Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-04-30

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:10 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
00:29 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:36 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:40 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
01:03 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
02:05 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:16 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
02:28 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:41 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
02:51 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
02:56 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
02:58 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
03:06 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
03:15 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
03:26 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
03:27 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
04:16 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
04:19 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
04:27 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
04:42 nkhare_ joined #openstack-rally
04:45 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:22 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
05:40 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
05:42 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
05:43 openstackgerrit Ravikumar Venkatesan proposed openstack/rally: Adds Keystone ec2-credentials tests  https://review.openstack.org/178060
05:56 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:08 openstackgerrit Vitaly Gusev proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Add context and scenario for resources  https://review.openstack.org/165092
06:16 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
06:21 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:39 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
06:40 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
06:45 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
06:50 kevinbenton joined #openstack-rally
06:55 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
07:08 yfried joined #openstack-rally
07:18 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
07:33 karimb joined #openstack-rally
07:46 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:56 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
08:11 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:14 svasheka joined #openstack-rally
08:14 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:29 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for heat resource group  https://review.openstack.org/178751
08:29 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed openstack/rally: Pass parameters, files and env  for heat stacks  https://review.openstack.org/178631
08:30 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:37 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:41 openstackgerrit svasheka proposed openstack/rally: Add keystone benchmark scenarios for roles  https://review.openstack.org/165409
08:56 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
09:19 yfried amaretskiy: ping
09:19 amaretskiy yfried: pong :)
09:20 yfried amaretskiy: https://answers.launchpad.net/rally/+question/265367
09:20 yfried amaretskiy: he raises an interesting issue: Rally only measures timing
09:20 amaretskiy yfried: ok, reading.....
09:20 yfried amaretskiy: could we extend it to measure more data, like bandwidth
09:23 yfried amaretskiy: also - he's first point was that we have a lot of unanswered questions that just expired
09:23 amaretskiy yfried: yes, problem is interesting, but we do not have implementation for any measures differ from timing
09:24 yfried amaretskiy: I know. is it on the roadmap?
09:24 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
09:24 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed openstack/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
09:24 yfried amaretskiy: https://answers.launchpad.net/rally/+question/265928 also - rally GUI - what's this video they are linking?
09:25 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed openstack/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
09:28 amaretskiy yfried: good question about video
09:29 yfried amaretskiy: aren't you @Mirantis? don't you know it?
09:30 amaretskiy yes, I'm from Mirantis, so I will find out what is this web UI :)
09:30 yfried arxcruz: re https://answers.launchpad.net/rally/+question/265928
09:30 arxcruz yfried, ?
09:31 yfried arxcruz: IIUC this functional framework is not functional testing OF rally, but rather intorducing assertions into rally scenario and contexts. am I right?
09:31 arxcruz yfried, yes, it's the beginning :)
09:32 yfried arxcruz: unclear from commit
09:33 arxcruz yfried, okay, what exactly do you want me to put in the commit message ?
09:34 arxcruz the commit says that this implement a mixin class that add basic unit test assert methods, and it will be part of the functional framework
09:34 arxcruz what is exactly what is doing
09:34 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
09:34 msdubov_ yfried, So regarding the Rally UI on YouTube
09:35 msdubov_ yfried, Seems to be a very old thing (Dec 2013)
09:35 msdubov_ yfried, And if I'm not mistaken this was done primarily for the sake of demonstration
09:35 msdubov_ yfried, But I personally don't know whether this UI has been developed afterwards
09:35 msdubov_ yfried, Anyway, Rally has completely changed over these 1.5 years
09:36 yfried arxcruz: IDK. can't think of a better msg
09:37 yfried arxcruz: just wanted to make sure I understand what I'm reviewing, because I thought it was the other way around at first
09:38 arxcruz yfried, I cannot think in a better commit message as well, the message explain exactly what I'm doing, and boris already explained the reasons for that
09:38 arxcruz it's also on the rally roadmap
09:38 yfried arxcruz: I'm not arguing with you.
09:38 yfried arxcruz: just wanted to know
09:38 openstackgerrit maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Added Neutron Loadbalancer pools and members scenario  https://review.openstack.org/178996
09:39 arxcruz yfried, oh, okay :) sorry, hehehe
09:39 * arxcruz think it's time for a coffee
09:41 yfried arxcruz: I don remember asking you about not allowing caller msg to override default msg instead of extending it
09:41 yfried arxcruz: do
09:41 yfried arxcruz: have you decided to drop that?
09:43 arxcruz yfried, I ask you how you liked, everything in one single line, not, but IMHO, if you're passing a msg as argument, it's because you want to override the msg
09:43 yfried msdubov_: https://answers.launchpad.net/rally/+question/265928 will you please answer this, then?
09:43 arxcruz I have no problem to concatenate, if everybody agrees :)
09:43 yfried arxcruz: or, because you want to ADD more details to the existing message
09:44 arxcruz yfried, okay, so, everything in a single line ?
09:45 arxcruz in one single line*
09:45 yfried arxcruz: I don't care about that. but I might be missing something re formatting. maybe ask msdubov_?
09:46 yfried arxcruz: might be easier to create a decorator for the assertion, that will add the message for you?
09:46 yfried arxcruz: instead of copy pasting all the methods?
10:00 andreykurilin arxcruz: ping
10:00 arxcruz andreykurilin, pong
10:00 andreykurilin arxcruz: hi!
10:00 andreykurilin arxcruz: I have found a small nit for your patch:)
10:00 arxcruz andreykurilin, another? D:
10:01 andreykurilin arxcruz: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146838/14/tests/unit/benchmark/test_functional.py
10:01 andreykurilin arxcruz: please, don't use unittest directly:) https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/tests/unit/test.py#L36 can be used instead
10:02 andreykurilin arxcruz: for skipIf, you can use @testtools.skipIf
10:03 andreykurilin arxcruz: after you fix this, I'll put +2 for your patch and ask amaretskiy to do the same:)
10:03 arxcruz andreykurilin, sure, thanks!
10:13 arxcruz andreykurilin, so, changing to use test.TestCase I can't use assertX with context :(
10:13 arxcruz TypeError: assertRaises() takes at least 3 arguments (2 given)
10:13 andreykurilin arxcruz: one moment
10:13 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Removed task validation from api.Task.start  https://review.openstack.org/158899
10:15 openstackgerrit_ joined #openstack-rally
10:18 andreykurilin arxcruz: interesting usecase:)
10:18 arxcruz I know, I was struggling with that, and that was the reason I used unittest directly
10:19 andreykurilin arxcruz: but I still prefer to don't use unittest:) maybe we can replace context with try...except block?
10:22 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
10:23 arxcruz andreykurilin, okay
10:28 msdubov_ yfried, Yep, will answer that quesiton
10:30 msdubov_ yfried, By the way, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148079/
10:30 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
10:31 msdubov_ yfried, Answered your questions from the previous patchset, I believe that the code is now as simple/readable as possible, and the changes you suggested will make it a bit messy...
10:35 yfried msdubov_: did you see Pavel's comment?
10:37 msdubov_ yfried, Seen, but not sure ValueError would be the best choice though
10:37 msdubov_ yfried, https://docs.python.org/2/library/exceptions.html#exceptions.ValueError
10:37 msdubov_ yfried, Maybe you have a better idea for another built-in exception class that could be used there?
10:39 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed openstack/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
10:39 yfried msdubov_: nope
10:43 yfried arxcruz: ^ didn't add the msg concatenation, right?
10:43 arxcruz yfried, nope
10:43 yfried arxcruz: so should I wait for it, or review this one?
10:45 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
10:53 cdent joined #openstack-rally
10:54 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
10:55 jose_lausuch joined #openstack-rally
10:57 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
11:10 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
11:12 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Clients] Add function osclients.register  https://review.openstack.org/177884
11:15 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
11:21 aix joined #openstack-rally
11:36 jose_lausuch Hi, may I ask a question of a possible bug?
11:37 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
11:38 jose_lausuch when I run a bech test  I get sometimes this error when cleaning up, although the test succeded: WARNING rally.benchmark.context.cleanup.manager [-] Resource deletion failed, max retries exceeded for nova.servers: fe65db9e-3fb1-409c-b5e7-39440d533150. Reason: Instance could not be found (HTTP 404)
11:43 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
11:47 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Context][Fuel] (WIP) Add context for fuelclient  https://review.openstack.org/178731
11:54 kiranr joined #openstack-rally
11:56 openstackgerrit Vitaly Gusev proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Add CeilometerNovaMetrics.get_nova_notifications scenario  https://review.openstack.org/154803
12:07 openstackgerrit Vitaly Gusev proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Add CeilometerNovaMetrics.get_nova_pollsters scenario  https://review.openstack.org/160387
12:09 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:16 openstackgerrit Ilya Shakhat proposed openstack/rally: Make plugins location configurable  https://review.openstack.org/177773
12:22 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for heat resource group  https://review.openstack.org/178751
12:22 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed openstack/rally: Pass parameters, files and env  for heat stacks  https://review.openstack.org/178631
12:22 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed openstack/rally: Add create-snapshot-restore-delete stack scenario  https://review.openstack.org/179037
12:25 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
12:29 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
12:34 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
12:51 yfried jose_lausuch: so you question isn't tempest related
12:51 yfried jose_lausuch: but it seems like rally is trying to delete a VM that's no longer there. it shouldn't raise an error on that. I don't know much more
12:52 jose_lausuch yep, its just running a bench test, it happens in some of the tests
12:52 jose_lausuch and that message appears many times
12:56 yfried jose_lausuch: sorry. not enough data to debug this.
13:00 jose_lausuch when running a bench like GlanceImages.create_and_delete_image
13:00 jose_lausuch when finished, it outputs that warning many times
13:00 jose_lausuch but the test is successful 100%
13:36 openstackgerrit Arx Cruz proposed openstack/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
14:02 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Setup volume detach timings separately  https://review.openstack.org/179087
14:17 openstackgerrit Joe Hakim Rahme proposed openstack/rally: Fixes a typo in the tutorial  https://review.openstack.org/179100
14:26 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
14:31 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
14:52 karimb joined #openstack-rally
14:59 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add functional test for task samples  https://review.openstack.org/163870
14:59 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Add functional test for task samples  https://review.openstack.org/163870
15:39 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed openstack/rally: Add Cinder create_backup volume scenario  https://review.openstack.org/167171
15:47 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
15:51 openstackgerrit Joe Hakim Rahme proposed openstack/rally: Fixes a typo in the tutorial  https://review.openstack.org/179100
15:54 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class  https://review.openstack.org/146838
16:14 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Add streaming algorithms and SLA to check for outliers  https://review.openstack.org/148079
16:40 pbandzi_ joined #openstack-rally
16:56 prashant_ joined #openstack-rally
16:56 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
16:58 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
17:41 BaQs_ joined #openstack-rally
17:45 coolsvapl joined #openstack-rally
17:45 vkmc_ joined #openstack-rally
17:46 vkmc joined #openstack-rally
17:49 mkoderer joined #openstack-rally
17:49 ptoohill joined #openstack-rally
17:49 vipul joined #openstack-rally
17:53 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
17:54 kairat_kushaev joined #openstack-rally
18:01 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
18:02 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:03 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:25 dspano joined #openstack-rally
18:55 davideagnello hello, I have made use of "@base.atomic_action_timer" wrapper functionality to get accurate timing of our service's CRUD functions (get, create, delete, list)  When generating the report for a benchmark run, I notice these action timers as individual entries in the action table.  The items displayed in this list do not seem to be in order or follow an intuitive pattern?  Is this a current limitation of Rally's report gene
18:55 davideagnello ration?
19:00 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
19:17 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
19:18 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
19:24 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
19:35 kevinbenton joined #openstack-rally
19:50 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
20:09 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
20:19 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
20:20 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
20:42 openstackgerrit Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed openstack/rally: [Spec] Add environment info to task report  https://review.openstack.org/169432
20:45 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
21:06 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
21:39 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
21:43 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
21:49 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:03 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fixes a typo in the tutorial  https://review.openstack.org/179100
22:16 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:21 prashant_ joined #openstack-rally
22:23 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:56 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
23:21 prashantS joined #openstack-rally
23:40 sputnik13 joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary