Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-05-21

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:12 georgem1 joined #openstack-rally
00:13 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
00:13 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
00:44 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
00:57 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
01:48 serverascode joined #openstack-rally
02:05 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
02:23 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
02:30 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
03:14 dratushn joined #openstack-rally
03:48 dratushn joined #openstack-rally
04:19 georgem1 joined #openstack-rally
04:26 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
04:30 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
04:41 zhiyan joined #openstack-rally
04:59 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
05:05 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
05:08 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
05:15 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
05:23 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:54 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
06:08 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
06:19 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
06:28 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
06:33 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:34 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
06:36 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - P4  https://review.openstack.org/183916
06:36 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - P5  https://review.openstack.org/183917
06:36 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - P6  https://review.openstack.org/183918
06:36 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - requests  https://review.openstack.org/184721
06:42 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:42 openstackgerrit nayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Adds Keystone ec2-credentials scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/178060
06:43 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
06:43 akuznetsova joined #openstack-rally
06:43 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
06:55 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
07:15 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
07:21 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:24 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
07:30 yfried_ rvasilets: re https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172831/
07:30 yfried_ rvasilets: here?
07:38 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:39 karimb joined #openstack-rally
07:49 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
07:50 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
07:51 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
07:55 vaidy_ joined #openstack-rally
08:00 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:03 yfried_ anyone here from Mirantis? the Mirantis gate is acting out
08:04 exploreshaifali yfried_, hey! Rally devs would be busy in OpenStack conf and design summit atm
08:04 exploreshaifali prolly after 22 you can catch them
08:04 vaidy_ joined #openstack-rally
08:05 yfried_ exploreshaifali: I am hoping Mirantis doesn't have the money to send all of their Rally team to the summit... :)
08:05 yfried_ exploreshaifali: ^
08:09 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:23 hop joined #openstack-rally
08:24 hop left #openstack-rally
08:25 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:40 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed openstack/rally: Add Cinder create_and_restore_volume_backup scenario  https://review.openstack.org/173412
08:55 yfried_ amaretskiy: there are issues with Mirantis gate
08:55 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
09:15 amaretskiy yfried_: not sure, here is a patch that successfully p passed MOS gates https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173412/
09:15 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
09:15 amaretskiy yfried_: try recheck rally
09:15 yfried_ amaretskiy: 1 - multiple rechecks finally passes
09:16 yfried_ amaretskiy: 2 - reheck also triggers "Jenkins" and that's bad. We need to change this some how to only trigger MIrantis gate
09:17 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
09:17 amaretskiy yfried_: this is known issue, afaik this is planned to be fixed soon
09:17 yfried_ amaretskiy: could you please review these patches? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/split-plugins,n,z
09:18 amaretskiy yfried_: yes
09:35 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:35 vaidy__ joined #openstack-rally
09:55 aix joined #openstack-rally
10:13 redixin joined #openstack-rally
10:46 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
10:53 amaretskiy yfried_: please take a look at my comment at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/183583/3/rally/benchmark/validation.py,cm
10:55 yfried_ amaretskiy: in that case, don't add deployment.
10:55 yfried_ amaretskiy: it's confusing
10:56 amaretskiy yfried_: this definition schema is same for all validators
10:57 yfried_ amaretskiy: ok
10:57 amaretskiy yfried_: some_validator(config, clients, deployment, {here are custom arguments})
11:01 rvasilets yfried_, Hi
11:01 rvasilets I'm here
11:02 yfried_ rvasilets: I don't understand your concern. could you please explain?
11:03 yfried_ rvasilets: what's the problem with importing those plugins, and how is it different that what's currently done?
11:07 yfried_ redixin: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/split-plugins,n,z rebase dropped your +2s
11:08 yfried_ redixin: could you please take another look?
11:08 redixin yfried_, sure
11:10 rvasilets Currently before moving code we don't need to import plugin when we want to use https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/vm/vmtasks.py Now When i want to use this scenario as plugin I want just type "rally --plugin-path ../vmtask.py" but this scenario use code that also need plugin import and its uncomfortable for me to import "rally --plugin-paths ../vmtask.py:../cinder_utils.py:/..novautils.py". So I'm rigth
11:10 rvasilets its bad experience when I want to use only one plugin but need to import two more
11:10 rvasilets Its my thoughts)
11:12 yfried_ rvasilets: intersting. I was unaware of that.
11:13 rvasilets I'm right it would be possible for example for scenario in link
11:13 yfried_ rvasilets: could you please explain that on patch? plugins is more boris-42's area
11:14 rvasilets yfried_, Lets imagine we merge all you patches and after them we merge Ilya Shahat patch.
11:15 yfried_ rvasilets: link?
11:15 rvasilets it allow just to specify in flag --plugin-paths multiple links
11:15 rvasilets https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177773/3
11:16 rvasilets Now lets try to use scenario https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/scenarios/vm/vmtasks.py
11:16 rvasilets What we need to type?
11:16 yfried_ rvasilets: hang on
11:17 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
11:18 yfried_ rvasilets: AFAIK offical rally plugins are already imported. the "--plugins-paths" options adds only "out of tree" plugins
11:18 yfried_ rvasilets: those that make sense?
11:20 rvasilets if rally official plugins like utils would be already imported then there is no problem I think
11:20 rvasilets like cinder? nova etc utils
11:20 yfried_ rvasilets: so, as I've said, we need to verify this with boris-42
11:21 rvasilets yfried_, Ok I think its doesn't influence on you work now
11:29 nkhare_ joined #openstack-rally
11:33 yfried_ vaidy__: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/split-plugins,n,z how does this solve the bug?
11:33 yfried_ vaidy__: without L247-251 repeated for each user?
11:36 vaidy__ joined #openstack-rally
11:49 vaidy__ yfried_, can you please be more specific?
11:49 vaidy__ yfried_, didn't get you
11:51 yfried_ vaidy__: sorry. bad link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179739/5/rally/cmd/commands/deployment.py,cm
11:54 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
11:57 vaidy__ yes
11:57 vaidy__ yfried_, you mean we dont need to repeat for each user?
11:58 yfried_ vaidy__: no
11:58 yfried_ vaidy__: I mean that for each user you just get a client
11:58 aix joined #openstack-rally
11:59 yfried_ vaidy__: but you're not doing anything with it, like lines 247-250
11:59 vaidy__ yfried_, my change was only to add the validation for users
11:59 yfried_ vaidy__: like "print"
11:59 vaidy__ yfried_, yes
11:59 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
11:59 yfried_ well, seems like I'm missing something. if you think it works I'll have to dig into it
12:00 vaidy__ yfried_, my changes are only from L:255-L255
12:02 vaidy__ yfried_, so i think my changes are good
12:02 vaidy__ yfried_, I have tested and works fine
12:03 vaidy__ yfried_, L252-L255 sorry about the lines
12:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - requests  https://review.openstack.org/184721
12:14 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - P4  https://review.openstack.org/183916
12:16 zhiyan joined #openstack-rally
12:29 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command-dict option to specify command args  https://review.openstack.org/177016
12:29 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command_customizer context  https://review.openstack.org/183227
12:29 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Introduce command-dict and add validator  https://review.openstack.org/177011
12:29 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add boot_runcommand_delete_custom_image scenario  https://review.openstack.org/183228
12:29 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Make `boot_runcommand_delete' accept command-dict  https://review.openstack.org/177014
12:29 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command-dict option to upload a local command  https://review.openstack.org/177015
12:29 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add sshutils._put_file_shell  https://review.openstack.org/184767
13:00 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
13:00 meteorfox joined #openstack-rally
13:02 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
13:05 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
13:18 openstackgerrit Yuriy Nesenenko proposed openstack/rally: Add Cinder create_and_restore_volume_backup scenario  https://review.openstack.org/173412
13:20 georgem1 joined #openstack-rally
13:24 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: Wait for status  https://review.openstack.org/172466
13:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - P5  https://review.openstack.org/183917
13:59 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Context] Users cleanup should not fail without networking  https://review.openstack.org/183510
14:02 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Validation] Allow `required_clients' validate admin clients  https://review.openstack.org/183583
14:04 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Scenario] Split Scenarios - P6  https://review.openstack.org/183918
14:08 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
14:10 yfried_ msdubov_: so the plugin move is done (I think). it should go in release notes
14:11 msdubov_ yfried_, Great job!
14:11 msdubov_ yfried_, You should also move your spec to 'implemented'
14:12 yfried_ msdubov_: ack
14:14 nkhare_ joined #openstack-rally
14:15 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: [Spec] Move plugins spec to implemented  https://review.openstack.org/184792
14:15 yfried_ msdubov_: ^^
14:16 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] Add Fuel scenario `list_environments'  https://review.openstack.org/178731
14:16 yfried_ msdubov_: Maybe wait for boris to sign off on this and make sure no more plugins are hiding anywhere?
14:17 msdubov_ yfried_, I've put +2 on this since no plugins are left in rally/benchmarks
14:17 msdubov_ yfried_, Even if something is left, this will be easy to fix
14:18 yfried_ msdubov_: ack
14:29 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
14:33 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
14:55 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
14:55 tosky joined #openstack-rally
14:59 nkhare_ joined #openstack-rally
15:13 dratushn joined #openstack-rally
15:14 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Rename rally.cmd to rally.cli  https://review.openstack.org/184591
15:17 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
15:21 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
15:24 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
15:39 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
15:53 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
15:56 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
16:01 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
16:05 dratushn joined #openstack-rally
16:06 PerfBein_ joined #openstack-rally
16:12 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
16:16 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed openstack/rally: Add context that creates servers using EC2 api  https://review.openstack.org/156228
16:26 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
16:32 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
16:49 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
16:50 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
16:54 pradeep joined #openstack-rally
17:00 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
17:25 lutostag joined #openstack-rally
17:35 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
17:46 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
17:50 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
17:59 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
18:05 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:08 yfried|afk joined #openstack-rally
18:16 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
18:46 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
18:50 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
18:53 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:54 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
18:55 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
19:25 georgem1 joined #openstack-rally
19:42 openstackgerrit Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add functional test for --plugin-paths parameter  https://review.openstack.org/183507
20:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Rename rally.cmd to rally.cli  https://review.openstack.org/184591
20:05 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Context] Users cleanup should not fail without networking  https://review.openstack.org/183510
20:06 hughsaunders joined #openstack-rally
20:13 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
20:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Validation] Allow `required_clients' validate admin clients  https://review.openstack.org/183583
20:25 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
20:25 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
20:25 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
20:30 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command-dict option to specify command args  https://review.openstack.org/177016
20:30 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add sshutils._put_file_shell  https://review.openstack.org/184767
20:30 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command_customizer context  https://review.openstack.org/183227
20:30 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Introduce command-dict and add validator  https://review.openstack.org/177011
20:30 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add boot_runcommand_delete_custom_image scenario  https://review.openstack.org/183228
20:30 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Make `boot_runcommand_delete' accept command-dict  https://review.openstack.org/177014
20:30 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command-dict option to upload a local command  https://review.openstack.org/177015
20:33 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
20:33 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
20:33 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
20:37 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
20:40 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
20:41 meteorfox boris-42: hey I just finished watching your talk.. good talk
20:41 meteorfox also cool hockey shirt :)
20:42 boris-42 meteorfox: hehe
20:43 meteorfox boris-42: last week I was traveling, I took a short "vacation", that's why I wasn't online
20:45 boris-42 meteorfox: it happens=)
20:51 meteorfox boris-42: did you have a design session on the summit?
20:52 boris-42 meteorfox: yep
20:53 meteorfox boris-42: any docs that came out of it?
20:53 boris-42 meteorfox: we had yesterday 1 and today 2 more
20:53 boris-42 meteorfox: yep
20:53 boris-42 meteorfox: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YxGtBRbhZ87uz_J3KqcMo-vgYIUIaS4nYm-MxGLpdRE/edit
20:54 meteorfox boris-42: cool, thanks. I'll read it, and catch up.
20:55 boris-42 meteorfox: so it is first session and I will give you later 2 more docs
20:58 meteorfox boris-42: heh, I'm done. that was short. I don't know if there's another session, but could you bring up the issue about collecting the http response times?  some time back we discussed, that maybe it could be done by monkey patching the clients requests library
21:07 boris-42 meteorfox: yep it may be done
21:07 boris-42 meteorfox: by monkey patchign libs
21:07 meteorfox boris-42: cool
21:08 boris-42 meteorfox: by the way we can use one laptop
21:08 boris-42 meteorfox: to run hangout *
21:08 boris-42 meteorfox: so you will be able to join desing session
21:08 meteorfox boris-42: at what time will it be?
21:09 boris-42 meteorfox: in 1 hour
21:09 meteorfox boris-42: :( I can't join, I need to leave soon
21:09 boris-42 meteorfox: o k
21:18 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
21:19 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
21:22 meteorfox boris-42: do you have any docs around, where you argument why using tempest for performance is not a good idea
21:22 meteorfox ?
21:24 boris-42 meteorfox: it's obvious
21:24 boris-42 meteorfox: I was working on blogpost but didn't finished
21:26 meteorfox boris-42: their runner, and lack of context comes to mind, what else?
21:33 boris-42 meteorfox: whole framework
21:33 boris-42 meteorfox: they don't have parametrized tests in parametrized enviorment
21:33 boris-42 meteorfox: and each iteration is setUP do_the_thing cleanUP
21:33 boris-42 meteorfox: they can't measure detailed durations
21:34 boris-42 meteorfox: so it's impossible it tempest to do create user, setup quotas, do the load, cleanup quotas delete user
21:34 boris-42 meteorfox: and so on and so on
21:34 meteorfox boris-42: cool, cool. good stuff. I'm just wanted give some point to one of my managers
21:34 meteorfox :)
21:35 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
21:36 boris-42 meteorfox: so I have two diagrams
21:36 boris-42 meteorfox: that you can show him
21:40 meteorfox boris-42: where can i find the diagrams?
21:41 boris-42 meteorfox: hm
21:42 meteorfox boris-42: it's okay, if you don't have it now
21:42 boris-42 meteorfox: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/boris-42/boris-42.github.io/master/blogs/1/tempest_workflow.png
21:42 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
21:42 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
21:42 boris-42 meteorfox https://raw.githubusercontent.com/boris-42/boris-42.github.io/master/blogs/1/rally_task.png
21:43 meteorfox boris-42: oh this is good.
21:43 meteorfox thanks
21:44 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
21:47 boris-42 meteorfox: some day I will finish blogpost
21:50 meteorfox boris-42: no worries, it was for one of our architects, he has a meeting Today with the openstack-qa and wanted some facts  regarding the downsides of Tempest
21:50 meteorfox :)
21:55 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
21:57 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
21:57 PerfBein_ joined #openstack-rally
22:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Spec] Move plugins spec to implemented  https://review.openstack.org/184792
22:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Server Group quotas support  https://review.openstack.org/184500
22:06 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
22:11 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
22:11 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
22:18 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:24 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
22:25 dratushnyy is it possible to specify custom tempest repository or even branch for rally validate command?
22:36 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: WIP: Random resource names all follow set pattern  https://review.openstack.org/184888
22:37 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot multiple servers in one request  https://review.openstack.org/176858
22:37 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Nova: Refactor utils._boot_servers to generate its own name prefix  https://review.openstack.org/183152
22:37 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Heat scenario to test scaling policies  https://review.openstack.org/178436
22:38 meghal joined #openstack-rally
22:38 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario to modify Cinder volume metadata  https://review.openstack.org/174894
22:38 meghal hello…I am playing around with rally boot and delete scenario, and was wondering if I could pass benchmark configs in json files ?
22:38 meghal for example - nova_server_boot_timeout
22:39 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
22:40 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova networks tests  https://review.openstack.org/178139
22:41 meghal boris-42:  ^^
22:44 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
22:47 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Keystone: Add scenarios to benchmark user disable/enable  https://review.openstack.org/172030
22:47 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add keystone benchmark scenarios for roles  https://review.openstack.org/165409
22:52 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
22:56 georgem1 joined #openstack-rally
23:10 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
23:16 andreykurilin__ meghal: hi
23:17 andreykurilin__ meghal: now, it is impossible to pass timings via task configuration:(
23:17 andreykurilin__ meghal: but we want to have such feature
23:18 meghal andreykurilin__:  thanks for the response
23:18 meghal so I can control global value using rally conf until then
23:18 andreykurilin__ yeah
23:19 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
23:21 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
23:21 andreykurilin__ meghal: Do you have some time and wish to implement it? :)
23:23 meghal andreykurilin__: I will try my best…I am beginning to use rally for ironic and also want to work on ironic node create scenarios…will try to give it back to the community once things are working fine
23:27 andreykurilin__ dratushnyy: hi! `rally-manage tempest install` accepts `--source` option. It can be used for specifying a repo.
23:28 andreykurilin__ meghal: ok, got it
23:29 dratushnyy got it, thanks, but not for branch?
23:30 andreykurilin__ dratushnyy: no, branches doesn't supported yet:(
23:30 dratushnyy that will be good idea to support them, i think
23:32 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
23:33 andreykurilin__ dratushnyy: yes. do you want to implement it?)
23:33 dratushnyy why not )
23:33 andreykurilin__ cool
23:34 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
23:43 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: WIP: Random resource names all follow set pattern  https://review.openstack.org/184888
23:48 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
23:52 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot multiple servers in one request  https://review.openstack.org/176858

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary