Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-05-11

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:33 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
00:36 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:01 fhubik_lunch joined #openstack-rally
01:11 fhubik_lunch joined #openstack-rally
01:20 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
01:54 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:25 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
02:33 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:49 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
03:22 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:29 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:33 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
03:34 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:39 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed openstack/rally: Fixes devstack repo  https://review.openstack.org/181304
03:54 jjmb1 joined #openstack-rally
04:05 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
04:23 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
04:51 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:53 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
05:09 neeti joined #openstack-rally
05:23 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
05:41 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:03 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:22 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
06:23 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
06:52 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
07:22 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
07:24 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
07:29 openstackgerrit Li Yingjun proposed openstack/rally: Validate tenant related scenarios when using keystone v3  https://review.openstack.org/181321
07:31 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:52 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
08:18 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:23 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:24 yfried joined #openstack-rally
08:25 yfried andreykurilin1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168849/
08:25 yfried andreykurilin1: this is waiting for you :)
08:28 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Remove executable bit from files that should not be executable  https://review.openstack.org/181373
09:20 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:31 cdent joined #openstack-rally
09:33 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
09:41 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
09:42 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
09:46 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
09:54 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
09:56 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
10:22 vaidy andreykurilin1, ping
10:22 vaidy boris-42, ping
10:23 vaidy yfried, ping
10:26 yfried vaidy: hey
10:26 vaidy yfried, hi
10:27 vaidy yfried, have a question regarding deployment create command
10:27 vaidy yfried, deployment create --fromenv commands creates the users and tags them as admin even they are normal user
10:27 vaidy yfried, i think that is wrong
10:28 vaidy yfried, that needs to be verified and created
10:28 yfried vaidy: what do you mean "tags them as admin"?
10:28 vaidy yfried, if you see the db entry for permission column all the users have admin tagged to them even if they are non admin users
10:29 vaidy yfried, which is wrong
10:30 yfried vaidy: I've never worked with non-admin users in rally. is this part of new users-accounts feature?
10:30 yfried vaidy: anyway, seems to me you are right. maybe post a bug?
10:31 vaidy yfried, for instance say a default devstack instance create 3 users admin/demo/alt_demo
10:31 yfried vaidy: ok
10:31 vaidy yfried, admin should have admin permission and demo and alt_demo should have users permission
10:31 vaidy yfried, but the db entries have admin for all 3 users
10:32 yfried vaidy: ok
10:32 vaidy yfried, which if not correct
10:32 yfried vaidy: I understand
10:32 yfried vaidy: as I've said - seems like a bug
10:32 vaidy yfried, yeah i will go ahead and post a bug with details
10:33 vaidy yfried, thanks
10:33 vaidy yfried, because this affects my other fix
10:33 vaidy :)
10:33 yfried vaidy: sure
10:34 vaidy yfried, i can't validate if its admin of a normal user because deployment.get doesn't return anything for normal users
10:34 vaidy yfried, thanks will post a bug though
10:34 yfried vaidy: I have no idea what you are talking about. sorry
10:43 vaidy yfried, no problem, i have posted a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1453758
10:43 openstack vaidy: Error: malone bug 1453758 not found
11:07 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
11:21 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
11:30 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
11:32 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
11:53 softCloud joined #openstack-rally
11:59 openstackgerrit Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Release 0.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/180498
12:05 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
12:18 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
12:20 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
12:43 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
12:48 frickler boris-42: would you prefer if we split https://review.openstack.org/179428 into two patches so that we can discuss the change to secgroup.py seperately?
12:50 jjmb joined #openstack-rally
12:50 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
12:50 boris-42 frickler: changes are just wrong
12:50 boris-42 frickler: we don't need to split them because there is nothing to discuss there
12:50 boris-42 frickler: you can use this context with any of benchmark scenarios
12:51 boris-42 frickler: and it will create and won't delete any sec groups
12:51 frickler boris-42: wrong, it will try to delete them twice and I get errors for the second try
12:51 boris-42 frickler: which produce bigger issue than one that you are trying to fix
12:51 boris-42 frickler: nope
12:52 boris-42 frickler: it will try to delete them twice only because we have currently issues with cleanup mechanism and cleanups inside context
12:52 boris-42 frickler: and this will happen only if cleanup context is used
12:53 boris-42 frickler: that deletes secgroups
12:53 boris-42 frickler: and it is not use for all scenarios
12:53 frickler so is there a different bug report for that?
12:53 frickler but o.k., so I'll just remove that part of the change
12:53 boris-42 frickler: it's not bug*
12:54 boris-42 frickler: it's just bad framework
12:54 boris-42 frickler: and for now we don't know how to fix it properly
12:54 boris-42 frickler: wtakase is working on improvment of cleanup mechansim
12:54 boris-42 frickler: part of those changes are related
12:55 boris-42 frickler: to isolation of resources create by ctx and scenario
12:56 boris-42 frickler: you can rewrite that code that deletes secuirity group
12:56 boris-42 frickler: in next way
12:56 boris-42 list of security groups / send delete requests if they exist
12:57 boris-42 so it won't pring warnings message
12:58 boris-42 but I would prefer to do this in separated patch anyway
12:58 boris-42 frickler: ^
12:59 frickler boris-42: yeah, I agree, so let me first update the current patch
13:00 boris-42 frickler: yep
13:00 boris-42 frickler: btw are you going to attend summit?
13:03 frickler boris-42: yep
13:03 boris-42 frickler: so Rally has 1 talk + 3 design sessions
13:04 flamebot joined #openstack-rally
13:09 openstackgerrit Jens Rosenboom proposed openstack/rally: Fix security groups cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/179428
13:09 frickler boris-42: yes, I added them to my schedule, but I'm currently still like 3x overbooked most of the time :D
13:10 boris-42 frickler: lol
13:11 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:11 frickler mostly comes from being op + dev at the same time, I really hope that the Ops Summit will get separated next time
13:13 boris-42 frickler: heh
13:13 boris-42 frickler: I don't know who I am
13:13 boris-42 =)
13:42 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
13:45 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
13:49 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
13:54 tosky joined #openstack-rally
13:55 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
13:59 vaidy boris-42, ping
14:07 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
14:11 rook joined #openstack-rally
14:17 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
14:20 openstack joined #openstack-rally
14:30 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/181915
14:33 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:34 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
14:35 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:35 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
14:35 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:48 vaidy boris-42, https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1453758
14:48 openstack vaidy: Error: malone bug 1453758 not found
14:48 vaidy boris-42, i feel this should be fixed to get the other bug you assigned me to be working
15:01 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
15:14 boris-42 vaidy: I do not understand that bug
15:14 boris-42 vaidy: could you provide more details?
15:17 vaidy boris-42, hi
15:18 vaidy boris-42, you remember you had given me this bug to fix?
15:18 vaidy https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1449760
15:18 openstack Launchpad bug 1449760 in Rally "Rally deployment check doesn't check "users" credentials " [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Vaidyanath (vaidyanath-m)
15:18 vaidy boris-42, when i was testing this i found that when i execute "rally deployment create --fromenv"
15:19 vaidy boris-42, the db gets updated with permission for users
15:19 vaidy boris-42, in my case the devstack have admin/demo/alt_demo all 2 users get the permission as admin in the db
15:20 rook joined #openstack-rally
15:22 boris-42 vaidy: so please give me some context...
15:22 boris-42 vaidy: what is "I was testing this"
15:23 boris-42 vaidy: regarding to "rally deployment create --fromenv" -> it's just shortcut and it requires that you have admin users in admin tenant inside the global env variables
15:24 vaidy boris-42, even if I have demo and demo in global env variables "rally deployment create --fromenv" will create the deployment
15:26 boris-42 vaidy: yep
15:26 boris-42 vaidy: it will
15:27 boris-42 vaidy: even if you have invalid user it will create
15:27 vaidy boris-42, so both admin and demo gets the permission column updated as "admin"
15:29 vaidy boris-42, i am talking in the context of database
15:30 vaidy boris-42, the database table deployment has a column permission which gets a value admin for both users admin and demo
15:30 vaidy boris-42, which is wrong
15:34 boris-42 vaidy: hm
15:34 boris-42 vaidy: in any case this won't be used in future and it is not used for now
15:35 vaidy boris-42, didn't get you
15:35 boris-42 vaidy: this column is not used
15:36 vaidy boris-42, ok in that case coming back to (what is "I was testing this")
15:36 boris-42 vaidy: so this column https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L84 ?
15:36 vaidy boris-42, hope you remember you assigned me the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/144976
15:36 boris-42 vaidy: or values inside it
15:36 openstack Launchpad bug 144976 in GetDeb Software Portal "Create package: vnstat" [Wishlist,Fix released]
15:37 boris-42 vaidy: seems like it's not bug that I asked you...
15:38 vaidy boris-42, deployment check for normal users
15:38 boris-42 vaidy: so yep
15:38 boris-42 vaidy: this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1449760
15:38 openstack Launchpad bug 1449760 in Rally "Rally deployment check doesn't check "users" credentials " [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Vaidyanath (vaidyanath-m)
15:39 boris-42 vaidy: ^ you forgot last 0
15:39 vaidy boris-42, sorry typo
15:40 vaidy boris-42, on what basis should I validate the admin users and normal users
15:41 boris-42 vaidy: if it is in deploymnet.get("admin") - it must be admin
15:41 boris-42 vaidy: in deployment.get("users") - you have users that are not admin
15:42 boris-42 vaidy: as we discussed in your patch before (you shouldn't touch existing code)
15:42 boris-42 vaidy: and just add after it few lines of code
15:42 vaidy boris-42, ok
15:42 boris-42 vaidy: that just creates osclients.Clients instance and run keystone()
15:43 vaidy boris-42, fine
15:43 vaidy boris-42, but just getting to know the complete flow
15:44 vaidy boris-42, understanding the bits and parts of rally so that in future it will be easy to fix future bugs
15:44 vaidy boris-42, please bare with me
15:44 boris-42 vaidy: yep sure
15:45 boris-42 vaidy: so you can actually improve deployment create plugin
15:46 boris-42 vaidy: this https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/deploy/engines/existing.py#L134-L144
15:47 boris-42 vaidy: so you can raise exceptions if no such users or so on
15:47 vaidy boris-42, sure this seems to be a good scope for inprovement
15:48 vaidy boris-42, yes
15:49 boris-42 vaidy: but it should be separated change
15:49 boris-42 vaidy: imho
15:49 vaidy boris-42, yes that will be a seperate activity
15:49 vaidy boris-42, will try to create a new bug and will take up that
15:52 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/181915
15:57 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
16:33 tosky joined #openstack-rally
16:36 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
16:37 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
16:55 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/171625
16:58 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
17:00 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
17:03 tosky joined #openstack-rally
17:08 baker joined #openstack-rally
17:15 turul joined #openstack-rally
17:16 boris-42 frickler: hey
17:16 boris-42 frickler: can we do cleanup of security groups without this hack: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179428/8/rally/benchmark/context/users.py
17:39 openstackstatus NOTICE: We have discovered post-upgrade issues with Gerrit affecting nova (and potentially other projects). Some changes will not appear and some actions, such as queries, may return an error. We are continuing to investigate.
17:39 Topic for #openstack-rally is now We have discovered post-upgrade issues with Gerrit affecting nova (and potentially other projects). Some changes will not appear and some actions, such as queries, may return an error. We are continuing to investigate.
17:46 fresh joined #openstack-rally
17:54 cdent joined #openstack-rally
18:00 baker joined #openstack-rally
18:02 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
18:12 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
18:19 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:24 igormarnat_ joined #openstack-rally
18:26 yfried joined #openstack-rally
18:27 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
18:27 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
18:27 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
18:27 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
18:27 svasheka joined #openstack-rally
18:35 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:52 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
19:02 baker joined #openstack-rally
19:03 baker joined #openstack-rally
19:12 boris-42 frickler: you can put any order number to secuirty group cleanup
19:12 boris-42 frickler: so it will be cleaned and the proper time
19:12 baker joined #openstack-rally
19:19 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot multiple servers in one request  https://review.openstack.org/176858
19:20 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Heat scenario to test scaling policies  https://review.openstack.org/178436
19:21 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario to modify Cinder volume metadata  https://review.openstack.org/174894
20:01 baker_ joined #openstack-rally
20:04 baker joined #openstack-rally
20:17 drwho joined #openstack-rally
20:33 tosky joined #openstack-rally
20:43 openstackgerrit_ joined #openstack-rally
20:50 frickler boris-42: the order only works within rally.benchmark.context.cleanup.context, but network cleanup is in rally.benchmark.context.network which comes strictly afterwards
20:52 frickler boris-42: the only other location I can see feasible would be NeutronWrapper.delete_network in rally/benchmark/wrappers/network.py, but IMHO that would not be much cleaner
20:53 boris-42 frickler: why we can't delete security groups during cleanup of network context
20:53 boris-42 frickler: seems more reasonable?
20:54 boris-42 frickler: I really don't want to make monster from user context
20:54 boris-42 frickler: btw I saw some email thread from stpierre regarding to this
20:54 frickler boris-42: in the end it is one resource per tenant, not per network
20:55 stpierre the email thread i started was sort of related, but it was only for 'default' security group deletion on nova-network. and i'm not sure i care enough to do the work necessary for it, since we're moving off of nova-network before too terribly long
20:55 meteorfox_ joined #openstack-rally
20:55 boris-42 stpierre: lol
20:56 boris-42 someday after few years
20:56 boris-42 rally team will remove nova-network related hacks
20:57 boris-42 frickler: so I have idea
20:58 boris-42 frickler: so what if we just refactor the security group context (allow_ssh)
20:59 boris-42 frickler: so it will delete only it's own secruity group rules & generic cleanup won't delete
20:59 boris-42 frickler: this ssh
21:01 boris-42 frickler: like resource from context can have  rally_ctx_*
21:01 boris-42 frickler: thoughts?
21:02 mwagner_lap joined #openstack-rally
21:03 frickler boris-42: that would resolve the conflict between these two, but I don't see where it would help with the default security group
21:06 frickler boris-42: we need to remove the default sg also when allow_ssh context is not used
21:06 boris-42 frickler: so seems like we have to do like you did for default one =((
21:06 boris-42 frickler: yep
21:06 boris-42 me hate openstack=(
21:06 frickler boris-42: its not like I didn't try other options
21:06 boris-42 and how users/tenants are implemented=(
21:08 botang joined #openstack-rally
21:08 frickler yes, being able to have objects referencing tenants which no longer exist is really bad
21:09 frickler but I guess we have to be happy with what we have
21:10 frickler just like the bug I had with nova the other day ... turns out it can't be easily fixed because that would be an API change what in turn would need a new micro-version ...
21:11 frickler or the glance bug with SSL, can't be fixed in stable/juno because there is no proper branch for python-glanceclient
21:11 frickler but I disgress, better get to bed now ... ;)
21:17 boris-42 frickler: reviewed your patch
21:17 boris-42 frickler: some nits
21:17 boris-42 frickler: otherwise we have to merge it
21:21 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
22:08 boris-42 jlk: ping
22:08 jlk howdy
22:08 boris-42 jlk: working on diagrams for presentation
22:08 boris-42 jlk: https://twitter.com/PavlovicBoris/status/597885837892853761 =)
22:09 jlk haha
22:09 boris-42 jlk: not too much?)
22:09 jlk I"m searching for the right image to represent a dead rabbit (server)
22:10 jlk boris-42: s/to/in/ for the first square
22:10 jlk but that process is about right
22:10 boris-42 jlk: ah going to fix
22:14 boris-42 jlk: =)
22:14 boris-42 jlk fixed https://twitter.com/PavlovicBoris/status/597887423406874625
22:15 boris-42 jlk: oh this is going to be funny =)
22:46 mpopow joined #openstack-rally
23:29 botang joined #openstack-rally
23:55 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit is going offline while we perform an emergency downgrade to version 2.8.
23:55 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gerrit is going offline while we perform an emergency downgrade to version 2.8.

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary