Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-03-30

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:21 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Testing nova stuff  https://review.openstack.org/168748
00:22 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Testing nova stuff  https://review.openstack.org/168748
00:24 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:28 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:53 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:07 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
01:07 shakamunyi_ joined #openstack-rally
01:14 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:40 rook__ joined #openstack-rally
02:29 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:32 baker joined #openstack-rally
02:51 shakamunyi__ joined #openstack-rally
02:54 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
03:08 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:23 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
03:35 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
03:43 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
03:51 aswadrangnekar joined #openstack-rally
03:52 aswadrangnekar left #openstack-rally
03:54 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
03:56 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
04:02 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
04:39 shakamunyi_ joined #openstack-rally
04:41 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
04:42 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
04:52 zerda joined #openstack-rally
05:01 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:09 Vishal_ joined #openstack-rally
05:22 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
05:39 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:06 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:18 Vishal_ kun_huang: Hi
06:19 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
06:19 Vishal_ kun_huang: Can there be combined scenario's of neutron and nova?
06:21 Vishal_ kun_huang: Like if I want to benchmark a combined scenario of create_and_list_router and boot_and_list_servers
06:26 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:28 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
06:42 yfried boris-42: good morning
07:03 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
07:37 psd joined #openstack-rally
07:38 nmagnezi joined #openstack-rally
07:41 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:53 pboros joined #openstack-rally
08:36 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
08:39 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:39 yfried boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/
08:43 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:56 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone create_update_and_delete_tenant scenario  https://review.openstack.org/165450
09:08 _kiran_ joined #openstack-rally
09:09 kiran-r Hello guys! =)
09:17 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
09:28 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Fix 'rally task results' output for running task  https://review.openstack.org/167550
09:41 pboros is there any way to skip cleanup in rally?
09:45 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Implementation of 'rally task abort' command  https://review.openstack.org/161636
09:49 karimb joined #openstack-rally
09:54 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:59 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds uninstall_tempest to API  https://review.openstack.org/168838
10:00 yfried andreykurilin: ^ I think we've discussed this a while ago
10:07 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds uninstall_tempest to API  https://review.openstack.org/168838
10:14 msdubov joined #openstack-rally
10:22 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Add streaming algorithms and SLA to check for outliers  https://review.openstack.org/148079
10:29 andreykurilin yfried: great!
10:30 andreykurilin yfried: please, add "related to bp improve-tempest-manage-cli" to commit message. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/improve-tempest-manage-cli
10:39 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds uninstall_tempest to API  https://review.openstack.org/168838
10:40 yfried andreykurilin: do we really need re-install?
10:40 yfried andreykurilin: seems like doing uninstall&install is simple enough
10:50 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Add streaming algorithms and SLA to check for outliers  https://review.openstack.org/148079
11:09 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds uninstall_tempest to API  https://review.openstack.org/168838
11:09 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds tempest re-install to API/CLI  https://review.openstack.org/168849
11:10 yfried andreykurilin: ^ another one
11:10 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds tempest re-install to API/CLI  https://review.openstack.org/168849
11:14 yfried andreykurilin:  question about tempest-update - how is this different than re-install?
11:17 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
11:27 boris-42 yfried: hi there
11:27 boris-42 kiran-r: hi there
11:27 boris-42 pboros: nope there is no way to skip it
11:27 kiran-r hello! :)
11:28 yfried boris-42: hi
11:35 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
11:39 boris-42 yfried: I would like to discuss your proposal
11:40 boris-42 yfried: regarding to refactoring utils and simplifying them
11:41 yfried boris-42: ?
11:41 yfried boris-42: what proposal?
11:42 neeti joined #openstack-rally
11:42 openstackgerrit Alexander Gubanov proposed stackforge/rally: Adds Nova floating IPs bulk tests  https://review.openstack.org/168054
11:45 yfried boris-42: andreykurilin: msdubov: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/
11:45 yfried could you please review? IMO it's ready to merge
11:47 andreykurilin yfried: about "update". sorry, but I forgot what it should do:D maybe update virtual environment.
11:48 andreykurilin yfried: uninstall && install is not equal to re-install. imo, re-install should keep configuration file
11:49 yfried andreykurilin: please post to review.
11:53 andreykurilin yfried: btw, what you think about options --simple and --hard for remove? if first one is selected(imo, it should be as a default) only for-deployment dir should be removed, if the second one - remove base dir too
11:56 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [Docs] Add tutorial chapter about task templates  https://review.openstack.org/168867
11:57 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [Docs] Add tutorial chapter about task templates  https://review.openstack.org/168867
11:57 yfried andreykurilin: I was thinking the same thing but different commands
11:58 yfried andreykurilin: tempest uninstall [--deployment] will remove local repo ("for-deployment...")
11:58 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [Docs] Add tutorial chapter about task templates  https://review.openstack.org/168867
11:58 yfried andreykurilin: tempest remove [--source XYZ] will remove base repo for specific source
11:59 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [Docs] Add tutorial chapter about task templates  https://review.openstack.org/168867
11:59 yfried andreykurilin: new tempest dir tree: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L124-L130
12:03 nmagnezi boris-42, msdubov, andreykurilin, amaretskiy, could you guys please review this one? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/
12:04 amaretskiy nmagnezi: sure, but after a hour...
12:04 nmagnezi amaretskiy, thanks :)
12:05 msdubov nmagnezi, will do
12:05 nmagnezi msdubov, thanks!
12:08 openstackgerrit Alexander Gubanov proposed stackforge/rally: Adds Nova floating IPs bulk tests  https://review.openstack.org/168054
12:08 cdent joined #openstack-rally
12:08 olkonami joined #openstack-rally
12:09 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
12:24 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
12:35 openstackgerrit Nir Magnezi proposed stackforge/rally: Adds dual-stack (IPv4 and IPv6) support for scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/154885
12:37 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: Hi
12:37 openstackgerrit Alexander Gubanov proposed stackforge/rally: Adds Nova floating IPs bulk tests  https://review.openstack.org/168054
12:37 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: H
12:38 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Hello
12:38 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: This is regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1428066
12:38 andreykurilin >tempest remove [--source XYZ] will remove base repo for specific source
12:38 andreykurilin users will need to remember sources... this is not good:(
12:38 Vishal_ I am still facing the issue..
12:38 andreykurilin yfried: ^
12:39 Vishal_ getting the same error as mentioned in the bug
12:39 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: in both heat and nova logs
12:41 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Do you have reference to logs?
12:41 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: That's strange
12:41 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: I hope changes in rally-jobs is not mandatory
12:41 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: changing the template file is enough
12:43 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Do you mean template in rally-jobs/extra folder of rally?
12:44 Vishal_ yes
12:44 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: yes
12:45 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: http://paste.openstack.org/show/197532/     this is the link to my heat template
12:47 yfried andreykurilin: I'm not sure if that is relevant at all (base removal)
12:47 yfried andreykurilin: base is unrelated from deployment repos. it just caches the sources to save DL bandwidth
12:48 yfried andreykurilin: but we could do tempest list-repos to list all bases by source
12:48 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Load openstack clients only if those are used  https://review.openstack.org/168887
12:49 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Have you updated the rally test with your template?
12:49 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: yes
12:50 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: [Docs] Add tutorial chapter about task templates  https://review.openstack.org/168867
12:51 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: not sure why it is still trying to pick the "default" security group
12:51 andreykurilin yfried: I see one test-case: users can test several branches, repos and choose the best variant for verification(all others base repos will be unneeded)
12:52 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: Please note I had not done any changes in rally-jobs/extra folder
12:53 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:53 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Ok, stop:). How did you detect the error? Have you catched this on gates?
12:53 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: or you are trying to laucnh the test manually?
12:54 baker joined #openstack-rally
12:54 andreykurilin yfried, about update cmd: when `rally-manage install` will copy base repo and trying to do `git pull` https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/verification/tempest/tempest.py#L247-L249 . imo, update should do the same. Maybe, there are no testcases for this... What do you think about this?
12:55 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: yes I am manually triggering the test "rally task start
12:57 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
12:57 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: Getting failures for the rally iterations..all the VM's are in error state...on checking nova scheduler logs there is this security group error
13:01 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed stackforge/rally: Add streaming algorithms and SLA to check for outliers  https://review.openstack.org/148079
13:06 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: That's strange, but I managed to laucnh your template
13:07 kairat_kushaev Vishal_:  Any change that you have the security group with the same name in nova?
13:07 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: And getting an error as result
13:08 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: For concurrency 1 it works for me as well...but for concurrency greater than 1 it fails...the nova error is ultiple security groups found matching 'default'. Use an ID to be more specific.\n"
13:09 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: Not sure why it is still going for default and not for the one given in my template :)
13:10 siva-subramaniam joined #openstack-rally
13:11 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Hmm, i launched it with concurrency = 2
13:11 siva-subramaniam boris-42: Hello!
13:12 siva-subramaniam yfried: Hello!
13:14 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: could you please provide the rally template that you are trying to launch?
13:14 boris-42 siva-subramaniam: hi hi
13:15 siva-subramaniam boris-42: This is regarding the refactoring we discussed yesterday on nova_server scenarios.
13:15 yfried siva-subramaniam: how are you?
13:16 siva-subramaniam yfried: I am good yfried! thanks.
13:16 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:16 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: http://paste.openstack.org/show/197545/
13:16 siva-subramaniam boris-42, yfried: So i have managed to write a sample code for the boot and perform server action scenario.
13:17 yfried andreykurilin: I'm sorry. I don't follow your suggestion/concerns. I can't understand if you are suggesting new extensions rally-manage tempest, admitting some ideas are redundant or finding problems in my patches
13:17 yfried siva-subramaniam: push it :)
13:19 siva-subramaniam yfried: yeah sure. i have one doubt. i am having a dictionary for the ready states.  where do i put them? Right now i have it in the nova/servers.py
13:19 psd joined #openstack-rally
13:23 siva-subramaniam yfried: where are the constants stored usually in rally?
13:24 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: So the template you sent previous is in "templates/scenario.template"
13:24 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: *previously
13:25 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: yes
13:25 andreykurilin yfried: I'm ok with your patches :) I just want to discuss ideas, since I'm not use rally verify usually and can be mistaken with what end-users want
13:25 andreykurilin siva-subramaniam: https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/consts.py
13:25 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed stackforge/rally: [Sahara] Improved provisioning plugin support  https://review.openstack.org/167651
13:33 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
13:37 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: I managed to laucnh the iteration with 5 threads and 7 tenants. No error were raised, especially related to default. So it is very likely that I missed something. let's reproduce my steps
13:37 yfried boris-42: andreykurilin: who is Sergey Skripnick?
13:37 andreykurilin yfried: rediskin
13:38 yfried andreykurilin: tnx. too bad he's off line
13:38 andreykurilin yfried: one moment. I'll try to ping his skype
13:38 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: I am launching rally -v task start create_vish_stack.json where crearte_vish_stack is http://paste.openstack.org/show/197545/
13:38 yfried andreykurilin: tnx
13:39 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed stackforge/rally: [Sahara] Add support for anti-affinity  https://review.openstack.org/168050
13:39 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: ok
13:39 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: create_vish_stack is placed in current folder where I am launching rally
13:39 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: yes
13:39 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: in templates folder i have a scenario.template: http://paste.openstack.org/show/197532/
13:40 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: exactly like this
13:40 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: yes
13:41 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: So as a result I have 100 success:)
13:42 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: :)
13:43 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: should I uninstall the existing rally installation and install fresh
13:44 kairat_kushaev Is it possible to provide heat logs?
13:44 redixin joined #openstack-rally
13:44 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Is it possible to provide logs? It is really strange for me that nova is trying to find default group
13:45 redixin hi there
13:45 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: instead of default_port_security_group
13:45 rook__ joined #openstack-rally
13:45 boris-42 yfried: Sergey is redixin
13:45 siva-subramaniam joined #openstack-rally
13:45 yfried boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/
13:46 yfried boris-42: since both he and Pavel are offline, could you please take a look at ^
13:46 redixin yfried hi
13:46 yfried redixin: hi
13:46 yfried nmagnezi: ^
13:46 yfried redixin: tnx for logging in
13:46 yfried redixin: re https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/
13:46 nmagnezi hi redixin, yfried
13:47 yfried redixin: IIUC you are asking for extended functionality - to support inline script as well as single command. am I right?
13:47 redixin yfried no, im asking to add inline script instead of single command
13:48 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: where can i send logs
13:49 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: cannot paste them on paste.openstack
13:49 nmagnezi redixin, I'm sorry but i do not understand what do you mean by "inline script"
13:49 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: kkushaev@mirantis.com
13:49 kairat_kushaev let's look at it
13:50 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: ok
13:50 yfried redixin: how do you differentiate between inline script and path without actual flag?
13:53 yfried boris-42: could you comment about Pavel's issue on the patch? nmagnezi has a WIP scenario that will use this, so I don't think it required a new task to add to the gate yet
13:55 boris-42 yfried: just a moment
13:55 boris-42 yfried: need to do something with my emails
13:55 boris-42 )
13:55 openstackgerrit Merged stackforge/rally: Fix 'rally task results' output for running task  https://review.openstack.org/167550
14:00 boris-42 yfried: regarding to the Nir patch
14:00 boris-42 yfried: A) we can run any one-line-script B) we can have chain of patches where in the end of chain we are adding script
14:01 boris-42 yfried: btw I do agree with redixin stuff
14:01 boris-42 yfried: (scirpt: PATH is_script: False) is something really hard to understand
14:02 redixin joined #openstack-rally
14:02 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: Sent you the nova-schduler.logs
14:02 redixin yfried sorry, have internet issues
14:02 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: please let me know in case any other logs are required
14:04 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed stackforge/rally: Adds tempest re-install to API/CLI  https://review.openstack.org/168849
14:05 yfried boris-42: redixin I think I understand the usage issue, but I don't understand how rally will know if the string is path to script file, or should be interpreted as commands
14:05 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: I am more instersting in heat logs
14:05 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: heat-engine.log
14:05 kairat_kushaev Exactly like in bugs that you mentionet
14:05 Vishal_ ??
14:06 yfried boris-42: what would stop rally from running "/bin/bash /path/to/local/file.sh"
14:06 redixin yfried by name. "script" for inline, "path" for file
14:06 yfried boris-42: or trying open("ping -c1 -w1 8.8.8.8", -rb)
14:07 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: Hmm, are you sure you send it to me?
14:07 kairat_kushaev Vishal_: I see nova-scheduler.log only
14:07 yfried redixin: ok
14:07 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: sending you the heat-engine.log
14:08 * yfried looking
14:08 redixin yfried: here json {script: {script: "ping -c1 8.8.8.8", "interpreter": "/bin/sh"}}
14:08 redixin or {script: {path: "/tmp/script.sh", interpreter: "/bin/sh"}}
14:08 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: sent
14:09 redixin so we have script inside of script
14:14 yfried redixin: current patch isn't changing the exposed scenario.
14:14 yfried redixin: it's only extending the utility function.
14:14 yfried redixin: the current patch only extend the utils functionality to be consumed by later patches
14:15 yfried redixin: I think we could expose this in the scenario as you suggest on a later patch
14:16 yfried redixin: Can we merge this, and I will suggest a new patch that does what you are asking for?
14:16 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: you got the logs?
14:18 yfried redixin: still here?
14:21 redixin yfried hm
14:21 yfried boris-42: what do you think? can we merge the current version, and I will push patch that exposes the new API in the way redixin suggests?
14:22 redixin yfried i just suggested another form of functionality you want
14:22 redixin this functionality will make happy both me and you
14:23 yfried redixin: where?
14:23 boris-42 redixin: yfried so seems like you are talking about different things
14:23 boris-42 yfried: - is talking about utils redixin - about scenario
14:23 Vishal_ kairat_kushaev: leaving for home...can you please mail me back in case you suspect something..thanks for the time
14:24 yfried boris-42: redixin: exactly. nmagnezi's patch changes utils. I can push a new one that will change scenario accordingly, but it shouldn't block the current patch from merging
14:26 boris-42 yfried: let me make small comment on that
14:26 redixin yfried do yo mean your changes are backward compatible?
14:27 yfried redixin: nmagnezi's changes are backward comatible. the only extend utils
14:28 redixin yfried ok, we can merge it, but definitely need another args name. is_script is confusing
14:29 yfried redixin: actually it's pretty straight forward, and has a very nice doc to it.
14:30 yfried redixin: but I will push a different commit that will follow your guidline after this one is merged. can we merge current patch?
14:30 boris-42 redixin: yfried guys I dislike is_script name
14:30 redixin boris-42 me too
14:30 boris-42 redixin: yfried because in both cases it is script (just one is in string another in file)
14:30 boris-42 redixin: yfried I would like to find something better
14:31 yfried boris-42: redixin: ok. please suggest a better name and we can merge it.
14:31 boris-42 script_path, script_inline
14:31 boris-42 redixin: yfried %
14:31 yfried boris-42: ??
14:31 yfried boris-42: s/is_script/script_path ?
14:32 boris-42 script_path and script_inline
14:32 boris-42 instead of script and is_script
14:32 yfried boris-42: but script_path is misleading if you want to use inline
14:32 boris-42 yfried: there will be both arguments
14:33 boris-42 yfried: you can use one of them
14:33 redixin yfried boris-42 is_file maybe
14:33 boris-42 redixin: okay is_file is better then is_script in any way
14:33 yfried boris-42: so we can settle on is_file?
14:33 yfried boris-42: I'll follow your suggestion on later patch
14:33 boris-42 yfried: yep that sounds better
14:38 ilyashakhat joined #openstack-rally
14:39 pboros boris-42, thanks, is there any easy way to turn it off at code level?
14:40 openstackgerrit Nir Magnezi proposed stackforge/rally: Modifies VMScenario._run_command function, to handle single bash cmd  https://review.openstack.org/154825
14:40 pboros I mean cleanup
14:43 yfried boris-42: redixin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/21
14:44 yfried I have to logout. assuming all is well with ^, please review
14:49 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
14:53 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
15:02 boris-42 ok thanks
15:10 svasheka hi guys
15:10 svasheka is there any idea why this is happening?
15:10 svasheka Benchmark configuration:
15:10 svasheka {'runner': {'type': 'constant', 'concurrency': 10, 'times': 100}, 'context': {'users': {'users_per_tenant': 2, 'tenants': 3}}}
15:10 svasheka Reason:
15:10 svasheka Invalid scenario argument: 'name_length is None which is not a valid float'
15:11 svasheka mb some cached things should be removed?
15:15 boris-42 svasheka: seems like you have to specify args section
15:15 boris-42 with name_length
15:17 svasheka but this is not requred by scenario
15:18 boris-42 svasheka: you didn't provide me enough infomration
15:18 boris-42 svasheka: what scenario?
15:21 svasheka http://paste.openstack.org/show/197571/
15:22 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
15:25 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
15:36 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: Testing nova stuff  https://review.openstack.org/168962
15:39 svasheka boris-42: so if I don't have name_lengthI get this error, but if I add it to yaml I'm getting TypeError: assign_and_remove_user_role() got an unexpected keyword argument 'name_length'
15:39 boris-42 svasheka: this is full scenario?
15:39 svasheka it is all of it in basic.py
15:40 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
15:40 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
15:46 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed stackforge/rally: Add context that creates servers using EC2 api  https://review.openstack.org/156228
15:48 boris-42 meteorfox: https://github.com/stackforge/nerd-reviewer =))
15:50 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone create_update_and_delete_tenant scenario  https://review.openstack.org/165450
15:56 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
15:59 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
16:03 meteorfox boris-42: lol, that picture
16:05 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone benchmark scenarios for roles  https://review.openstack.org/165409
16:10 shakamunyi joined #openstack-rally
16:10 boris-42 meteorfox: =)
16:13 meteorfox boris-42: is this a real changeset, or a test?  https://review.openstack.org/168962
16:13 yfried joined #openstack-rally
16:14 boris-42 meteorfox: hm?
16:14 boris-42 meteorfox: as you see it is "test"
16:14 boris-42 meteorfox: this patch depends on nova patch
16:15 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone create_update_and_delete_tenant scenario  https://review.openstack.org/165450
16:18 meteorfox boris-42: I mean as a throwaway changeset? The topic says = "aaa", and there's a sentece "uuuu" on Line 5
16:19 meteorfox sentence*
16:19 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed stackforge/rally: Add EC2 api scenario that list all servers  https://review.openstack.org/168991
16:19 boris-42 meteorfox: yep this just tests patch in nova gates
16:20 meteorfox boris-42: ok, that's what I thought
16:20 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone update_user_password scenario  https://review.openstack.org/165422
16:21 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone benchmark scenarios for roles  https://review.openstack.org/165409
16:29 soumit joined #openstack-rally
16:35 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: [Spec] Rally upgrades  https://review.openstack.org/167319
16:38 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed stackforge/rally: [Spec] Rally upgrades  https://review.openstack.org/167319
17:11 Vishal_ joined #openstack-rally
17:28 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
17:39 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
17:41 soumit joined #openstack-rally
17:42 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
17:45 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
17:54 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add murano benchmarks  https://review.openstack.org/137661
17:54 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed stackforge/rally: Add base for murano benchmarking  https://review.openstack.org/137650
18:02 baker joined #openstack-rally
18:06 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: do not merge testing  https://review.openstack.org/169033
18:07 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add unit test for keystone._get_service_by_name  https://review.openstack.org/169034
18:09 meteorfox boris-42: what are the requirements to implement a deployment engine? Would something like os-ansible-deployment fit this model? https://github.com/stackforge/os-ansible-deployment
18:09 soumit joined #openstack-rally
18:32 yfried boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154825/
18:32 yfried boris-42: ^ could you please review this as we discussed earlier?
18:32 baker joined #openstack-rally
18:34 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:34 baker joined #openstack-rally
18:42 PerfBein_ joined #openstack-rally
18:44 PerfBein_ joined #openstack-rally
18:58 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed stackforge/rally: Add keystone benchmark scenarios for roles  https://review.openstack.org/165409
19:03 openstackgerrit pradeep proposed stackforge/rally: Add nova suspend_and_resume  https://review.openstack.org/169046
19:18 verdurin joined #openstack-rally
19:29 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
19:56 openstackgerrit Olga Kopylova proposed stackforge/rally: Load OpenStack clients only if those are used  https://review.openstack.org/168887
21:30 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
21:37 boris-42 meteorfox: yep it fits
21:37 boris-42 mitz: the major requirement to driver is that it a least somehow works=)
22:33 plieb joined #openstack-rally
22:34 plieb is there an easy way to install an older version of rally? (juno)  the latest on github has requirements ahead of my versions
22:43 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
22:45 harlowja_ joined #openstack-rally
22:50 boris-42 plieb: install rally in venv
22:50 boris-42 plieb: you can do it by passing -v to "install_rally.sh -v" script
22:50 plieb ok thx
22:50 boris-42 plieb: or doing by hands virtualenv
22:50 boris-42 plieb: or you can use version 0.0.1 or 0.0.2 or master from dockerhub
22:51 boris-42 plieb: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/rallyforge/rally/
22:56 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed stackforge/rally: do not merge testing  https://review.openstack.org/169033
23:33 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
23:46 plieb left #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary