Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-06-12

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:05 mahito joined #openstack-rally
00:43 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: DO NOT MERGE: only one neutron task  https://review.openstack.org/190796
00:45 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Testing that old lib for MySQL works better  https://review.openstack.org/190882
00:55 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
01:02 mahito joined #openstack-rally
01:33 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:03 mahito joined #openstack-rally
02:27 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
03:12 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
03:20 mwagner_afk joined #openstack-rally
03:37 openstackgerrit maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer v1 create and list pool  https://review.openstack.org/182685
03:51 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
03:55 kiranr joined #openstack-rally
04:54 rdas joined #openstack-rally
04:54 frickler joined #openstack-rally
04:58 openstackgerrit Mahito OGURA proposed openstack/rally: Change "find" command path in tox.ini  https://review.openstack.org/190920
05:07 openstackgerrit Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rally: Move sphinx from requirements to test-requirements  https://review.openstack.org/190921
05:11 openstackgerrit Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/rally: Remove psycopg2 from requirements  https://review.openstack.org/190931
05:17 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
05:21 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
05:22 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:01 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
06:03 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
06:11 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:26 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:40 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
06:43 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
06:50 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:06 anshul joined #openstack-rally
07:20 openstackgerrit maplelabs proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer v1 create and list pool  https://review.openstack.org/182685
07:32 amalinow joined #openstack-rally
07:37 frickler_ joined #openstack-rally
07:42 karimb joined #openstack-rally
07:43 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
08:15 kiranr joined #openstack-rally
08:16 kiranr joined #openstack-rally
08:22 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
08:35 cdent joined #openstack-rally
08:38 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
08:42 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:48 rook joined #openstack-rally
08:48 vipul joined #openstack-rally
08:53 vponomaryov joined #openstack-rally
08:59 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add benchmark for Manila list share servers operation  https://review.openstack.org/190981
09:08 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
09:11 anshul joined #openstack-rally
09:15 openstackgerrit Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Add  scenario for events and traits  https://review.openstack.org/180514
09:18 karimb joined #openstack-rally
09:20 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
09:22 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:23 tosky joined #openstack-rally
09:56 karimb joined #openstack-rally
10:04 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:20 Miouge joined #openstack-rally
10:23 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila security services  https://review.openstack.org/190999
10:24 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila security services  https://review.openstack.org/190999
10:28 aix joined #openstack-rally
10:31 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
11:12 karimb joined #openstack-rally
11:16 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
11:20 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for attach of security service to share network  https://review.openstack.org/191016
11:22 openstackgerrit Andrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally: Add role assignment in keystone wrapper for both v2 and v3  https://review.openstack.org/188553
11:28 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add base benchmark for list shares operation  https://review.openstack.org/184553
11:31 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila quotas  https://review.openstack.org/188484
11:32 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila shares  https://review.openstack.org/190667
11:34 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila share networks  https://review.openstack.org/190724
11:36 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila share networks  https://review.openstack.org/190724
11:37 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and listing of Manila share networks  https://review.openstack.org/190737
11:40 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and listing of Manila share networks  https://review.openstack.org/190737
11:43 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add benchmark for Manila list share servers operation  https://review.openstack.org/190981
11:45 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and deletion of security services  https://review.openstack.org/190999
11:46 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for attach of security service to share network  https://review.openstack.org/191016
11:50 openstackgerrit Igor Degtiarov proposed openstack/rally: [Ceilometer] Add  scenario for events and traits  https://review.openstack.org/180514
12:17 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
12:18 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
12:26 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add share networks context for existing users  https://review.openstack.org/185423
12:36 boris-42 kbaikov: ping
12:37 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add share networks context for existing users  https://review.openstack.org/185423
12:38 kbaikov boris-42: pong!!! sorry. some work interfered. but i remember
12:39 boris-42 kbaikov: so just one suggestion
12:40 boris-42 kbaikov: fix setup.cfg
12:40 boris-42 kbaikov: to copy samples in proper place
12:41 kbaikov boris-42: what? where? is it about the specs?
12:42 boris-42 kbaikov: s?
12:42 boris-42 kbaikov: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1461894
12:42 openstack Launchpad bug 1461894 in Rally "Add samples to docker image " [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to kbaikov (kbaikov)
12:43 kbaikov boris-42: i see
12:43 kbaikov boris-42: thank you
12:50 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
12:53 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila with autocreated resources + benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/187643
12:56 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Heat scenario to test scaling policies  https://review.openstack.org/178436
12:58 boris-42 stpierre: ping
12:58 stpierre boris-42: pong
13:00 boris-42 stpierre: http://logs.openstack.org/80/190880/2/check/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-neutron/2a7f451/logs/screen-q-svc.txt.gz?level=TRACE
13:00 boris-42 stpierre: something is wrong
13:01 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
13:01 stpierre i'd say so
13:02 stpierre is this blocking neutron gates too, or just us?
13:04 boris-42 stpierre: rally neutron jobs (in neutron) are blocked as well
13:05 stpierre well i guess that's good -- they've got a vested interest in fixing it, too
13:05 stpierre i saw that you tried an older mysql library -- did that help any?
13:09 boris-42 stpierre: as you see from logs
13:09 boris-42 stpierre: nope
13:10 stpierre oh :(
13:19 boris-42 stpierre: so I really don't know what is failing
13:41 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila with autocreated resources + benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/187643
14:02 kbaikov is this being worked on? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/verification-import
14:03 psd joined #openstack-rally
14:03 boris-42 kbaikov: so we can talk with dpaterson
14:03 boris-42 kbaikov: not sure that he started working on this
14:04 dpaterson boris-42: I did get started a while back but got derailed due to other responsibilities.
14:04 boris-42 kbaikov: but I belive it should be done in athoer way
14:04 boris-42 kbaikov: dpaterson like we can just add abbility to generate html/compare results from raw resutls
14:05 dpaterson boris-42, kbaikov: I am open to suggestions.  boris-42 having the results live in the database as a psuedo deployment is pretty useful for future reporting
14:06 dpaterson The problem is keeping the results in the file system kind of sucks long term
14:07 boris-42 dpaterson: ah sounds reasonable
14:07 boris-42 dpaterson: so yep we should think about that stuff
14:07 dpaterson boris-42: the other alternative is to deploy rally at customer sites and provide merge mechanism
14:08 dpaterson Which can be done right at database level pretty easily.
14:08 boris-42 dpaterson: ya we talk before about that functionallity
14:08 dpaterson boris-42: at the end of the day what would be very useful is to have a single repository with all results accross qa stamps and from field.
14:08 boris-42 dpaterson: and I like idea of merging dbs
14:10 dpaterson boris-42: I'd actually prefer deploying rally out in field as it provides much more than just verfication but getting cleanup working against production cloud is a bit tricky right now.  Why I am hoping getting a proper cli and integration points in tempest will make this much better.
14:10 boris-42 dpaterson: ok
14:15 boris-42 stpierre: so I will try to debug with neutron
14:15 boris-42 stpierre: and find the patch that breaks everything
14:15 boris-42 stpierre: I believe it's on neutron side..
14:16 stpierre yeah, i agree. it'd be nice if we could find a way to replicate it locally and 'git bisect' it
14:16 stpierre but i have never been successful at getting a kilo devstack with neutron running
14:18 stpierre although i don't understand how a single commit could have caused the issue if neutron is gated on rally
14:19 stpierre oh, it's non-voting
14:22 boris-42 stpierre: ya
14:22 boris-42 stpierre: it's not the first time
14:23 stpierre looking at https://jenkins05.openstack.org/job/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-neutron/, looks like it broke between 10:38 and 11:41 (presumably UTC) yesterday
14:29 boris-42 stpierre: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/a643070e835329e547a2c183dc1edc831ab900e0
14:29 boris-42 stpierre: maybe this patch?
14:31 boris-42 stpierre: nope seems like it works good https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188585/
14:31 stpierre ours broke between 11:03 and 17:22: https://jenkins05.openstack.org/job/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally/
14:32 stpierre nothing merged to either rally or neutron between 11:03 and 11:41 yesterday :/
14:32 stpierre version bump to one of the libraries, maybe?
14:35 yeungp joined #openstack-rally
14:35 marcoceppi joined #openstack-rally
14:35 marcoceppi joined #openstack-rally
14:35 stpierre http://ur1.ca/mt112
14:37 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
14:38 rhalkyard joined #openstack-rally
14:41 stpierre pyOpenSSL looks interesting
14:42 stpierre i've pinned pyOpenSSL to 0.13 in your review that reverts the switch to PyMySQL, see if that helps
14:43 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
14:46 yeungp joined #openstack-rally
14:49 boris-42 stpierre: as usually it's ahrd to say
15:08 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
15:08 mgagne joined #openstack-rally
15:16 boris-42 stpierre: oh good
15:16 boris-42 stpierre: need to create new VM...
15:34 boris-42 stpierre: this may help https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191010/
15:34 boris-42 stpierre: it was just merged
15:37 stpierre oooOOooooo
15:38 boris-42 stpierre: ya
15:45 lutostag joined #openstack-rally
15:47 meteorfox so is VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete  the only approach to execute a benchmark? It's fine if it just runs 1 or 2 commands, provided that the image supports such commands, but it doesn't seem like a good approach to run more complex benchmarks, which involve setting up a disks (raid, partition, ext4 formatting, etc), installing packages, and dependencies,
15:47 meteorfox etc. Plus the installation, and configuration of the benchmark can change drastically from image to image, and even flavors
15:47 meteorfox boris-42: ^^
15:47 boris-42 meteorfox: so for now it is
15:48 stpierre currently, yes. i'm not sure rally is (currently) the best tool for running arbitrary benchmarks across VMs
15:48 boris-42 meteorfox: but we are working as I said before on another thing
15:48 boris-42 meteorfox: context that creates servers topology
15:48 boris-42 meteorfox: and scenario that executes via http/ssh/... some commands inside these servers
15:48 boris-42 meteorfox: to trigger tool that works isnide VM and after that collect all results
15:49 meteorfox boris-42: ok
15:50 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: Add create_and_list_share scenario for Manila  https://review.openstack.org/188833
15:51 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila with autocreated resources + benchmark  https://review.openstack.org/187643
15:51 boris-42 meteorfox: so I hope pboldin will be online
15:52 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add create_and_list_share scenario for Manila  https://review.openstack.org/188833
15:55 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add create_and_list_share scenario for Manila  https://review.openstack.org/188833
16:02 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
16:04 Prashan__ joined #openstack-rally
16:14 frickler_ joined #openstack-rally
16:14 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
16:17 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:27 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
16:28 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
16:40 boris-42 stpierre: uh oh almost 300 patches in check queue
16:40 stpierre we'll have results in no time!
16:44 boris-42 stpierre: =))
16:49 cdent_ joined #openstack-rally
16:58 rook joined #openstack-rally
16:59 boris-42 stpierre: okay soon we will get info
17:00 boris-42 stpierre: https://jenkins03.openstack.org/job/gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally/1158/console
17:10 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
17:14 * boris-42 Aleluia seems like rally gates are fixed!!
17:22 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
17:23 darkhuy boris-42: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/cinder/volumes.py#L259
17:24 darkhuy naming on this is confusing when compare to boot_servers
17:24 boris-42 darkhuy: agreee
17:24 boris-42 darkhuy: but at this moment we are not able to change in simple way naming and depracate stuff
17:24 boris-42 darkhuy: need to finish plugin base before that...
17:25 darkhuy boris-42: got it
17:25 darkhuy boris-42: I should be able to comment out the two delete calls locally, and should work the same as boot_server yes?
17:26 boris-42 darkhuy: actually you can copy paste this code in ~/.rally/plugins/
17:26 boris-42 darkhuy: and do what you want =)
17:26 darkhuy boris-42: =D
17:26 boris-42 darkhuy: they will be autodiscovered
17:29 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
17:31 agarciam joined #openstack-rally
17:43 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
18:00 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:07 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
18:19 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
18:21 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add base benchmark for list shares operation  https://review.openstack.org/184553
18:29 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila quotas  https://review.openstack.org/188484
18:34 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila quotas  https://review.openstack.org/188484
18:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Add role assignment in keystone wrapper for both v2 and v3  https://review.openstack.org/188553
18:42 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila quotas  https://review.openstack.org/188484
18:43 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
18:57 mgagne I "discovered" rally and hope to use it to validate our openstack installer against an ephemeral deployment created by Jenkins. The deployment is discoverable at a well known location just like devstack. We already have a smoke test and would like to replace with rally.
18:58 mgagne How do you suggest we use rally? We use Jenkins to run our tests. Should we preinstall rally on our slaves, pre-add our deployment and simply ask a job to execute rally against the deployment?
19:00 mgagne I would also like to keep track of previous results. Do you suggest I install a centralized database for this purpose? Is it a well known use case or do people just publish the HTML somewhere and call it a day?
19:04 stpierre mgagne: preinstalled with a deployment already created would certainly be a simple way to start; you can get more dynamic/ephemeral in the future if you need to (and maintaining state in Jenkins is shit, so you'll probably at least want to).
19:04 stpierre rally can produce both HTML and JSON output, so you might be able to throw the JSON in MongoDB or something like that
19:04 stpierre or just timestamped HTML, linked from the Jenkins build output
19:05 mgagne right, I already scp stuff to a server, might add rally output too
19:05 mgagne anyone installing rally with puppet? =)
19:06 mgagne heresy you might say, use ansible!
19:06 stpierre i'm not, but if I were i'd just build $distro packages to keep it simple
19:06 mgagne yea, packages ^^'
19:07 mgagne ok so pre-installed rally with pre-configured deployments and scp output somewhere
19:08 mgagne is ./rally-jobs in the project a well known location by rally or is some magic involved by openstack infra to make us of it?
19:08 stpierre the other option would be to have the jenkins job run install_rally.sh itself to get a fresh install in the build directory on each run
19:08 stpierre which might not be the worst idea ever
19:08 stpierre magic is involved
19:08 mgagne alright
19:09 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Update Dockerfile to use new install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/191194
19:09 mgagne we unfortunately don't have ephemeral slaves so we try to avoid sudo or anything installing stuff globally at the job level
19:09 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:10 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
19:14 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila quotas  https://review.openstack.org/188484
19:16 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila quotas  https://review.openstack.org/188484
19:19 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
19:42 boris-42 mgagne: hi there
19:42 mgagne hi
19:43 boris-42 meteorfox: about rally-jobs in repo (it's magic from infra and our functional tests)
19:43 boris-42 meteorfox: sorry
19:43 boris-42 mgagne: ^
19:44 meteorfox np
19:44 mgagne right so I would need to dig into infra and find the actual job definition
19:44 boris-42 mgagne: this is script that we run https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/tests/ci/rally-gate.sh
19:44 boris-42 mgagne: on each patch against various devstack deployments
19:45 boris-42 mgagne: so if you need to keep all results (the best way is to have postgres/mysql server) and change rally.conf connection string
19:45 mgagne which assumes a zuul environment
19:45 boris-42 mgagne: to install rally you have 3 official ways =)
19:45 mgagne -> BASE and ZUUL_PROJECT
19:45 boris-42 1) install_rally.sh
19:46 boris-42 2) docker image https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/rallyforge/rally/
19:46 boris-42 3) murano application https://github.com/openstack/murano-apps/tree/master/Rally/package
19:46 boris-42 there will be soon ansible
19:46 boris-42 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186248/
19:46 boris-42 mgagne: ^
19:47 mgagne as I suffer from stockholm syndrome, I'm working on a puppet manifest for it
19:47 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
19:48 mgagne true about mysql database, I might use it later, scp looks much more simple to setup for now (from my perspective)
19:49 boris-42 mgagne: so if we decide to keep puppet modules
19:49 boris-42 mgagne: we will need to work on gating stuff
19:50 boris-42 mgagne: to ensure that puppet manifest are working correctly =0
19:50 mgagne yep
19:50 mgagne for now it's just a POC in my own infra
19:51 boris-42 mgagne: btw one more thing that we are supporting now is rally task report --junit
19:52 mgagne oh, that sounds cool, I'll try it
19:52 boris-42 mgagne: one thing that it is not implmeneted is SLA stuff
19:52 boris-42 mgagne: like we should put errors to benchmarks that failed
19:53 boris-42 mgagne: this block needs improvement https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/cli/commands/task.py#L593-L603
19:53 mgagne we will see where this POC leads us =)
19:53 boris-42 mgagne: so if you would like to improve --junit that will be nice...
19:53 mgagne boris-42: might not be working on SLA for now, mainly working on replacing a custom made smoke test with something else supported by the community
19:54 mgagne yep, will keep that in mind
19:54 boris-42 mgagne: SLA are required (without SLA everything will pass 100%) no matter what happend=)
19:54 mgagne really? :O
19:56 boris-42 mgagne: yep
19:56 boris-42 mgagne: this is done mostly because of negative testing
19:56 boris-42 mgagne: e.g. set quotas cpu 1 and run 5 vms check that you get 4 failures =)
19:57 boris-42 mgagne: so by default everything jut works=)
19:57 mgagne I see
20:02 boris-42 stpierre: okay let's get rid of deprecated stuff https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188077/
20:06 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
20:06 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
20:07 frickler_ joined #openstack-rally
20:07 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
20:07 dmellado joined #openstack-rally
20:12 NikitaKonovalov joined #openstack-rally
20:18 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Update Dockerfile to use new install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/191194
20:19 boris-42 stpierre: hey I saw already 2 times https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184553/
20:19 boris-42 stpierre: that py26 job stuck...
20:21 anshul joined #openstack-rally
20:28 oanufriev joined #openstack-rally
20:38 stpierre that's exciting
20:45 mgagne Is there a way to call recreate and not crash if deployment does not exist yet? In fact, I would like an idempotent version of rally deployment create --name=existing --filename=existing.json
20:56 stpierre rally deployment show foo || rally deployment create --name=foo --filename foo.json
20:57 stpierre or: if rally deployment show foo >& /dev/null; then rally deployment recreate ... ; else rally deployment create ... ; fi
20:58 stpierre depending on what you want
20:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Eliminated string formatting with single mapping key  https://review.openstack.org/189355
21:00 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Remove deprecated code  https://review.openstack.org/188077
21:08 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
21:10 darkhuy joined #openstack-rally
21:16 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
21:44 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit will be offline for project renames between 22:00 and 22:30 UTC
21:44 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gerrit will be offline for project renames between 22:00 and 22:30 UTC
21:49 boris-42 mgagne: heh maybe it will be interesting to create Jenkins plugin
21:49 boris-42 mgagne: for Rally
21:49 boris-42 mgagne: I don't have enough expirience with Jenkins but maybe some day
22:05 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit is offline for project renames. ETA 20:30
22:05 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gerrit is offline for project renames. ETA 20:30
22:09 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit is offline for project renames. ETA 22:40
22:09 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gerrit is offline for project renames. ETA 22:40
22:11 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:19 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
22:38 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:40 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:43 Topic for #openstack-rally is now Gerrit is offline for project renames. ETA 20:30
22:43 openstackstatus NOTICE: Gerrit is back online. Zuul reconfiguration for renamed projects is still in progress, ETA 23:30.
22:50 Topic for #openstack-rally is now ☁ Rally RoadMap: http://goo.gl/JZkmwY ☁ Review Dashboard: http://goo.gl/YuCJfl ☁ IRC logs http://irclog.perlgeek.de/openstack-rally ☁ Key persons to ask:  boris-42, yfried, msdubov, rediskin, andreykurilin, amaretskiy  ☁ Documentation: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ ☁ To publish changes to Rally:  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute.html
23:18 boris-42 stpierre: btw my favouirte  piece of code in Rally =)
23:22 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
23:23 davideag_ joined #openstack-rally
23:36 klindgren joined #openstack-rally
23:59 boris-42 stpierre: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/52bd8076b6b3a579ed3ac2b69a293122dbce2e01/rally/benchmark/context/base.py#L108-L129

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary