Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-05-05

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:37 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
00:46 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed openstack/rally: Set default value for updated_at  https://review.openstack.org/176583
00:48 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:53 boris-42 yingjun: hi there
00:55 boris-42 Wooot Rally is availbe in debian https://twitter.com/PavlovicBoris/status/595384972250370048
00:56 boris-42 jlk: ^
00:56 boris-42 jaypipes: ^ =)
01:01 pradeep boris-42: debain seems to be too fast
01:01 pradeep :)
01:01 boris-42 pradeep: ?)
01:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot and associate a floating IP  https://review.openstack.org/177968
01:02 pradeep boris-42: as soon as its moved from stackforge to openstack, they picked up immediatly
01:03 boris-42 pradeep: so actually Thomas is working on Mirantis and we talk about this before=)
01:03 boris-42 pradeep: even when rally was on stackforge=)
01:03 pradeep boris-42: ahh ok :)
01:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/179939
01:04 boris-42 pradeep: but in any case now need to do the same in centos=)
01:04 pradeep boris-42: True :)
01:07 boris-42 pradeep: heh
01:07 boris-42 pradeep: 4 morning need to go and sleep
01:07 pradeep boris-42: GN :)
02:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Remove _delete_all_servers() nova utils function  https://review.openstack.org/179795
03:12 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
03:29 vaidy boris-42, ping
03:31 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
03:51 anshul joined #openstack-rally
03:53 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
04:06 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
04:22 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:28 boris-42 vaidy: hi
04:29 vaidy hey
04:30 vaidy boris-42, i am almost done with the comments provided
04:30 vaidy boris-42, i will resend it for review today
04:30 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
04:30 vaidy https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179739/
04:31 boris-42 vaidy: ok great
04:35 vaidy boris-42, we alredy have the unit test for admin users do you want me to create method for non admin users?
04:36 vaidy boris-42, or use the same method and call it with different credentials?
04:36 boris-42 vaidy: not sure what you are asking
04:36 boris-42 vaidy: in case of writting unit tests it will be better to have 2 methods (one tests admin credintials) another one (admin + users)
04:37 vaidy boris-42, unit test for validating deployment check command
04:37 boris-42 vaidy: so 2 methods
04:37 vaidy boris-42, currently we have it only for admin users
04:39 boris-42 vaidy: so let me
04:39 boris-42 vaidy: left some comments
04:40 vaidy https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/tests/unit/cmd/commands/test_deployment.py#L278-L286
04:40 boris-42 vaidy: I left comment
04:40 boris-42 vaidy: so code should be fixed a bit
04:43 vaidy boris-42, yeadh
04:43 vaidy yeah
04:44 vaidy boris-42, got your point for admin we just validate from deployment and for users we validate from keystone
04:44 vaidy boris-42, hope my understanding is right
04:44 boris-42 vaidy: what do you mean validate from deployment?
04:45 boris-42 vaidy: for admin user are checking roles and listing service (for users you are just trying to authenticate)
04:45 vaidy boris-42, get it from deployment as i am currently doing
04:45 boris-42 vaidy: you are getting users as well from deployment
04:47 vaidy boris-42, client = clients.keystone()??
04:47 vaidy boris-42, may be i need more under standing on this one.
04:48 vaidy boris-42, ok
04:48 boris-42 clients = osclients.Clients(
04:48 boris-42 vaidy: ^
04:48 boris-42 after that
04:48 vaidy boris-42, we are authenticating it from keystone
04:48 boris-42 clients.keystone() will return intialized python keystone client
04:49 boris-42 with credentials that you pass to oscleints.Cleints()
04:52 vaidy boris-42, whatever i have coded still holds good
04:53 vaidy boris-42, I will have to authenticate the users which i got from deployment
04:54 vaidy boris-42, hope my understanding is right
04:54 boris-42 vaidy: nope what you did doens't work actually
04:54 boris-42 vaidy: we are not able to test it in gates unforutantelly
04:55 vaidy boris-42, it will not because it is not complete
04:55 vaidy boris-42, its half complete.. :)
04:56 boris-42 vaidy: nope it just won't work *
04:56 vaidy boris-42, the later part of your comment is not incorporated yet
04:56 boris-42 vaidy: you can't call verifed_keystone from not admin user
04:57 vaidy boris-42, yeah i agree i will have to modify that code
05:10 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:27 neeti joined #openstack-rally
05:30 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:04 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:23 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
06:34 openstackgerrit Jens Rosenboom proposed openstack/rally: Fix security groups cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/179428
06:37 svasheka joined #openstack-rally
06:38 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:40 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
06:51 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
06:56 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
07:05 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
07:08 kairat_kushaev boris-42: Boris, hello
07:08 kairat_kushaev boris-42: Do you have an example of patch where the heat test is failing with this issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1450997?
07:08 openstack Launchpad bug 1450997 in Rally "HeatStacks are not properly deleted " [High,Triaged]
07:09 kairat_kushaev boris-42: because it is not clear from logs which test is failing
07:09 kairat_kushaev boris-42: Oops, found the test definition
07:09 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: yep
07:10 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: btw it is not failing 100% of runs
07:10 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: but it is failing often
07:10 amalinow While preparing rally tests for my company, I had to add some code for test runners. What are possibilities for upstreaming this code? Should I prepare blueprint?
07:11 boris-42 amalinow: so usually we don't use blueprints
07:12 boris-42 amalinow: if you have something to discuss (or it affects a lot of code) than you should write a spec
07:12 boris-42 amalinow: if you already have some code you can just sent it on review
07:13 boris-42 amalinow: and we will decide does it require spec or not
07:13 amalinow_ joined #openstack-rally
07:13 boris-42 amalinow: works for you?
07:13 boris-42 amalinow: btw what company?)
07:13 amalinow_ I had to reload, I only saw: "we usually don't use blueprints'"
07:13 boris-42 amalinow_: ah
07:14 boris-42 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/AAZyXOum
07:14 boris-42 amalinow_: ^
07:16 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
07:16 boris-42 amalinow_: so
07:16 boris-42 amalinow_: does that work for you?
07:22 rdas joined #openstack-rally
07:29 openstackgerrit Vadim Rovachev proposed openstack/rally: Fix validation for rps parameter  https://review.openstack.org/170160
07:29 openstackgerrit Vadim Rovachev proposed openstack/rally: Fix validation for rps parameter  https://review.openstack.org/170160
07:38 karimb joined #openstack-rally
07:41 rdas joined #openstack-rally
07:42 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
07:44 boris-42 amalinow: https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/AAZyXOum
07:44 amalinow boris-42: soory, I had problems with connection, I changed client
07:45 boris-42 amalinow: no worries that paste has all my messages
07:45 amalinow boris-42: ok, looks good to me
07:45 amalinow boris-42: Intel
07:48 boris-42 amalinow: ok I will wait for your patches
07:51 amalinow boris-42: great
07:52 openstackgerrit Vadim Rovachev proposed openstack/rally: Fix validation for rps parameter  https://review.openstack.org/170160
07:54 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
07:59 redixin joined #openstack-rally
08:00 jose_lausuch joined #openstack-rally
08:03 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:12 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:14 openstackgerrit Vadim Rovachev proposed openstack/rally: Fix validation for rps parameter  https://review.openstack.org/170160
08:14 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:25 andreykurilin yfried: pong
08:27 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:28 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:39 rdas joined #openstack-rally
09:01 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/175549
09:04 openstackgerrit Kairat Kushaev proposed openstack/rally: Cleanup heat stacks 1 time per tenant  https://review.openstack.org/180068
09:14 agarciam1 joined #openstack-rally
09:17 cdent joined #openstack-rally
09:26 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:27 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
09:31 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Set default value for updated_at  https://review.openstack.org/176583
09:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to list hypervisors  https://review.openstack.org/178805
09:56 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
10:04 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
10:11 yfried joined #openstack-rally
10:15 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: okay I tested locally your patch
10:16 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: yep heat stacks are per tenant
10:16 kairat_kushaev boris-42: Ok, thanx for review
10:17 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: sorry for not accepting this patch before
10:17 kairat_kushaev boris-42: I remember there were some troubles with the whole OS
10:17 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: they are always
10:17 boris-42 kairat_kushaev: problmes with OS=)
10:18 kairat_kushaev boris-42: :)
10:22 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
10:24 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
10:25 aix joined #openstack-rally
10:34 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Shifting _generate_random_name() call to utils  https://review.openstack.org/159719
10:49 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
10:52 rvasilets_ vaidy, hi im here
10:59 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
10:59 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add MuranoPackage context  https://review.openstack.org/137650
11:02 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:03 openstackgerrit Vadim Rovachev proposed openstack/rally: Fix validation for rps parameter  https://review.openstack.org/170160
11:07 openstackgerrit Vadim Rovachev proposed openstack/rally: Fix validation for rps parameter  https://review.openstack.org/170160
11:09 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
11:12 vaidy rvasilets_, hi
11:12 vaidy rvasilets_, got it clarified from boris-42
11:12 vaidy rvasilets_, thanks
11:13 rvasilets_ )
11:13 rvasilets_ sorry for delay
11:13 vaidy no problem
11:50 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
12:06 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
12:07 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
12:09 softCloud joined #openstack-rally
12:16 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Removed task validation from api.Task.start  https://review.openstack.org/158899
12:17 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
12:26 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Add Swift to input data sources  https://review.openstack.org/178677
12:33 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:36 openstackgerrit Vitaly Gusev proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Add context and scenario for resources  https://review.openstack.org/165092
12:44 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
12:45 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Clients] Add classmethod osclients.Clients.register  https://review.openstack.org/177884
12:47 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Clients] Add classmethod osclients.Clients.register  https://review.openstack.org/177884
12:52 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
12:53 openstackgerrit Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Removed task validation from api.Task.start  https://review.openstack.org/158899
12:55 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
12:55 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] (WIP) Add Fuel scenario `list_environments'  https://review.openstack.org/178731
13:00 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: Wait for status  https://review.openstack.org/172466
13:01 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
13:01 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] More debug logging  https://review.openstack.org/170491
13:03 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] More debug logging  https://review.openstack.org/170491
13:10 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
13:13 openstackgerrit Ilya Tyaptin proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Improve create_meter function  https://review.openstack.org/180142
13:18 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: WIP: implement subunit_python_parser  https://review.openstack.org/180144
13:18 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova lock and unlock scenario  https://review.openstack.org/175912
13:22 openstackgerrit Ilya Tyaptin proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Improve create_meter function  https://review.openstack.org/180142
13:28 rook joined #openstack-rally
13:37 tosky joined #openstack-rally
13:55 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot multiple servers in one request  https://review.openstack.org/176858
13:59 kkuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
14:05 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
14:11 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
14:13 openstackgerrit Ilya Tyaptin proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Improve create_meter function  https://review.openstack.org/180142
14:37 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add functional test for task samples  https://review.openstack.org/163870
14:39 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add functional test for task samples  https://review.openstack.org/163870
14:53 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
15:15 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
15:19 openstackgerrit Alex Drahon proposed openstack/rally: Add Dockerfile for CentOS-based Rally image  https://review.openstack.org/180191
15:20 neeti joined #openstack-rally
15:20 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: DO-NOT-MERGE: add fuel scenario  https://review.openstack.org/180195
15:20 boris-42 ^ oh so active day
15:39 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
15:43 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Fix broken sample scenario for CinderVolumes.create-and-attach-volume  https://review.openstack.org/180205
15:43 openstackgerrit Vadim Rovachev proposed openstack/rally: Fix validation for rps parameter  https://review.openstack.org/170160
15:44 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Fix broken sample scenario for CinderVolumes.create-and-attach-volume  https://review.openstack.org/180205
15:50 anshul joined #openstack-rally
15:58 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] Add Fuel scenario `list_environments'  https://review.openstack.org/178731
16:00 tosky joined #openstack-rally
16:03 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Improve Image context  https://review.openstack.org/166859
16:04 boris-42 yfried: I bet you will like new meeting times=)
16:11 yfried boris-42: didn't see that
16:12 boris-42 yfried: take a look at mailing list
16:14 yfried boris-42: I'm confused do we have a mtg today?
16:16 yfried boris-42: or will it be tomorrow at 14:00 or at 13:00?
16:18 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
16:19 boris-42 yfried: we will have on 13:30 (release managment meeting(
16:19 boris-42 yfried: and on 14 regular meeting
16:19 yfried boris-42: so no mtg in 40 min?
16:20 boris-42 yfried: no meeting
16:20 boris-42 yfried: i hope now you will attend more often in meetings
16:21 yfried boris-42: me too
16:21 yfried boris-42: these are terrific news
16:21 boris-42 yfried: ?)
16:22 yfried boris-42: just saying I love the change.
16:25 boris-42 yfried: =)
16:26 boris-42 yfried: say that in mailing list=)
16:37 amaretskiy1 joined #openstack-rally
16:38 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
16:46 yfried boris-42: btw, where you guys yesterday?
16:46 yfried boris-42: is StarWars day an offical holiday at Mirantis?
17:03 andreykurilin yfried: heh
17:03 andreykurilin yfried: almost
17:04 andreykurilin yfried: StarWars day was a day off in whole Russia and Ukraine this year;)
17:09 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
17:33 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
17:38 boris-42 yfried: hm I was working LOL
17:39 boris-42 yfried: whole night lol
17:41 yfried boris-42: just remiding you I'm blocked on your plugins patches
17:42 boris-42 yfried: sure but I had to reivew a lot
17:42 boris-42 yfried: 3 days ago we had 20 OPEN without any comments ready for review patches
17:44 boris-42 yfried: so you can speed up the process
17:44 boris-42 yfried: if you help with reviews more
17:50 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:03 yfried boris-42: I know. I was working from home today and usually I do a lot of reviews when I'm at home, but my internet was down for the whole day, so...
18:03 yfried boris-42: I appologize for that
18:04 yfried boris-42: still managed to log 2-3 reviews, so ... *success baby!*
18:04 boris-42 yfried: no worries=)
18:04 boris-42 yfried: thank you for your work I really appreciate
18:06 yfried boris-42: tnx
18:07 meteorfox boris-42: yfried: hey, sorry I missed the meetings.
18:08 boris-42 meteorfox: there is no meeting today
18:09 yfried meteorfox: yeah. mtg tomorrow
18:10 boris-42 meteorfox: take a look at mailing list
18:10 meteorfox heh
18:10 yfried boris-42: meteorfox: the ML isn't clear at all
18:10 pradeep boris-42: Now every reviewer reviwing all of the openstack components right. instead if each reviewer can take primary responsibility  of one or 2 components, do you thing, things will speed up?
18:11 yfried pradeep: ^ what?
18:12 meteorfox yfried: ok, 14:00 UTC every Wednesday ?
18:12 meteorfox boris-42: ^^
18:12 pradeep s/ Now every reviewer reviewing various rally scenarios & bugs  right. instead if each reviewer can take primary responsibility  of one or 2 ( nova & cinder scenarios) components, do you thing, things will speed up?
18:12 yfried meteorfox: 13:30
18:12 pradeep yfried: ^
18:13 meteorfox yfried: ok, damn, I'm going to be late most of the time
18:14 yfried pradeep: where have you seen that? what do you meen "reviewer"? do you mean core members? because people can review what they want when they want. I'm also unaware of any sort of reviewing distributions
18:14 meteorfox yfried: that's 8:30 am here, and when daylight saving ends, it will be at 7:30 am
18:14 pradeep yfried: yes
18:14 meteorfox I guess I'll attend meetings during the summers only
18:14 pradeep core members
18:14 meteorfox lol
18:15 yfried meteorfox: well, 13:30 - 14:00 should be release related, and the main mtg starts at 1400
18:17 meteorfox yfried: yeah, I saw that in the chat log. That still will be too early for me, I usually get in between 9:30-10:00 am, so I'm going to run late most of the time
18:19 yfried meteorfox: can't you pick it up at home and then head on to the office?
18:19 meteorfox yfried: that's a good idea
18:19 yfried meteorfox: sorry. current (old) time was 20:00 for me
18:20 meteorfox yfried: If you don't mind I ask, where do you live?
18:20 yfried meteorfox: Israel. don't mind at all :)
18:20 yfried meteorfox: you?
18:20 yfried meteorfox: also, no idea how you travel, but I have a friend that has a 90min commute and he starts working on the bus via tethering.
18:20 meteorfox yfried: I'm at Texas, US. heh
18:21 meteorfox yfried: I drive, is only 15 min drive
18:22 meteorfox yfried: I live in the US, but I'm actually from Puerto Rico (still is US)
18:23 meteorfox yfried: anyway, but that's a good suggestion, I think I can attend the meeting at home, and then just head down to the office after that
18:24 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
18:25 yfried meteorfox: glad we can have you on-board
18:30 yfried meteorfox: isn't there some app for IRC to voice that you could use while driving?
18:30 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
18:31 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
18:41 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
18:59 boris-42 meteorfox: great that time works for you
18:59 boris-42 meteorfox: I think I will have soon issues with it
19:01 boris-42 pradeep: so not sure about reviewing
19:01 boris-42 pradeep: but I belive the key secret of scaling team is based on next two things
19:01 boris-42 pradeep: be a team (and work on common rules)
19:02 boris-42 pradeep: and automate everything that is possible to automate
19:02 boris-42 if CI says +1 it should mean only one patch is safe for merge
19:02 boris-42 after that we should just check that code is good written and aligned with road map
19:03 pradeep boris-42: ok
19:04 boris-42 pradeep:  so that is our goal
19:04 pradeep boris-42: got it.
19:04 boris-42 pradeep: for exmple I am going someday to start this https://github.com/stackforge/nerd-reviewer
19:05 boris-42 pradeep: that will do a part of dummy reviews (write unit tests / do better commit / fill bug report / to big patch / to much files changed / ....)
19:05 boris-42 pradeep:  will be automatically passed
19:05 pradeep boris-42: i was not aware of this nerd-reviewer.
19:05 * pradeep checking
19:06 boris-42 pradeep: so it's not done yet
19:06 boris-42 need to find the time to work on it
19:06 yfried pradeep: boris-42: where did the idea for devision of reivews come from?
19:07 boris-42 yfried: not sure maybe tempest?
19:07 pradeep yfried:  hehe. :)  just a thought.
19:07 boris-42 pradeep: for example
19:07 yfried pradeep: as boris-42 and I discussed, we need to decouple the code as much as we can so openstack code is not tied up with rally engine code
19:07 boris-42 yfried: yep
19:07 boris-42 yfried: and we can have nerd reviewer rule
19:07 boris-42 yfried: that will check that engine and plugins are not changed in single patch
19:08 yfried pradeep: that way, reviewers can focus on their strong zones
19:08 boris-42 yfried: as well if we make 2 repos one with plugins for openstack another with rally core
19:08 yfried boris-42: only once the split is clear
19:08 boris-42 yfried: split is VERY VERY OBVIOUS
19:08 boris-42 yfried: all SLA pulugins => are common
19:08 boris-42 yfried: all Runners plugins => are common
19:09 boris-42 yfried: all context (except dummy) => are openstack
19:09 yfried boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179644/ this has to pass
19:09 boris-42 yfried:  all scenarios (except request and dummy) => are openstack
19:09 boris-42 yfried:  ^ could you add that to spec please
19:09 yfried boris-42: good idea
19:09 boris-42 yfried: in workitems
19:10 boris-42 yfried: because really task is clear and easy
19:10 boris-42 yfried: just pass it instead of your two step solution
19:10 boris-42 yfried: and I will be happy to put +2 on it
19:10 boris-42 so sorry guys I have to go
19:10 yfried boris-42: though this is just an observation of current status. no one says we won't have some new ctx that wouldn't be openstack related
19:10 yfried boris-42: will do
19:11 boris-42 yfried: and they will go to common/* or something_else/*
19:11 boris-42 yfried: but current (including on review) are all mostly openstack/*
19:11 boris-42 yfried: so I belive that we should push some stronger effort
19:11 yfried boris-42: still, it is blocked by plugin patches
19:11 boris-42 yfried: nope it is not
19:11 boris-42 yfried: I can always rebase
19:12 boris-42 yfried: and I am mostly changing base.py that won't be affected by your refactoring
19:12 yfried boris-42: IMO it is, cause they all should have a single ancestor that defines them
19:12 boris-42 yfried: ?
19:12 boris-42 yfried: there is NO blockers now
19:12 boris-42 yfried: you will just cause maybe small simple to fix merge conflicts with plugin base
19:13 boris-42 yfried: everything will work no matter where they are
19:13 boris-42 yfried: could you just start moving stuff?
19:14 boris-42 yfried: like first step move all context to rally/plugins/openstack/context/* and rally/plguins/common/context/*
19:14 yfried boris-42: I just like your patch because it makes things simpler, and more organized. I really want it to land before I start moving things around
19:14 yfried boris-42: but I agree it's not a HARD blocker
19:14 boris-42 yfried: yep
19:14 boris-42 yfried: so you can start moving and we will merge part of your patches
19:14 boris-42 and when my will be finished we will land them
19:15 boris-42 Okay now really have to go
19:16 yfried boris-42: "see" you tomorrow. good night
19:27 subscope_ joined #openstack-rally
19:34 stpierre anyone have any clever ideas what might be going on with the tests here? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174894/
19:34 stpierre i've rechecked, same failure
20:35 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
20:38 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
20:50 _dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
20:59 frobware_ joined #openstack-rally
21:13 anshul joined #openstack-rally
22:30 kun_huang joined #openstack-rally
22:31 dmellado joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary