Perl 6 - the future is here, just unevenly distributed

IRC log for #openstack-rally, 2015-06-16

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:25 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
00:31 dmorita joined #openstack-rally
01:47 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
01:50 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer v1 create and delete pools  https://review.openstack.org/191472
01:58 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
01:59 openstackgerrit John Wu proposed openstack/rally: Fix sqlite file permission for system-wide install  https://review.openstack.org/192034
02:04 mahito joined #openstack-rally
02:06 mahito joined #openstack-rally
02:16 openstackgerrit John Wu proposed openstack/rally: Fix sqlite file permission for system-wide install  https://review.openstack.org/192034
02:29 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
02:48 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
03:12 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
03:16 mahito joined #openstack-rally
03:46 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
04:05 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
04:07 mahito joined #openstack-rally
04:21 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
05:00 klindgren_ joined #openstack-rally
05:08 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
05:11 pbandzi joined #openstack-rally
05:18 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
05:26 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
05:27 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
05:29 anshul joined #openstack-rally
05:30 mahito joined #openstack-rally
05:35 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
05:43 itzikb joined #openstack-rally
05:49 rdas joined #openstack-rally
05:50 asrangne joined #openstack-rally
06:04 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
06:05 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:10 yfried joined #openstack-rally
06:17 anshul joined #openstack-rally
06:28 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
06:36 mahito joined #openstack-rally
07:00 anshul joined #openstack-rally
07:07 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
07:18 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Refactor rally/deploy -> rally/deployment  https://review.openstack.org/192086
07:22 neeti joined #openstack-rally
07:36 adiantum joined #openstack-rally
07:40 arxcruz joined #openstack-rally
07:47 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Refactor rally/deploy -> rally/deployment  https://review.openstack.org/192086
08:15 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
08:19 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
08:28 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
08:45 rushiagr boris-42: oh cool. That will do the job for me :)
08:49 rvasilets joined #openstack-rally
08:51 aarefiev joined #openstack-rally
08:51 vponomaryov joined #openstack-rally
08:51 andreykurilin joined #openstack-rally
08:52 amaretskiy joined #openstack-rally
09:00 aix joined #openstack-rally
09:10 cdent joined #openstack-rally
09:12 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:22 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
09:28 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
09:42 tosky joined #openstack-rally
10:01 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
10:12 aix joined #openstack-rally
10:16 openstackgerrit Aleksey Ripinen proposed openstack/rally: Creation an array of samples in sample generator  https://review.openstack.org/192130
10:17 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Add rally.common.plugin.discover module  https://review.openstack.org/191342
10:17 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Remove rally.deploy.__main__ hacks  https://review.openstack.org/191343
10:17 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
10:36 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split EDP context  https://review.openstack.org/177682
10:43 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: Improved wait_for benchmark helper  https://review.openstack.org/172466
10:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Manila] Add context for Manila quotas  https://review.openstack.org/188484
11:33 MaxPC joined #openstack-rally
11:37 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
11:41 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
12:01 stpierre joined #openstack-rally
12:17 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
12:25 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
12:50 openstackgerrit Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split EDP context  https://review.openstack.org/177682
12:54 yfried_ joined #openstack-rally
12:59 georgem1 joined #openstack-rally
13:03 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
13:09 tfreger joined #openstack-rally
13:18 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Update Dockerfile to use new install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/191194
13:19 fhubik joined #openstack-rally
13:20 georgem1 boris-42: did you have a chance to take a look at this question I asked on your blog? http://boris-42.me/rally-can-generate-load-with-passed-users-now/
13:23 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/189463
13:39 rvasilets kiran-r, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192086/2 are you make this task by boris suggestion? or its your own initiative
13:39 kiran-r rvasilets: Boris told me.
13:40 kiran-r rvasilets: * to do that. :)
13:40 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:41 rvasilets kiran-r, ok, greate! we will review it)
13:41 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/175549
13:42 yingjun_ joined #openstack-rally
13:44 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] More debug logging  https://review.openstack.org/170491
13:49 nihilifer_ joined #openstack-rally
13:51 rvasilets georgem1, did you tried to use existing user context?
13:52 georgem1 rvasilets: so there are two questions actually: 1) Do I need to provide an admin account? 2) How do I set it up so it uses the existing context?
13:53 rvasilets georgem1, ok. I will think and try to answer now
13:54 georgem1 rvasilets: spasibo :)
13:57 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
13:57 rvasilets georgem1, ok. Im ready)
13:57 rvasilets 1)
13:57 rvasilets Lokks like no
13:57 rvasilets 2) Look in my link
13:57 rvasilets https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168524/8/samples/deployments/existing-with-predefined-users.json
13:58 rvasilets In this patch we add this context and there is an examples https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168524/8
14:00 georgem1 rvasilets: 1) you DO have an admin user in your example json; I tried to load a deployment without the admin section and it fails to load
14:01 psd joined #openstack-rally
14:02 rvasilets georgem1, o my fault there was another patch. Thinking.....
14:08 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Heat scenario to test scaling policies  https://review.openstack.org/178436
14:09 georgem1 rvasilets: 2) I tried to set the context like this in the task http://pastebin.com/K6W5k0Wz but it complains that Reason:
14:09 georgem1 [{'username': 'rally', 'tenant_name': 'rally', 'password': 'XXX'}] is not of type 'object'
14:09 lutostag joined #openstack-rally
14:10 georgem1 rvasilets: I basically want to have a dedicated tenant and user that runs this task a few times a day to test the health of the environment, and it has to be the same tenant and user so I can easily discard its activity from other reports
14:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Do not update the average when iteration failed  https://review.openstack.org/191524
14:11 georgem1 right now Rally creates a temporary tenant and user every time the task runs...
14:12 vponomaryov georgem1:  users context has explicitly defined set of expected options, see https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/1b842d8d/rally/plugins/openstack/context/users.py#L59
14:12 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add Neutron Loadbalancer v1 create and delete pools  https://review.openstack.org/191472
14:13 vponomaryov georgem1: type 'object' is analog of python's dict, you set "list"
14:13 rvasilets georgem1, you use task in json in wrong way
14:13 vponomaryov georgem1: to be able to use existing users, you need to register appropriate deployment and remove "users" context
14:13 yingjun joined #openstack-rally
14:14 vponomaryov georgem1: http://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/tutorial/step_3_benchmarking_with_existing_users.html
14:17 vponomaryov georgem1: NOTE about current logic of usage of deployments with existing users - if you register more than one user, then they will be taken randomly for Rally scenarios for the moment. I consider it a bug.
14:18 tosky joined #openstack-rally
14:20 nkhare joined #openstack-rally
14:24 openstackgerrit Kiran proposed openstack/rally: pool_create_args not handled for type error  https://review.openstack.org/192222
14:29 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
14:30 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
14:33 ajiang left #openstack-rally
14:39 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
14:40 aswadr joined #openstack-rally
14:44 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
15:06 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
15:11 openstackgerrit Evgeny Sikachev proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Split Data Sources context  https://review.openstack.org/177732
15:20 asrangne joined #openstack-rally
15:25 klindgren__ joined #openstack-rally
15:29 asrangne__ joined #openstack-rally
15:34 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
15:35 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
15:54 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
15:57 stpierre rvasilets: what can i do to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172030/ to get your +1?
16:01 karimb joined #openstack-rally
16:04 rvasilets stpierre, hi. When i looking in the code of python keystone client I found that https://github.com/openstack/python-keystoneclient/blob/master/keystoneclient/v3/users.py#L50 user enable is a field by default and we can delete kine 57 here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172030/8/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/keystone/basic.py
16:05 stpierre we can't; i explained why that's there in my reply
16:05 rvasilets stpierre,  oh sorry I wrote something wrong
16:05 stpierre i mean, we *can*
16:05 stpierre but it'd be potentially less friendly
16:06 stpierre if that's all that's between that review and a +1 i'll remove that line, and benchmarker emptor
16:06 rvasilets no I wrote right)
16:07 rvasilets I'm agree that its more friendly) But I don;t know is this a duplication of code beetween projects?)
16:08 rvasilets Нуы ершы шы щтдн щту шыыгу ерфе Ш ащгтв
16:08 rvasilets Sorry, yes this is the only issue
16:08 stpierre i don't think so -- what code is duplicatd?
16:09 rvasilets Looks like we don't use knowlandges that they have parameters by default
16:09 stpierre sorry, i don't understand
16:10 rvasilets I's not strong position ok. I'll just copy my point of view there for community and remove -1
16:10 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
16:10 rvasilets ok7
16:11 stpierre ok, thanks
16:13 rvasilets stpierre, done
16:13 stpierre tyvm
16:30 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/189463
16:35 kiran-r joined #openstack-rally
16:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Install data files in proper path  https://review.openstack.org/182849
16:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: Improved wait_for benchmark helper  https://review.openstack.org/172466
16:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/rally: [Sahara] More debug logging  https://review.openstack.org/170491
16:50 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/189463
16:53 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Keystone: Add scenarios to benchmark user disable/enable  https://review.openstack.org/172030
17:07 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and deletion of Manila shares  https://review.openstack.org/190667
17:14 openstackgerrit John Wu proposed openstack/rally: Fix sqlite file permission for system-wide install  https://review.openstack.org/192034
17:20 jaredrohe joined #openstack-rally
17:22 jaredrohe Has anyone ever came across the following issue while using rally?
17:26 jaredrohe You have a custom scenario test to benchmark using rally ( so you place it in .rally/plugins).   Rally will run the plugin scenario test. However, if this plugin scenario contains a "import unittest.TestCase" statement then rally all of a sudden can't find my custom plugin scenario test.
17:27 yfried__ joined #openstack-rally
17:27 jaredrohe Remove "import unittest.TestCase" and rally can find my plugin testcase. However, this is not desireable since I want to use methods such as assertRaises in the TestCase module
17:28 meteorfox boris-42: ^^
17:31 boris-42 jaredrohe: I am working on fixes
17:32 jaredrohe @boris-42 Thank you!
17:34 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation/deletion of Manila share networks  https://review.openstack.org/190724
17:35 frayedknot joined #openstack-rally
17:37 jaypipes joined #openstack-rally
17:40 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add scenario for creation and listing of Manila share networks  https://review.openstack.org/190737
17:42 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
17:49 openstackgerrit Valeriy Ponomaryov proposed openstack/rally: [Manila] Add benchmark for Manila list share servers operation  https://review.openstack.org/190981
17:53 psd_ joined #openstack-rally
17:54 boris-42 meteorfox: heh he should use unittest.TestCase in plugins...
17:54 boris-42 meteorfox: he should use our functional frmaework....
17:55 anshul joined #openstack-rally
18:01 meteorfox boris-42: ?? You mean the SLA feature?
18:03 boris-42 meteorfox: nope
18:03 boris-42 meteorfox: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/functional.py
18:04 meteorfox boris-42: I didn't even know about this lol
18:04 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Keystone: Add scenarios to benchmark user disable/enable  https://review.openstack.org/172030
18:11 boris-42 meteorfox: we are going to make proper assertations for all current sceanarios
18:13 ajiang joined #openstack-rally
18:16 jaredrohe joined #openstack-rally
18:24 jaredrohe boris-42: Ok I will just use the functional framework. Thanks for the help!
18:28 boris-42 jaredrohe: yep we are going to use it in all scenarios someday
18:28 boris-42 jaredrohe: so we will have better functional tests*
18:40 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/175549
18:45 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
18:46 nihilifer joined #openstack-rally
18:47 e0ne joined #openstack-rally
19:18 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
19:48 jaredrohe joined #openstack-rally
19:50 jaredrohe_ joined #openstack-rally
19:59 dpaterson joined #openstack-rally
20:02 openstackgerrit Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Keystone: Add scenarios to benchmark user disable/enable  https://review.openstack.org/172030
20:02 jaredroh- joined #openstack-rally
20:28 exploreshaifali joined #openstack-rally
20:43 darkhuy joined #openstack-rally
21:11 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
21:12 openstackgerrit Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/175549
21:13 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
21:15 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
21:21 davideagnello joined #openstack-rally
21:22 georgem1 joined #openstack-rally
21:40 pboldin joined #openstack-rally
22:02 harlowja joined #openstack-rally
22:07 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:08 Prashan__ joined #openstack-rally
22:30 openstackgerrit Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Remove rally.deploy.__main__ hacks  https://review.openstack.org/191343
22:39 openstackgerrit joined #openstack-rally
22:43 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:50 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
22:54 Prashan__ joined #openstack-rally
23:04 PrashantS joined #openstack-rally
23:40 BitSmith joined #openstack-rally
23:58 mahito joined #openstack-rally

| Channels | #openstack-rally index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary