sec_key
10:28 Kennan sed -i "s/hmac_keys =.*/hmac_keys = SECRET_KEY/" /etc/heat/api-paste.ini
10:28 boris-42 Kennan: reading it*
10:28 Kennan here it is SECRET_KEY
10:29 boris-42 Kennan: give me please sec=)
10:31 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:31 boris-42 Kennan: one thing
10:31 boris-42 Kennan: did you do . openrc
10:31 boris-42 or . openrc admin admin
10:31 boris-42 ?)
10:31 Kennan http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/getting_started/on_devstack.html
10:31 Kennan source  admin admin
10:32 Kennan I used admin admin
10:32 boris-42 Kennan: ok
10:33 boris-42 Kennan: so I am going to reproduce all steps for heat tutorial
10:33 boris-42 Kennan: and find the reason
10:33 boris-42 it will take a bit
10:34 Kennan OK. Thanks, Would be helpful to learn if it work or not. I used latest devstack
10:34 Kennan :boris-42, leave office now, you could leave message here, I could check. Thanks
10:35 boris-42 Kennan: yep I will
10:43 boris-42 yfried|afk: what link did you post?
10:44 openstackgerrit Nir Magnezi proposed stackforge/rally: Modifies VMScenario._run_command function, to handle single bash cmd  https://review.openstack.org/154825
10:58 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
11:00 boris-42 Kennan: everything works for me
11:00 boris-42 Kennan: let me share localrc file
11:02 boris-42 Kennan: i have this in locarlc http://paste.openstack.org/show/193518/
11:02 boris-42 Kennan: but I did ./unstack ./stack sh
11:04 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
11:05 pcaruana joined #openstack-rally
11:05 boris-42 yfried: ping
11:11 yfried boris-42: pong
11:13 openstackgerrit Victor Ryzhenkin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the ability to get versions from context  https://review.openstack.org/165423
11:18 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
11:22 yfried boris-42: were you looking for me?
11:27 boris-42 yfried: yep you said that you have some question to me?
11:28 yfried boris-42: yeah, as we know we are working on integrating rally into our internal CI
11:28 yfried boris-42: and we want our ppl to also use it more often
11:32 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
11:33 yfried boris-42: so I want to make sure first I understand how YOU are using rally
11:33 yfried boris-42: in Gate
11:33 boris-42 yfried: hm?
11:33 yfried boris-42: every job is installing rally using devstack-plugin (on the same VM as openstack)
11:34 boris-42 yfried: you mean our Rally gates (that we are using for testing Rally?)
11:34 boris-42 Jenkins/Mirnatis Rally CI?
11:34 yfried boris-42: yes
11:34 yfried boris-42: yes
11:34 boris-42 ah ok
11:34 boris-42 yfried: did you see this page https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/tests/ci before?
11:34 yfried boris-42: and runs a single task/verify, and then uses CLI to query results and SLA and export that to output
11:35 yfried boris-42: yes
11:35 boris-42 so basically there are few types of jobs
11:35 boris-42 types of jobs are quite different*
11:35 boris-42 we have pep8, coverage, py26,27,34 that are unit test based
11:36 boris-42 gate-rally-install (just tests install_rally.sh script0
11:37 boris-42 gate-rally-dsvm-* are running single task against deployment that is deployed by devstack + rally plugin
11:37 boris-42 execpt -verify and -cli *
11:37 boris-42 -cli is running our functional tests for all Rally commands
11:38 boris-42 https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/tests/functional -<
11:38 boris-42 but we are going to refactor this to use Rally for Rally functional testing
11:38 boris-42 when I finish refactoring of plugins and so on
11:40 yfried boris-42: I'm talking about jobs that use rally (not do ci ON rally)
11:41 boris-42 yfried: so those jobs for now just run single task and generate html results and publish it
11:41 yfried boris-42: ok
11:41 boris-42 yfried: and check return value of sla_check (to make voting job +1/-1)
11:41 boris-42 yfried: in future we are going to change this
11:41 yfried boris-42: do they work with logstash?
11:41 boris-42 yfried: not directly *
11:41 boris-42 yfried: it's devstack integration with infra
11:42 boris-42 http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiIiLCJmaWVsZHMiOltdLCJvZmZzZXQiOjAsInRpbWVmcmFtZSI6OTAwLCJncmFwaG1vZGUiOiJjb3VudCJ9
11:42 asalkeld left #openstack-rally
11:48 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
11:51 boris-42 psd: hey there
11:51 boris-42 paboldin: wanna some small bug fix?)
11:51 psd boris-42, Hey!
11:52 boris-42 psd: hey hey
11:52 boris-42 psd: this one is nasty https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1432898
11:52 boris-42 psd: if we don't import keystone client rally want start working at all!
11:52 boris-42 won't*
11:56 psd boris-42, I'm on it :)
11:59 boris-42 psd: there are actually jsut few mistakes
11:59 cdent joined #openstack-rally
11:59 boris-42 psd: you will see them after removing builtins = _
12:00 k4n0 joined #openstack-rally
12:07 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:14 yfried boris-42: what about using rally as long-living testing server?
12:14 yfried boris-42: do you have a production system that does this?
12:15 yfried boris-42: I mean - have a single rally server that's executing tests and keeps the results in DB instead of deploying new rally for every job build
12:20 psd joined #openstack-rally
12:24 boris-42 yfried: andreykurilin ping
12:24 yfried boris-42: pong
12:24 boris-42 yfried: andreykurilin could you run "rally task list | wc -l "
12:24 boris-42 yfried: we have 2 months old installation
12:24 boris-42 yfried: with single db
12:24 andreykurilin boris-42: pong
12:24 boris-42 yfried: that is used on daily basis
12:25 boris-42 andreykurilin: could you say to us what is the amount of tasks that we run on scale lab?
12:25 andreykurilin boris-42: one moment
12:34 andreykurilin boris-42: around 4,677 :)
12:35 andreykurilin in db
12:36 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
12:38 openstackgerrit Nir Magnezi proposed stackforge/rally: Modifies _boot_server() to handle instances with multiple networks  https://review.openstack.org/154833
12:38 boris-42 yfried: ^
12:43 yfried boris-42: is it regularly used in CI?
12:43 yfried boris-42: or just by manual users?
12:43 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
12:55 boris-42 yfried: I think in both ways
12:57 openstackgerrit Vitaly Gusev proposed stackforge/rally: [Ceilometer] Add CeilometerAlarms.create_alarm_and_get_history scenario  https://review.openstack.org/153994
13:00 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed stackforge/rally: Removed task validation from api.Task.start  https://review.openstack.org/158899
13:00 andreykurilin yfried: most of this tasks launched by CI
13:02 yfried andreykurilin: and what about updating the live server to latest rally version?
13:02 yfried boris-42: ^ is this currently supported by rally?
13:07 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone create_and_delete_service scenario  https://review.openstack.org/165468
13:07 boris-42 yfried: there is no updates
13:08 boris-42 yfried: of rally
13:08 boris-42 yfried: they are using rally v0.0.1 and going to move by hand to v0.0.2 soon
13:09 yfried boris-42: the biggest adv of using a long term server is to use it's DB to store tests. if I loose this DB on update or don't have latest (<week old) rally there's no use for maintaining a server
13:11 boris-42 yfried: you should do always backups
13:12 boris-42 yfried: before updating
13:12 boris-42 yfried: it's common practice
13:12 yfried boris-42: CAN I backup rally db?
13:13 boris-42 yfried: like any other backup
13:13 boris-42 yfried: of DB
13:13 boris-42 http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/backup.html
13:13 boris-42 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/backup-methods.html
13:13 boris-42 in case of sqilite you need to copy-paste file
13:15 boris-42 yfried: ^
13:26 exploreshaifali boris-42, around?
13:27 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:32 nmagnezi boris-42, could you please check http://logs.openstack.org/25/154825/16/check/gate-rally-python27/523dcd5/console.html
13:32 nmagnezi boris-42, i do not see why that key is missing ..
13:33 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Removes from tox.ini flake configuration _ as builtin and fixes all bugs  https://review.openstack.org/165817
13:35 psd joined #openstack-rally
13:35 soumit joined #openstack-rally
13:35 psd boris-42, ^ :)
13:36 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
13:40 pboros joined #openstack-rally
13:40 rvcehimanshu joined #openstack-rally
13:44 boris-42 soumit: hi there=)
13:44 boris-42 nmagnezi: so it's not clear for me why it fails
13:45 boris-42 nmagnezi: i have to go now will be online in 1 hr
13:45 boris-42 nmagnezi: amaretskiy please help nmagnezi
13:45 nmagnezi boris-42, thank you for checking
13:45 boris-42 nmagnezi: but it seems very strange for me...
13:45 nmagnezi amaretskiy, plz advise when you can.. :)
13:49 amaretskiy nmagnezi hi
13:49 nmagnezi amaretskiy, hi. so for one of the tests i resolved it
13:49 nmagnezi amaretskiy, it was direction to _run_action which no longer exists
13:50 nmagnezi amaretskiy, now i'm left with test_boot_runcommand_delete_json_fails
13:50 amaretskiy ok, checking this out....
13:52 nmagnezi amaretskiy, ok it was a direction to _run_action in the setup.. now test_boot_runcommand_delete is the last one that does not work
13:53 amaretskiy ok, I'm checking this... wait for a while....
13:53 amaretskiy I see obvious KeyError
13:58 rook boris-42 did you happen to check out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151899 ?
13:58 rook i got pinged by Cisco about it.
13:58 rook I asked them to resolve the Jenkins errors
14:01 openstackgerrit Nir Magnezi proposed stackforge/rally: Modifies VMScenario._run_command function, to handle single bash cmd  https://review.openstack.org/154825
14:09 yfried boris-42: so theoretically, you could move DB from 1 rally server to another?
14:11 nmagnezi amaretskiy, ok all fixed besides this https://jenkins02.openstack.org/job/gate-rally-python26/1642/console
14:13 amaretskiy nmagnezi the main reason of errors in test sis that you have renamed run_command -> run_action but not renamed mock'ed run_command
14:14 amaretskiy sorry, typo
14:14 nmagnezi amaretskiy, where? I've already fixed that.. now for some reason it complains about the order of params
14:14 amaretskiy so, teher is a mock run_action nut actually called run_command
14:14 nmagnezi amaretskiy, which  i've reverted.. but i must have forgot to revet it somewhere
14:15 nmagnezi amaretskiy, but i've removed all "run_action" .. (at least so i thought)
14:16 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
14:16 amaretskiy nmagnezi look at  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/16/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/vm/test_vmtasks.py,cm
14:16 amaretskiy there are `run_action'  here
14:16 nmagnezi amaretskiy, please check the later patchset
14:16 amaretskiy ok
14:16 nmagnezi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/17/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/vm/test_vmtasks.py,cm
14:17 obutenko joined #openstack-rally
14:19 yfried boris-42: so (assuming we backup DB) does rally support constant update?
14:20 amaretskiy nmagnezi: now tests are almost ok, just shift one argument  - http://paste.openstack.org/show/193576/
14:21 amaretskiy nmagnezi:    "foo_script"  <-->   "foo_interpreter",
14:24 karimb joined #openstack-rally
14:25 openstackgerrit Nir Magnezi proposed stackforge/rally: Modifies VMScenario._run_command function, to handle single bash cmd  https://review.openstack.org/154825
14:26 nmagnezi amaretskiy, thanks! i got confused since the test get's the script and interpreter in a reversed order (as opposed to the run_command function)
14:28 amaretskiy great! :)
14:43 karimb joined #openstack-rally
14:54 openstackgerrit David Paterson proposed stackforge/rally: Added 'alias' decorator  https://review.openstack.org/163861
14:57 dpaterson boris-42, and all, please take look at new blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/verification-import
14:59 openstackgerrit Nir Magnezi proposed stackforge/rally: Modifies _boot_server() to handle instances with multiple networks  https://review.openstack.org/154833
15:01 exploreshaifali_ joined #openstack-rally
15:14 amaretskiy boris-42: please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154833/7  here we have backward compatibility broken by renamed argument auto_assign_nic -> auto_assign_nics
15:31 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
15:32 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
15:35 psd joined #openstack-rally
15:45 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:00 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone get_entities scenario  https://review.openstack.org/165490
16:02 openstackgerrit Mike Fedosin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the ability to specify versions for clients  https://review.openstack.org/165423
16:06 rook_ joined #openstack-rally
16:14 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone get_entities scenario  https://review.openstack.org/165490
16:31 soumit joined #openstack-rally
16:37 soumit1 joined #openstack-rally
16:42 meteorfox boris-42: hey! is there a proposal already for the commit message format?
17:04 openstackgerrit Mike Fedosin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the ability to specify versions for clients  https://review.openstack.org/165423
17:14 soumit joined #openstack-rally
17:16 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: Restore fixed IP support in boot_runcommand_delete  https://review.openstack.org/161699
17:31 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
17:32 openstackgerrit Marian Krcmarik proposed stackforge/rally: Add to constant and rps runneres limits for maximun Core usage  https://review.openstack.org/164888
17:37 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
17:52 openstackgerrit Mike Fedosin proposed stackforge/rally: Add the ability to specify versions for clients  https://review.openstack.org/165423
17:56 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
18:04 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: [Ceilometer] Add CeilometerAlarms.create_alarm_and_get_history scenario  https://review.openstack.org/153994
18:33 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
18:47 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
18:48 abehl joined #openstack-rally
18:48 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:53 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed stackforge/rally: Removes from tox.ini flake configuration _ as builtin  https://review.openstack.org/165817
19:17 psd joined #openstack-rally
20:09 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
21:11 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
21:20 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
21:30 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
21:36 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
21:55 andreykurilin_ joined #openstack-rally
21:58 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
22:11 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:36 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
22:53 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed stackforge/rally: [Tempest]: Try to find py27 interpreter  https://review.openstack.org/158490
22:54 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
22:59 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
23:28 Kennan :boris-42, thanks. but what reclone = no does is old stack. maybe not same as my new devstack

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary