Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-05-07

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:27 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:28 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
02:30 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:56 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
04:07 yfried joined #openstack-rally
04:18 abitha joined #openstack-rally
04:28 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
04:51 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
04:59 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:05 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:13 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:20 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
05:50 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:53 neeti joined #openstack-rally
05:57 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:58 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
06:05 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:17 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:19 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:20 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
06:25 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:26 kairat_kushaev joined #openstack-rally
06:29 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
06:40 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
07:18 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Release 0.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/180498
07:20 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Release 0.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/180498
07:21 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Release 0.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/180498
07:22 jose_lausuch joined #openstack-rally
07:35 frickler stpierry: that will be me, added some comments to the review
07:54 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:02 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:08 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:12 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: Split SLA to base and plugins  https://review.openstack.org/180509
08:12 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: Split runners to base and plugins  https://review.openstack.org/180904
08:12 yfried boris-42: ^ please check out my newest try.
08:16 yfried amaretskiy: boris-42: how do I "recheck" Mirantis CI (not jenkins)
08:17 amaretskiy yfried: type "recheck rally"
08:18 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:18 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:23 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:49 fhubik_afk joined #openstack-rally
08:49 yfried amaretskiy: tnx. do you know why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180509/7 failed?
08:50 amaretskiy yfried: afaik gates are dead for now :(
08:51 yfried amaretskiy: so system failure, and not mine? great!
08:51 amaretskiy yfried: i think we just have to wait
09:03 yfried amaretskiy: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180508/3 andreykurilin
09:04 yfried amaretskiy: btw "recheck rally" triggered jenkins as well
09:04 amaretskiy yfried: great! I believe I will review this soon
09:04 yfried amaretskiy: don't get too excited. this patch only creates 3 __init__.py files :)
09:05 yfried boris-42: are you around?
09:05 amaretskiy yfried: oh yes.... :)
09:14 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:23 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
09:25 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:30 cdent joined #openstack-rally
09:35 redixin joined #openstack-rally
09:38 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
09:38 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add MuranoPackage context  https://review.openstack.org/137650
09:39 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
09:59 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
10:20 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
10:21 yfried amaretskiy: is the gate still broke?
10:22 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Release 0.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/180498
10:23 amaretskiy yfried: I don't know, I usually type "recheck" and see what is happening
10:23 yfried amaretskiy: http://logs.openstack.org/49/168849/6/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/99ed110/console.html
10:23 yfried amaretskiy: I think we have a bug in the gate
10:23 yfried amaretskiy: see the Traceback
10:25 amaretskiy yfried: something is wrong with heat
10:37 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
10:38 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
10:48 amaretskiy yfried: this seems to be a cause of broken gates: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170608/
10:50 frobware_ joined #openstack-rally
10:50 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
10:57 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
10:58 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
10:58 amaretskiy yfried: here is fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180937/
11:07 panbalag joined #openstack-rally
11:16 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
11:25 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
11:29 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Gates] Disable Heat scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/180948
11:35 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Gates] Revert `Disable Heat scenarios'  https://review.openstack.org/180949
11:44 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
11:47 dmellado boris-42: pong
11:47 dmellado are you around?
11:49 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
11:52 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
11:54 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
11:56 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Release 0.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/180498
11:57 softCloud joined #openstack-rally
12:01 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
12:06 yfried__ amaretskiy: andreykurilin: redixin: I'm seeing something weird: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/mistral/test_workbooks.py#L51
12:07 yfried__ when I'm running tests via "tox -e py27" it works fine
12:07 yfried__ everything passes
12:07 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
12:07 yfried__ but executing this test returns AttributeError: 'MistralWorkbooks' object has no attribute 'create_delete_workbook'
12:08 yfried__ which seems reasonable since it really doesn't have that attribute. anyone knows what's up with that?
12:08 yfried__ akuznetsova: ping
12:09 akuznetsova yfried__, pong
12:09 yfried__ akuznetsova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144320/
12:09 yfried__ is this your patch?
12:09 akuznetsova yfried__, yes
12:10 yfried__ akuznetsova: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/mistral/test_workbooks.py#L51 please see my above question
12:11 boris-42 yfried__: hi there
12:11 boris-42 yfried__: what's up?
12:11 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
12:11 yfried__ boris-42: working on the "move"
12:11 boris-42 yfried__: do not forget one thing
12:11 yfried__ boris-42: trying to follow your guide re backword comp
12:11 boris-42 yfried__: you should import all modules*
12:11 yfried__ boris-42: what do you mean?
12:12 boris-42 yfried__: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/__init__.py
12:12 boris-42 yfried__: regarding to backward compability
12:12 boris-42 yfried__: we should take care only about base.py modules (to make sure that htey are on the same place)
12:13 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
12:13 yfried__ boris-42: no idea what that import does/mean
12:13 yfried__ akuznetsova: ?
12:13 amaretskiy yfried__: this test is broken
12:14 yfried__ amaretskiy: the Mistral test?
12:14 amaretskiy yfried__: mistral tests are not executed at all because there is no __ini__.py
12:14 amaretskiy __init__.py
12:14 amaretskiy in tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/mistral/
12:14 amaretskiy :)
12:15 yfried__ amaretskiy: ok. so I should make sure there's no init file in test/unit/.../mistral?
12:15 boris-42 amaretskiy: it can't be borken
12:15 boris-42 amaretskiy: or maybe
12:15 amaretskiy https://github.com/openstack/rally/tree/master/tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/mistral
12:16 boris-42 amaretskiy: seems you are right
12:16 akuznetsova oops
12:16 boris-42 =(
12:17 boris-42 sad that we merged that..
12:17 amaretskiy boris-42: we need a checker for __init__.py on gates
12:17 yfried__ amaretskiy: boris-42: akuznetsova: now they are being executed in my patch (plugin migration). the __init__ file is still missing, so that's not the reason they are skiiped
12:19 amaretskiy yfried__: I run tox on master - result is OK, then add __init__.py and got expected error
12:19 yfried__ amaretskiy: init in mistral dir or in tests dir?
12:20 yfried__ amaretskiy: anyway that doesn't work for me
12:20 amaretskiy yfried__: so if your tests do fail on master, then your way of running tests is different
12:20 yfried__ amaretskiy: I'll push the patch and you'll see
12:20 yfried__ tox -e py27
12:20 amaretskiy $ touch tests/unit/benchmark/scenarios/mistral/__init__.py
12:20 akuznetsova I will prepare fix for test
12:20 amaretskiy yfried__: I run "tox -e py27" and all results are as expected
12:23 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
12:24 yfried__ amaretskiy: me too. but on my work branch it doesn't work the same
12:25 amaretskiy yfried__: maybe __init__.pyc still exist
12:25 amaretskiy yfried__: anyway the main question about test looks solved
12:26 yfried__ amaretskiy: I'll take a look
12:27 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
12:28 akuznetsova yfried__, boris-42 do I need to report bug first or I can just create a commit ?
12:29 dmellado hey boris-42
12:29 dmellado did you ping me yesterday? ;)
12:30 boris-42 akuznetsova: create commit
12:30 boris-42 dmellado: yep we implemented register method in osclients
12:31 dmellado oh great, I'll have a look
12:31 dmellado would you have a link to the commit?
12:31 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
12:32 yfried__ boris-42: akuznetsova: well, it's a bug, so for tracking reasons it would be better to create a bug (1 line of description) so your commit can point to it as Closes-bug
12:33 akuznetsova yfried__, yes, I meant it
12:34 yfried__ akuznetsova: then go ahead
12:34 akuznetsova yfried__, I am already in progress
12:34 boris-42 dmellado: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180937/
12:35 dmellado thanks boris-42
12:39 openstackgerrit Anastasia Kuznetsova proposed openstack/rally: Fix Mistral unit tests  https://review.openstack.org/180974
12:40 akuznetsova boris-42, yfried__ , amaretskiy patch is ready ^
12:40 amaretskiy ok
12:42 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
12:43 yfried__ boris-42: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180508/ please comment if you think these __init__ files should contain some imports
12:54 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
13:07 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:12 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
13:14 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
13:16 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
13:26 openstackstatus joined #openstack-rally
13:26 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
13:34 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
14:05 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Implement subunit_parser  https://review.openstack.org/180144
14:10 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Implement subunit_parser  https://review.openstack.org/180144
14:21 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Fix security groups cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/179428
14:22 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
14:25 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
14:37 panbalag amaretskiy, Hi
14:37 amaretskiy panbalag: hi
14:38 panbalag amaretskiy, I'm responding to one of your comments "Restructured text provides numeric lists:#. Item 1#. Item 2" in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166487/6/doc/specs/in-progress/common-rally-verify.rst
14:38 panbalag amaretskiy, what exactly did you mean? did you want to replace 1. 2. etc with # item 1, # item 2 etc?
14:40 amaretskiy panbalag: RestructuredText is a markup language that is useful for generating docs in different formats (usually to HTML) - so there is special markup for lists generation
14:40 amaretskiy panbalag: open http://rst.ninjs.org/
14:41 amaretskiy panbalag: and play with lists
14:41 amaretskiy panbalag: also there is a reference http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#enumerated-lists
14:42 panbalag amaretskiy, I'll follow this example. Thanks
14:46 dmellado panbalag: I highly recommend you to take a look at this too :)
14:46 dmellado http://sphinx-doc.org/
14:46 dmellado you can get there examples with rst
14:51 frickler stpierre: we are still getting python3.4 errors: http://paste.openstack.org/show/216216/ (and Hi, I'm Jens ;)
14:52 frickler also Mirantis CI seems broken, http://185.8.56.88/logs/TrXpnGDIAbhaSlMw/tox-ecli-py27-postgres-dsvm/ gives me a 404
14:52 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
14:54 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
14:54 panbalag dmellado, Thanks. I'll try it out
14:56 klindgren__ joined #openstack-rally
14:57 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
15:03 panbalag amaretskiy, I forgot the sequence of commands to send out the file for review..is it git add , git commit and then git review?
15:03 fhubik_afk joined #openstack-rally
15:04 amaretskiy panbalag: yes, but do not forget to be sure that your patch is rebased to up-to-date master, and run tox before `git review' to be sure that everything is fine with tests
15:05 pboros joined #openstack-rally
15:05 panbalag whats the command to rebase? git pull?
15:05 panbalag amaretskiy,  whats the command to rebase? git pull?
15:05 amaretskiy `git rebase master'
15:05 amaretskiy yes, you need to checkout master and run git pull
15:06 amaretskiy and then checkout back to patch branch and run rebase if required
15:11 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE. Test  https://review.openstack.org/181031
15:16 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
15:18 frickler gate-rally-dsvm-rally is still not running with heat, it seems
15:20 panbalag amaretskiy, there are few tox tests that fail because of  "ImportError: No module named 'boto'" . It is probably some package missing in my python installation..any idea what this is?
15:20 amaretskiy rm -rf .tox
15:21 amaretskiy so next time when tox is run it reinstalls updated dependencies from test-requirements.txt
15:24 panbalag amaretskiy, ok. let me try  that
15:28 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
15:32 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Fix security groups cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/179428
15:36 panbalag amaretskiy, that worked. Thanks
15:42 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
15:49 pboros joined #openstack-rally
15:57 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
16:00 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
16:12 openstackgerrit Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: [WIP][Ceilometer] Add  scenario for events and traits  https://review.openstack.org/180514
16:49 frickler so the infra ppl confirmed that the rally job should be running with heat enabled, still it fails here: http://logs.openstack.org/28/179428/7/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/3a24ab4/console.html#_2015-05-07_15_54_32_553
16:54 frickler http://logs.openstack.org/28/179428/7/check/gate-rally-dsvm-rally/3a24ab4/console.html#_2015-05-07_15_54_16_076 does not see heat in the services list, though
16:58 openstackgerrit Prasanth Anbalagan proposed openstack/rally: Specs to modify rally verify  https://review.openstack.org/181078
17:00 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
17:01 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
17:02 boris-42 frickler: we know
17:03 boris-42 frickler: they deleted it
17:03 boris-42 frickler: from default and didn't say
17:03 boris-42 frickler: to rally team
17:04 boris-42 frickler: I don't know the polite word to describe what I think about the person who did this
17:11 panbalag boris-42, regarding the new review request. Since rally changed  from stackforge to openstack, amaretskiy suggested cloning the repo again from https://github.com/openstack/rally and copying files over there.
17:12 boris-42 panbalag: so that was the bad idea 2 times
17:12 boris-42 panbalag: first of all the only thing that you need to do with old repo is to remove gerrit remote
17:12 boris-42 panbalag: and run "git review -s"
17:13 panbalag boris-42, oh I didnt know that
17:13 boris-42 panbalag: after git pull all changes
17:13 boris-42 panbalag: the second bad advice was to copy changes
17:13 boris-42 panbalag: if you chose to keep new repo do the next thing
17:13 boris-42 panbalag: git checkout master
17:13 boris-42 panbalag: git checkout -b your_new_branch
17:14 boris-42 panbalag: and on gerrit page of all patch find the "cherry-pick" tab
17:14 boris-42 panbalag: copy-paste this command and run inside your repo
17:17 panbalag boris-42, which command ?
17:18 panbalag boris-42, I still have the old repo (just renamed it to a temp directory..did not delete it)..can I just change the gerrit remote there and run "git review -s" ? and is there a way to delete the new one?
17:20 frickler boris-42: yes, but the patch to restore it was merged and yet we are still seeing errors
17:21 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
17:25 boris-42 frickler because it doens't return
17:25 boris-42 heat
17:25 panbalag boris-42, what does the command inside "cherry-pick" tab do?
17:26 boris-42 panbalag: it copy-paste your commit from gerrit
17:26 boris-42 panbalag: to your local repo
17:26 boris-42 panbalag: in the rigth way
17:28 panbalag boris-42, I'm a bit confused. So are we trying to overwrite the new review request with the old review request? or somehow copy the comments from old one to new one?
17:29 panbalag boris-42, I would rather prefer keeping the old review request because all the comments are there .
17:32 boris-42 panbalag: so to continue work on old review
17:32 boris-42 panbalag: you need to keep only one thing in commit message
17:32 boris-42 panbalag: change-id
17:32 boris-42 panbalag: but proper way to get in new repo patch
17:33 boris-42 panbalag: is to cherry-pick it
17:33 boris-42 panbalag: and you have link in your old review that allows you to do this
17:35 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
17:37 panbalag boris-42, ok. also what should be the new gerrit remote path? ssh://<user>@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/rally.git?
17:42 boris-42 panbalag: you should do the next
17:42 boris-42 git remote remove gerrit
17:42 boris-42 git checkout master
17:42 boris-42 git pull
17:42 boris-42 git review -s
17:42 boris-42 this will do all that you need and setup new remote
17:42 boris-42 don't do this by hands
17:43 panbalag boris-42, ok let me do that
17:44 frickler hmm, looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169709/1/stackrc maybe we need "h-eng,h-api,h-api-cfn,h-api-cw" back in enabled_services instead of "heat"?
17:44 frickler boris-42: ^^
17:44 boris-42 frickler: we are already working on this
17:45 boris-42 frickler: redixin actually
17:45 frickler k, thx
17:45 boris-42 frickler: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181088/
17:53 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
18:07 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:16 openstackgerrit Prasanth Anbalagan proposed openstack/rally: Rally verify support for any in-tree Openstack project functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/166487
18:16 openstackgerrit Prasanth Anbalagan proposed openstack/rally: Addressed comments from patchset 6.  https://review.openstack.org/181103
18:17 panbalag boris-42, I did use the cherry-pick from old review request. But looks like again a new request has been generated.
18:18 stpierre you need to amend the commit
18:18 boris-42 stpierre: actually cherry-pick should be ok
18:18 stpierre cherry-pick, amend, review
18:19 * stpierre prefers 'git review -d' to cherry-pick, but that's an underwear problem. in the end you need to review a single commit -- that's a hard requirement
18:20 panbalag boris-42, stpierre, how do I delete the requests https://review.openstack.org/181103 and https://review.openstack.org/181078.
18:20 stpierre there's an "Abandon Change" button
18:23 stpierre panbalag: once you get used to gerrit it's actually pretty slick, but it's got a doozy of a learning curve.
18:24 panbalag stpierre, Thanks. yeah. I'm still getting used to it.
18:24 boris-42 stpierre: heeh
18:24 boris-42 stpierre: +1
18:24 boris-42 stpierre: but overall after you learn it it's nice
18:25 boris-42 stpierre: https://twitter.com/PavlovicBoris/status/596376891562598400
18:25 boris-42 panbalag: ^
18:25 boris-42 WOOT
18:25 gema_ joined #openstack-rally
18:25 boris-42 frickler: okay patch that fix rally gates
18:25 boris-42 isg going to be merged soon
18:26 stpierre sweet!
18:26 stpierre (on both counts)
18:26 panbalag boris-42, stpierre, so everytime I want to modify the patch and post it for review, I need to do a cherry-pick from previous version , git amend and git review?
18:27 boris-42 panbalag: nope
18:28 boris-42 panbalag: cherry-pick is just copy-paste function in git
18:28 boris-42 panbalag: so you copy patch from review and paste inside your local repo
18:28 boris-42 panbalag: after that you should just amend + send on review
18:28 stpierre panbalag: you've got a number of possible workflows: 1) keep a persistent branch for work on a given feature/bug; amend the HEAT commit and review for each patchset; 2) 'git review -d' to download the current patch in gerrit, amend, then 'git review -f' to review it and delete the temporary branch; 3) keep a persistent branch for work on a given feature/bug; make new commits to that branch, then squash the branch to master to review.
18:28 stpierre i'm sure there are others. i use a mix of 1 and 2, but i know 3 has its adherents
18:29 stpierre 2 is mainly useful when you're collaborating with someone else on a single patch, because you always get the latest version of the patch in gerrit
18:30 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
18:30 stpierre just remember: nearly every git problem can be solved with MOAR BRANCHES
18:32 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
18:44 exploreshaifali_ joined #openstack-rally
18:52 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve installation script  https://review.openstack.org/162418
19:02 openstackgerrit Omar Khalid proposed openstack/rally: Changes for scenario for VM-VM throughput L2/L3 For now it supports iperf/TCP but plan is to support nuttcp by adding a new nuttcp class Once my other boot_hypervisor_test review is merged i will provide ability to control same/different host  https://review.openstack.org/151905
19:04 panbalag boris-42, do you know how I can execute "gate-rally-dsvm-rally" test locally?
19:06 panbalag boris-42, the logs show "Benchmark HeatStacks.list_stacks_and_resources[0] has wrong configuration.. Invalid scenario argument: 'Service is not available: heat'". I dont understand what the specs has got anything to do with this
19:10 karimb joined #openstack-rally
19:13 boris-42 panbalag: Rally gates are broken
19:13 boris-42 panbalag: they should be soon fixed
19:13 boris-42 stpierre> just remember: nearly every git problem can be solved with MOAR BRANCHES
19:13 boris-42 LOL
19:14 panbalag boris-42, now if I just want to re execute the tests once gates are fixed, how do I do that?
19:15 panbalag boris-42, does jenkins do it automatically?
19:16 boris-42 panbalag: you should write "recheck" in commit message
19:32 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
19:55 boris-42 HOLA
19:55 boris-42 gates are unblocked
19:55 boris-42 finally
20:28 stpierre are we blocked on something else now? it looks like the tox-ecli-py**-postgres-dsvm tests are reliably failing with no obvious error message
20:30 boris-42 stpierre: so I think it's the different issue
20:30 boris-42 stpierre: I hope redixin will fix it
20:30 boris-42 stpierre: however it's not blocking like Jenkins
20:30 boris-42 stpierre: so 2 patches are going to be merged
20:46 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
20:47 boris-42 stpierre: turned it off
20:47 boris-42 stpierre: unit it will be fixed
20:51 stpierre cool
20:56 boris-42 stpierre: seems like we should add more jobs
20:56 boris-42 stpierre: and organize better where benchmarks are run *
20:58 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
20:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix broken samples scenario for CinderVolumes.create-and-attach-volume  https://review.openstack.org/180205
21:04 baker joined #openstack-rally
21:06 exploreshaifali_ joined #openstack-rally
21:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Remove sla from Heat scenarios in MOS job  https://review.openstack.org/180467
21:24 msdubov__ joined #openstack-rally
21:44 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/180605
21:52 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Speed up and reorganize rally jobs  https://review.openstack.org/181163
21:56 openstackgerrit Omar Khalid proposed openstack/rally: Changes for scenario for VM-VM throughput L2/L3 For now it supports iperf/TCP but plan is to support nuttcp by adding a new nuttcp class Once my other boot_hypervisor_test review is merged i will provide ability to control same/different host  https://review.openstack.org/151905
22:08 openstackgerrit Omar Khalid proposed openstack/rally: Changes for scenario for VM-VM throughput L2/L3 For now it supports iperf/TCP but plan is to support nuttcp by adding a new nuttcp class Once my other boot_hypervisor_test review is merged i will provide ability to control same/different host  https://review.openstack.org/151905
22:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Fix RALLY_SCENARIO filename in rally-gate.py  https://review.openstack.org/180525
22:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Creates "plugins" tree  https://review.openstack.org/180508
22:38 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
23:40 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Speed up and reorganize rally jobs  https://review.openstack.org/181163
23:41 abitha joined #openstack-rally
23:43 abitha boris-42: Hi Boris, i have a question about adding test package to rally
23:44 boris-42 abitha: hi there
23:44 abitha one of the test scenario im doing requires the use of scp. I see that rally has paramiko but no scp... how do i go about adding scp support?
23:45 abitha do we just add it to our test-requirement.txt?
23:45 boris-42 abitha: first of all which library is it?
23:45 abitha https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scp
23:45 boris-42 abitha: the second thing test-requirments.txt are requirements required during the testing
23:46 boris-42 abitha: no such lib here https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt
23:47 boris-42 abitha: so it will be quite problematic to add it
23:47 abitha ok so this package needs to be in the global requirement
23:47 boris-42 abitha: yep otherwice our CI will fail
23:47 abitha ok ill find another way then
23:48 abitha thanks
23:49 boris-42 abitha: np
23:49 boris-42 abitha: you can calll it from shutil
23:49 boris-42 abitha: or something like that
23:50 abitha oh ok. thanks :)

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary