Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-05-26

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:13 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
00:49 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
01:01 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
01:25 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
01:48 ilbot3 joined #openstack-rally
01:48 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
02:10 MatthewL1 joined #openstack-rally
02:13 MatthewL1 hi, are there some rallyforge guys here? I have installed the rallyforge/rally, however, when I run "rally deployment check" it fails
02:14 MatthewL1 I establish the same rally service in a VM, it sucessed
02:22 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
02:59 psd joined #openstack-rally
03:10 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
03:23 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:32 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
03:47 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
04:19 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
04:24 vaidy_ril MatthewL1, can you please be more elaborate?
04:24 vaidy_ril MatthewL1, did you do deployment create?
04:25 MatthewL1 hi I have solve this by adding ip name in /etc/hosts
04:25 vaidy_ril MatthewL1, :)
04:25 MatthewL1 first you should update the docker to latest version
04:26 MatthewL1 however, when I exit the docker and docker commit a new image, then docker run ,I have to reconfigure the /etc/hosts
04:26 MatthewL1 why?
04:27 MatthewL1 I not quite familiar with the docker
04:31 vaidy_ril MatthewL1, even i am not familiar with docker, afaik there should be a script which overwrites the /etc/hosts after reboot
04:32 vaidy_ril MatthewL1, thats a guess may be you can confirm
04:58 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
05:00 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
05:05 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
05:10 MatthewLi joined #openstack-rally
05:11 MatthewLi yep, sounds reasonable,
05:18 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
05:26 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
05:35 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
05:42 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
05:45 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
05:46 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
05:46 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
05:52 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
05:52 MatthewLi2 joined #openstack-rally
06:00 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Set Python2.7 as basepython for testenv  https://review.openstack.org/185500
06:07 openstackgerrit nayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Adds Keystone ec2-credentials scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/178060
06:15 rdas joined #openstack-rally
06:45 neeti joined #openstack-rally
06:50 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
06:52 kiran-r yfried_ Shall I modify the objects in the code as V1??
06:52 yfried_ kiran-r: I think so. did you ask amaretskiy to look into this as well?
06:53 kiran-r He reviewed, unfortunately did not mention anything about V1.
06:53 kiran-r yfried_ He reviewed, unfortunately did not mention anything about V1.
06:53 kiran-r yfried_: I think I should do it coz soon v2 would come into picture. :)
06:54 yfried_ kiran-r: I agree with you, but I only touched LBaaS very briefly. please ask him specifically about this issue
06:55 kiran-r yfried_ ok. Thanks!!
06:55 yfried_ kiran-r: I wouldn't want you to change everything based on my opinion only to later have to argue with someone else who might know better
06:59 kiran-r yfried_ hmm.
07:06 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
07:34 yfried_ NikitaKonovalov: ping
07:35 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:38 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
07:39 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
07:45 morgan_orange joined #openstack-rally
07:49 anshul joined #openstack-rally
07:54 morgan_orange hi
07:54 yfried_ morgan_orange: ho :)
07:55 morgan_orange I am dealy with functional testing in OPNFV, we use Rally to launch Tempest and perform bench tests from CI
07:55 morgan_orange https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-opnfv-jump-1/29/console
07:55 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
07:56 morgan_orange on a glance scenario (http://opnfv.orange.org/test/POD1/1405/opnfv-glance.html#/GlanceImages.list_images/overview) I got a 400 Bad Request (but not all the time)
07:56 morgan_orange any idea?
07:56 morgan_orange otherwise we got lots of  WARNING rally.plugins.openstack.context.cleanup.manager [-] Resource deletion failed, max retries exceeded for nova.security_groups
07:57 yfried_ morgan_orange: the 2nd link is Rally (and not Tempest via Rally)
07:58 morgan_orange yes it is the html generated by running Rally
07:59 morgan_orange for Tempest via Rally, we can fin the log in the first link
07:59 morgan_orange but the 400 Bad requets and teh warning are linked to Rally
07:59 yfried_ do you have a question re tempest, or just the rally/glance thing?
07:59 morgan_orange I have a lso some questions on tempest
08:00 yfried_ morgan_orange: because the 400 thing seems like something is wrong with your Glance
08:00 tosky joined #openstack-rally
08:00 yfried_ morgan_orange: that's a glanceclient error
08:01 yfried_ can you access the rally setup, or was it destroyed? I'd try to issue some glance commands from it to debug the problem
08:01 yfried_ morgan_orange: other than that, I don't know. sorry. maybe someone else here might
08:02 morgan_orange I thin I can access rally setup on one of the POD
08:03 yfried_ morgan_orange: if you do "rally depolyment use <deployment>" rally should give you the openrc file to source for using the openstack CLI
08:04 karimb joined #openstack-rally
08:06 morgan_orange I can see it
08:06 morgan_orange the openrc is not correct I got an openrc-************* which is correct butwhen I perform a rally deployment use **** the openrc file is the defaut one
08:09 morgan_orange oups it is correct I mixing 2 platforms
08:09 morgan_orange so my openrc is correct
08:09 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/182843
08:10 morgan_orange Concerning Tempest, the errors correspond to 3 types of erros: #1 Quotas exceeded (but installer teams pushed the default value -especially neutron quotas)  #2; Invalid credential on keystone v3 tests (used to work but Invalid since last week) #3 Multiple possible network - normal because default fresh install have already several networks, I have to look for a way to precise the network id before running the
08:25 yfried_ morgan_orange: for tempest failures, please ask on #openstack-qa channel.
08:25 yfried_ morgan_orange: Rally only pulls tempest and creates a tempest.conf. If you discover that you have a bad tempest conf, we can look into it
08:35 morgan_orange ok thanks
08:35 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Clients] Add test for osclients.cached  https://review.openstack.org/184030
08:39 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
08:40 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
08:44 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
08:44 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
08:49 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
08:50 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
08:56 turul joined #openstack-rally
08:59 redixin joined #openstack-rally
09:02 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
09:08 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:09 kbaikov joined #openstack-rally
09:10 openstackgerrit Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Fuel] Add Fuel scenario `list_environments'  https://review.openstack.org/178731
09:19 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Split slow rally job to several small ones  https://review.openstack.org/185031
09:25 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: Feature request Uninstall and version.  https://review.openstack.org/185543
09:26 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Split slow rally job to several small ones  https://review.openstack.org/185031
09:27 yfried_ redixin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185031/ please set topic on both patches to match so reviewers will know they are related
09:30 redixin yfried_, https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:rally-split-jobs,n,z
09:30 yfried_ redixin: scenarios removed from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185031/4/rally-jobs/rally-neutron.yaml,cm are intended to run on a neutron gate
09:31 yfried_ redixin: IIUC your infra patch makes them run only on nova-network gate
09:31 yfried_ redixin: is this ok?
09:31 redixin yfried_, some scenarios removed from neutron gate should not run on neutron gate
09:32 yfried_ redixin: re topic - tnx. when you push the next patches use "git review -t <topic>" to set it explicitly
09:32 yfried_ redixin: if that is the case, please state so in commit (and maybe why?) on the rally patch because now it seems like a mistake
09:33 redixin yfried_, we decided to left some scenarios on rally-neutron just to be sure it works at all. there is no need to run all scenarios like "boot_and_delete", "" boot_and_list", "boot_and_bounce" etc
09:33 yfried_ redixin: I understand, but please put this on the commit message so everyone else will
09:34 redixin yfried_, i just trying to make both rally and rally-neutron jobs pass in 30 minutes. then I remove WIP and add what and why was changed
09:36 yfried_ redixin: ok
09:41 openstackgerrit nayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Adds Keystone ec2-credentials scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/178060
09:42 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
10:16 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: Wait for status  https://review.openstack.org/172466
10:19 openstackgerrit maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Added Loadbalancer create and list pool  https://review.openstack.org/182685
10:21 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] More debug logging  https://review.openstack.org/170491
10:22 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add Manila project support  https://review.openstack.org/184553
10:23 neeti joined #openstack-rally
10:28 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:28 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add context for Manila  https://review.openstack.org/185423
10:29 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add create_delete_shares scenario for Manila  https://review.openstack.org/185424
10:36 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
10:40 yfried_ NikitaKonovalov: Hi, I've seen boris-42's comments and I disagree.
10:41 yfried_ redixin: msdubov_: amaretskiy: could you please take a look at NikitaKonovalov's patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172466/ ?
10:41 amaretskiy yes
10:41 yfried_ and my comments on it
10:44 amaretskiy yfried_ I think we need boris-42 opinion
10:46 yfried_ amaretskiy: I agree. but he's not around, so I'm staging a coup =)
10:47 amaretskiy yfried_ I've asked him one sec ago :)
10:49 openstackgerrit Yair Fried proposed openstack/rally: Feature request Uninstall and version  https://review.openstack.org/185543
10:49 boris-42 joined #openstack-rally
10:50 msdubov_ yfried_: IMO what you suggest makes sense.
10:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Add skip case for not installed clients into functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/185415
10:51 amaretskiy boris-42: yfried_ is asking about his comments in  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172466/
10:53 * boris-42 I am back!!!
10:53 boris-42 WOOOT
10:53 boris-42 I am not able to read IRC logs yet
10:54 * boris-42 need 30 minutes to finsish with emails
10:54 yfried_ boris-42: we took a vote and kicked you out
10:58 boris-42 yfried_: LOL
11:03 openstackgerrit nayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Adds Keystone ec2-credentials scenarios  https://review.openstack.org/178060
11:15 kiranr joined #openstack-rally
11:15 aix joined #openstack-rally
11:16 vaidy_ril boris-42, ping
11:17 vaidy_ril boris-42, please do review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179739/ when you get time
11:28 boris-42 vaidy_ril: I will try
11:32 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
11:51 boris-42 MatthewLi2: hi
11:52 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
11:53 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
11:53 pboldin Hi there. I see that many of the developers do use mocks incorrectly. I present you the https://github.com/paboldin/python-samples/blob/master/why-not-call-mock-during-test-setup.py sample code.
11:53 MatthewLi2 hi sorry, I had some work done , I will look through your discussions
11:56 openstackgerrit maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Added Loadbalancer create and list pool  https://review.openstack.org/182685
11:57 MatthewLi2 boris-42: so, hi me about what?
11:58 MatthewLi2 or just hi...I see...
11:58 boris-42 MatthewLi2: nope
11:58 boris-42 MatthewLi2: I saw your message about ansible
11:59 MatthewLi2 yep
11:59 MatthewLi2 do you have any ideas?
11:59 boris-42 MatthewLi2: soo we can create playbooks and put them under rally/contrib/
11:59 boris-42 MatthewLi2: as well as for puppet
12:00 MatthewLi2 ok let me try this?
12:00 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
12:00 boris-42 MatthewLi2: sure
12:00 MatthewLi2 ok
12:01 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
12:06 bdevcich joined #openstack-rally
12:09 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
12:14 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
12:15 boris-42 MatthewLi2: are you familiar with contribution to openstack projects?
12:15 boris-42 MatthewLi2: I mean gerrit and rest of stuff/
12:15 MatthewLi2 yes
12:16 boris-42 MatthewLi2: great if you have any questions just ping me I will be here now=)
12:16 MatthewLi2 I have done some work in other open source project, and have some experience in some stackforge projects
12:16 MatthewLi2 boris-42: thx
12:17 boris-42 yfried: rally-ci recheck btw will recheck only mirantis gates
12:19 yfried boris-42: really? in that case, could you please put this as a custom message for Mirantis failures?
12:24 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
12:24 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova networks tests  https://review.openstack.org/178139
12:30 boris-42 yfried: not sure what you are asking?)
12:30 boris-42 yfried: you mean in Mirantis Rally CI message?
12:30 yfried re Mirantis gate?
12:31 yfried boris-42: I mean that Mirantis CI failure message should mentions that "rally-ci recheck" would trigger it
12:32 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
12:32 boris-42 yfried: agree on this
12:32 boris-42 redixin: ^ could you please do this
12:33 matthewli_ joined #openstack-rally
12:34 redixin boris-42, yfried sure
12:36 pboldin yfried: please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184767/
12:42 yfried pboldin: isn't this your old branch? what happened to the old commits I've already reviewed?
12:42 yfried pboldin: everything here seems new
12:44 pboldin yfried: I just squashed two commits for command-dict
12:45 yfried pboldin: that's too bad. I can't find my old comments. now I have to read everything from the beginning
12:47 yfried pboldin: can you please point me to where you are using the sshutils._put_file methods?
12:47 pboldin yfried: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177015/13/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/vm/utils.py,cm
12:48 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
12:57 pboldin What is the new recheck command syntax?
12:58 yfried rally-ci recheck
12:59 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
13:00 yfried pboldin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184767/2/rally/common/sshutils.py,cm
13:00 yfried pboldin: I'm probably missing something
13:00 yfried pboldin: remote path is the path on the remote host, right?
13:00 pboldin yfried: yep
13:01 yfried pboldin: like /home/remoteuser/whatever
13:01 pboldin yfried: yep
13:02 yfried so how would cat > /home/remoteuser/whatever <<...
13:02 yfried pboldin: write to the remote host?
13:02 yfried pboldin: it would write to the file /home/remoteuser/whatever on the localhost, won't it?
13:02 pboldin yfried: it is executed on the remote host.
13:02 yfried pboldin: it is?
13:03 pboldin yfried: yep. using the ssh.execute
13:04 yfried pboldin: tnx
13:04 yfried pboldin: I knew I was missing something
13:05 bdevcich joined #openstack-rally
13:08 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Minor install script improvements  https://review.openstack.org/182809
13:09 pboldin yfried: now please this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177011/12
13:11 yfried pboldin: I can follow the branch by myself, thank you very much =)
13:11 yfried pboldin: it's a more complicated one, so it will take me a little more time
13:11 pboldin yfried: yeah, but Boris asked me to squash these. actually, this is how i intended to do these.
13:12 bdevcich joined #openstack-rally
13:13 yfried pboldin: please don't squash. it's better to review each commit alone
13:13 pboldin yfried: no, there were two commits that mostly cancelled each other
13:14 pboldin yfried: first introduced the code and second immediately moved that code to a different file
13:21 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
13:24 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Keystone: Add scenarios to benchmark user disable/enable  https://review.openstack.org/172030
13:26 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:26 stpierre can someone more familiar with the rally CI infra comment on why all of the Cinder scenarios are only in rally-neutron.yaml, not rally.yaml? (context: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174894/11/rally-jobs/rally-neutron.yaml)
13:26 yfried pboldin: I don't know which commits you are talking about
13:26 pboldin yfried: they are squashed at the moment.
13:27 yfried pboldin: so are you going to split one of the commits, or squash the others?
13:27 pboldin yfried: nope and nope. current structure is OK for me.
13:28 pboldin yfried: the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177011/8 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177012/ were squashed to the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177011/12
13:30 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot multiple servers in one request  https://review.openstack.org/176858
13:30 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Nova: Refactor utils._boot_servers to generate its own name prefix  https://review.openstack.org/183152
13:45 openstackgerrit maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Loadbalancer create and list pool  https://review.openstack.org/182685
13:46 boris-42 stpierre: hey hey
13:46 boris-42 stpierre: did you get back from summit?)
13:47 stpierre boris-42: yep! now for the week-long hangover.
13:56 yfried boris-42: amaretskiy: redixin: could you please review? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184767/2
13:57 yfried it's a small patch and IMO ready to merge
13:57 boris-42 yfried: i reviewed it before
14:03 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: WIP: Random resource names all follow set pattern  https://review.openstack.org/184888
14:03 stpierre boris-42: can you shed any light on my question about Cinder scenarios in rally-neutron.yaml?
14:04 boris-42 stpierre: what was the question?
14:04 stpierre why are the cinder scenarios only in rally-neutron.yaml?
14:04 stpierre context: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174894/11/rally-jobs/rally-neutron.yaml
14:07 boris-42 stpierre: balancing of time in gates
14:07 boris-42 redixin: ^ is working on splitting cinder tests in separated gate
14:10 stpierre awesome, thanks
14:12 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario to modify Cinder volume metadata  https://review.openstack.org/174894
14:19 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Split slow rally job to several small ones  https://review.openstack.org/185031
14:24 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
14:41 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command-dict option to specify command args  https://review.openstack.org/177016
14:41 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add sshutils._put_file_shell  https://review.openstack.org/184767
14:41 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command_customizer context  https://review.openstack.org/183227
14:41 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Introduce command-dict and add validator  https://review.openstack.org/177011
14:41 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add boot_runcommand_delete_custom_image scenario  https://review.openstack.org/183228
14:41 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Make `boot_runcommand_delete' accept command-dict  https://review.openstack.org/177014
14:41 openstackgerrit Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add command-dict option to upload a local command  https://review.openstack.org/177015
14:43 pboldin redixin: updated
14:58 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
15:01 aarefiev boris-42: hi, are you around ?
15:04 boris-42 aarefiev: partially
15:05 aarefiev boris-42:  :) could you look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185336/ when you have time
15:09 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
15:12 yfried redixin: pboldin: could you please explain the changes to put_file patch?
15:12 pboldin yfried: I used a `cat > ...' just like it was in the example
15:14 redixin yfried, he didnt know about "stdin" arg in run() method
15:15 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot multiple servers in one request  https://review.openstack.org/176858
15:15 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Nova: Refactor utils._boot_servers to generate its own name prefix  https://review.openstack.org/183152
15:15 yfried redixin: pboldin: ack tnx
15:15 psuriset joined #openstack-rally
15:16 pboldin redixin: at first, i'm here and it is unnice to speak about some one as he/she in presence.
15:16 pboldin redixin: at second, I used stdin for self.execute function, so obviously I was aware that there is such a thing.
15:18 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
15:19 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
15:19 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
15:20 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
15:20 redixin pboldin, I always use ssh.run("cat > dst", stdin=open(src)) and dont know why sftp is needed at all :]
15:20 pboldin redixin: chmod-in-place. we can add an ability to upload a directory later.
15:21 pboldin redixin: this will be hard to do with the cat > ...
15:21 redixin pboldin, we can upload and extract tarball =))
15:21 kiran-r Hi!
15:21 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova networks tests  https://review.openstack.org/178139
15:21 pboldin redixin: i find it rather difficult to extract a tarball without the tar installed.
15:22 redixin kiran-r, hi there
15:22 kiran-r Hi redixin gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally is failing with Jenkins, but locally I dont see the error it is throwing.
15:23 redixin kiran-r, please give me a link to patch
15:23 kiran-r redixin, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182685/
15:27 redixin kiran-r, your scenario is trying to get "subnets" from context
15:27 kiran-r Yes
15:27 redixin kiran-r, this subnets should be added by context
15:28 redixin kiran-r, as you can see here http://logs.openstack.org/85/182685/8/check/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally/4c7874d/rally-plot/results.html.gz#/NeutronLoadbalancer.create_and_list_pools/failures
15:28 kiran-r redixin, yes I have given network context in my yaml :)
15:28 redixin kiran-r, click on any "KeyError"
15:29 kiran-r redixin, I totally agree to your point. :) All I am asking is, locally, the same yaml is working fine and I do not see the error.
15:30 kiran-r Let me paste the local run.
15:30 redixin kiran-r, but how "subnets" does appear in context?
15:31 redixin boris-42 please help us ^^
15:34 kiran-r redxin, https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/network.py#L58-Lundefined https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/wrappers/network.py#L254-L269
15:35 kiran-r redixin, please refer the first link for network context and the second for the wrapper the context uses to create networks, subnets and attach it to routers
15:37 kiran-r redixin, boris-42 this is the run I made from the yaml put in rally-neutron.yaml :) http://paste.openstack.org/show/238041/
15:38 kiran-r redixin, I have reduced the concurrency to avoid failures, as my deployment is on my laptop.
15:43 kiran-r redixin, boris-42 I have a point to be noted. Before when I created the network using network_wrapper I was not seeing this error and rally-dsvm was passing but since I implemented it using context I am seeing this. :(
15:44 kiranr joined #openstack-rally
15:45 tosky joined #openstack-rally
15:52 meteorfox boris-42: heh... some people are stepping out of being core contributors, across multiple 'main' openstack projects,  do you know if there's any reason? or is it just coincidence?
15:56 vponomaryov kiran-r: parent "self.context" does not contain subnets
15:56 karimb joined #openstack-rally
15:59 vponomaryov kiran-r: try self.context.get("tenant", {}).get("networks", []).get("subnets", [])
15:59 vponomaryov kiran-r: on line 46 in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182685/8/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/neutron/loadbalancer.py
16:00 vponomaryov iter list of dicts - self.context.get("tenant", {}).get("networks", []) and get "subnets" on each iteration
16:06 kiran-r Hi vponomaryov
16:06 vponomaryov kiran-r: hello
16:07 kiran-r vponomaryov, How come it is working locally? :)
16:08 kiran-r With the same code
16:08 vponomaryov kiran-r: have you removed old pyc file?
16:08 kiran-r I confirmed again in a different setup too.
16:08 kiran-r yes
16:08 kiran-r I freshly installed this code on a different machine.
16:08 kiran-r vponomaryov ^^
16:10 vponomaryov kiran-r: locally you are running it directly using sample without rally-jobs/rally-neutron.yaml ?
16:11 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
16:12 kiran-r vponomaryov I copied the scenario causing failure in rally-neutron.yaml to another yaml file and ran.
16:14 vponomaryov kiran-r: it raises same error in my env
16:15 vponomaryov so, your lab has something different than you commited to gerrit
16:17 vponomaryov kiran-r: try this change: http://paste.openstack.org/show/238066/
16:22 kiran-r vponomaryov, shall I submit the patch with this change??
16:22 kiran-r Locally I dont see any change, the code is working.
16:23 vponomaryov kiran-r: are you sure that this part of code is executed at all?
16:23 vponomaryov try set breakpoint there and see result
16:37 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: WIP: Random resource names all follow set pattern  https://review.openstack.org/184888
16:40 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
16:55 openstackgerrit maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Loadbalancer create and list pool  https://review.openstack.org/182685
17:07 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
17:07 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed openstack/rally: Add context that creates servers using EC2 api  https://review.openstack.org/156228
17:10 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
17:25 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Set Python2.7 as basepython for testenv  https://review.openstack.org/185500
17:29 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
17:32 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova networks tests  https://review.openstack.org/178139
17:44 dratushnyy joined #openstack-rally
17:45 pboldin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177011/13 << please review
17:47 cloudm2 joined #openstack-rally
17:55 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
17:58 darkhuy joined #openstack-rally
18:06 harlowja_ joined #openstack-rally
18:08 davideag_ joined #openstack-rally
18:21 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
18:24 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
18:26 boris-42 meteorfox: it always happen *
18:26 boris-42 meteorfox: sometimes silently (before) like core contributor is not doing enough reviews
18:27 boris-42 meteorfox: and then PTL started kicking off people
18:27 meteorfox boris-42: oh ok
18:27 boris-42 meteorfox: that's why now they use more polite version
18:27 meteorfox :)
18:28 meteorfox boris-42: did you start the patch for the certification stuff?
18:33 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
18:35 darkhuy boris-42: have you checked your emial
18:40 csoukup joined #openstack-rally
18:43 darkhuy joined #openstack-rally
18:47 logan2 joined #openstack-rally
18:50 boris-42 darkhuy: yep
18:50 boris-42 stpierre: hey hey
18:50 boris-42 stpierre: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177011/
18:50 boris-42 stpierre: about mocking
18:50 stpierre yeah
18:50 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
18:52 PerfBein_ joined #openstack-rally
18:53 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:55 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
18:59 darkhuy trying to get rally started in a docker container, getting this
18:59 darkhuy rally OperationalError: (OperationalError) unable to open database file None None
18:59 darkhuy rally OperationalError: (OperationalError) unable to open database file None None
19:00 darkhuy rally OperationalError: (OperationalError) unable to open database file None None
19:00 darkhuy rally OperationalError: (OperationalError) unable to open database file None None
19:00 darkhuy ideas?
19:01 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
19:04 boris-42 darkhuy: hm did you do all the steps from manual?
19:04 boris-42 darkhuy: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/rallyforge/rally/
19:04 boris-42 darkhuy: seems like container doesn't have access to file where you would like to store your sqlite DB
19:05 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
19:05 darkhuy boris-42:let me double check. I thought I gave it the permissions
19:06 boris-42 darkhuy: so user in docker and in system usually are different
19:06 boris-42 stpierre: so the idea is that we don't pure unit tests
19:06 boris-42 stpierre: don't use*
19:07 stpierre okay, cool. i got a -1 a while back that suggested that we did, but i don't think it was from a core reviewer so was probably just a mistaken assumption
19:07 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
19:08 boris-42 stpierre: yep if you just mock evertyhing you will get good test coverage
19:08 boris-42 stpierre: but you won't test anything =(
19:09 darkhuy boris-42:hmmm what should the user for rally_home be when calling ls -l
19:09 boris-42 darkhuy: hm what I know is that everything should be done not from root
19:19 darkhuy boris-42:let me try again
19:22 arcimboldo joined #openstack-rally
19:36 briandowns joined #openstack-rally
19:44 openstackgerrit Brian Downs proposed openstack/rally: Remove break from case statement to allow for parsing of CLI args.  https://review.openstack.org/185296
19:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Nova: Refactor utils._boot_servers to generate its own name prefix  https://review.openstack.org/183152
19:46 marcoceppi joined #openstack-rally
19:46 marcoceppi joined #openstack-rally
19:47 boris-42 briandowns: hey
19:47 briandowns Hello
19:48 boris-42 briandowns: so if you have questions this is the right place to ask
19:48 briandowns Sounds good.  Thanks!
19:56 briandowns joined #openstack-rally
20:00 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
20:10 briandowns joined #openstack-rally
20:11 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
20:20 rook boris-42 not sure if you know, but where is a good place to find someone smart with shaker?
20:27 anshul joined #openstack-rally
20:31 pboros joined #openstack-rally
20:40 darkhuy boris-42: it was an selinux issue. had to do setenforce 0
20:41 boris-42 darkhuy: lol selinux strikes again
20:41 boris-42 rook: he is sometimes in this irc chat
20:41 boris-42 rook: ilyashakat
20:41 darkhuy boris-42:maybe should add a note to docs about selinux
20:41 boris-42 rook: I will give you email
20:44 boris-42 briandowns: did you see my comment ?
20:44 briandowns Not yet, I'll take a look in a moment.
20:53 openstackgerrit Wataru Takase proposed openstack/rally: Add context that creates servers using EC2 api  https://review.openstack.org/156228
21:05 boris-42 darkhuy: btw could you like docker hub
21:05 darkhuy boris-42:docker hub?
21:06 boris-42 darkhuy: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/rallyforge/rally/ = )
21:06 boris-42 darkhuy: thee is a star *
21:06 boris-42 stpierre: so actually there is a patch that already refactors names
21:06 darkhuy boris-42:ah ok
21:06 boris-42 stpierre: I asked Wataru to write a spec before
21:07 stpierre is there? I didn't see it in the spec
21:07 boris-42 stpierre: because we need to disucss a lot
21:07 stpierre yeah :)
21:07 boris-42 stpierre: it was before and I asked before doing such big changes to get merged spec
21:08 msdubov_ joined #openstack-rally
21:09 stpierre hrm, i think it might be https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139643/, but the commit message is a little vague, and it seems to tackle the problem in a very different way. since we have two different PoCs, it should be easier to choose an approach in the spec :)
21:10 briandowns boris-42 just read the comment and will fix now.
21:12 boris-42 stpierre: exactly
21:23 openstackgerrit Brian Downs proposed openstack/rally: Remove break from case statement to allow for parsing of CLI args.  https://review.openstack.org/185296
21:31 andreykurilin__ joined #openstack-rally
21:34 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
21:38 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Change logic of wait_for_ping  https://review.openstack.org/182624
21:52 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
22:08 lutostag joined #openstack-rally
22:11 lutostag joined #openstack-rally
22:26 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
22:28 jlk uh hi
22:28 jlk is master known to be broken?
22:28 jlk @rutils.log_task_wrapper(LOG.info, _("Enter context: `flavors`"))
22:28 jlk NameError: name '_' is not defined
22:29 PerfBein_ joined #openstack-rally
22:32 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Implement subunit_parser  https://review.openstack.org/180144
22:36 PerfBeing joined #openstack-rally
22:51 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
22:53 boris-42 jlk: this is not master
22:53 jlk boris-42: strange, that's what I was getting from master
22:53 boris-42 jlk: it was between 0.0.2 and 0.0.3 versions when new version of something broke rally
22:54 jlk I had to back down to 068da92  before the traceback went away
22:54 boris-42 jlk: master is not broken
22:54 boris-42 jlk: that bug was fixed after 0.0.2 and before 0.0.3
22:54 boris-42 jlk: I fixed it=)
22:55 jlk maybe I'm experiencing it in a different way
22:55 boris-42 jlk: it was fresh installation?
22:55 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
22:56 boris-42 jlk: if not that you should cleanup site packages
22:56 boris-42 then*
22:56 boris-42 jlk: because we moved all plugins and seems like it uses old plugin that was not changed from the version that you have
22:56 boris-42 jlk: but with new dependencies it doesn't work
22:57 jlk it was a new install to a new venv
22:57 boris-42 jlk: I am not sure how you did that=(
22:57 boris-42 jlk: this was the source of the bug https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/context/flavors.py#L19
22:57 darkhuy So i source my rc file....create deployment...rally deployment show shows the correct 172.16.x.x but when I run the damn check, it keeps erroring 192.168.........
22:58 jlk boris-42: as in that line should be there?
22:59 boris-42 jlk: yep
22:59 boris-42 jlk: it was monkeypatched in some other lib
22:59 openstackgerrit Brian Downs proposed openstack/rally: Remove break from case statement to allow for parsing of CLI args  https://review.openstack.org/185296
22:59 boris-42 jlk: after they made release code stopped working
22:59 boris-42 jlk: and break the master
23:00 jlk hrm.
23:00 jlk I'll try again
23:02 darkhuy boris-42:seems like this is fuel issue?
23:03 botang_ joined #openstack-rally
23:06 jlk boris-42: I'm getting it out of rally/benchmark/context/flavors.py
23:06 jlk ahhh
23:06 jlk I see
23:06 jlk git left over files
23:06 jlk or not
23:06 jlk wtf
23:07 jlk boris-42: does the install script shuffle some files around, that would be installed into the above path?
23:35 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
23:36 boris-42 jlk: so this is known issue
23:36 boris-42 jlk: with setup.py
23:36 boris-42 jlk: it doesn't delete old files (that were renamed)
23:36 boris-42 jlk: and you have old rally/becnhmark/context/flavors (that is not fixed)
23:37 jlk but this is a brand new dir?
23:37 jlk I'm using --target on a path that doesn't exist
23:38 jlk and I'm doing it from a git checkout of master, that doesn't have anything beyond base.py and __init__.py in rally/benchmark/context
23:39 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Remove break from case statement to allow for parsing of CLI args  https://review.openstack.org/185296
23:49 boris-42 jlk: no
23:49 boris-42 jlk: you are using old git repo
23:49 boris-42 jlk: try to do git clone
23:49 boris-42 jlk: and with fresh repo to install evertyhing
23:54 csoukup joined #openstack-rally
23:55 jlk will try.
23:56 boris-42 jlk: ya each time when we are renaming something this happens..

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary